BMW confirms not scrapping ICEs...
#31
Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
If someone doesn't force it...the transition will never get off the ground.
#32
Do you even realize how ridiculous and contradicting this statement is? Attitudes as such is exactly why many people resent EVs and their owners. This being said, the US and other Western governments love to implement self destructive policies. It's fun to watch the society slowly implode.
#35
Originally Posted by Och
Do you even realize how ridiculous and contradicting this statement is? Attitudes as such is exactly why many people resent EVs and their owners. This being said, the US and other Western governments love to implement self destructive policies. It's fun to watch the society slowly implode.
#36
At some point being when majority of sales are EV. Not ridiculous at all. At least you get a chance to own an ICE vs outright ban. It's ridiculous that people think they can keep burning fossil fuels forever without ramifications. It's finally transitioning which is a GOOD thing.
#38
Originally Posted by Och
Where do you think electricity comes from? In the US about 80% comes from burning fossils and nuclear, and only 20% is "renewable", out of which almost 10% is hydro. Anyone who thinks we can just stop burning fossils is completely divorced from reality.
#39
At some point being when majority of sales are EV. Not ridiculous at all. At least you get a chance to own an ICE vs outright ban. It's ridiculous that people think they can keep burning fossil fuels forever without ramifications. It's finally transitioning which is a GOOD thing.
It is ridiculous to think nickel, lithium, sodium, etc massive strip mining can go on forever or be implemented without ramifications.
Where do you think the energy comes from to charge all these big batteries? The vast majority of it is not renewable nor is it possible to provide the energy needs to most of the developed world through renewables, renewables still need non renewables to back them up when they fail, energy demands are too high. There is also no way you are replacing ICE engines in ships, boats, 18 wheelers, military vehicles, aircraft which are the biggest polluters with EV's for a very long time, it would be way too complicated and way too expensive, most trucking companies have such small profit margins with their current fleet and paying drivers less and less.
#40
Its ridiculous to think countries/govt. needs to force EV's on the populations when they don't solve really anything, ban ICE/burning fossil fuels and they can't be utilized in someway for a very long time along with options of other energy means.
It is ridiculous to think nickel, lithium, sodium, etc massive strip mining can go on forever or be implemented without ramifications.
Where do you think the energy comes from to charge all these big batteries? The vast majority of it is not renewable nor is it possible to provide the energy needs to most of the developed world through renewables, renewables still need non renewables to back them up when they fail, energy demands are too high. There is also no way you are replacing ICE engines in ships, boats, 18 wheelers, military vehicles, aircraft which are the biggest polluters with EV's for a very long time, it would be way too complicated and way too expensive, most trucking companies have such small profit margins with their current fleet and paying drivers less and less.
It is ridiculous to think nickel, lithium, sodium, etc massive strip mining can go on forever or be implemented without ramifications.
Where do you think the energy comes from to charge all these big batteries? The vast majority of it is not renewable nor is it possible to provide the energy needs to most of the developed world through renewables, renewables still need non renewables to back them up when they fail, energy demands are too high. There is also no way you are replacing ICE engines in ships, boats, 18 wheelers, military vehicles, aircraft which are the biggest polluters with EV's for a very long time, it would be way too complicated and way too expensive, most trucking companies have such small profit margins with their current fleet and paying drivers less and less.
#41
Originally Posted by UDel
Its ridiculous to think countries/govt. needs to force EV's on the populations when they don't solve really anything, ban ICE/burning fossil fuels and they can't be utilized in someway for a very long time along with options of other energy means.
It is ridiculous to think nickel, lithium, sodium, etc massive strip mining can go on forever or be implemented without ramifications.
Where do you think the energy comes from to charge all these big batteries? The vast majority of it is not renewable nor is it possible to provide the energy needs to most of the developed world through renewables, renewables still need non renewables to back them up when they fail, energy demands are too high. There is also no way you are replacing ICE engines in ships, boats, 18 wheelers, military vehicles, aircraft which are the biggest polluters with EV's for a very long time, it would be way too complicated and way too expensive, most trucking companies have such small profit margins with their current fleet and paying drivers less and less.
It is ridiculous to think nickel, lithium, sodium, etc massive strip mining can go on forever or be implemented without ramifications.
Where do you think the energy comes from to charge all these big batteries? The vast majority of it is not renewable nor is it possible to provide the energy needs to most of the developed world through renewables, renewables still need non renewables to back them up when they fail, energy demands are too high. There is also no way you are replacing ICE engines in ships, boats, 18 wheelers, military vehicles, aircraft which are the biggest polluters with EV's for a very long time, it would be way too complicated and way too expensive, most trucking companies have such small profit margins with their current fleet and paying drivers less and less.
#42
Why do passenger cars that aren't the big polluters and the general population that buys them have to get punished with bans/fines/penalties/forced into EV's?
There is just no need to do it especially so quickly, this focus on EVs is really a more political agenda about power, money, control, and trying to convince the public something is being done or politicians/govt is more useful then it is when there are other far greater problems they need to and should address that they won't, can't, or don't want to.
#43
Originally Posted by UDel
Why do you have to start somewhere in regards to forced EV implementation/banning ICE? Why does there need to be pain? Some people have this delusion about EV's like they are miracles of engineering and solve so many problems when they don't. The treat them like they run on water or can float/fly and are such a positive revolution when they simply aren't.
Why do passenger cars that aren't the big polluters and the general population that buys them have to get punished with bans/fines/penalties/forced into EV's?
There is just no need to do it especially so quickly, this focus on EVs is really a more political agenda about power, money, control, and trying to convince the public something is being done or politicians/govt is more useful then it is when there are other far greater problems they need to and should address that they won't, can't, or don't want to.
Why do passenger cars that aren't the big polluters and the general population that buys them have to get punished with bans/fines/penalties/forced into EV's?
There is just no need to do it especially so quickly, this focus on EVs is really a more political agenda about power, money, control, and trying to convince the public something is being done or politicians/govt is more useful then it is when there are other far greater problems they need to and should address that they won't, can't, or don't want to.