Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

M5 vs E63S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-18, 07:04 PM
  #1  
Diesel350
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
Diesel350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 1,841
Received 74 Likes on 56 Posts
Default M5 vs E63S

M5 vs E63

Diesel350 is offline  
Old 03-24-18, 09:47 PM
  #2  
2URGSE
Racer
 
2URGSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 1,689
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

He turned on the 4 wheel drive and still lost.............ha................
2URGSE is offline  
Old 03-25-18, 03:07 AM
  #3  
blacksc400
Car Chat Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
blacksc400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas!
Posts: 10,143
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not trying to defend the M5, but I curious to know if the car has reached 1200 miles and the break-in mode was removed for this drag race...
blacksc400 is offline  
Old 03-25-18, 06:27 AM
  #4  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11,133
Received 138 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

C&D just did a comparison test that included the M5 and AMG E63. In all of the tests the two were nearly identical or with the M5 about 1/10th quicker. 1/4 mile 10.9 @129 vs. 11.0 @128 and 0-60 2.8 sec. vs. 2.9 seconds.
LexBob2 is offline  
Old 03-25-18, 03:30 PM
  #5  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,447
Received 1,612 Likes on 1,028 Posts
Default

I would choose the M5, without a second thought.
JDR76 is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 06:27 AM
  #6  
geko29
Super Moderator

 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 7,852
Received 297 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

How nonsensical. If someone is buying a $100k+ sport sedan to go drag racing, they've wasted their money and should have just bought a Demon instead. How about some form of testing that uses that big round thing right in front of you?
geko29 is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 06:51 AM
  #7  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 11,133
Received 138 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

In the comparison test mentioned above the CTS-V was quickest thru the slalom followed by the M5. On the skid pad the CTS-V was quickest followed by the AMG. In the 70-0 braking test the M5 stopped the shortest followed by the CTS-V, AMG/Panamera.
LexBob2 is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 06:52 AM
  #8  
Johnhav430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Johnhav430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 8,491
Received 372 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

2.8, 2.9? I'm old enough to remember when 5.9 was ridiculous. So when my 4 y.o. is old enough to drive, he's going to be in a car that can go 0-60 in like 1.3 sec?
Johnhav430 is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 06:54 AM
  #9  
Johnhav430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Johnhav430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 8,491
Received 372 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
In the comparison test mentioned above the CTS-V was quickest thru the slalom followed by the M5. On the skid pad the CTS-V was quickest followed by the AMG. In the 70-0 braking test the M5 stopped the shortest followed by the CTS-V, AMG/Panamera.
Scotty Kilmer would say these are not good cars to spend your money on. Please reset your autotempest search to 1994 Celicas for under $400.
Johnhav430 is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 09:13 AM
  #10  
arentz07
drives cars
 
arentz07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 8,426
Received 3,744 Likes on 1,904 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
How nonsensical. If someone is buying a $100k+ sport sedan to go drag racing, they've wasted their money and should have just bought a Demon instead. How about some form of testing that uses that big round thing right in front of you?
Well, I guess it goes without saying that there's something these cars offer that a Demon doesn't. For one: all-wheel-drive
arentz07 is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 10:42 AM
  #11  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,178
Received 68 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

These cars are for bragging rights and most ppl have already decided if they want the Benz or BMW.
I personally dont like the looks of either.

M5 Competition Pack is around the corner and will have even more power and better handling.
Hard to pick against M5 if u need a sport sedan in the $125-135k range.
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 12:01 PM
  #12  
Mr Bond
Pole Position
 
Mr Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: europe
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think its pretty clear that BMW really doesn´t care about thins kind of tests anymore. First of all the car still has "only" 600 hp ( in Europe ) and so did one version of the previous M5 . Its 12 hp less than the Merc and it has even less torque. The new M5 has a larger engine ( 4,4 vs 4 ) than the Merc so they could easily add another 100 hp to this M5 engine, but apparently they did not.

Its pretty much the same with the new M760i vs Mercedes S63 AMG S, its a 6,6 liter biturbo V12 and they simply didnt care to tune to more than 610 hp. There would be no problem at all to tune it to about 750-800 hp, but they did not.
Mr Bond is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 12:14 PM
  #13  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,178
Received 68 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr Bond
I think its pretty clear that BMW really doesn´t care about thins kind of tests anymore. First of all the car still has "only" 600 hp ( in Europe ) and so did one version of the previous M5 . Its 12 hp less than the Merc and it has even less torque. The new M5 has a larger engine ( 4,4 vs 4 ) than the Merc so they could easily add another 100 hp to this M5 engine, but apparently they did not.

Its pretty much the same with the new M760i vs Mercedes S63 AMG S, its a 6,6 liter biturbo V12 and they simply didnt care to tune to more than 610 hp. There would be no problem at all to tune it to about 750-800 hp, but they did not.
LOL - Yes BMW just gave up!
Thats why they went through all the trouble of developing AWD system for this new M5 so it can put down the power.
Car and Driver just got it to do 2.8sec which was the quickest time ever for any sedan.

Also there is an even faster Comp Pack version coming next year with 625hp!
I hope you realize these power figures are really underrated.

As far as the M760i - its not a full on M car.
BMW has never reall had a true answer to the Sclass AMG cars. The V12 it had is all about top end power but its Mperformance model not full on M7.


Last edited by RNM GS3; 03-26-18 at 12:19 PM.
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 12:42 PM
  #14  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blacksc400
Not trying to defend the M5, but I curious to know if the car has reached 1200 miles and the break-in mode was removed for this drag race...
kklllllllll

bagwell is offline  
Old 03-26-18, 01:10 PM
  #15  
Johnhav430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Johnhav430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 8,491
Received 372 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3


LOL - Yes BMW just gave up!
Thats why they went through all the trouble of developing AWD system for this new M5 so it can put down the power.
Car and Driver just got it to do 2.8sec which was the quickest time ever for any sedan.

Also there is an even faster Comp Pack version coming next year with 625hp!
I hope you realize these power figures are really underrated.

As far as the M760i - its not a full on M car.
BMW has never reall had a true answer to the Sclass AMG cars. The V12 it had is all about top end power but its Mperformance model not full on M7.

My wife and I drove the E65 Alpina B7, and she literally said, "I don't see anything at all special about this car." I showed her the plaque inside, and she was still unimpressed. I just wanted to make sure we didn't hit any potholes as the rims were like $4,100 each, which is silly...
Johnhav430 is offline  


Quick Reply: M5 vs E63S



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:14 PM.