2017 Land Rover Discovery
#3
That's what it looks like if its based off the Discovery Sport(aka 3rd generation of the small car based Freelander and LR2). Kind of sad, as I always liked the old Discovery/LR3/LR4's image as the expedition vehicle with the roof rack loaded with gear, slugging through the mud on knobby tires in a country that doesn't have such fancy things as cell phone towers, much less electricity.
#5
Land Rover developed a body construction method for the Discovery 3 (also Discovery 4), marketed as Integrated Body Frame (IBF). The engine bay and passenger compartment are built as a monocoque, then mated to a basic ladder-frame chassis for the gearbox and suspension. Land Rover claims IBF combines the virtues of monocoque and ladder-frame – though it makes for a heavier vehicle than a monocoque construction, compromising performance and agility somewhat but adding strength, toughness and adaptability.
#6
I hate what they've done to the Discovery.
No. Same platform as RR and RR Sport.
I too miss that image, but this is not based off the Disco Sport.
It's important to note that those aren't more shots, but rather pictures of the concept. While close there's some differences from the production model that hasn't been completely unveiled yet. Also here's a spyshot of the actual interior instead of a bad configurator picture of the Disco Sport interior:
It won't be a departure. Also the Discovery has had a permanent four wheel drive system system since 1989 with the Series I, not when the Series II arrived in 1998.
That's what it looks like if its based off the Discovery Sport(aka 3rd generation of the small car based Freelander and LR2). Kind of sad, as I always liked the old Discovery/LR3/LR4's image as the expedition vehicle with the roof rack loaded with gear, slugging through the mud on knobby tires in a country that doesn't have such fancy things as cell phone towers, much less electricity.
It won't be a departure. Also the Discovery has had a permanent four wheel drive system system since 1989 with the Series I, not when the Series II arrived in 1998.
#7
So essentially it's a BIG F U to all the lovers of the original Discos? Big mistake on moving away from teh body-on-frame platform. They already have multiple suv's that ride on a unibody chassis, what's the point of having another one?
Trending Topics
#8
The Disco moving away from a body on frame platform was a given. It needed to lose weight and switching to unibody was the way to go. They also weren't about to create a new body on frame platform just for the Disco, as that would've been cost prohibitive. They still could've kept the rugged styling though...
#10
The Disco moving away from a body on frame platform was a given. It needed to lose weight and switching to unibody was the way to go. They also weren't about to create a new body on frame platform just for the Disco, as that would've been cost prohibitive. They still could've kept the rugged styling though...
#11
While the design creates exceptional stiffness, the platform is seriously heavy. It actually has weights hanging off it to quell vibrations for crying out loud.
Last edited by TangoRed; 09-06-16 at 09:54 PM.
#12
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post