When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Quirky British marque Mini is going with a ... less-than-quirky logo redesign, unveiling a "flat design" that it says is intended to focus on the essentials. It replaces the three-dimensional white-on-black logo that first appeared in 2000.
Gone are the three-dimensional style, shading, gray tones and gray-on-black name of the previous version in favor of a stark contrast of black lines and the all-caps Mini name against a white background. It keeps the wings, which first featured on the iconic cars in the early 1960s, according to the Logos History blog, which has a comprehensive collection of logos stretching back to the brand's origins in 1959 under the British Motor Corp. and the Austin and Morris brand names. It also bears a visual similarity to the logo introduced during the mid-'90s. We're not saying the new logo was designed on an old PC using MS Paint, but it looks like it could've been.
Parent BMW Group says the new logo combines stylistic elements from the early phases of the classic Mini "with a future-oriented appearance that focuses on the essentials" and a two-dimensional look "allowing universal application." (Meaning, cheaper to produce?) It'll appear on all new Mini models starting in March on the bonnet, the rear, at the center of the steering wheel and on the remote control.
Ugh. IMO it demeans the nameplate. Buick made the same error when they traded the nice tri-color shield for the Skyhawk bird-wings symbol back in the 1970s, the chrome-outline shield a couple of decades later, and Cadillac when they traded their nice wreath-and crest for a single crest without the little ducks, and just multicolored blobs.
That looks rather dull. Of course maybe its part of their plan to kind of declutter/streamline the look of the cars. The new era Minis have always been very busy visually, lots of stuff going on, stripes, lots of body line cuts, scoops, chrome doo-dads and what not.
Of course from what I read about the quality, reliablity and durability of the new-era Minis, maybe this logo is more representative and should be used again.
Ugh. IMO it demeans the nameplate. Buick made the same error when they traded the nice tri-color shield for the Skyhawk bird-wings symbol back in the 1970s, the chrome-outline shield a couple of decades later, and Cadillac when they traded their nice wreath-and crest for a single crest without the little ducks, and just multicolored blobs.
I think Cadillac actually did a great job of modernizing its logo. Retains the crest and colors. Didn't need to wreath or the ducks.
Of course it's great if a brand can continue with a core logo over the long term, but I can see the need when brands are trying to re-shape how they're viewed and trying to shed old images/stigmas.
I think Cadillac actually did a great job of modernizing its logo. Retains the crest and colors. Didn't need to wreath or the ducks.
I don't quite see how that "modernizes" Cadillac's logo, but, if you think it looks better, I'll respect your opinion.
Of course it's great if a brand can continue with a core logo over the long term, but I can see the need when brands are trying to re-shape how they're viewed and trying to shed old images/stigmas.
As see it, part of a brand's image is pride in its own logo...and not necessarily bowing to every whim to change it. Buick, for instance, shed the old tri-color in the American market for a blank, chrome-outline one.....and, just recently, shifted back to the old tri-color again because customers demanded it. Changing the old logo was a mistake.....though the brand did prosper the last several years, even in spite of it.
Not bad. Manufacturers are always making their logos more contemporary. I liked the current one, but this one will blend in quickly. The Mini brand sales seem to have stagnated recently.
Not bad. Manufacturers are always making their logos more contemporary. I liked the current one, but this one will blend in quickly. The Mini brand sales seem to have stagnated recently.
Mini, in the U.S. has gotten at least some competition lately from the Fiat 500....and the 500 Abarth versions compete with the Cooper S and John Works models.
Mini, in the U.S. has gotten at least some competition lately from the Fiat 500....and the 500 Abarth versions compete with the Cooper S and John Works models.
Those things are WAY cheaper than comparably equipped Mini models. I remember a friend almost bought a Fiat 500 Abarth back in late 2014, mabye 2015 or so. Dealer was practically giving them away, said it would have been around $20,000 out the door for that car. He ended up in a Civic Si which was like $4000-5000 more though.
12-13-17 | 02:34 PM
Mini unveils new, stripped down logo
