Lexus IS500 F SPORT Performance
#286
If anything, it shows that an F is (well, was) way more than just dropping a big engine into a car. Much in the same way AMG used to mean more than just an engine tune and some body trim.
The PR on the IS500 just shows the direction Lexus decided to take here. Chock full of bluster.
Last edited by gengar; 02-22-21 at 09:54 PM.
#287
You're thinking from the perspective of an existing F car owner of which there are few and far between. Lexus, with the IS500 F-Sport, has just effectively lowered the price of entry for new and prospective Lexus buyers desiring the famed Lexus V8. To these people, the V8 is brand new and intoxicating with its engine note and 470hp. I actually suspect the IS500 will be a surprise sales hit.
#288
Even LS500 with rwd is rated at 4.6 with 414hp in V6tt form.
#289
I don’t see Lexus getting too concerned with 0-60 times and 1/4 mile times. The F cars tend to focus more on handling, braking, damping, steering, sound, F aesthetic.
Either this is bc they know they’ll be slower bc of the NA engine and have just accepted that reality, or they’re just doing their own thing. I hope it’s the latter, and I’ve liked the F cars that Lexus has produced including the original ISF.
Either this is bc they know they’ll be slower bc of the NA engine and have just accepted that reality, or they’re just doing their own thing. I hope it’s the latter, and I’ve liked the F cars that Lexus has produced including the original ISF.
#290
You're thinking from the perspective of an existing F car owner of which there are few and far between. Lexus, with the IS500 F-Sport, has just effectively lowered the price of entry for new and prospective Lexus buyers desiring the famed Lexus V8. To these people, the V8 is brand new and intoxicating with its engine note and 470hp. I actually suspect the IS500 will be a surprise sales hit.
#291
IS500 will be cheaper than RCF, it doesnt have most of the F components that RCF has and its using parts bin components. If they make this starting 55k its going to completely shat over the M340 which is the same price. If Lexus was smart they would make the tons of option packages for upgraded interior, brakes, TVD etc. I honestly would be fine with just the V8 and mark levinson audio
#292
IS500 will be cheaper than RCF, it doesnt have most of the F components that RCF has and its using parts bin components. If they make this starting 55k its going to completely shat over the M340 which is the same price. If Lexus was smart they would make the tons of option packages for upgraded interior, brakes, TVD etc. I honestly would be fine with just the V8 and mark levinson audio
#293
#294
IS500 will be cheaper than RCF, it doesnt have most of the F components that RCF has and its using parts bin components. If they make this starting 55k its going to completely shat over the M340 which is the same price. If Lexus was smart they would make the tons of option packages for upgraded interior, brakes, TVD etc. I honestly would be fine with just the V8 and mark levinson audio
i don't know what other buyers are like, but the performance/handling of my lc FAR exceeds any driving i'm going to be doing in it. a car like a mclaren would be utterly wasted on me. for me, the lc represents a driving experience, between the beautiful interior and exterior, the sounds, the raw mechanical nature of it, the quality of everything, and the amazing all wheel steering and handling.
i know the is500 isn't an lc500, but it will still be a GREAT experience to drive. anyone who doesn't enjoy it just isn't into cars. it could always be 'more' but then there would be more $$ too.
#295
Putting the same engine into an IS doesnt make it an LC. There are so many special things about the LC that won't be present here, every facet of the LC is an experience. The styling, the beauty, the interior, the feel behind the wheel...AND the engine. If you drive an RC F and then drive an LC, the RC F is nowhere near as special.
I don't mean to sound negative, but I don't think we're wrong by not being over the moon by being thrown this bone by Lexus.
I don't mean to sound negative, but I don't think we're wrong by not being over the moon by being thrown this bone by Lexus.
#296
#298
I don’t see Lexus getting too concerned with 0-60 times and 1/4 mile times. The F cars tend to focus more on handling, braking, damping, steering, sound, F aesthetic.
Either this is bc they know they’ll be slower bc of the NA engine and have just accepted that reality, or they’re just doing their own thing. I hope it’s the latter, and I’ve liked the F cars that Lexus has produced including the original ISF.
Either this is bc they know they’ll be slower bc of the NA engine and have just accepted that reality, or they’re just doing their own thing. I hope it’s the latter, and I’ve liked the F cars that Lexus has produced including the original ISF.
#299
CT5 2.0 237hp
CT5 3.0 335hp
CT5-V 3.0 360hp
CT5-V Blackwing 668hp
#300
Last edited by Toys4RJill; 02-23-21 at 07:56 AM.