Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Cadillac Is Switching to New Torque-Based Engine Badging

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-19, 04:57 AM
  #61  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,117
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
It was the American system of mass-produced automobiles, using English measurements and developed by Henry Ford, that made mass-ownership of vehicles possible. The later European/Japanese systems, using metric measurements, were essentially copycats.
I'm not sure when you improve upon, and exceed the original, that you should be labeled a "copycat".

tex2670 is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 06:08 AM
  #62  
MattyG
Lexus Champion
 
MattyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: RightHere
Posts: 2,300
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
The Lexus LS 500 no longer has a 5.0 liter engine; the IS 250 no longer has a 2.5 liter engine.
The BMW 330 and 340 don't have 3.3/3.4 liter engines.
The MB C300 doesn't have a 3.0 liter engine.
etc, etc.

Are these brands using underhanded deception?
Are the digits behind LS, 3 and C torque numbers? Or do they represent where in the model range those cars sit?
MattyG is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 06:48 AM
  #63  
coolsaber
Lead Lap
 
coolsaber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: In your head
Posts: 4,086
Received 275 Likes on 246 Posts
Default

Cadillac...finding solutions to problems that dont exist lol
coolsaber is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 06:52 AM
  #64  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,422
Received 65 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MattyG
Are the digits behind LS, 3 and C torque numbers? Or do they represent where in the model range those cars sit?
Come to think of it. Lexus does all three. LX570, LS500, and RX400h all mean different things. So perhaps Lexus IS a little misleading
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 07:18 AM
  #65  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,117
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MattyG
Are the digits behind LS, 3 and C torque numbers? Or do they represent where in the model range those cars sit?
They used to represent engine size. With the move to from the E90 to F30 generation, BMW could have used the names 320 and 330 to continue to represent the engine size, but that would have meant that the 328 became a 320, and the 335 became a 330.

So clearly with the move to smaller engines, the marketing departments don't like the image that reducing the numbers represents. So, just like Caddy's torque numbering system, it's more about marketing than anything else.

It's not deception; it's marketing. Whether it's smart or dumb--well, we can keep debating that.
tex2670 is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 07:26 AM
  #66  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,117
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill


Come to think of it. Lexus does all three. LX570, LS500, and RX400h all mean different things. So perhaps Lexus IS a little misleading
Just because the naming convention originally represented engine size, but no longer does across the board doesn't make it "misleading".

No more so than the Buick Lacrosse isn't built in Lacrosse, or that you can't really "scale a fortified walls using ladders, as a form of military attack" in an Escalade. It's a name.
tex2670 is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 07:29 AM
  #67  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,422
Received 65 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Just because the naming convention originally represented engine size, but no longer does across the board doesn't make it "misleading".

No more so than the Buick Lacrosse isn't built in Lacrosse, or that you can't really "scale a fortified walls using ladders, as a form of military attack" in an Escalade. It's a name.
I said perhaps misleading. I am sure there are some that might think it is. In Cadillac’s case, they have made it clear that the change is to avoid confusion across the line.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 03-15-19 at 07:38 AM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 08:41 AM
  #68  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,259
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
The Lexus LS 500 no longer has a 5.0 liter engine; the IS 250 no longer has a 2.5 liter engine.
The BMW 330 and 340 don't have 3.3/3.4 liter engines.
The MB C300 doesn't have a 3.0 liter engine.
etc, etc.

Are these brands using underhanded deception?
Yes they are but at least they don’t say that they got their figures by converting from lb ft to Nm and then rouning off....


RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 08:58 AM
  #69  
geko29
Super Moderator

 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 8,015
Received 309 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
It's not deception; it's marketing.
These statements cannot both be correct.
geko29 is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 09:22 AM
  #70  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,117
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
These statements cannot both be correct.
Ok, you got me there. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
tex2670 is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 12:12 PM
  #71  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,417
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
These statements cannot both be correct.

They can be correct...but not very often. I have, on rare occasions, seen honest marketing.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 12:17 PM
  #72  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,117
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
They can be correct...but not very often. I have, on rare occasions, seen honest marketing.
#Sarcasm ...
tex2670 is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 01:37 PM
  #73  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,457
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MattyG
this won't matter much because it's just a badge on the back of a G̶M̶C̶ ̶A̶c̶a̶d̶i̶a̶ Cadillac XT6.
Cute but not accurate, when it comes to the GMC Acadia: the XT6 is 5.2 inches longer, 1.9 inches wider, 2.9 inches taller, with a wheelbase that’s 0.2 inches longer. The XT6 has wider tracks – 1.9 inches in the front and 1.7 in the rear. And, Electric vehicles are coming much sooner than 25 yrs from now

Read more: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2019/02/...#ixzz5iH54vEJq
rogerh00 is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 01:45 PM
  #74  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,457
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
It was the American system of mass-produced automobiles, using English measurements and developed by Henry Ford, that made mass-ownership of vehicles possible. The later European/Japanese systems, using metric measurements, were essentially copycats.


What we learned was that the American public did not want the change. Some things, though, were still forced on them, like the engine displacement in liters instead of the former cubic inches, and tire size in millimeters/inches combined. Nuts and bolts, scattered throughout the vehicles, became a hodgepodge combination of both English and metric sizes, often on the same vehicle. It was a mess that IMO should never have happened, as we should have kept the (former) all-English measurements.
You sound like an old curmugeon. As you state the metic system has been slowly creeping into the USA. I worked for 30 yrs with the metric system in my profession. It's much easier to use once you start using it. I don't think Henry Ford would mind if we switched.
rogerh00 is offline  
Old 03-15-19, 01:56 PM
  #75  
MattyG
Lexus Champion
 
MattyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: RightHere
Posts: 2,300
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rogerh00
Cute but not accurate, when it comes to the GMC Acadia: the XT6 is 5.2 inches longer, 1.9 inches wider, 2.9 inches taller, with a wheelbase that’s 0.2 inches longer. The XT6 has wider tracks – 1.9 inches in the front and 1.7 in the rear. And, Electric vehicles are coming much sooner than 25 yrs from now

Read more: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2019/02/...#ixzz5iH54vEJq
From this very blog:

Before we get into the nitty gritty, let’s set a baseline to better understand what we’re dealing with here. All of the models that are part of this Dimensional Comparison are based on the GM C1 platform (pronounced “Chi”). However, there are three different versions of the C1 architecture. The first is the original, short-wheelbase version. This one has a wheelbase of 112.5 inches and underpins the Cadillac XT5 and the second-generation GMC Acadia. The second is the long-wheelbase version with a wheelbase of 120.9 inches. This one underpins the second iterations of the Chevrolet Traverse and Buick Enclave. And that brings us to the third C1 platform variant.The third version is based on the original, short-wheelbase version of C1, but with a few minor improvements, the most notable of which (on paper) is the addition of 0.2 inches to the wheelbase. It’s this platform that the Cadillac XT6 is based on.
As people often say about German cars around here; same sausage, different length.
MattyG is offline  


Quick Reply: Cadillac Is Switching to New Torque-Based Engine Badging



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:10 PM.