mmarshall

You will DEFINITELY want a GX if you are towing any kind of appreciable load.

tex2670

Years ago, when I looked at a 4Runner, I discovered the same thing. I thought the 4Runner was much bigger than the Pilot and Highlander that I was looking at, but was actually about the same size--but much more cramped inside.

SW17LS

It's the body on frame vs unibody.

chikoo

Not only that GX has higher ground clearance by at least 1".

coolsaber

Good presence coupled with a buttery smooth engine is what really does it for me. The lack of advanced safety tech is what pulls me to the RX or RDX

TRDRAV4

This thing is on a lease. Right now, the leases on the HL are turrible, where even the RX has a better moneyfactor. Not a bad decision at all by the OP to get this, especially with the M package.

SW17LS

Leases on the Sienna are terrible too. Clearly just not commonly leased vehicles

coolsaber

Quite a thread bump, but programs may change seeing how the Sienna demand was down 86% in April...

SW17LS

That doesn't seem to impact it, I think they just don't have a lot of leasing customers. Lease payments are basically the same as finance payments. Odyssey isn't much better. The Pacifica and Sedona are WAY cheaper to lease. Its like $300 a month less to lease a $50k Pacifica than it is a $50k Sienna.

Felix

As you know three totally different vehicles/platforms....Really depending on where & what you'd really use it for. I spent a little while, late last yr checking/researching different vehicles for my wife & I & found the rx is a great well rounded vehicle for what we need. I do like the GX, but then if I going that way, I would of gone w/ a srt8 G/C.....I prefer a little more substance in a vehicle, hence a 6 cylinder. My wife actually wanted a SRX/XT5 which I looked at. My thought is if your going to step up, I wanted something on the other end that holds its value.....I'd say take someone w/ you & listen to what they say & think about your needs......