Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Toyota Cost Cutting, really grinding my gears.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-19, 08:33 AM
  #166  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,225
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
I bet you cannot find concrete evidence of this ever happening.
Originally Posted by mmarshall
My vote would be for metal. In a crash, Plastic stalks can break and have jagged edges, although a properly-functioning airbag and shoulder-belt might help prevent impact. Metal stalks usually don't break.
I would say that plastic shattering loses force compared to a solid piece of metal hitting an occupant during an crash. I am willing to bet that plastic shattering is weighted into crash scores.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 08:59 AM
  #167  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,342
Received 2,740 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
I'm sorry, more useless than an ultra thin piece of plastic between power window buttons.

I'm all for being against cost-cutting. But you are making this into "Toyota eliminates features that I like, and it bothers me."
Exactly.....
SW17LS is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 10:06 AM
  #168  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,099
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Can you give me an example of something you find that is cost-cutting? I want to see if I would agree.
Well, there are many things. Some may bother me; others not.

Door locks--with the proliferation of key fobs, many (most?) vehicles no longer have a physical key lock on the passenger side door, since most people will use the key fob, or now the proximity key. I have no problem with this.

In that vein, my '07 IS had a little plastic cover over the physical lock on the driver door since most people aren't using the physical lock with the Smart Key. It looks to me from internet pix like the current generation IS has an exposed lock (as does my BMW and my wife's Mazda). This is clear cost cutting--again, doesn't bother me.

I had a 2000 Acura TL. There was no physical lock on the trunk. You had to open the trunk lid with either the inside trunk release, or with the fob. This seems like cost cutting to me, and was slightly annoying, but not a major problem.

The new Toyota RAV4 does not offer leather interior--only fake stuff. Cost cutting or social consciousness? Most likely cost-cutting. Bothersome? Not sure--I'll let you know if I end up getting one.

I saw the new Mazda 6 at the auto show--no fog lights. Cost cutting.

And how could I forget--eliminating the spare tire. I find it shocking that even Buick does this. How many of the prototypical Buick Regal buyer knows that the car has no spare?

Here's one @mmarshall will relate to--cars nowadays have fewer dials--no oil pressure or volts like my '78 Mailbu had. Instead, they have warning lights for those functions. Cost cutting. Again--bothersome? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Here's probably the most egregious cost cutting: option/option package combos/prerequisites. You can look at a list of all available options, but you can't get, say, the panoramic sunroof unless you get the "Premier" option group. So, in the name of reducing overall production costs, manufacturers may make an individual purchase more expensive, because that person may be forced to pay for options he/she doesn't want, in order to get those that are truly desired.

Last edited by tex2670; 02-10-19 at 02:59 PM.
tex2670 is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 10:11 AM
  #169  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,314
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Here's one @mmarshall will relate to--cars nowadays have fewer dials--no oil pressure or volts like my '78 Mailbu had. Instead, they have warning lights for those functions. Cost cutting. Again--bothersome? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Well, my Lacrosse actually has MORE gauges and dials than many of my previous vehicles did. It has an analog gauge for engine temperature, and analog-style electronic gages for oil temperature and voltage. It's unusual, BTW, to find oil-temp and voltmeters in non-sporting sedans.




mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 10:38 AM
  #170  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,099
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Well, my Lacrosse actually has MORE gauges and dials than many of my previous vehicles did. It has an analog gauge for engine temperature, and analog-style electronic gages for oil temperature and voltage. It's unusual, BTW, to find oil-temp and voltmeters in non-sporting sedans.

I don't think you can include digital instruments as evidence against that cost-cutting example. Not only does it not cost Buick anything more to include those "dials", digital screens replacing dials and buttons is, in itself, a cost-cutting measure.
tex2670 is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 11:49 AM
  #171  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,225
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Well, there are many things. Some may bother me; others not.

Door locks--with the proliferation of key fobs, many (most?) vehicles no longer have a physical key lock on the passenger side door, since most people will use the key fob, or now the proximity key. I have no problem with this. Never thought about this.

In that vein, my '07 IS had a little plastic cover over the physical lock on the driver door since most people aren't using the physical lock with the Smart Key. It looks to me from internet pix like the current generation IS has an exposed lock (as does my BMW and my wife's Mazda). This is clear cost cutting--again, doesn't bother me. Cost cutting for sure (what if someone decides to be mean and they steal the cover?)

I had a 2000 Acura TL. There was no physical lock on the trunk. You had to open the trunk lid with either the inside trunk release, or with the fob. This seems like cost cutting to me, and was slightly annoying, but not a major problem. With modern day key fobs or proximity sensors, kinda pointless

The new Toyota RAV4 does not offer leather interior--only fake stuff. Cost cutting or social consciousness? Most likely cost-cutting. Bothersome? Not sure--I'll let you know if I end up getting one. I used to be very against faux leather, but whatever I don't really care anymore. The real stuff in my 4Runner is crap, so I guess you could have nice fake leather, but crappy real stuff

I saw the new Mazda 6 at the auto show--no fog lights. Cost cutting. Cost cutting for sure. Some will say it is because of design, I don't know about that. The new UX has both fog lights and cornering lighting.

Here's one @mmarshall will relate to--cars nowadays have fewer dials--no oil pressure or volts like my '78 Mailbu had. Instead, they have warning lights for those functions. Cost cutting. Again--bothersome? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Never really considered this.

Here's probably the most egregious cost cutting: option/option package combos/prerequisites. You can look at a list of all available options, but you can't get, say, the panoramic sunroof unless you get the "Premier" option group. So, in the name of reducing overall production costs, manufacturers may make an individual purchase more expensive, because that person may be forced to pay for options he/she doesn't want, in order to get those that are truly desired.
I did my response to you in bold. I think forum rules allow it.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 12:16 PM
  #172  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,099
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I did my response to you in bold. I think forum rules allow it.
I had a 2000 Acura TL. There was no physical lock on the trunk. You had to open the trunk lid with either the inside trunk release, or with the fob. This seems like cost cutting to me, and was slightly annoying, but not a major problem. With modern day key fobs or proximity sensors, kinda pointless
You asked for examples. This was the tech in 2000. The point is, there will always be examples--current and past--of ways that car companies cut costs. Again, some more significant than others. And none of which will be viewed the same way by all buyers.
tex2670 is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 12:31 PM
  #173  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,225
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
You asked for examples. This was the tech in 2000. The point is, there will always be examples--current and past--of ways that car companies cut costs. Again, some more significant than others. And none of which will be viewed the same way by all buyers.
Which I agree.

So back to the windor spacers. I find it hard to believe people with a straight face could honestly say the removal of the spacers is not for a cost cutting reason, while at the same time, Lexus keeps the spacers for new models.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 12:38 PM
  #174  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,342
Received 2,740 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
So back to the windor spacers. I find it hard to believe people with a straight face could honestly say the removal of the spacers is not for a cost cutting reason, while at the same time, Lexus keeps the spacers for new models.
I just don't see how removing them reduces cost since its just molded plastic, and as I said before what you fail to realize is the same designers no longer design the switchgear for both Toyota and Lexus.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 01:14 PM
  #175  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,225
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I just don't see how removing them reduces cost since its just molded plastic, and as I said before what you fail to realize is the same designers no longer design the switchgear for both Toyota and Lexus.
What are some of the cost cutting in cars that you do not like?
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 01:22 PM
  #176  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,342
Received 2,740 Likes on 1,961 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
What are some of the cost cutting in cars that you do not like?
There are tons of things I don't like. I hate the use of hard touch plastic in luxury cars, I hate to see companies go from double stitching for leather to single stitching, I hate to see grainy bare plastic trim on cars instead of nice painted trim, I don't like the shift towards the use of 4cyl engines over V6 and V8 engines. I hate CVT transmissions. I hate prop-rods for hoods. I don't like to see any model reduce the quality of its build generation to generation.

Like I said though, I feel like cost cutting is on a decline, not an increase. I think cars made today have some of the best quality materials and build as of any time in my life, with even economy cars dramatically improving in that area,
SW17LS is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 01:33 PM
  #177  
Johnhav430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Johnhav430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 8,491
Received 372 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

One thing I would like that will never happen, is to put true dual exhausts on the cars, and then with the increased exahaust flow, let off the aggressive mapping of the ECU or DME. Make the power and torque by the hardware, not the software. Since most car are turbo'd nowadays be it 4, 6, or 8 cyl, make sure they are twin, have two manifolds, and smaller turbochargers, with engineering looking to lower the boost and still achieve the HP/TQ numbers.
Johnhav430 is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 01:36 PM
  #178  
Johnhav430
Lexus Fanatic
 
Johnhav430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 8,491
Received 372 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
There are tons of things I don't like. I hate the use of hard touch plastic in luxury cars, I hate to see companies go from double stitching for leather to single stitching, I hate to see grainy bare plastic trim on cars instead of nice painted trim, I don't like the shift towards the use of 4cyl engines over V6 and V8 engines. I hate CVT transmissions. I hate prop-rods for hoods. I don't like to see any model reduce the quality of its build generation to generation.

Like I said though, I feel like cost cutting is on a decline, not an increase. I think cars made today have some of the best quality materials and build as of any time in my life, with even economy cars dramatically improving in that area,
BINGO! My dad always felt gas struts to support the hood was a sign of being quality. I've never owned a vehicle with a power pull down trunk, and actually, don't need that. So I want gas struts for the trunk lid as well. Not those big arms that eat up the trunk space. My 335i and LS430 both use struts at the trunk. That 2020 Subaru looks like my 1998 Maxima, with crudely shaped trunk lid arms, and a cheap wire with zip ties running up one--bizarre for 2020.
Johnhav430 is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 01:44 PM
  #179  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,225
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Johnhav430
BINGO! My dad always felt gas struts to support the hood was a sign of being quality. I've never owned a vehicle with a power pull down trunk, and actually, don't need that. So I want gas struts for the trunk lid as well. Not those big arms that eat up the trunk space. My 335i and LS430 both use struts at the trunk. That 2020 Subaru looks like my 1998 Maxima, with crudely shaped trunk lid arms, and a cheap wire with zip ties running up one--bizarre for 2020.
Toyota has improved the rear truck experience (lol if you want to call it that) for the new Avalon and ES over the outgoing models.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-10-19, 01:47 PM
  #180  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,225
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Johnhav430
BINGO! My dad always felt gas struts to support the hood was a sign of being quality.
Going the opposite way for just a second. On my 4Runner, it the weather is very, very cold, like at -25c like it was last week, the hood struts had a hard time keeping up the hood. And when there is a lot of frozen ice on the hood, it wants to lower itself. Still held up, but it wanted to drop slowly.
Toys4RJill is offline  


Quick Reply: Toyota Cost Cutting, really grinding my gears.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:23 PM.