Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Lexus IS500 F SPORT Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-21, 05:49 PM
  #451  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,721
Received 2,772 Likes on 1,979 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by patgilm
At this point all I know is I want Toyota to make a factory NASCAR Camry that I can drive on the road complete with fake headlights and a big V8 engine. Make it and they will come!
I know right? Just drop it in there...it'll destroy everybody. Dont know where people will get the racing fuel or the ear protection, but they'll find it somewhere! Night vision...it wont even need real headlights. Just don't try and turn right.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 02-28-21, 12:11 AM
  #452  
rominl
exclusive matchup
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,673
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by iceman28
I wasn’t even a little close to insinuating that Lexus should produce a one off Solara Resto Mod that wouldn’t be street legal in every state. Simply stated again, Lexus IMO could compete with BMW & MB by offering their TRD NASCAR motor (or variant) as a STOCK OPTION (not an engine swap) in the IS, RC and GS PRODUCTION cars. So they install the NASCAR V8 into a IS, RC or GS AT THE FACTORY as a STOCK option instead of a less powerful V8 or V6. Which is Nothing close to the RK Motor’s door slammer Toyota Solara. Especially not the Camry shell you’re mentioning. IMO this High Output V8 would up Lexus’ game in the high end high performance sedan market. Also the RK Motors 2010 Camry sold or was selling for $156K. I think you’ll agree with me that the RK car would not help Lexus’ bottom line. Furthermore I think we beat this horse silly.
evidently you don't really read and understand gengar's posts or SW17LS's posts so you are the only one going in circle. and honestly if the most you care is reliability, this isn't really a thread for you. you have enjoyed your lexus for 2 weeks, i have been doing it for 2 decades.
rominl is offline  
Old 02-28-21, 07:37 AM
  #453  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 88 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

The IS350 F-Sport seems dynamically very similar to the IS500 F-Sport Performance except for the larger brakes and Yamaha horizontal chassis dampers in the IS500 and the heavier V8 in the nose of the car. I wonder if the IS500 will handle similarly to the IS350 in the winding roads as shown in this review. The reviewer seems very impressed by the new Lexus Driving Signature and his main complaint was the IS350 engine was lacking in power in an otherwise sublime chassis. Perhaps the IS500 fixes that issue :

natnut is offline  
Old 02-28-21, 10:03 PM
  #454  
IceIridium
Instructor
iTrader: (2)
 
IceIridium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: BC
Posts: 984
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

If this is meant to be Lexus's answer to the S4 / M340 / C43 ranges, I really hope this does well, because if they're doing 472hp for this range then imagine the HP spec they'll need for a full-on new IS-F for the next generation!

THEN it might be enticing enough to finally pry my 08 IS-F for a trade-in!
IceIridium is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 09:08 AM
  #455  
UDel
Lexus Fanatic
 
UDel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ------
Posts: 12,274
Received 296 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gengar
You've argued here that the IS500 is perfectly reasonable at $58,500 but also that it will definitely be a sales failure at $60k. If that's "the only argument that makes sense" there's nothing we can hope to productively discuss.




You do know Lexus sold more than double the IS F's in the USA the first MY (2008) than AMG sold C43s for the entire W202 generation? And that's just picking two cars I've personally had. Pretty unbelievable the absolute nonsense people spout on here. It's no wonder you have to strawman so hard (I've argued literally none of the things you accuse me of).
My argument is if they price this 8 Cylinder F Sport in the 50's it could likely get some decent sales/interest, if they price it in the 60's, it won't, there is generally a 10K difference between priced in the 50's and 60's, I am saying starting more around the mid 50's and not going into the 60's fully loaded. You are going to the extremes in pricing to try to make your argument work/mine not by throwing out the very high 50's compared to very low 60's.

You are cherry picking one AMG model/gen out of so many over the years that wasn't very successful comparing it to the original IS-F to try to prove a point which doesn't mean anything when you consider how much success AMG and M have had over the years/gens/all the models, you also aren't taking in world wide sales where AMG/M cars sell very well, especially Europe(I believe they normally sell more in UK/Europe then US) where the F cars have very little sales outside of the US(they allocated about 150 IS-F's to the UK market, about 500 a year targeted sales in Japan). In regards to the 203 C class(not really a shining example of Mercedes cars) AMG's, didn't they originally super charge a 6 cylinder for the first few years and then after several years replaced it with the C55AMG which probably accounted for lower sales/interest for that gen AMG's?

Talking of expensive Japanese luxury sedans in general, what is going on with the GS, RLX, Infiniti M/Q70? They have all been unfortunately killed over the past few years due to poor sales. Why were sales poor, you can say each had its weaknesses which they did but also because they were pricey and hit too high of price points that many buyers don't want to pay for Japanese luxury cars. What is happening to the current LS500? It is failing too, due to many reasons other then price but also because the nicer equipped ones that you want are nudging at 100K. What happened when the GTR's price went up so much despite constant improvements, its sales plummeted, new NSX is a great car yet it can't manage any sales. I could go on and on but the fact is expensive Japanese cars generally don't fare well in the market unless they just nail it and even then the price has to really be right/seen as a bargain.

The F cars were not good sellers for Lexus, the last 2 have failed which is why they have to try something new like mainly just giving buyers the V8/power option they want in a IS without all the other stuff that drives the price up so high to hopefully generate some more sales/interest in higher performance Lexus cars so full on F's may get more sales/interest in the future. I don't see anything wrong with that, I just don't see why anyone would complain about that or be so disappointed, I don't see why shoe horning that V8 in a IS means there can't also be a full on IS-F or RC-F in the future. I wish they would have shoe horned that V8 in a GS and just offered it at a lower price then the GS-F or better yet offered a lesser tuned version of that V8 as a very affordable V8 option in the GS from the get go instead of the hybrid, maybe then the GS would have been more successful and not killed, who knows.
UDel is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 09:16 AM
  #456  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,262
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

^
They also waited way too long to bring GSF to market - after refresh and to me the car is very underwhelming. It was significantly underpowered compared to E63, M5, CTS-V. In that executive performance class - power #s are everything.

They are doing same thing now with LC - waiting forever to bring LCF model to market. Again consistency of new products and product investment is key and something that Lexus has never followed through on their various performance vehicles/parts - TRD, TTE, Ltuned, Fsport etc. I have seen it all.....
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 09:35 AM
  #457  
Joe Z
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joe Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Under an IS F since 2008
Posts: 13,441
Received 1,064 Likes on 586 Posts
Exclamation

Originally Posted by IceIridium
If this is meant to be Lexus's answer to the S4 / M340 / C43 ranges, I really hope this does well, because if they're doing 472hp for this range then imagine the HP spec they'll need for a full-on new IS-F for the next generation!

THEN it might be enticing enough to finally pry my 08 IS-F for a trade-in!
@IceIridium

IF there was an IS F in the planned pipeline, they would have needed to start it a few years back...
(see sample of the LC F prototype circling Nurburgring)

Currently I don't see a true IS "F" car coming anytime soon!! Insert the IS 500

Even the LC F has been halted or still questionable based on several reports few months back.

@RNM GS3 Sharing truth and honest opinions should be welcomed by Lexus Intl / USA / JP.. Otherwise we'll keep getting the same "no more boring cars"

We can't just keep hopping on the same "thank you Lexus" bandwagon...

Joe Z

Last edited by Joe Z; 03-01-21 at 09:42 AM.
Joe Z is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 10:42 AM
  #458  
gengar
Lexus Test Driver

 
gengar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NV
Posts: 5,285
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
You are going to the extremes in pricing to try to make your argument work/mine not by throwing out the very high 50's compared to very low 60's.
ROFL, I'm using the number you provided. You're the one who said "around 10k" is a reasonable premium for dropping the V8 into the IS, and that's where the $58.500 figure comes from. This is precisely why I asked that you be specific, because otherwise in this thread you just keep making vague and obscure statements, then when challenged, attempt to weasel out of it with more vague and obscure statements. Whenever we stick to specific numbers and facts, we see how little sense your argument makes, and that's why your statements here are so easily dismissed.

Originally Posted by UDel
You are cherry picking one AMG model/gen out of so many over the years that wasn't very successful comparing it to the original IS-F...
Cherry-picked??? Then you know absolutely nothing about AMG history. The reason I picked these two cars is that they were the first AMG and F cars made in-house by MB and Lexus.

And to further debunk this "cherry-picking" nonsense, the C36 sold even fewer units in the USA than the C43. But IMO that wasn't a fair comparison since, again, this was before AMG production went in-house at MB.
gengar is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 11:03 AM
  #459  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,721
Received 2,772 Likes on 1,979 Posts
Default

This car will be solidly in the $60k range. No way its optioned in the 50s.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 11:48 AM
  #460  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,262
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Z
@IceIridium

IF there was an IS F in the planned pipeline, they would have needed to start it a few years back...
(see sample of the LC F prototype circling Nurburgring)

Currently I don't see a true IS "F" car coming anytime soon!! Insert the IS 500

Even the LC F has been halted or still questionable based on several reports few months back.

@RNM GS3 Sharing truth and honest opinions should be welcomed by Lexus Intl / USA / JP.. Otherwise we'll keep getting the same "no more boring cars"

We can't just keep hopping on the same "thank you Lexus" bandwagon...

Joe Z
I have been sharing my opinion for years when i left the brand years ago. 😀
Right now its too late to revamp ICE performance so let’s be greatful for the “old” V8 they still have. Any future ICE performance models Lexus can bring to market would be highly appreciated.

If you want pure performance brand with enthousiast focus - you need to go to Porsche in the current marketplace.


RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 11:50 AM
  #461  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,262
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
This car will be solidly in the $60k range. No way its optioned in the 50s.
It could start at high $50s like 57-59k or they can just offer fully loaded model for $63-65k.
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 11:54 AM
  #462  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
It could start at high $50s like 57-59k or they can just offer fully loaded model for $63-65k.
This is what I think they will do. I think they will be very successful if they do this
EZZ is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 12:03 PM
  #463  
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (24)
 
Kira X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 東京都
Posts: 11,320
Received 445 Likes on 367 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
^
They also waited way too long to bring GSF to market - after refresh and to me the car is very underwhelming. It was significantly underpowered compared to E63, M5, CTS-V. In that executive performance class - power #s are everything.

They are doing same thing now with LC - waiting forever to bring LCF model to market. Again consistency of new products and product investment is key and something that Lexus has never followed through on their various performance vehicles/parts - TRD, TTE, Ltuned, Fsport etc. I have seen it all.....
I agree with this. They wait too long to put out the performance version of their cars. The GS-F and LC-F should have come much earlier on. The GS- should have had more power, especially for how expensive the car was. The competition was much more powerful.

It’s interesting that you pointed out all of the Lexus performance part names. They didn’t seem consistent with anything for a while. I remember seeing L-Tuned, TTE, and TRD parts on the first generation IS and second generation GS.

Kira X is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 03:24 PM
  #464  
perfctreig
Intermediate
 
perfctreig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 340
Received 63 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
M and AMG also watered down their products and brand image by slapping the badge on every car.
Totally agree. I love the e39 and the e39 BMW M5 cars. I dream of driving one. One of my friends has a BMW "M-Sport" car. I look at it and laugh. It is cute, and she's happy with it, but I keep thinking it is a wannabe. Simply a sales marketing gimmick.
perfctreig is offline  
Old 03-01-21, 04:54 PM
  #465  
rominl
exclusive matchup
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,673
Received 190 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
I have been sharing my opinion for years when i left the brand years ago. 😀
Right now its too late to revamp ICE performance so let’s be greatful for the “old” V8 they still have. Any future ICE performance models Lexus can bring to market would be highly appreciated.

If you want pure performance brand with enthousiast focus - you need to go to Porsche in the current marketplace.
amen to that man, porsche listens to their buyers and people are willing to pay premium for it.

you are also right about AMG and M slapping their badge on everything. very sad move. it started out with the fsport, and then later on audi bmw and mb jumped on it, sigh...
rominl is offline  


Quick Reply: Lexus IS500 F SPORT Performance



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 AM.