Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Would a Lexus Pickup Make Sense for the U.S.?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-18 | 03:55 AM
  #76  
geko29's Avatar
geko29
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,174
Likes: 340
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I think people who are calling the Cadillac EXT a failure are wrong. The EXT and Avalanche need to be viewed upon hand in hand. Just like a Land Cruiser and LX. The Avanlanche/EXT survived 12 years which makes it pretty successful IMO. The recession killed the future development. Also, the Avalanche/EXT was technically a Suburban more than it was a Silverado.
Except for the first sentence, this is all true. The EXT was a complete sales flop, averaging 2k units/year. The only reason it existed in the first place and then stuck around was because the work was already done. It was literally an Avalanche with the trim from the already-existing Escalade bolted on, since they were the same truck up until the C-pillar. Almost nothing had to be created bespoke for the EXT. That would not be the case for a Lexus pickup truck, as there is no Lexus version of the Sequoia. Everything that would differentiate the TX570 or whatever they would call it from the Tundra would have to be engineered from scratch.

Basing it off the Land Cruiser would arguably be even worse, since now they have to re-engineer the platform to be a pickup, it would be too small for American tastes, and they would not likely be able to sell a Toyota version to help offset some of the engineering costs with some actual volume. The Avalanche was not a runaway success, but did push a little over 10x the volume that the EXT did--just enough to keep both on the market.
Old 08-23-18 | 06:37 AM
  #77  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,710
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
the 450 was (is) a tank, a slightly upgraded landcruiser. respectully yours is 22 years old though so not very relevant to product decisions now. the current lx570 is less off road capable than previous versions and while it has great towing capacity, i highly doubly any see any serious off roading in north america.

however, lexus u.s. website says it's rugged, so there is that
....and the website is correct. The LX570 os fully off-road-capable....if you find spaces wide enough to accommodate its bulk. It's obviously not going to fit in places narrow enough for a small Suzuki or Jeep Wrangler. One reason you don't see more people taking their LXs off-road (in addition to the usual ones of insurance not covering it, and the fact that few SUV owners outside of the Jeep Wrangler still do) is that who in their right mind would want to scratch (and possibly dent) that beautiful Lexus paint job and get the nice interior filthy? Also, continuing land-development and ownership means fewer and fewer places to really be in the boonies.
Old 08-23-18 | 07:38 AM
  #78  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,746
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
the 450 was (is) a tank, a slightly upgraded landcruiser. respectully yours is 22 years old though so not very relevant to product decisions now. the current lx570 is less off road capable than previous versions and while it has great towing capacity, i highly doubly any see any serious off roading in north america.

however, lexus u.s. website says it's rugged, so there is that



now their page is pushing the 2 row instead presumably since it's cheaper but the 2 row still STARTS at 86k.
Sometimes manufacturers need to take some chances and be a little experimental. If Lexus were to target the equestrian and marine industry, they would have a hit on their hands. If you have ever been around either (we have), high end (1/2 ton) trucks is what you see a lot of, more so with smaller horse trailers for horse jump competitions and fairs. This is the demographic.
For the Lexus LX 2-row, it just goes to show you how uncompetitive the LX is for North America. It’s just a tad bit too small. They are nice I will say.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 08-23-18 at 08:34 AM.
Old 08-23-18 | 08:28 AM
  #79  
Curated Content Editor's Avatar
Curated Content Editor
Thread Starter
CL Editor
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 172
Default

Originally Posted by SLegacy99
I think it would need to be more than a scooped out GX. Something funky and futuristic, but also stylish. ...take the first gen. Ridgeline, put a Lexus badge on it and plop the 3.5L and 6AT and it will blend right into the rest of the lineup...
And what of a F Sport model with the 5.0 liter V8 in a sort of urban F-150 Raptor or an SR5 Toyota?
Old 08-23-18 | 09:01 AM
  #80  
LexBob2's Avatar
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,342
Likes: 142
From: Illinois
Default

Mercedes
Originally Posted by LexsCTJill


Sometimes manufacturers need to take some chances and be a little experimental. If Lexus were to target the equestrian and marine industry, they would have a hit on their hands. If you have ever been around either (we have), high end (1/2 ton) trucks is what you see a lot of, more so with smaller horse trailers for horse jump competitions and fairs. This is the demographic.
For the Lexus LX 2-row, it just goes to show you how uncompetitive the LX is for North America. It’s just a tad bit too small. They are nice I will say.

Targeting the marine and/or equestrian markets would be too small and limited to have much of an effect at all on sales of a Lexus pickup. Usually entire brands focus on these niche segments to increase brand awareness. BMW in golf, sailing cup etc. Lexus in golf and tennis and Mercedes in whatever they sponsor.
Old 08-23-18 | 09:35 AM
  #81  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,746
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
Mercedes

Targeting the marine and/or equestrian markets would be too small and limited to have much of an effect at all on sales of a Lexus pickup. Usually entire brands focus on these niche segments to increase brand awareness. BMW in golf, sailing cup etc. Lexus in golf and tennis and Mercedes in whatever they sponsor.
Absolutely not limited and small. Neither MB, BMW, or Audi are very good out of the box vehicles for towing and that type of lifestyle. Range Rover and Land Rover are pretty good It would definitely work.

Not sure why everyone seems to so offended.
Old 08-23-18 | 09:38 AM
  #82  
GS3Tek's Avatar
GS3Tek
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,364
Likes: 168
From: so cal
Default

You baaarely see any C/ E class and 3/5 wagons.
Fugly bmw 3 and 5 GT aren't even popular.

No, lexus should not focus their $ wagons.

It's a CUV/SUV craze.
Old 08-23-18 | 10:14 AM
  #83  
LexBob2's Avatar
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,342
Likes: 142
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill


Absolutely not limited and small. Neither MB, BMW, or Audi are very good out of the box vehicles for towing and that type of lifestyle. Range Rover and Land Rover are pretty good It would definitely work.

Not sure why everyone seems to so offended.
​​​​​​
Not offended, just don't think it's a viable idea. Personally couldn't care less if Lexus launches a pick up. It would be interesting to hear someone from the brand pass along the rationale for not having one
Old 08-23-18 | 10:14 AM
  #84  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,746
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
. Usually entire brands focus on these niche segments to increase brand awareness. BMW in golf, sailing cup etc. Lexus in golf and tennis
Just so you know. Lexus already sponsors equestrian event past and present.
Old 08-23-18 | 10:32 AM
  #85  
situman's Avatar
situman
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,486
Likes: 166
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
Except for the first sentence, this is all true. The EXT was a complete sales flop, averaging 2k units/year. The only reason it existed in the first place and then stuck around was because the work was already done. It was literally an Avalanche with the trim from the already-existing Escalade bolted on, since they were the same truck up until the C-pillar. Almost nothing had to be created bespoke for the EXT. That would not be the case for a Lexus pickup truck, as there is no Lexus version of the Sequoia. Everything that would differentiate the TX570 or whatever they would call it from the Tundra would have to be engineered from scratch.

Basing it off the Land Cruiser would arguably be even worse, since now they have to re-engineer the platform to be a pickup, it would be too small for American tastes, and they would not likely be able to sell a Toyota version to help offset some of the engineering costs with some actual volume. The Avalanche was not a runaway success, but did push a little over 10x the volume that the EXT did--just enough to keep both on the market.
Tart up a next gen Tundra and up the powertrain game with two options, a V6TT and top trim V8TT and done.
Old 08-23-18 | 02:45 PM
  #86  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,746
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by situman
Tart up a next gen Tundra and up the powertrain game with two options, a V6TT and top trim V8TT and done.
Yeah. Pretty easy to do.
Old 08-23-18 | 03:07 PM
  #87  
KahnBB6's Avatar
KahnBB6
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,247
Likes: 1,258
From: FL & CA
Default

I'm a bit late to this thread but... a Lexus PICKUP? It doesn't make sense... you'd have an immaculate, high end interior and carpet that would get dirtied up and scuffed in short order if anything useful were to be done with it. And for all the body-on-frame hauling capability no one would ever want to put a scratch on the thing.

I know Cadillac does (or did) sell their own luxury pickup truck and that also makes no sense to me at all.

I suppose there is a market but... weird trend...
Old 08-23-18 | 03:16 PM
  #88  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,746
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by KahnBB6
I'm a bit late to this thread but... a Lexus PICKUP? It doesn't make sense... you'd have an immaculate, high end interior and carpet that would get dirtied up and scuffed in short order if anything useful were to be done with it. And for all the body-on-frame hauling capability no one would ever want to put a scratch on the thing.

I know Cadillac does (or did) sell their own luxury pickup truck and that also makes no sense to me at all.

I suppose there is a market but... weird trend...
So how does a $100K LX570 make sense then?
Old 08-23-18 | 04:55 PM
  #89  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 58,363
Likes: 2,791
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
So how does a $100K LX570 make sense then?
Its just a completely different segment...
Old 08-23-18 | 05:18 PM
  #90  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,746
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by KahnBB6

I suppose there is a market but...
Yes there is. Luxury car owners are trading in their cars for trucks. I posted a like earlier

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 08-23-18 at 05:44 PM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:26 PM.