Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2021 Mercedes S-Class (W223)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-20, 02:33 PM
  #421  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Cars are disposable now, with all that complexity they are good for a 3 year lease, and then maybe 3 more years before they become "endless money pits" (® Scotty Kilmer). I'm not saying if its good or bad, just merely stating the obvious. So if I'm only going to lease for three years, I want all the latest tech and toys.

However this new S class looks awful inside and out, and its infotainment and general user control tech seems like a giant clusterpluck.
Och is offline  
Old 10-31-20, 02:35 PM
  #422  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,243
Received 216 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Cars are disposable now, with all that complexity they are good for a 3 year lease, and then maybe 3 more years before they become "endless money pits" (® Scotty Kilmer). I'm not saying if its good or bad, just merely stating the obvious. So if I'm only going to lease for three years, I want all the latest tech and toys.

However this new S class looks awful inside and out, and its infotainment and general user control tech seems like a giant clusterpluck.
The thing is, 30-40 years ago you bought an S-Class to be dead reliable for 15 years, and they were for the most part.

Now cars are being designed to be jettisoned after a measly 3 year lease?
AJT123 is online now  
Old 10-31-20, 02:39 PM
  #423  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
Car and Driver 40k mile test:

For the sake of science, we spec'd the pricier engine, and we have to say, even at today's discounted premium, we wouldn't spend our own money on the electrically assisted Hemi. We averaged an underwhelming 14 mpg, a number that we matched during two weeks in a Ram without eTorque. (Our long-termer's fuel economy rises to 15 mpg if we omit our towing.) More disappointing than its performance, the 48-volt system proved just finicky enough for us to lose faith in it. The vast majority of the time, eTorque works exactly as intended, smoothing engine restarts and increasing the amount of time the V-8 is shut down in traffic. But the system periodically stumbled when refiring, and on a handful of occasions, it stalled the engine right as we were expecting the truck to accelerate. This rough behavior was sometimes accompanied by a warning light and an error message indicating that the system wasn't charging properly. And when an editor woke to find the truck's electrical system dead one morning, we couldn't shake the feeling that a leaky 48-volt system was the culprit. We never got an answer, as the Ram recovered with a jump-start and the dealer never identified the cause of the drained battery, the rough restarts, or the intermittent stalling.

Pass. At least on a FCA product.
Why are you passing judgement on a technology based of its implementation in a Chrysler product?
Och is offline  
Old 10-31-20, 02:43 PM
  #424  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
The thing is, 30-40 years ago you bought an S-Class to be dead reliable for 15 years, and they were for the most part.

Now cars are being designed to be jettisoned after a measly 3 year lease?
Yes, and I am still at a loss what happens to all those off lease cars. You come to major cities, and its all brand new fancy cars that are being leased. But you go to rural areas, and its either new cheap American cars, or older American cars. There aren't many 5-10 year old cars on the roads anywhere, especially luxury brands.
Och is offline  
Old 10-31-20, 03:22 PM
  #425  
rosskoss
Advanced
 
rosskoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
That has to be a joke. I don't even think the exterior looks that good, they took the current one and made it worse. The interior is absolutely atrocious, it is horrible, it looks like a terrible place to spend time in and is now fighting the Audi A8 for the worst interior in class, I prefer the LS500 interior to the new S class interior and I don't like the LS500 interior at all. I hoped the finished product would be better, what is with all that shiny glossy wood/finishes, just a giant eyesore. What are luxury automakers doing to their interiors? With the new S class they are copying the absolute worst auto interiors, Tesla's out for some stupid reason. Like I said before that interior looks like a unfinished cheaply designed demonstrator interior you see to audio equipment, it is so cold, bland, and does not even look luxurious. At least they kept the V8 engines, the way things are going we are lucky it didn't only have a 4 cylinder hybrid or EV power train.

Bentley is definitely king of luxury, they didn't abandon real luxury and opulence for sci fi tech junkies who aren't Mercs. or flagship cars buyers.

I have a feeling the value for the current S class is going to hold and there will be no rush to get into this aside from the gotta have the newest thing buyers but who knows, the masses buy so many ugly CUV's they may go for this too, it is not like they really have any other good choice in the flagship sedan range now unless they pay a fortune for a Bentley or Rolls Royce.
I agree - this S-class interior looks silly. Audi interior is not bad. Lexus LS interior is totally disjointed - a bunch of lines all over the place - texture for the sake of texture - don't care for it.

I believe the best interiors now are actually Genesis, Cadillac and Lincoln!
rosskoss is offline  
Old 10-31-20, 06:09 PM
  #426  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,097
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
The thing is, 30-40 years ago you bought an S-Class to be dead reliable for 15 years, and they were for the most part.
What brought the 80s-vintage Mercedes products down from that lofty pedestal of quality they enjoyed back then was the introduction of Lexus and Infiniti. Unlike Acura, they were the first Japanese luxury makes to clearly challenge Mercedes in their own type of vehicle....in a way that not even the Acura Legend could. Mercedes, to compete, was forced to cut costs...and chose to do it through the solidness of the materials it used its vehicles....and, unfortunately, the company has never been the same since, reliability-wise.

At first, in the early-mid 1990s, it was not particularly noticeable (particularly on the C-class), but, a time went on, one could clearly tell that the three-pointed star was not what it once was.

However, in defense of recent S-Class sedans, they do have some excellent engineering in the chassis/suspension/sound-insulation departments, and have succeeded in becoming one of the world's best luxury cars in refinement/road-manners, if not in reliability.

Last edited by mmarshall; 10-31-20 at 06:13 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 10-31-20, 07:44 PM
  #427  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,177
Received 68 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Yes, and I am still at a loss what happens to all those off lease cars. You come to major cities, and its all brand new fancy cars that are being leased. But you go to rural areas, and its either new cheap American cars, or older American cars. There aren't many 5-10 year old cars on the roads anywhere, especially luxury brands.
A lot are Sold off and shipped over seas.
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 11-01-20, 05:48 AM
  #428  
geko29
Super Moderator

 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 7,852
Received 297 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Why are you passing judgement on a technology based of its implementation in a Chrysler product?
So glad I didn't have my coffee when I read this comment....
geko29 is offline  
Old 11-01-20, 12:08 PM
  #429  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,944
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
The thing is, 30-40 years ago you bought an S-Class to be dead reliable for 15 years, and they were for the most part.

Now cars are being designed to be jettisoned after a measly 3 year lease?
I think it just depends on how one looks at a Mercedes. General Motors as well as other American cars used to last a very long time as well. But as new tech keeps coming out, things need to be replaced when in fact the very part or item never before existed. Air suspensions, power tilt steering wheels, digital displays, small motors inside the door or trucks just didn’t exist on prior MBs...

I do believe Cadillac did have air suspensions in the 1970s....all the best stuff was in Cadillac for a while

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 11-01-20 at 12:14 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 11-02-20, 08:25 AM
  #430  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,971
Received 2,723 Likes on 1,950 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Why are you passing judgement on a technology based of its implementation in a Chrysler product?
Exactly lol. Its fear of change, nothing more.

Originally Posted by AJT123
The thing is, 30-40 years ago you bought an S-Class to be dead reliable for 15 years, and they were for the most part.

Now cars are being designed to be jettisoned after a measly 3 year lease?
#1, S Classes of 30 years ago were a reliability nightmare. The W140 S Classes are NOTORIOUS for electrical problems, suspension problems, and that got much, much worse with the W220.

#2, If we talk about 40 years ago, those MB S Classes were very simple, austere and didnt have much in the way of creature comforts or technology to go wrong.

Its a tradeoff, when you pack something with technology and features, long term reliability and usability is going to go down, but thats what consumers want. If you made an S Class today like one made 40 years ago with no features or technology, very few comforts, hard interior materials that last forever nobody would buy it.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 11-02-20, 08:46 AM
  #431  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,243
Received 216 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Exactly lol. Its fear of change, nothing more.



#1, S Classes of 30 years ago were a reliability nightmare. The W140 S Classes are NOTORIOUS for electrical problems, suspension problems, and that got much, much worse with the W220.

#2, If we talk about 40 years ago, those MB S Classes were very simple, austere and didnt have much in the way of creature comforts or technology to go wrong.

Its a tradeoff, when you pack something with technology and features, long term reliability and usability is going to go down, but thats what consumers want. If you made an S Class today like one made 40 years ago with no features or technology, very few comforts, hard interior materials that last forever nobody would buy it.
#1: I said 30-40 years ago. Of course I didn’t mean the W140 I meant the W126 and prior, even though the W140 is my favorite S-Class. It came out as a 1992 model.

And of course cars are different now. I just am disappointed that these high end cars are seemingly designed to lease and then toss. Not everybody does that, or wants to do that. I don’t want a lease payment for my whole life, I like to pay things off and keep them. My pristine LS430 with literally zero wrong with it is a good example. It’s got more woodgrain and softer leather than most luxury cars sold today.
AJT123 is online now  
Old 11-02-20, 10:29 AM
  #432  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,944
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123

And of course cars are different now. I just am disappointed that these high end cars are seemingly designed to lease and then toss. Not everybody does that, or wants to do that. I don’t want a lease payment for my whole life, I like to pay things off and keep them. My pristine LS430 with literally zero wrong with it is a good example. It’s got more woodgrain and softer leather than most luxury cars sold today.
People who buy German usually do not car about long-term reliability in the same way as those who buy Lexus. That said, the UZ engine was around since 1990...I bet most of the suspension parts where from the previous LS as well It is not much different today in how Lexus has older powertrains....Lexus doesn't update as frequently as the Germans do
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 11-02-20, 11:04 AM
  #433  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,243
Received 216 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
People who buy German usually do not car about long-term reliability in the same way as those who buy Lexus. That said, the UZ engine was around since 1990...I bet most of the suspension parts where from the previous LS as well It is not much different today in how Lexus has older powertrains....Lexus doesn't update as frequently as the Germans do
LS430 was claimed to be 90% new by Lexus at release. But if there are older parts from previous LS cars, I don’t care. They still all work, lol. Rides and drives as smooth as ever.
AJT123 is online now  
Old 11-02-20, 11:35 AM
  #434  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

It's a trade off, and even the W126 and W220 are probably reliable by todays standards. Sure, the air suspensions are prone to fail, but that is true for air suspension in general, no matter who the manufacturer is, and there are some electronic gremlins due to short life expectancy of capacitors used in circuit boards back in those days - but the engines were solid.

Todays turbo charged engines, with lightweight rotating assemblies, carbon build up due to DI, and ultra thin oils, are mostly purposed to return good fuel economy and performance during the 3 year lease term, and after 40-50k they are pretty much done.

Just lease, and you don't have to worry about any of this.
Och is offline  
Old 11-02-20, 11:58 AM
  #435  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,243
Received 216 Likes on 181 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
It's a trade off, and even the W126 and W220 are probably reliable by todays standards. Sure, the air suspensions are prone to fail, but that is true for air suspension in general, no matter who the manufacturer is, and there are some electronic gremlins due to short life expectancy of capacitors used in circuit boards back in those days - but the engines were solid.

Todays turbo charged engines, with lightweight rotating assemblies, carbon build up due to DI, and ultra thin oils, are mostly purposed to return good fuel economy and performance during the 3 year lease term, and after 40-50k they are pretty much done.

Just lease, and you don't have to worry about any of this.
Yes, unlike BMW, Mercedes knew how to make a V8.

However I personally wouldn’t call a W220 reliable by any standards but I do see some still on the road. Some look great, some are junkers. If people want to pay the cost to maintain high end Mercedes, more power to them.

I always see this old lady around my end driving a 2003ish white absolutely pristine CL500, I’ve seen the car pull out of the mansion on the lake they live in..I doubt maintenance and repairs are a problem. Some people just like to hang onto cars, myself obviously included.
AJT123 is online now  


Quick Reply: 2021 Mercedes S-Class (W223)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 AM.