Johnhav430

Scotty K and his Celicas are a good example...the ol' 180 HP and 133 ft. lbs. This marketing actually worked two decades ago, it would be nice to think people don't fall for that anymore. At minimum, when people see that, they should be thinking unusable rpms.

GS is a good choice too, if handling is of any concern (avoid LS in that case)

Htony

Driver does not sit in the rear seat, LOL! Any way how many times you have rear passengers? If it were family car, maybe some children in the back?
Nowadays most families have two vehicles,. In my case 4 vehicles between 3 persons.

Hoovey689

iTrader: (16)

Just stating facts for the OP who is new to Lexus. No need to dismiss numbers. The difference will come down to the GS having both port and direct injection, and the transmission gearing. Also bolsters why I mentioned which octane each model is tuned on.

Htony

In old days we could walk into a dealer show room, pick up a brochure which always had power band graphs.

SW17LS

One of the main reasons why I traded my GS in on the LS and my LS in on the LWB LS is rear legroom. I liked the GS a lot, but I do drive people from time to time and as great a car as it was, it was annoying to not have my backseat passengers comfortable and to have people complain about rear seat comfort. One of the last straws was when we took a trip to WV with my cousin and his wife in the backseat and by hour 3 they were pretty vocally uncomfortable. Thats annoying when passengers aren't comfortable in your $60,000 car.

The SWB LS was plenty comfortable in the back, but with carseats my kids could still kick the seats. Yes we have a minivan, but both of us need to be able to take the kids places, and my kids especially my son love riding in daddy's car from time to time. The rear legroom in the LWB LS is cavernous.

ALL4SPL

Drove a GS 350 this weekend I think I have found what I want.

EZZ

GS is a great car. Get the F sport package with AVS for a better handling car. The LS also wouldn't fit in my garage due to dedicated storage areas. The GS is about the largest size I could accommodate. I also think the LS is just too big and not very engaging. You made the right choice.

SW17LS

Cool!

I too would recommend a Luxury model or an F Sport to get the AVS suspension.

The LS isn't "engaging" at all, it isn't supposed to be.

ALL4SPL

Now I have a problem, because I found the ES 350 Crafted Line, which I love the way it looks, refined yet a side of sporty to it. The things I don't like about the GS when you go Crafted or FSport is the staggered wheel size, and the higher octane gas required. Of those two things I don't like the gas is my least worry as I do not drive much more than to work and back.

So IF I can find an ES 350 CL, I may opt for that over the GS.

SW17LS

MattyG

Yeah, as SW says. You want a premium product and the ride/handling/luxe into an upper tier - you have to pay to play. The ES looks great, but the GS is the real deal, but it's also a very slow seller. You can find deals on such a car. Find a GS with a luxury package and you won't miss anything about the ES. The LS is in an entirely different tier. If you're worrying about gas costs and other concerns, then the LS is not for you.

Hoovey689

iTrader: (16)

You mean painted black door handles and scarlet inserts don't address the shortcomings?!

SW17LS

ALL4SPL

I have now driven both styles of GS, Fsport and Non, the Fsport is too harsh for me. The regular is nice but the ES's I have driven seem to ride smoother. I have a car finder dealer who is going to meet me today to discuss either a GS350 luxury (which I can find ZERO of in 500 miles of me) or a Crafted Line ES. Yes they are different cars, but I don't care about going fast, my main concern is quiet smooth ride comfort.

Htony

If you like ES that wil be what you get. Personally I don't like FWD cars. I like rear wheel biased AWD cars.