Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Toyota suspends U.S. testing of self-driving vehicles.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-18, 02:45 PM
  #1  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,306
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default Toyota suspends U.S. testing of self-driving vehicles.

Toyota has become the first major manufacturer to stop tests on self-driving vehicles, at least temporarily. Apparently they agree that the cart is getting too far ahead of the horse.

Moderators...I know we already have a Car Chat thread going on self-drivers, but that was a general thread, and this one, I felt, deserves a new thread because it is specifically Toyota-related). You can combine them, of course, if you disagree.

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-43478158


Toyota has suspended US tests of driverless cars on public roads following a fatal accident in Arizona involving one of Uber Technologies' self-driving vehicles.

Toyota said it was concerned about the "emotional effect" the incident might have on its test drivers.

The carmaker said it did not have a timeline for re-starting the trials.

The Arizona accident has revived debate about whether autonomous vehicles are being put into use prematurely.

Analysts say the technology has the potential to reduce accidents and expand transportation options for the disabled and elderly, but some have warned that the technology is not ready and urged regulators to introduce more stringent safety tests.

"Hopefully Congress will take note and stop rushing to deploy this immature technology," Missy Cummings, a professor of engineering at Duke University
after the accident in Arizona.

A survey last year by Pew Research Center found that more than half of Americans would not want to ride in a driverless car if given the option and expressed some level of worry about such vehicles.

The accident in Tempe, Arizona on Sunday is believed to be the first fatality involving a fully autonomous vehicle.

Police and federal officials are investigating the details of the incident, in which a 49-year-old woman was killed by an Uber car operating in autonomous mode. A human monitor was also behind the wheel.

On Tuesday, Tempe police said they had reviewed video of the crash and repeated that fault had not been determined.

Uber said after the accident that it would temporarily halt driverless car tests.

Toyota has also been performing trials of its Chauffeur mode on public roads in Michigan and California. The firm previously said it expected some of its cars to be equipped with automated driving technology by 2020.

"Because we feel the incident may have an emotional effect on our test drivers, we have decided to temporarily pause our Chauffeur mode testing on public roads," a spokesman said.

He said the firm is continuing its tests of driverless cars in other countries.

Last edited by mmarshall; 03-21-18 at 02:51 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 03-21-18, 03:19 PM
  #2  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Smart move from Toyota. All the nonsense from the nonsenual UA witch hunt is still fresh in their memory, and they don't need anymore such liability that can spur from automated cars.

Everyone interested in the topic should read this.

https://www.millercanfield.com/asset...2018_Final.pdf
AUTOMATED VEHICLES: LIABILITY CRASH COURSE MCITY—AFFILIATE LAW RESEARCH PROGRAM March 2018
Och is offline  
Old 03-21-18, 03:47 PM
  #3  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,058
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

knee jerk reaction. How many people got killed with manned cars today?
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 03-21-18, 03:54 PM
  #4  
corradoMR2
The pursuit of F
 
corradoMR2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 8,296
Received 296 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4TehNguyen
knee jerk reaction. How many people got killed with manned cars today?

Good point, but it's about optics at this time...

Do we yet know the fault? We can't discount the unfortunate possibility the woman just suddenly crossed in front of the car without any time to physically avoid her, automated, or if human driven.
corradoMR2 is offline  
Old 03-21-18, 05:06 PM
  #5  
MattyG
Lexus Champion
 
MattyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: RightHere
Posts: 2,300
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

It's a PR and legal liability move. The last thing you need is people looking at an autonomous Toyota running around in the midst of a viral story. And the worst thing you need is a collision right after this just happened, even if it is a minor one, because you can bet the news media would jump on it.
MattyG is offline  
Old 03-21-18, 05:29 PM
  #6  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,305
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

I agree, let this play out, put Autonomy on the backburner and maybe focus on Solid State batteries for the time being.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 03-22-18, 01:04 AM
  #7  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

IMO this is just a temporary "pause" due to bad press. But IMO the real thing Toyota will be looking for is the legal ramifications resulting from this death. If companies can be held on the hook for several million dollars every self driving car death, this technology will NEVER become viable, at least in the United States.
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 03-22-18, 03:23 AM
  #8  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,969
Received 2,456 Likes on 1,610 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I agree, let this play out, put Autonomy on the backburner and maybe focus on Solid State batteries for the time being.
not an either/or. liability and some free press for appearing 'sensible' are toyota motivations but the r&d will continue apace, just on private testing grounds and labs. the other nice thing about self-driving cars is you don't need physical cars at all to test, you can do a huge amount of it through simulation.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 03-22-18, 04:06 AM
  #9  
Johnhav430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Johnhav430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 8,491
Received 372 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

Agreed, smart move. They are running a business, meaning, they have skin in the game.
Johnhav430 is offline  
Old 03-22-18, 04:51 AM
  #10  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,923
Received 161 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I agree, let this play out, put Autonomy on the backburner and maybe focus on Solid State batteries for the time being.
they dont have anything to do with each other though

But, main reason they said they did it was to focus on their test drivers... now it is obvious why - Uber test driver failed to react completely when their system failed. I think they will have to set much stricter rules for the drivers, industry wise... Because obviously they got careless, which is not surprising since it is tedious job.
spwolf is offline  
Old 03-22-18, 07:21 AM
  #11  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,454
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PatrixUSA
I disagree. Smart assessment pause on Toyota's part IMO. How many people drove manned cars today? A great deal many many more than there are self-driving cars, so not really a relevant / fair comparison. I think Toyota may be pausing to see if any litigation arises from this tragic incident - and until they know more about how that aspect of this whole self-driving car thing shakes out, smart move to hit the pause button IMO.
Kinda do wonder who can people sue in accidents. Since the driver is not at fault cuz he/she isnt the one driving. No different than a passenger.
situman is offline  
Old 03-22-18, 10:15 AM
  #12  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,305
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
they dont have anything to do with each other though
They don't have to. I was just implying I'd rather see Toyota put their time and resources in battery technology rather than autonomous technology right now. As terrible as it is, take advantage of this moment and put autonomy on the back burner, let it simmer down. In the meantime they won't sit idly, work on other projects and technologies.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 03-22-18, 02:03 PM
  #13  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,454
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PatrixUSA
In fact, re the responsibility of the human driver in the AZ incident, scenarios like this play out 1000s of times everyday in commercial aviation, where automated activities are supervised by a human pilot(s) (auto-pilot during flight, landing, take off). Much the same as in self-driving cars IMO, aircraft pilots owe not only their passengers, but the public at large, their full attention in operating their aircraft at all times – even during “automated” activities.

But alas, from a litigation standpoint, the driver is small potatoes, uber and the software developer (if they are not one in the same) are where the civil focus will most likely form - which IMO gives rise to Toyota's pause in testing.
Airline pilots are paid to do a job and yes in this testing instance, the human is also paid to do a job. However, what happens when autonomous cars are introduced commercially? Airline pilots will still be paid to pilot an airplane. However, you or your neighbor is simply a passenger when anybody can walk into a car dealership and buy the self driving car. At that point, what responsibility does the "driver" have? He/she is not being paid to test or monitor and is simply a passenger. If I still have to put my hands on the steering and with my foot ready on the brakes, why dont I just drive the damn thing myself? The real difference is I wont have to press on the gas pedal.
situman is offline  


Quick Reply: Toyota suspends U.S. testing of self-driving vehicles.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:28 AM.