Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Ford F-150 nets IIHS Top Safety Pick in Small-Front Overlap Test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-16 | 10:14 AM
  #1  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,327
Likes: 129
From: California
Default Ford F-150 nets IIHS Top Safety Pick in Small-Front Overlap Test



The company's F-150 SuperCab was the only one of nine pickup trucks tested by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety to earn a "good" rating on an influential new crash test. The vehicle joins its SuperCrew sibling as the only large pickups to earn the organization's "Top Safety Pick" award when equipped with a collision warning system.

"Ford is leading the way among large pickup manufacturers when it comes to protecting people in a range of crashes and offering technology to warn drivers of imminent frontal crashes," said Raul Arbelaez, vice president of the IIHS Vehicle Research Center.

This is the first time the overall pickup class has been put through the new small-front overlap test, which evaluates how vehicles withstand crashes in which their front quarters strike a fixed object. Except for the F-150, all the pickups allowed moderate to severe intrusion of vehicle structure into the cabin, putting occupants at risk for injuries.

The worst-performing pickups were the Ram 1500 Crew Cab and the Ram 1500 Quad Cab, according to the IIHS. Both earned marginal overall ratings on the test and poor ratings for structure. Force from the crash pushed the door-hinge pillar, instrument panel and steering column back toward the crash-test dummy. In the worst cases, intrusion reached 16 to 17 inches, according to test results.

"Drivers in these pickups would need help freeing their legs from the wreckage following a small overlap crash," Arbelaez said. "We encourage manufacturers to redesign their pickups to resist intrusion in the lower occupant compartment to safeguard people from serious leg and foot injuries that might require months of rehabilitation."

General Motors' offerings fared somewhat better. The Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Double Cab and the GMC Sierra 1500 Double Cab, essentially the same vehicle, both earned "acceptable" overall scores, though both fared poorly on lower-cabin intrusion. The Chevy Silverado 1500 Crew Cab and the Sierra 1500 Crew Cab both earned "marginal" overall scores while also receiving poor scores on lower cabin intrusions.

Aside from perhaps the Ford Mustang-Chevy Camaro rivalry, there's no bigger competition between Detroit's Big Three than on pickups. The F-150 is the best-selling vehicle in America, racking up more than 186,000 sales so far in 2016. Chevy has sold 128,965 Silverados through March, and Chrysler has sold 113,367 Rams. Results from the IIHS test could further help differentiate the pickups in the eyes of consumers.

For the F-150, the test results represent a turnaround. Although the IIHS has never tested pickups en masse before, it did test the '15 SuperCab alone, and it received a "marginal" rating. "We commend Ford for taking last year's results to heart and upgrading protection for SuperCab occupants in small overlap crashes," Arbelaez said.

The small-front overlap test is one of five administered by the not-for-profit IIHS, including a moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint, which count in the group's Top Safety Pick formula.

The overhauled '16 Nissan Titan and Honda Ridgeline have yet to be tested. An IIHS spokesperson says they'll be evaluated later this year.
http://www.autoblog.com/2016/04/12/f...ash-test-iihs/
Old 04-12-16 | 05:52 PM
  #2  
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,184
Likes: 109
From: Las Vegas
Default

Further vindication of the decision to go aluminum.
Old 04-12-16 | 06:37 PM
  #3  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,964
Likes: 179
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
Further vindication of the decision to go aluminum.
it is more about being the newest one.

Also, sad that Ford does not have autobrake system that works well in 2016.
Old 04-12-16 | 08:35 PM
  #4  
Sulu's Avatar
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 31
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by BrettJacks
Further vindication of the decision to go aluminum.
It is not the material but rather the design that caused the good result.

When the new aluminum F-150 first came out last year, IIHS tested both the 2015 long crew cab and shorter extended cab models. Unexpectedly, the longer model earned a Good (top) rating but the shorter model (which you would think would be stiffer and thus be more crash resistant) only earned a Marginal (second worst) rating. The difference was due to a key design difference: The crew cab model had steel wheel blockers at the front and rear of the front wheel wells that prevented the wheels from being pushed into the cabin space; the shorter model did not have these wheel blockers.

A year later, and Ford has given the 2016 extended cab model the same wheel blockers, and it too has now earned a Good (top) rating. A simple design change bumped up the extended cab model 2 ratings, from Marginal to Good.
Old 04-13-16 | 01:12 AM
  #5  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,327
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

It is nice to see an automakers respond quickly. Kudos to Ford.
Old 04-13-16 | 07:06 AM
  #6  
Sulu's Avatar
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 31
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
It is nice to see an automakers respond quickly. Kudos to Ford.
Agreed. But in this case, it was a very easy fix, since Ford already used the design on their crew cab model. Why Ford did not use the wheelwell blockers on the shorter models -- until it was forced to -- is the question of the day.
Old 04-13-16 | 02:50 PM
  #7  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Thread Starter
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,327
Likes: 129
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
Agreed. But in this case, it was a very easy fix, since Ford already used the design on their crew cab model. Why Ford did not use the wheelwell blockers on the shorter models -- until it was forced to -- is the question of the day.
No clue. I'd of thought they'd want to keep them as uniform as possible from the beginning
Old 04-13-16 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,964
Likes: 179
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
Agreed. But in this case, it was a very easy fix, since Ford already used the design on their crew cab model. Why Ford did not use the wheelwell blockers on the shorter models -- until it was forced to -- is the question of the day.
probably because in their internal testing they they thought it would pass without them. And heavier model got them because test is harder for it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
37
03-22-15 05:14 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
1
03-06-14 06:42 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
3
06-18-13 01:31 PM
Overclocker
Car Chat
5
08-28-06 01:50 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:04 PM.