Lexus IS500 F SPORT Performance
#421
That’s correct romini. But businesses, for the most part, have to change with the times or fall behind. Maybe small changes and one or two systems at a time. And see if there’s enough public interest to build on and make it worthwhile. How about a business opportunity for one of today’s big car enthusiast like “*****in Rides” follow in Carroll Shelby footsteps. Take a limited number of Stock Mustangs and turn them into highly collectible modified beasts. Just like the Yenko Nova, Callaway Vetts, Roush...
#422
Is the IS500 F-Sport Performance the spiritual successor of the E90 M3 sedan, except reliable and minus the manual?
On the surface, they seem very similar, both normally aspirated V8s, both 400+ hp, RWD only with LSD, both electronically adjustable suspension, both on the surface have very easily adjustable and very immediate throttle response due to the free revving NA V8 engine. Both Daily Driveable 4 doors with acceptable ride quality on normal roads. Very similar 0-60 times.
People have critiqued the F80 M3 as too mechanical and the boosted engine power response makes it hard to drive smoothly unlike the NA V8 E90 M3. Could Lexus have inadvertently captured the essence of the E90 M3 sedan(previously hailed the world's most complete car) with the IS500 F-Sport Performance?
Could people wanting to relive the old school BMW driving experience obtain it with the IS500, now with added liveability and much better reliablity?
In that case, the IS500 could be a hidden gem and future classic. Imagine : " Classic BMW, except without the headaches."
On the surface, they seem very similar, both normally aspirated V8s, both 400+ hp, RWD only with LSD, both electronically adjustable suspension, both on the surface have very easily adjustable and very immediate throttle response due to the free revving NA V8 engine. Both Daily Driveable 4 doors with acceptable ride quality on normal roads. Very similar 0-60 times.
People have critiqued the F80 M3 as too mechanical and the boosted engine power response makes it hard to drive smoothly unlike the NA V8 E90 M3. Could Lexus have inadvertently captured the essence of the E90 M3 sedan(previously hailed the world's most complete car) with the IS500 F-Sport Performance?
Could people wanting to relive the old school BMW driving experience obtain it with the IS500, now with added liveability and much better reliablity?
In that case, the IS500 could be a hidden gem and future classic. Imagine : " Classic BMW, except without the headaches."
Last edited by natnut; 02-25-21 at 10:08 PM.
#423
Sure like the one the Launch Video?
DHP Package = $0 "Standard"
Infrared = $595
Navigation / ML = $2,750
Premium Tripple Beam HL = $1,400
Power Moonroof = $1,100
Park Assit, Rear Ped Detect & Pano View Montitors = $1400
More or Less they are not putting them in the show room stripped down.. It's not the business model.
Joe Z
DHP Package = $0 "Standard"
Infrared = $595
Navigation / ML = $2,750
Premium Tripple Beam HL = $1,400
Power Moonroof = $1,100
Park Assit, Rear Ped Detect & Pano View Montitors = $1400
More or Less they are not putting them in the show room stripped down.. It's not the business model.
Joe Z
#424
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,441
Likes: 1,064
From: Under an IS F since 2008
The price is still $49K and this build configuration is NOT in any dealership inventory..
Just going with what we know today!! Apples to Apples
Joe Z
#425
of course businesses have to change and adapt to the market, but there should a single tone and direction instead of all over the map. if they decided to cancel the GS last year and then this year say hey let's do a is500 fun car, it really makes people wonder what management is thinking. mb and bmw always have sports in mind, they have specific divisions for them. now we can argue about their approach on performance (moving to forced induction, diluted msport and amg lines, etc...), but key is they have a sports segment. can't say the same about lexus, and now with is500 it still doesn't fill the void on true F. i am waiting
Last edited by iceman28; 02-26-21 at 01:55 PM.
#426
But we already know that there are features that are optional on the IS350 that are going to be standard on the IS500, such as the F-Sport fluff and AVS/LSD. So it makes no sense to use the price of an IS without these options as the reference point. A vague, anecdotal "mid 40's" is obviously irrelevant when, as has been pointed out repeatedly to you, an IS350 F-Sport with only the AVS/LSD package and no other options is already $48,550.
This is why your arguments in this thread have been so incoherent. You keep comparing things that aren't comparable, using words you later claim you didn't mean, or changing your arguments from post to post.
That's why I asked you to be specific about your numbers. And we can already see they don't add up.
This is why your arguments in this thread have been so incoherent. You keep comparing things that aren't comparable, using words you later claim you didn't mean, or changing your arguments from post to post.
That's why I asked you to be specific about your numbers. And we can already see they don't add up.
I don't know if this V8 IS F sport will sell, don't know where they are going to price it at, I do know a 70K+ full on IS F will fail, fail worse then the previous one, just like all the previous pricey F's have failed. If they price this V8 IS anywhere close to the RC-F or in the 60's it will fail too whether they have expensive IS350 option packages that take it into the mid 50's has nothing to do with it, they kind of paint themselves in a corner with that pricing and still wanting to offer a V8 version at a attractive price. There can also be some overlap in pricing, maybe even some buzz that hey you can get a V8 IS for very close to or around the price of a loaded IS350 F Sport, I don't think they would hurt excitement or sales of a V8 IS.
#427
You do know Lexus sold more than double the IS F's in the USA the first MY (2008) than AMG sold C43s for the entire W202 generation? And that's just picking two cars I've personally had. Pretty unbelievable the absolute nonsense people spout on here. It's no wonder you have to strawman so hard (I've argued literally none of the things you accuse me of).
#428
Gonna go out on a limb and say that is a little disappointing. To come all this way, bringing back the hot rod engine, giving it more power, but still the same quickness as 2008. I think we are just spoiled, as 4.5 is nothing to sneeze at.
A well-optioned S4 seems like a compelling combination of speed and price. Hopefully Lexus prices it close to that ($55k).
A well-optioned S4 seems like a compelling combination of speed and price. Hopefully Lexus prices it close to that ($55k).
#430
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,441
Likes: 1,064
From: Under an IS F since 2008
My argument is the only one that makes sense, yours is failed and has no basis in reality. You want Lexus to only build some super duper full on IS-F with a tricked out twin turbo V8, body kit, big brakes, high end wheels, carbon fiber this and that, performance exhaust etc to fully take on a BMW M3 which means the price will be at least 70K or likely more and it will again fail worse then the RC-F or GS-F and you are complaining that they didn't do that, are just offering a nice V8 at likely a much more reasonable price.....
"If you build they will come ???" That was the pitch for the GS F we wanted that unfortunately didn't sell well at all.. And now the GS is history..!!
Replaced by ES350 F Sport ?
Insert -> RC F Track Edition / Fuji Speedway Edition
$105K on the showroom floor - limited 60 units ish
Joe Z
#431
I’m with you. The thing is that either there is a bean counter(s) making the call or an enthusiast. As I see it that Hot Rod market is hot hot hot. Dollar for dollar how do you compete with the new Vette, the new Supra (BMW) is not the answer. GM put their toes in the water with the 2014- 2018 SS impala. 400 + horse 6 speed manual with all the bells and whistles for it’s time. It was a bust. There are no Lee Iacocca’s, John DeLorean or Carol Shelby out there that I know of willing to take the risk. Offer the 358 Camry motor in something.And MAKE IT AFFORDABLE, NOT A LIMITED EDITION WITH MARKET ADJUSTMENTS ADDED ON to the price.
lexus F, if exists, should just go against bmw m and mb amg. imho the isf was not a great but still very good attempt (mainly because the car was an afterthought). it was a clear head to head fight against the m3 which i was both surprised and excited about. part of the reason why i was very close from getting one. it showed that lexus had the ability to compete. i am not saying it was the winner but it was in the same pack. it took AMG years before they really built up a good lineup and following, as well as gaining the reputation they have now. lexus can't expect to have one car and achieve the same.
it takes time and patience, and i think that's exactly where lexus failed. like you said, too many voices and not a strong enough person to lay down the direction. one day the accountant sent out the "ES rules" memo, and 3 months later the parts department manager screamed "we have too many leftover v8 here". it should be a big long term commitment and it probably will suck a lot of money before seeing any return. that's the call lexus has to make. i do hope this is500 performance is a start, and like i said they have to follow through (in a timely fashion) with a true F as well as future F offerings, otherwise it will just hurt them even more.
#432
i am a little confused, are you trying to stack up lexus F against the cars you mentioned? personally i am not sure if they are in the same segment. the market you mentioned is an even more complicated pile of mess imho, i think that segment is more random and yet at the same time each model already has some very loyal following.
lexus F, if exists, should just go against bmw m and mb amg. imho the isf was not a great but still very good attempt (mainly because the car was an afterthought). it was a clear head to head fight against the m3 which i was both surprised and excited about. part of the reason why i was very close from getting one. it showed that lexus had the ability to compete. i am not saying it was the winner but it was in the same pack. it took AMG years before they really built up a good lineup and following, as well as gaining the reputation they have now. lexus can't expect to have one car and achieve the same.
it takes time and patience, and i think that's exactly where lexus failed. like you said, too many voices and not a strong enough person to lay down the direction. one day the accountant sent out the "ES rules" memo, and 3 months later the parts department manager screamed "we have too many leftover v8 here". it should be a big long term commitment and it probably will suck a lot of money before seeing any return. that's the call lexus has to make. i do hope this is500 performance is a start, and like i said they have to follow through (in a timely fashion) with a true F as well as future F offerings, otherwise it will just hurt them even more.
lexus F, if exists, should just go against bmw m and mb amg. imho the isf was not a great but still very good attempt (mainly because the car was an afterthought). it was a clear head to head fight against the m3 which i was both surprised and excited about. part of the reason why i was very close from getting one. it showed that lexus had the ability to compete. i am not saying it was the winner but it was in the same pack. it took AMG years before they really built up a good lineup and following, as well as gaining the reputation they have now. lexus can't expect to have one car and achieve the same.
it takes time and patience, and i think that's exactly where lexus failed. like you said, too many voices and not a strong enough person to lay down the direction. one day the accountant sent out the "ES rules" memo, and 3 months later the parts department manager screamed "we have too many leftover v8 here". it should be a big long term commitment and it probably will suck a lot of money before seeing any return. that's the call lexus has to make. i do hope this is500 performance is a start, and like i said they have to follow through (in a timely fashion) with a true F as well as future F offerings, otherwise it will just hurt them even more.
Those companies are fully committed to those products. They have an M/AMG version for each SUV even. Lexus surely can do it but it will never happen - bec its too much $$$ and needs to be long term commitment accross the lineup. Therefore we should enjoy this IS500 and hope for LC-F.
M and AMG also watered down their products and brand image by slapping the badge on every car.
The only brand still left that cares about making drivers cars is Porsche imo but you will pay dearly for them and good luck securing a GT variant.
#433
i am a little confused, are you trying to stack up lexus F against the cars you mentioned? personally i am not sure if they are in the same segment. the market you mentioned is an even more complicated pile of mess imho, i think that segment is more random and yet at the same time each model already has some very loyal following.
lexus F, if exists, should just go against bmw m and mb amg. imho the isf was not a great but still very good attempt (mainly because the car was an afterthought). it was a clear head to head fight against the m3 which i was both surprised and excited about. part of the reason why i was very close from getting one. it showed that lexus had the ability to compete. i am not saying it was the winner but it was in the same pack. it took AMG years before they really built up a good lineup and following, as well as gaining the reputation they have now. lexus can't expect to have one car and achieve the same.
it takes time and patience, and i think that's exactly where lexus failed. like you said, too many voices and not a strong enough person to lay down the direction. one day the accountant sent out the "ES rules" memo, and 3 months later the parts department manager screamed "we have too many leftover v8 here". it should be a big long term commitment and it probably will suck a lot of money before seeing any return. that's the call lexus has to make. i do hope this is500 performance is a start, and like i said they have to follow through (in a timely fashion) with a true F as well as future F offerings, otherwise it will just hurt them even more.
lexus F, if exists, should just go against bmw m and mb amg. imho the isf was not a great but still very good attempt (mainly because the car was an afterthought). it was a clear head to head fight against the m3 which i was both surprised and excited about. part of the reason why i was very close from getting one. it showed that lexus had the ability to compete. i am not saying it was the winner but it was in the same pack. it took AMG years before they really built up a good lineup and following, as well as gaining the reputation they have now. lexus can't expect to have one car and achieve the same.
it takes time and patience, and i think that's exactly where lexus failed. like you said, too many voices and not a strong enough person to lay down the direction. one day the accountant sent out the "ES rules" memo, and 3 months later the parts department manager screamed "we have too many leftover v8 here". it should be a big long term commitment and it probably will suck a lot of money before seeing any return. that's the call lexus has to make. i do hope this is500 performance is a start, and like i said they have to follow through (in a timely fashion) with a true F as well as future F offerings, otherwise it will just hurt them even more.
#434
Nothing about a Camry NASCAR has anything to do with Toyota, other than Toyota choosing to pay to advertise by having that car be a "Camry".
Toyota has built race vehicles and competed in numerous racing circuits where they did develop and build the cars, but NASCAR ain't an example of that.
#435