2016 Toyota Tacoma news
#241
it's mainly the fact that the new engine gets the same fuel economy as full sized trucks and is still barely competing. not sure what the advantage of the taco is besides the fact that "its a reliable toyota". this goes for their entire V6 line. and why is the 4 cylinder even being offered? no point, fuel economy wise or power wise.
#243
The Tacoma does not get barely the same fuel economy as the Toyota Tundra full size truck. It is nowhere even close. The Tacoma exists because it does very well for Toyota and buyers are not willing to go to the Tundra size. Toyota has two clearly defined roles for their trucks. And the Tacoma is a very personal use truck.
Yes the Tacoma has a fairly unique and stronger identity with the Toyota truck lineup, but even the full size trucks are very much "personal use" trucks. That's why there is a huge number of premium crew cab trims all over the market, Platinum, Limited, Denali, High Country, 1794, King Ranch etc.
#244
Tacoma might be well ahead of the Tundra in terms of fuel economy, but in terms of rated economy does come fairly close to the other Full Size trucks.
Yes the Tacoma has a fairly unique and stronger identity with the Toyota truck lineup, but even the full size trucks are very much "personal use" trucks. That's why there is a huge number of premium crew cab trims all over the market, Platinum, Limited, Denali, High Country, 1794, King Ranch etc.
Yes the Tacoma has a fairly unique and stronger identity with the Toyota truck lineup, but even the full size trucks are very much "personal use" trucks. That's why there is a huge number of premium crew cab trims all over the market, Platinum, Limited, Denali, High Country, 1794, King Ranch etc.
I wonder if the F150 and Tacoma were equipped the same, what the difference in price will be? My guess is that a Tacoma will be at least 5k cheaper for the same equipment.
#245
The Tacoma's future competition from Ford will not be the F-150, but, if they decide to bring it to the U.S., the next-generation Ranger. The success of the new Colorado/Canyon is providing even more incentive for a return of the Ranger.
#246
Didn't Ford refuse to bring in a new Ranger because it would be too close in price and fuel consumption to an F-150? Isn't that the problem with these mid-size pickup trucks in North America?
But if GM and Toyota can prove that there is still a market for a mid-size truck, perhaps that will persuade Ford to bring in the international Ranger.
#247
Didn't Ford refuse to bring in a new Ranger because it would be too close in price and fuel consumption to an F-150? Isn't that the problem with these mid-size pickup trucks in North America?
But if GM and Toyota can prove that there is still a market for a mid-size truck, perhaps that will persuade Ford to bring in the international Ranger.
But if GM and Toyota can prove that there is still a market for a mid-size truck, perhaps that will persuade Ford to bring in the international Ranger.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...uction-to-u-s-
#248
Didn't Ford refuse to bring in a new Ranger because it would be too close in price and fuel consumption to an F-150? Isn't that the problem with these mid-size pickup trucks in North America?
But if GM and Toyota can prove that there is still a market for a mid-size truck, perhaps that will persuade Ford to bring in the international Ranger.
But if GM and Toyota can prove that there is still a market for a mid-size truck, perhaps that will persuade Ford to bring in the international Ranger.
I doubt there is much room for a Ranger.
#249
Even given similar price points and fuel mileage, I would choose a Tacoma over a full sized truck. The Tacoma is the max size I would buy. I don't want to drive and park something larger, and don't want to take up that much more room in my garage.
#250
I don't have much care for the North America Land Cruiser like I once did. What it has evolved to become is just horrendous IMO.
For all the off-road pics and blah blah blah about the North American Land Cruiser, at $84,820 I expect more than 8.9 inches of ground clearance and I sure as hell would expect at least a rear locking differential.
For all the off-road pics and blah blah blah about the North American Land Cruiser, at $84,820 I expect more than 8.9 inches of ground clearance and I sure as hell would expect at least a rear locking differential.
#251
Originally Posted by JDR76
Even given similar price points and fuel mileage, I would choose a Tacoma over a full sized truck. The Tacoma is the max size I would buy. I don't want to drive and park something larger, and don't want to take up that much more room in my garage.
#252
But they are not similar price points. From what I have seen, there is at least a $2k-$4k price difference between them. In this segment price is huge. The difference becomes much larger as you add options to the F150
#253
I wasn't necessarily referring to the F-150, but rather any full size truck. I'm just not interested, whether they are the same price or not. But FWIW you can easily get an F-150 for the same price as a Tacoma. The F-150 will top out MUCH higher, but for $30-35k you can get a nicely equipped Tacoma or F-150.
#254
I wasn't necessarily referring to the F-150, but rather any full size truck. I'm just not interested, whether they are the same price or not. But FWIW you can easily get an F-150 for the same price as a Tacoma. The F-150 will top out MUCH higher, but for $30-35k you can get a nicely equipped Tacoma or F-150.
I do not think you can get an equally close in MSRP. The F150 will still be higher but a lot.
#255
A well equipped F-150 will indeed have a higher MSRP, but I don't think anyone pays MSRP for an F-150. In fact, a local dealer to me has sale prices typically $10k below MSRP. Here's an example:
http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/de...7600/overview/
MSRP: $47,095
Sale Price: $34,367
http://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/de...7600/overview/
MSRP: $47,095
Sale Price: $34,367