California Banning Sales Of New Gasoline Cars In The State By 2035
#46
They can't keep the power on from people using AC too much but they want to force tens of millions of drivers into electrics. What could go wrong when tens of millions of electrics are being charged over night on top of the extra charging stations that are built/utilized, its going to be a nighmare.
the problem is not CA not having enough electricity. The problem is that usage from AC sky rockets at 3pm to 7pm when it is hottest so the grid can’t handle the peak usage. With electric cars, utility companies can and do incentivize cheaper rates when charging at night which would have no extra strain on the grid. So the blackouts and problems with the grid are not valid arguments
#48
#49
My own system currently generates 2x the energy i use so I have a net surplus of credits...i'm twice as green
#50
Unless CA allows for more energy production there is no way they will be able to charge the cars.
Let's not forget the added cost of the car as well. I can buy a truck for $25k right now. What will I do when when those are banned? Buy a $70k Rivian or Tesla? Unless electric vehicle prices come down most people won't be able to afford one.
Let's not forget the added cost of the car as well. I can buy a truck for $25k right now. What will I do when when those are banned? Buy a $70k Rivian or Tesla? Unless electric vehicle prices come down most people won't be able to afford one.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=38912
#51
Cali is the biggest importer of electricity in the US, but they are low emissions right. Just emitting in someone else backyard. Sure peak usage is lower at night but what if one accounts for millions of cars charging at night?
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=38912
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=38912
#52
Or, solar during the day feeds back into the grid to help with peak energy use during the day
#53
They give you credit for this which you use at night to charge the car.
i do agree though that home solar is the way to go for many but for almost all of america the cost of the system is too high or there's no incentives or there isn't enough sunlight.
#54
power company battery farms? do you know of a company that can store significant amounts of power?
sure, as long as the power company can deliver the power, which if they're more and more on solar they can't without a new to-be-invented magical power storage system.
i do agree though that home solar is the way to go for many but for almost all of america the cost of the system is too high or there's no incentives or there isn't enough sunlight.
sure, as long as the power company can deliver the power, which if they're more and more on solar they can't without a new to-be-invented magical power storage system.
i do agree though that home solar is the way to go for many but for almost all of america the cost of the system is too high or there's no incentives or there isn't enough sunlight.
Battery farms are alive and well in California. They just turned on the biggest one in the world. They have smaller ones too in California and the plan is to expand to store the renewable energy here. At night, there are natural gas plants that do supply electricity but the plan is to go to renewals and storage in the future. Natural gas is cleaner than coal and much cleaner than any ICE so overall, EVs in general are much much cleaner in California than any ICE. I'm sure many states also has California's situation where there is plenty of sun to warrant a solar solution at home. My breakeven is 6 years with my current solar system and I can charge 2 full EVs with the amount of power i generate (and thats how i spec'd my system). No reason not to get solar if you are in Arizona, Nevada, Florida, etc...
#56
the cost to store the energy 1 barrel of oil provides is over 100x more when you do it in a battery
https://youtu.be/X39W1U3Oqps
https://youtu.be/X39W1U3Oqps
#58
There is nothing easy about that, it will be extremely expensive and difficult to implement systems to provide that kind of power needed to charge tens of millions of electric cars not to mention still fulfill regular energy needs. Where are they going to get all that money, raise taxes even higher, they won't be getting much fuel taxes if they do that so electric bills are going to skyrocket too and many people are leaving California. It is not going to work.
#59
There is nothing easy about that, it will be extremely expensive and difficult to implement systems to provide that kind of power needed to charge tens of millions of electric cars not to mention still fulfill regular energy needs. Where are they going to get all that money, raise taxes even higher, they won't be getting much fuel taxes if they do that so electric bills are going to skyrocket too and many people are leaving California. It is not going to work.
The grid not being able to handle mass EVs is a myth. The current infrastructure can handle a 25% penetration of EVs which the current EV market isn't even close to (reference linked). It will take decades to get there and as EVs propagate, the utilities will expand because that is a lot more potential revenue for them.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-017-0074-z
#60
You already have an idea how much energy it costs, its built into the cost, which is 100x less for oil. Should I even ask how much energy it takes to make that battery?