Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2021 Acura TLX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-20 | 10:19 AM
  #196  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 66
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
$70k for a TLX is more expensive than a loaded M340. I'd be surprised if it was that expensive given it's middling horsepower numbers.
To be fair, it is substantially larger on the outside than a 3 Series. Since Acura said something about benchmarking the Audi A7, maybe the price makes more sense in comparison to a BMW 4GC or Audi A5 Sportback. It all depends on how successfully they can market this vehicle to be seen as a 4-door-coupe competitor.
Old 09-15-20 | 10:26 AM
  #197  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,460
Likes: 228
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
To be fair, it is substantially larger on the outside than a 3 Series. Since Acura said something about benchmarking the Audi A7, maybe the price makes more sense in comparison to a BMW 4GC or Audi A5 Sportback. It all depends on how successfully they can market this vehicle to be seen as a 4-door-coupe competitor.
If they do market in that class, it has to compete on that level of refinement and interior appointments...all reviews point it to being more of a 3 series competitor. To be fair, if its marketed as a performance car, its only middle of the road in its segment and nowhere near the top. Given all that, I expect it to top out around $60k fully loaded. I'd be shocked if it was $70k.
Old 09-15-20 | 10:32 AM
  #198  
Kense's Avatar
Kense
Instructor
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 794
Likes: 3
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
Oh boy, can't wait to see what other packages are going to bring this up near the $70K pricetag.
You can't be serious. Acura isn't that stupid to price a car the same as a C43 AMG. Especially if the car does 0-60 above 4.6 seconds which I'm thinking it will.
Old 09-15-20 | 10:37 AM
  #199  
EZZ's Avatar
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,460
Likes: 228
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Kense
You can't be serious. Acura isn't that stupid to price a car the same as a C43 AMG. Especially if the car does 0-60 above 4.6 seconds which I'm thinking it will.
Yeah...only Lexus prices a car in the $70k range with a 0-60 in ~4.5s
Old 09-15-20 | 10:50 AM
  #200  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 66
From: N/A
Default

CT5 is seen as a 3-Series competitor too despite being a substantially larger tweener like the TLX. I strongly believe that the Type S reception will be very similar to that of the CT5-V. Neither have the performance of a 3-Series or the luxury appointments of a 5-Series, but they're an acceptable middle ground for the same price as an equivalently equipped 3-Series.

Old 09-15-20 | 10:50 AM
  #201  
GS3Tek's Avatar
GS3Tek
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,364
Likes: 168
From: so cal
Default

Originally Posted by PauloFR
It looks sportier than the ES for sure but most importantly, it offers AWD and a V6 at the same time.
ES offers AWD now too
Old 09-15-20 | 10:50 AM
  #202  
EXE46's Avatar
EXE46
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 581
Likes: 27
From: Sofla
Default

70K is loaded M340i money and even then, it's alot. Mine was a hair over 60. This Acura shouldn't exceed 55k, it's an inferior product and Acura simply lacks the cachet to sell at that price. Still don't see the Acura appeal when the Stinger is better in all categories.
Old 09-15-20 | 11:03 AM
  #203  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 66
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by Kense
You can't be serious. Acura isn't that stupid to price a car the same as a C43 AMG.
The base price of a Type S isn't that far off a C43 AMG ($58K). And that's still missing a mountain of features from the Advance Package. Assuming Acura lets you add on all the features of the Advance Package onto the Type S, I am certain it will cross the $60K threshold. Some fancy wheels and body kits will bring that up to $65-70K easily.

Who would pay for it? I'm not sure, but the Civic Type R flies out the dealerships at $40K.
Old 09-15-20 | 12:05 PM
  #204  
UDel's Avatar
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,274
Likes: 296
From: ------
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
Oh boy, can't wait to see what other packages are going to bring this up near the $70K pricetag.
I don't think the top package is going to be above 60K, rumors are Type S is around 54K, highest optioned around high 50's. No way are they going to slap a 70K price on a loaded one, I don't even think the RLX hybrid got to 70K.
Old 09-15-20 | 12:14 PM
  #205  
geko29's Avatar
geko29
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,176
Likes: 340
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by GS3Tek
ES offers AWD now too
But not in combination with a V6 engine, which was @PauloFR 's point.
Old 09-15-20 | 12:16 PM
  #206  
UDel's Avatar
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 12,274
Likes: 296
From: ------
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
But not in combination with a V6 engine, which was @PauloFR 's point.
Plus it is a 350+hp V6 engine that will likely do 0-60 in under 5 sec with great handling.
Old 09-15-20 | 12:33 PM
  #207  
pbm317's Avatar
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,891
Likes: 12
From: Virginia
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
I don't think the top package is going to be above 60K, rumors are Type S is around 54K, highest optioned around high 50's. No way are they going to slap a 70K price on a loaded one, I don't even think the RLX hybrid got to 70K.
There's no point with Motorola, who is somehow convinced that Acura will stretch the Type S to somehow hit this $70K number he's had in his head for quite some time now.


Old 09-15-20 | 12:48 PM
  #208  
Motorola's Avatar
Motorola
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5,135
Likes: 66
From: N/A
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
There's no point with Motorola, who is somehow convinced that Acura will stretch the Type S to somehow hit this $70K number he's had in his head for quite some time now.
Yes, remember when a handful of people were arguing with me that the price would for a loaded Type S would top at $50K?

I don't think it'll hit $70K, but fully loaded, assuming Acura lets you load all the options on the Type S, I would expect this to be between $65-70K.
Old 09-15-20 | 01:46 PM
  #209  
EXE46's Avatar
EXE46
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 581
Likes: 27
From: Sofla
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
There's no point with Motorola, who is somehow convinced that Acura will stretch the Type S to somehow hit this $70K number he's had in his head for quite some time now.
Lol, nobody in their right mind would pay 60/70k for a FWD Acura sedan with faux tech SH-AWD which is junk compared to the competition's AWD. Those will sit on lots and then they're forced to sell at 20k discount. Acura would be dumb to price it that high.
Old 09-15-20 | 01:57 PM
  #210  
JBison73's Avatar
JBison73
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 528
Likes: 133
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
$70k for a TLX is more expensive than a loaded M340. I'd be surprised if it was that expensive given it's middling horsepower numbers.
I think the Type S will top out around 65k.

Which means 72-75k here in Canada. 😅

For that price, I'd rather get a muscle car or lease a BMW/Mercedes/Audi.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:37 AM.