Collusion in the CPO Process?
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Collusion in the CPO Process?
So I purchased a '11 LS460 CPO two weeks ago. Shortly after leaving the dealership I noticed that the "soft-close" function on the driver's door didn't work. I'd think that this problem would have come to light during the 161-point CPO inspection. Indeed, it's a bit troubling for a CPO vehicle need a $1K repair immediately after purchase.
But perhaps not.
Had the door lock actuator been repaired during the CPO process, the service dept. would have billed the used car dept. The used car manager would (not eat the expense but) pass the cost on to the buyer. Potential buyers would probably balk at paying the higher price. So what's the solution? Let the problem go unrepaired. If/when the buyer discovers it, the buyer can bring it in and have it covered under the CPO warranty. Indeed, this is the desired result -- to ultimately have Lexus pay for the repair (rather than the dealership or the buyer). If the buyer is inconvenienced by bringing the car in for service, so be it.
Is what I described a reality? I don't know. If so, I'm wondering if it is ethical.
But perhaps not.
Had the door lock actuator been repaired during the CPO process, the service dept. would have billed the used car dept. The used car manager would (not eat the expense but) pass the cost on to the buyer. Potential buyers would probably balk at paying the higher price. So what's the solution? Let the problem go unrepaired. If/when the buyer discovers it, the buyer can bring it in and have it covered under the CPO warranty. Indeed, this is the desired result -- to ultimately have Lexus pay for the repair (rather than the dealership or the buyer). If the buyer is inconvenienced by bringing the car in for service, so be it.
Is what I described a reality? I don't know. If so, I'm wondering if it is ethical.
#2
Forum Administrator
iTrader: (2)
I think it's more likely it was simply missed during the inspection. Your door still closes fine; the LS is the only model with this feature so probably not a discrete item to check on the standard list.
Should they have caught it? Yep. Intentional? No.
Should they have caught it? Yep. Intentional? No.
#3
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
I bought a CPO with a filthy dirty air filter and filthy engine compartment/covers. I pointed it out and they took care of it N/C. Very shocked at the lack of care and thoroughness during inspection.
#5
Lexus Fanatic
Congratulations.
Although your car is now 4-5 years old, cars, in general, keep getting more and more complex all the time, so there are more potential points to check...and potential things to miss.
As far as passing the added costs on to the consumer, Toyota, from what I understand, generally has one set figure that is supposed to cover the whole CPO process.....though that sounded suspect to me, at least that's what they told me at the time, though that policy may have now changed.
Among random CPOs just sitting on the lot, I've seen a fair amount of variation in them. Some look and/or drive virtually like the day they were built. Others, despite the well-publicized 160-180 check-point lists, have obviously had a few corners cut on them, both in looks and road-manners. So my general advice, even with a CPO, is to look it over and test-drive it as thoroughly as you would any other used car.
Shortly after leaving the dealership I noticed that the "soft-close" function on the driver's door didn't work. I'd think that this problem would have come to light during the 161-point CPO inspection. Indeed, it's a bit troubling for a CPO vehicle need a $1K repair immediately after purchase.
But perhaps not.
Had the door lock actuator been repaired during the CPO process, the service dept. would have billed the used car dept. The used car manager would (not eat the expense but) pass the cost on to the buyer. Potential buyers would probably balk at paying the higher price. So what's the solution? Let the problem go unrepaired. If/when the buyer discovers it, the buyer can bring it in and have it covered under the CPO warranty. Indeed, this is the desired result -- to ultimately have Lexus pay for the repair (rather than the dealership or the buyer). If the buyer is inconvenienced by bringing the car in for service, so be it.
Is what I described a reality? I don't know. If so, I'm wondering if it is ethical.
But perhaps not.
Had the door lock actuator been repaired during the CPO process, the service dept. would have billed the used car dept. The used car manager would (not eat the expense but) pass the cost on to the buyer. Potential buyers would probably balk at paying the higher price. So what's the solution? Let the problem go unrepaired. If/when the buyer discovers it, the buyer can bring it in and have it covered under the CPO warranty. Indeed, this is the desired result -- to ultimately have Lexus pay for the repair (rather than the dealership or the buyer). If the buyer is inconvenienced by bringing the car in for service, so be it.
Is what I described a reality? I don't know. If so, I'm wondering if it is ethical.
As far as passing the added costs on to the consumer, Toyota, from what I understand, generally has one set figure that is supposed to cover the whole CPO process.....though that sounded suspect to me, at least that's what they told me at the time, though that policy may have now changed.
Among random CPOs just sitting on the lot, I've seen a fair amount of variation in them. Some look and/or drive virtually like the day they were built. Others, despite the well-publicized 160-180 check-point lists, have obviously had a few corners cut on them, both in looks and road-manners. So my general advice, even with a CPO, is to look it over and test-drive it as thoroughly as you would any other used car.
#6
Lexus Fanatic
I agree, I think it was just overlooked. I would not even know to look
Trending Topics
#9
Lexus Fanatic
#10
Lexus Fanatic
A little more than that, but I agree that they don't catch all 160-180 points on every car. Not only do vehicles keep getting more and more complex all the time, but the technicians only have a certain amount of time during any given work-day to devote to each CPO-candidate they inspect. If they spend their entire days on just CPOs, nothing else would get done.....and lots of other customers are waiting.
#11
Intermediate
Thread Starter
AS for the self-closing feature, the dealership that I bought the car from should be quite familiar with it. I think it's the highest-volume Lexus dealership in the Southeast; it routinely has at least 5 CPO LS460s on the lot at a given time.
Last edited by irishbrahm; 07-04-15 at 08:43 AM.
#12
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Congratulations.
As far as passing the added costs on to the consumer, Toyota, from what I understand, generally has one set figure that is supposed to cover the whole CPO process.....though that sounded suspect to me, at least that's what they told me at the time, though that policy may have now changed.
As far as passing the added costs on to the consumer, Toyota, from what I understand, generally has one set figure that is supposed to cover the whole CPO process.....though that sounded suspect to me, at least that's what they told me at the time, though that policy may have now changed.
I should mention that I love my LS460! The car is absolutely amazing!
#13
Lexus Fanatic
Collusion in the CPO Process?
IMHO this sort of thing is just a part of life. My brand new LS460 had an inoperative navigation system when I took delivery that required it to spend a week at the dealer. Then it was delivered back to me with a new nav unit...that still malfunctioned the same way. So...they replaced the unit and never tested it, the service advisor noticed it when he brought it around.
Should that have happened, no, but it did and that's life.
Should that have happened, no, but it did and that's life.
#14
Lexus Champion
So I purchased a '11 LS460 CPO two weeks ago. Shortly after leaving the dealership I noticed that the "soft-close" function on the driver's door didn't work. I'd think that this problem would have come to light during the 161-point CPO inspection. Indeed, it's a bit troubling for a CPO vehicle need a $1K repair immediately after purchase.
But perhaps not.
Had the door lock actuator been repaired during the CPO process, the service dept. would have billed the used car dept. The used car manager would (not eat the expense but) pass the cost on to the buyer. Potential buyers would probably balk at paying the higher price. So what's the solution? Let the problem go unrepaired. If/when the buyer discovers it, the buyer can bring it in and have it covered under the CPO warranty. Indeed, this is the desired result -- to ultimately have Lexus pay for the repair (rather than the dealership or the buyer). If the buyer is inconvenienced by bringing the car in for service, so be it.
Is what I described a reality? I don't know. If so, I'm wondering if it is ethical.
But perhaps not.
Had the door lock actuator been repaired during the CPO process, the service dept. would have billed the used car dept. The used car manager would (not eat the expense but) pass the cost on to the buyer. Potential buyers would probably balk at paying the higher price. So what's the solution? Let the problem go unrepaired. If/when the buyer discovers it, the buyer can bring it in and have it covered under the CPO warranty. Indeed, this is the desired result -- to ultimately have Lexus pay for the repair (rather than the dealership or the buyer). If the buyer is inconvenienced by bringing the car in for service, so be it.
Is what I described a reality? I don't know. If so, I'm wondering if it is ethical.
It's a compelling conspiracy theory, but stuff happens, and sometimes issues get missed in CPO inspection.
#15
Lexus Champion
Maybe the do and maybe they don't. I bought a CPO BMW, and at my purchase, they showed me the checklist completed by the service department. If I'm the guy putting my name on that checklist that goes into their system, and is given to the customer, I want it right. Otherwise, you are creating the very paper trail to get yourself fired.