Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

California Banning Sales Of New Gasoline Cars In The State By 2035

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-20, 03:07 PM
  #61  
LeX2K
Lexus Fanatic
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 20,551
Received 3,034 Likes on 2,549 Posts
Default

I'm talking about how much energy is in the oil already, not just what it takes to refine, store, transport etc.

Yes I do know how much energy it takes to make a battery, I've read all about well to wheel energy cost petrol vs. a BEV, and have watched a fair number of vids on the matter.
LeX2K is offline  
Old 09-25-20, 04:59 PM
  #62  
RA40
Super Moderator

iTrader: (6)
 
RA40's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 20,851
Received 472 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

CA could use grand infrastructure updates as the population has grown from the '40's-70's when most of the cities outside of LA were built up. This will bring that. The outer regions of the basin like Riverside county saw growth in the late 80's so they have the updates for the most part. For my neighbors with EV's they have had a 220V sub panel installed. They spend about ~$1K give take a bit for that. Summer and winter rates will vary along with the added generation charges as they build or update the service. In winter we are at tier 1 usage so my monthly is about $65. Summer tier 2 and our Sept billing statement hit $180.

Our SC Edison rates are:
Tier 1 $.21/kWH
Tier 2 $.27/kWH
Tier 3 $.33/kWH

I've run some numbers in the past for a Hybrid and those don't project in a typical timeline. The 5K annual miles driven and less since this Coronavirus has been going on makes operating the commuter quite tame. Gas at this point remains the flexible and affordable choice in my situation. As long as the remaining ICE are around there will be gas though at what costs will be interesting by then.
RA40 is offline  
Old 09-25-20, 05:25 PM
  #63  
gengar
Lexus Test Driver

 
gengar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NV
Posts: 5,285
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA40
Our SC Edison rates are:
Tier 1 $.21/kWH
Tier 2 $.27/kWH
Tier 3 $.33/kWH
LOL and I was just complaining to a friend here about the 11.22c/kwh flat rate here in NV (the context was the in-state energy monopoly). CA often seems like the default for why many other states shouldn't complain about anything.
gengar is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 05:21 AM
  #64  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,457
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Newsome will be long gone in 15 yrs. His executive order can be overturned easily by who ever is in power then. The world will have other issues to deal with by then and Ice vehicles may be necessary.
rogerh00 is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 05:24 AM
  #65  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,457
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sdls
So no electric Cadillacs or Ford Mustang Mach-e-Machs will be allowed?
I had the same thought. I'm sure the legislation will allow all Big 3 EV's, that's the whole purpose.
rogerh00 is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 06:09 AM
  #66  
FatherTo1
Racer
 
FatherTo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,846
Received 115 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95bat
Nope... we're having rolling blackouts because the power grid can't handle people using their air conditioners in the heat. CA can't keep the lights on, literally.


I'm in the Central Valley, medium sized city, and SCE (Southern California Edison) is our provider.

I looked up my electric bill just to verify. Our tier 1 rates are 21 cents per kwh and it varies by month how much electricity you get in tier 1. In July we got 726kwh in tier 1, but in August we got 638 kwh. To be fair, I found it does vary by area and we are among the highest. It gets hotter than two hamsters farting in a wool sock here and they charge us more because we use more electricity to run the AC. It's really awesome of them, raise the rates in the areas that need it most Additionally, our rates have increased by 15-17% each year for the last two years. I didn't go back any further, but I actually checked the last 3 years recently. Our bill was nearly $500 in July so I compared July 2019 and July 2018 with July 2020... 15-17% increase each year. I think I calculated it at 32.x% higher now compared to two years ago.

I actually really want to try out a Tesla, but the charging is too crazy here. I'd have to plug it in when I get home from work in the evening, unless I installed a 400V (or 300V, whatever it is) charger in my home that could quickly charge during the super-off peak hours. Otherwise it would be plugged into 110V and have to slowly charge during peak hours...

A lot of people have been getting solar panels here to help offset electric costs. They do help! But we're not sticking around here much longer so there is no point to buy panels. We will never see a return before we sell the house.
I live in NorCal and feel bad for anyone experiencing rolling blackouts. We have been fortunate that SMUD, our local utility, hasn't resorted to blackouts.

We have been on Time-Of-Day rates for several years now, no longer Tier 1, 2 , 3, etc. When we were on tiered pricing, solar effectively kept us in Tier 1 all the time, even in Summer. There was zero out-of-pocket cost to add solar because we went with the power purchase agreement, basically buying our solar electricity at a lower rate. It has worked out well and our monthly electricity costs today is about the same as we paid in 2013. Solar has basically guarded us from rate increases over the years (and future) despite us using more electricity with a Tesla. *Side-note: We signed up with solar in late 2013 with a company called Paramount Solar, which was bought out by Solar City. Elon was part of Solar City and brokered a deal to be acquired by Tesla. So now our solar bill comes from Tesla.

You don't need a 300 or 400 Volt system to charge an EV at home. A 240V NEMA 14-50 is the standard and many utilities give you a rebate on it so it effectively is free to install. Not only that, we pay only 7.15 cents per kW overnight to charge, 10x cheaper than what it costs to fuel our previous LS 460 (and current ES 330).

As much as I love our Model S, 15 years is not enough time to completely phase out ICE sales but it has to start sometime. There are some workloads that EVs are not yet ready to handle, such as commercial hauling or towing. I see a bunch of exceptions in the future for commercial vehicles.

So what does this mean for all the gas stations in California? They'll still be there to serve existing ICE vehicles but what about longterm?

Last edited by FatherTo1; 09-26-20 at 06:22 AM.
FatherTo1 is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 07:38 AM
  #67  
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
4TehNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,059
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA40
CA could use grand infrastructure updates as the population has grown from the '40's-70's when most of the cities outside of LA were built up. This will bring that. The outer regions of the basin like Riverside county saw growth in the late 80's so they have the updates for the most part. For my neighbors with EV's they have had a 220V sub panel installed. They spend about ~$1K give take a bit for that. Summer and winter rates will vary along with the added generation charges as they build or update the service. In winter we are at tier 1 usage so my monthly is about $65. Summer tier 2 and our Sept billing statement hit $180.

Our SC Edison rates are:
Tier 1 $.21/kWH
Tier 2 $.27/kWH
Tier 3 $.33/kWH

I've run some numbers in the past for a Hybrid and those don't project in a typical timeline. The 5K annual miles driven and less since this Coronavirus has been going on makes operating the commuter quite tame. Gas at this point remains the flexible and affordable choice in my situation. As long as the remaining ICE are around there will be gas though at what costs will be interesting by then.
no wonder solar is more viable here with outrageous energy costs. Paying 11-12 cents per kWh here and doesnt depend on which month it is

Last edited by 4TehNguyen; 09-26-20 at 07:46 AM.
4TehNguyen is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 08:41 AM
  #68  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95bat
Just a quick correction on California electric rates. We discussed this in another thread

We have a tiered system with our provider. The lower advertised rates are tier 1 and provide enough electricity to keep a fridge running, maybe a microwave, couple light bulbs... Once you hit tier 2 (which everyone does) we're paying over 40 cents per kwh. It is NOT that cheap to charge a car here. Depending on how much you drive, charging could push you into tier 3 which are ridiculous rates.
LOL, if that's the case I think people are just pretty damn stupid to live in California and dont install some type of solar panels on their home....I don't care if you have an EV or not.

Last edited by bagwell; 09-26-20 at 08:53 AM.
bagwell is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 08:51 AM
  #69  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
LOL, if that's the case I think people are just pretty damn stupid to live in California and dont install some type of solar panels on their home.
California is big. Each region is specific. 95bat lives in a relatively smaller population base compared to So-cal which has 11 cents kwh at night and 25 cents during day. 50 cents during peak of 4-9pm. Norther cali seems to pay more
EZZ is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 08:53 AM
  #70  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,509
Received 1,621 Likes on 1,034 Posts
Default

Crazy rates in CA. I pay a flat rate of 10.3 cents per KWH.
JDR76 is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 09:00 AM
  #71  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
Thread Starter
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
Crazy rates in CA. I pay a flat rate of 10.3 cents per KWH.
Overall, it pays to have solar. A solar installation is pretty cheap for a decent sized house...probably $30-50k. Of course, the houses here cost about a million easy so its not that much considering the overall cost of living.
EZZ is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 09:12 AM
  #72  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,509
Received 1,621 Likes on 1,034 Posts
Default

That’s not bad for solar. We’ve been planning a move down there at some point and solar is in our plans.
JDR76 is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 10:37 AM
  #73  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,435
Received 66 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95bat
Unless CA allows for more energy production there is no way they will be able to charge the cars.
Let's not forget the added cost of the car as well. I can buy a truck for $25k right now. What will I do when when those are banned? Buy a $70k Rivian or Tesla? Unless electric vehicle prices come down most people won't be able to afford one.


You're contradicting yourself here. When you say the grid can't handle the peak usage it literally means CA doesn't have enough electricity. The electric companies cannot keep up with demand = not enough. They can't handle the required usage leading to blackouts. Environmentalists have also pushed wind/solar so much companies like PG&E have spent less on maintaining lines and more on wind/solar development. Those old lines are what caused some of the CA fires. The Camp Fire was caused by 100 year old PG&E equipment! So now we have blackouts due to bad weather too.

I think we COULD have enough electricity, but the utility companies are restricted in production. Plus the whole failed nuclear reactor ordeal in San Onofre. During our last heat wave the governor allowed the electric companies to increase production and even purchased out-of-state electricity.

I don't see how it would be possible for the current grid to support a large number of electric vehicles. I guess that means even higher rates so utility companies can repair the grid to prepare for all of the electric vehicles... I'm glad I won't be here to pay for it. Edit - I wanted to add that I am really rooting for all of this to work out, the electric stuff. I an fascinated by the idea of nearly zero maintenance and ridiculous acceleration. I will even get over not being able to make noise doing it. I am rooting for some big updates, I just don't want to pay more for them Over 30% of my paycheck already disappears, I don't want to lose more!
Someone will have to pay for the green initiatives coming. ...as everything turns to electric battery cars, where do the batteries get recycled...who pays for that? I am not sure where it stands but some governments are proposing consumers install/upgrade to electric furnaces. Gas has been the most cost effective way to fuel for 100+ years...as everyone plugs-in, the cost of electricity goes up...road taxes need to be collected...it goes on and on...I fully believe the cost/taxes etc of a green car will end up costing more than a gas car at some point

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 09-26-20 at 10:43 AM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 11:12 AM
  #74  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,419
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
Crazy rates in CA. I pay a flat rate of 10.3 cents per KWH.
Next time you look at your monthly electric-bill, check it out. I'll bet that you find that, like here in Virginia, what you pay in Washington for the flat KW-fee is nowhere near the total for the bill. A large percentage of it goes to Federal/state/local fees/taxes, Consumption taxes, Generation fees, fuel fees, and all kinds of B.S. add-on stuff. And then, on top of that, there's a late-fee if you don't pay by a certain date (usually 2-3 weeks later), and you are also asked if you want to voluntarily contribute an extra payment, over and above the bill itself, for the Energy-Share program to benefit people who who can't pay their bills.

One thing, though, in Washington, that helps (and something that California lacks) is the huge Grand Coulee Dam, which itself produces a lot of hydroelectric power.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 09-26-20, 11:14 AM
  #75  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,509
Received 1,621 Likes on 1,034 Posts
Default

Oh yes, there are taxes of course. Not very much, though, at 6%. My last bill was $61 in electricity and about $3 in taxes, so $64 total.

Last edited by JDR76; 09-26-20 at 11:17 AM.
JDR76 is offline  


Quick Reply: California Banning Sales Of New Gasoline Cars In The State By 2035



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:25 AM.