Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Ok y'all, help me choose a sports car.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-18 | 08:25 PM
  #61  
Stroock639's Avatar
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 255
From: Long Island
Default

was the C6 ZR1 accepted / rejected yet?
Old 11-05-18 | 10:34 AM
  #62  
bagwell's Avatar
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,205
Likes: 11
From: The Woodlands, TX
Default

Originally Posted by ArmyofOne
Corvettes are pretty much out as they ride like **** on all but the smoothest roads and are difficult st best for me to get out of.
really? I had a base C6 MN6 coupe and I thought it was super comfy to sit in and great ride quality.

Old 11-05-18 | 10:51 AM
  #63  
Stroock639's Avatar
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,156
Likes: 255
From: Long Island
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
really? I had a base C6 MN6 coupe and I thought it was super comfy to sit in and great ride quality.
yea well you also have a WRX and A5 sport each with big wheels so i imagine the corvette would seem comfortable after that lol

i've driven a base C6 too and i really didn't think it was that bad tbh but it's definitely apparent you're in something with "sporty" intentions
Old 11-05-18 | 01:16 PM
  #64  
bagwell's Avatar
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,205
Likes: 11
From: The Woodlands, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Stroock639
yea well you also have a WRX and A5 sport each with big wheels so i imagine the corvette would seem comfortable after that lol

i've driven a base C6 too and i really didn't think it was that bad tbh but it's definitely apparent you're in something with "sporty" intentions
A5 w/19s isn't bad
WRX w/18s is bad even with soft sidewall tires.

on Corvettes, a lot of guys guys swap the RFT for regular tires to get much more comfy ride as well.....I thought the RFTs were fine and the C5 and C6 seats are super comfy for me (6ft 175lbs)



Old 11-05-18 | 01:38 PM
  #65  
ST430's Avatar
ST430
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 127
From: Silicon Valley
Default

I just replaced my Q50 with it's sibling, a Q60 RS AWD coupe....love it to do death! More GT then sports car and that twin turbo VR30DETT is to die for!

Old 11-06-18 | 03:51 AM
  #66  
bagwell's Avatar
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,205
Likes: 11
From: The Woodlands, TX
Default

Originally Posted by ST430
I just replaced my Q50 with it's sibling, a Q60 RS AWD coupe....love it to do death! More GT then sports car and that twin turbo VR30DETT is to die for!
Whoa, nice! Pics please!
Old 11-06-18 | 07:43 AM
  #67  
ArmyofOne's Avatar
ArmyofOne
Thread Starter
Dysfunctional Veteran
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,828
Likes: 160
From: Van Alstyne, TX
Default

Drove an F Type S-V8 RWD convertible.

Amazing drive. I think that might be my car. I am going to drive that and the SC430 again, back to back. I know they are very different cars, but I need to decide if I am willing to sacrifice sportiness for more luxury (SC430) or luxury for more sportiness (F-type).

I can't get over how good that Jag V8 sounds with the top down. I found the car a bit cumbersome to get into with the top up, but not terrible. Seat bolsters were a bit much, however with about 20lbs more weight loss (which I am working on) they will be much more comfortable. The acceleration is really good, the car is overall very planted. The ride is good on smooth roads, a bit harsh on rougher asphalt but nothing like the C6 vette. Those paddle shifters are awesome, the trans shifts with instantaneous precision.

With that said, with a simple exhaust modification, I could make the SC sound almost as good, but with it just being a plain old auto (no paddle shifters), it won't drive or sound anything like the F-type. 2 totally different types of car.

Last edited by ArmyofOne; 11-06-18 at 07:48 AM.
Old 11-06-18 | 08:17 AM
  #68  
TerrySmith's Avatar
TerrySmith
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
The 2009 Carrera S you drove looks like a nice car if you can settle on a number you're happy with and the history is good. First year of the 997.2 so newer 9A1 engine without an IMS. The poster above correctly highlighted possible IMS issues with M96/M97 but they were far more prevalent with older cars and were less prevalent with the later cars. I sold my 997 to get the F Type but I personally wouldn't be unduly concerned about owing say an 08 even though it has the M97. With that said, if you can get a 997.2 (2009 on, until the 991 debuted) they are a better choice (997.1 to .2 was a pretty big jump) although some say the 997.1 had more responsive steering (hydraulic vs electric assist).

Still hoping you drive an F Type!
Failure rate ("grenading") was about 10% on older M96 engines and only about 1% on the M97 (997.1) engines. But the oiling system on the M96 and M97 are not sufficient for high-G (more than about .7 of .8 G I think) turns so that tracked cars might develop bore scoring. So scoping the cylinders for an M96 / M97 during a PPI might be a good idea. The Porsche operator's manual warned that use of "race tires" (allowing higher-G turns) would void your warranty. 9A1 has a much better oiling system. The hydraulic steering rack was maintained for all 997 and 987 cars - the electric assist appeared with the 991 / 981 cars in 2013. 991 / 981 cars maintained the 9A1 engine.
Old 11-06-18 | 09:08 AM
  #69  
gadgetSC's Avatar
gadgetSC
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 6
From: NY/NV
Default

Originally Posted by ArmyofOne
Drove an F Type S-V8 RWD convertible.

Amazing drive. I think that might be my car. I am going to drive that and the SC430 again, back to back. I know they are very different cars, but I need to decide if I am willing to sacrifice sportiness for more luxury (SC430) or luxury for more sportiness (F-type).

I can't get over how good that Jag V8 sounds with the top down. I found the car a bit cumbersome to get into with the top up, but not terrible. Seat bolsters were a bit much, however with about 20lbs more weight loss (which I am working on) they will be much more comfortable. The acceleration is really good, the car is overall very planted. The ride is good on smooth roads, a bit harsh on rougher asphalt but nothing like the C6 vette. Those paddle shifters are awesome, the trans shifts with instantaneous precision.

With that said, with a simple exhaust modification, I could make the SC sound almost as good, but with it just being a plain old auto (no paddle shifters), it won't drive or sound anything like the F-type. 2 totally different types of car.
Just a reminder...The seats in the SL550 are fully adjustable, including the bolstering, heated/cooled, and massage. It also has an active suspension, you can select sport or comfort. You have gotten great input and advice in this thread. IMHO the F-type is a beauty as well as the SL550. Good luck.
Old 11-06-18 | 09:19 AM
  #70  
Johnhav430's Avatar
Johnhav430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,491
Likes: 372
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by TerrySmith
Failure rate ("grenading") was about 10% on older M96 engines and only about 1% on the M97 (997.1) engines. But the oiling system on the M96 and M97 are not sufficient for high-G (more than about .7 of .8 G I think) turns so that tracked cars might develop bore scoring. So scoping the cylinders for an M96 / M97 during a PPI might be a good idea. The Porsche operator's manual warned that use of "race tires" (allowing higher-G turns) would void your warranty. 9A1 has a much better oiling system. The hydraulic steering rack was maintained for all 997 and 987 cars - the electric assist appeared with the 991 / 981 cars in 2013. 991 / 981 cars maintained the 9A1 engine.
Very fascinating info, I don't know these details. I do feel like a 997 drives better to me for feel, than a 991.1, probably the steering. I like the look of the 991 better, and for whatever reason for looks I like 997 and newer...a person told me 5 y.o. is the sweet spot on a 911 (he owned at that point 5 and said 2 were purchased brand new--yeah one meets such folks at launches).

p.s. it's funny when you get to experience "sporty." I drive the LS430 daily and am used to it, it's like a mattress on wheels. Take an onramp to the bridge at 50 (might be a 40 limit) and the car is begging for a more reasonable speed, maybe 30 lol

Take the BMW out with Pilot Super Sports and same onramp at 65, happy as a quahog in Rhode Island. I always thought Japanese engine, German chassis, it would be like Reese's peanut butter cups...

Last edited by Johnhav430; 11-06-18 at 09:31 AM.
Old 11-06-18 | 11:07 AM
  #71  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,498
Likes: 2,559
From: Present
Default

Originally Posted by ArmyofOne
Drove an F Type S-V8 RWD convertible.

Amazing drive. I think that might be my car. I am going to drive that and the SC430 again, back to back. ..[snip].. 2 totally different types of car.
that's for sure! not to mention the sc430 is just plain old now. you already have a comfortmobile (the es) so there's no need imo to get the sc430. even with coilovers and an exhaust you'll still find the sc430 lazy to kick down and sluggish.
Old 11-06-18 | 01:02 PM
  #72  
swajames's Avatar
swajames
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,630
Likes: 741
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

Glad you liked the F Type!

That exhaust really is something, isn't it?
Old 11-06-18 | 01:04 PM
  #73  
TXgearhead's Avatar
TXgearhead
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 296
Likes: 17
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
that's for sure! not to mention the sc430 is just plain old now. you already have a comfortmobile (the es) so there's no need imo to get the sc430. even with coilovers and an exhaust you'll still find the sc430 lazy to kick down and sluggish.
It is also shaped like an egg and still has a full length antenna.
Old 11-07-18 | 12:53 AM
  #74  
ST430's Avatar
ST430
Pole Position
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 127
From: Silicon Valley
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
Whoa, nice! Pics please!

I'll post in a different thread as to not detract from the OPs.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ST430
Car Chat
12
12-21-18 04:44 PM
Hoppean
LC Model (2018-present)
14
08-06-17 05:11 AM
woodranch
RC F (2015-present)
5
02-11-17 04:30 PM
ChuH
RC F (2015-present)
17
05-02-14 08:16 PM
LexFather
Car Chat
36
02-09-09 08:12 AM



Quick Reply: Ok y'all, help me choose a sports car.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:05 PM.