2020 Buick Encore GX
#31
Oh, no doubt. But, if the Pacifica had better reliability, it would also be more appealing....yet your wife still loves them. That just shows that no vehicle is perfect...you're always going to fine something you don't like. I haven't seen a prefect vehicle yet....although the LS430 and the last LS460 probably came close.
If we take the engines off the table, what is it about this vehicle that stands above the other vehicles in the segment and for the money that makes it worth it to accept a terrible 3 cyl engine? I don't see anything. Interior is okay, it doesnt ride great, its expensive. When you add in a terrible engine...I just don't get it.
With respect that you have ordered one of these, I think the primary driver of that is that its a Buick, and the Buick brand has a draw for you. I don't see on specs how this vehicle is competitive with those engines. I wouldn't even consider one.
Last edited by SW17LS; 10-17-20 at 09:14 AM.
#32
The MT Encore GX review was more negative than most. Most of the reviews I've seen, both in print and on video, have been quite favorable (as my own impression was), short of the three-cylinder power plant. I agree, though, that the Encore is probably not as deserving as the Trailblazer, which has had a much greater impact on the small crossover industry, and is currently almost impossible to get from supply and demand. I personally, though, think the Encore is much better-looking inside and out than the Trailblazer, particularly in the front end.
^^^ Nope, my a**. This is nonsense on the judges' part....and where they blew it. I'd bet the monthly rent that, on the Interstates, I could easily get 30+ plus MPG, from either of the Encore GX's powerplants or transmissions, FWD or AWD. I can get 30 on the highway from my Lacrosse and its much larger V6 and 9-speed, driven moderately.
^^^ Nope, my a**. This is nonsense on the judges' part....and where they blew it. I'd bet the monthly rent that, on the Interstates, I could easily get 30+ plus MPG, from either of the Encore GX's powerplants or transmissions, FWD or AWD. I can get 30 on the highway from my Lacrosse and its much larger V6 and 9-speed, driven moderately.
#34
Smaller engines do not always equal better MPG, especially on the highway.
Case in point, I get better mileage in my LS than I did in my GS, and not far off the ES. I get 27 MPG highway, best in the GS was 25 or 26. Doesnt surprise me at all that the Lacrosse has better highway MPG, its more aerodynamic and I bet it cruises at a much lower RPM.
Case in point, I get better mileage in my LS than I did in my GS, and not far off the ES. I get 27 MPG highway, best in the GS was 25 or 26. Doesnt surprise me at all that the Lacrosse has better highway MPG, its more aerodynamic and I bet it cruises at a much lower RPM.
#35
I have a lot of respect for Mazda (I owned three of them, brand-new)...but, in general, they are too sport-oriented for my current tastes.
You mentioned the CX-5. I haven't seen the latest 2020/2021 versions, but, the last one I sampled, several years ago (and did a review on), had an annoying red/blue idiot-light system for the engine-coolant-temperature instead of (IMO) a proper gauge. That's a deal-breaker for me....no gauge, no sale. I'm a firm believer in knowing what's going on under the hood before things get out of hand.
If we take the engines off the table, what is it about this vehicle that stands above the other vehicles in the segment and for the money that makes it worth it to accept a terrible 3 cyl engine? I don't see anything. Interior is okay, it doesnt ride great, its expensive. When you add in a terrible engine...I just don't get it.
With respect that you have ordered one of these, I think the primary driver of that is that its a Buick, and the Buick brand has a draw for you. I don't see on specs how this vehicle is competitive with those engines. I wouldn't even consider one.
The Trailblazer has the same engines/drivetrains, so its not necessarily a Buick-issue. I'll admit, though, that, with a few small exceptions, I am generally very pleased with my GM dealership's sales/service...and, in my book, good businesses deserve repeat customers.
No, it's not much engine, but then, it well-fits my driving style today, although, yes, I agree (as I've stated before) that another cylinder wouldn't hurt.
And, look at the way the Trailblazer is selling (dealers can't keep them in stock), so one has to admit that the basic platform is attractive to a lot of people. I just prefer the Buick version overall.
I wouldn't even consider one.
#36
A CX-30 would be cheaper than a loaded Essence....not necessarily a Select or Preferred Encore GX. And it certainly wouldn't be less-expensive than a low-line Trailblazer, which starts at $19,995.
I have a lot of respect for Mazda (I owned three of them, brand-new)...but, in general, they are too sport-oriented for my current tastes.
I have a lot of respect for Mazda (I owned three of them, brand-new)...but, in general, they are too sport-oriented for my current tastes.
You mentioned the CX-5. I haven't seen the latest 2020/2021 versions, but, the last one I sampled, several years ago (and did a review on), had an annoying red/blue idiot-light system for the engine-coolant-temperature instead of (IMO) a proper gauge. That's a deal-breaker for me....no gauge, no sale. I'm a firm believer in knowing what's going on under the hood before things get out of hand.
BTW, most coolant gauges today arent actually gauges anyway. They just are normal or high, so it just goes from normal to overheating. How is a light any different?
I was drawn to it from the first moment I saw it. I liked the overall exterior size (perfect for my current needs...the current Encore is too small), interior packaging, cleverly-designed seat-folds for carrying large or long items, adjustable cargo-floor level, reasonably-comfortable seats (though not as cushy as the Lacrosse's), tri-color Buick emblems inside and out, buttons to connect/disconnect the AWD and engine start/stop systems, the unprecedented number of safety-features either standard or available which breaks new ground for a GM product, the handsome front end (many reviewers have commented favorably on the styling), ease of parking/low-speed manverabilty, and the nice materials used inside on the front dash and door-panels, though the rear-seat materials are cheap. But I don't ride in back LOL.
Of course not...it's clearly too small for your family. (your wife would probably laugh at the thought of one LOL) . But I'm single, and usually don't have people in the back seat.
#39
#40
GM currently has very generous incentives to try and move the older, smaller Encore because all the attention is currently focused on the GX. Previously, the Encore was Buick's best-selling product in the U.S. (the Verano/Excelle was their biggest seller in China).
I don't know if my Encore GX order will be included in the total-sales or not, as it it will be an early-production 2021. Didn't want a 2020, even with incentives......first-year GM products can be risky.
#43
GM currently has very generous incentives to try and move the older, smaller Encore because all the attention is currently focused on the GX. Previously, the Encore was Buick's best-selling product in the U.S. (the Verano/Excelle was their biggest seller in China).
I don't know if my Encore GX order will be included in the total-sales or not, as it it will be an early-production 2021. Didn't want a 2020, even with incentives......first-year GM products can be risky.
I don't know if my Encore GX order will be included in the total-sales or not, as it it will be an early-production 2021. Didn't want a 2020, even with incentives......first-year GM products can be risky.
#45
When I checked the pricing of the Encore GX they have like a $3,200 incentive on it too, which is huge given its price point
I also don’t understand the name. They couldn’t come up with a new name?
I also don’t understand the name. They couldn’t come up with a new name?