Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Scotty talks about Tesla’s being green

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-21, 09:28 AM
  #136  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Are there Porsche EVs models on the market that are faster than Tesla models? Are there any Ford EVs are faster than the Tesla models?
Nope. Only one I can think of is Rimac but it costs a million dollars.
EZZ is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 09:29 AM
  #137  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,218
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
Nope. Only one I can think of is Rimac but it costs a million dollars.
Only very top spec Tesla models are faster. By how much? 1/2 a second?
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 09:37 AM
  #138  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Only very top spec Tesla models are faster. By how much? 1/2 a second?
The Plaid Model on sale now will do 0-60 in about 2 seconds flat. So 1/2 second faster than the Taycan Turbo S but will be cheaper with more range. The Model 3 is faster than a $100k Taycan 4s with the same range at about 1/2 the price. Nothing Ford sells currently can catch a Model Y but the new GT Mach E may come close to the Model Y Performance but will be more expensive due to a bigger battery but should have equivalent range. Tesla is 3 or more years ahead of the competition still.
EZZ is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 09:41 AM
  #139  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,218
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
The Plaid Model on sale now will do 0-60 in about 2 seconds flat. So 1/2 second faster than the Taycan Turbo S but will be cheaper with more range. The Model 3 is faster than a $100k Taycan 4s with the same range at about 1/2 the price. Nothing Ford sells currently can catch a Model Y but the new GT Mach E may come close to the Model Y Performance but will be more expensive due to a bigger battery but should have equivalent range. Tesla is 3 or more years ahead of the competition still.
Are there any Porsche Taycans on the market that are faster than any Tesla 3s?
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 09:48 AM
  #140  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Are there any Porsche Taycans on the market that are faster than any Tesla 3s?
The Taycan Turbo and Turbo S. Turbo starts at $155k, the Turbo S starts at $185k and these have no options. Typical Porsche option upgrades about $25k...the options alone represent almost 50% of the Model 3 price
EZZ is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 09:53 AM
  #141  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,457
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
Carbon credits is not a new idea probably goes back to the Kyoto Protocol or earlier. The term has 70 million search hits if that's a hidden tax, conspiracy or some other nefarious scheme it's the worst kept secret ever.

edit- google tells me carbon credits have been around since the 90's at least.
My understanding is they started in California during the LA smog crisis. Ca adopted a stringent emissions standard that was eventually adopted by about 11 more States which came to be called the CARB states. At present this why non CARB states don't get vehicles like the Rav4 prime.
rogerh00 is online now  
Old 05-07-21, 09:54 AM
  #142  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,218
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
The Taycan Turbo and Turbo S. Turbo starts at $155k, the Turbo S starts at $185k and these have no options. Typical Porsche option upgrades about $25k...the options alone represent almost 50% of the Model 3 price
I understand that Porsche has 800V architecture…what is Tesla at?
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 09:59 AM
  #143  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I understand that Porsche has 800V architecture…what is Tesla at?
400V. Unknown for the 4680 cell coming later. The 800v architecture helps with charging, not performance. The fastest Taycan charging speeds exceed Teslas. 270kw vs 250kw. Also, the 800v can allow for longer high speed charging sessions. It's not hard to go 800v but it costs more and Teslas legacy Superchargers are all 400V so it wouldn't do Tesla any good. Hyundai and Kia have gone to 800v already.
EZZ is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 10:00 AM
  #144  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,457
Received 45 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
LOL, maybe one way to stop rednecks from buying these stupid pickup trucks, is to force manufacturers to provide a breakdown of the price. If they see that a percentage of the cost is going to Tesla to pay for the carbon credits, they will stop buying them.
CARB credits in Blue,


rogerh00 is online now  
Old 05-07-21, 10:01 AM
  #145  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
Where did you see them catch up to Tesla? The old Model S still beats everyone in terms of range and efficiency and its not even close. EQS has the range but significantly underpowered and the Taycan has the power but significantly less range. Toyota has been making motors for longer but they don't even build an EV and their motors are pathetically weak. So when all other arguments fail, the profitability trope arises again?

EQS - 108kWh, ~400 miles of range, 4.3 to 60
Taycan - 93 kWh, 260 miles of range, 2.8 to 60
Model S - 100 kWh 400 miles of range 3.1 to 60
Model S Plaid ?kWh 520 miles of range, <2s to 60
Lets not forget to take Teslas claims with a healthy dose of BS.

Och is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 10:03 AM
  #146  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Lets not forget to take Teslas claims with a healthy dose of BS.

It will hit 2s with rollout. That is how mags do it. It will have 1050hp. My Model 3 was Dino tested at 520hp. Tesla doesn't have to lie about hp because it's stupid easy to produce on an EV.
EZZ is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 10:06 AM
  #147  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
It will hit 2s with rollout. That is how mags do it. It will have 1050hp. My Model 3 was Dino tested at 520hp. Tesla doesn't have to lie about hp because it's stupid easy to produce on an EV.
Again, deceptive marketing, otherwise known as BS.
Och is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 10:07 AM
  #148  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,976
Received 2,459 Likes on 1,613 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
None of this is difficult, and to claim that major OEMs are incompetent and can't design a similar battery pack is delusional. I don't know what's preventing them from doing so, perhaps Tesla is getting government subsidies that others are not, or maybe they are deliberately being held back. Again, it just doesn't make sense for them to buy carbon credits from Tesla when they are perfectly capable of building their own EVs, and have demonstrated their ability with cars like the Leaf, 500e, Focus EV, and so on.
those leaf, 500e, focus ev, all suck compared to teslas. why? because those companies weren't "all in" on EVs, their r&d is shared with all the rest of it (ICE, trucks, etc). tesla has also been at this a LONG time now. and yes, being (mostly) vertically integrated does help them get things done faster and more efficiently in many cases.

Originally Posted by Och
Taycan is expensive and it seems the EQS might be even more expensive. A Tesla Model 3 leases for the price of a V6 Camry, so no, there isn't a practical alternative to Teslas.
with ford's mach-e and vw's id.4 that is no longer true. the hyundai ioniq and kona and kia niro ev's are also competitive even if they're more 'traditional' and not lightning fast.

Originally Posted by EZZ
The Plaid Model on sale now will do 0-60 in about 2 seconds flat. So 1/2 second faster than the Taycan Turbo S but will be cheaper with more range. The Model 3 is faster than a $100k Taycan 4s with the same range at about 1/2 the price. Nothing Ford sells currently can catch a Model Y but the new GT Mach E may come close to the Model Y Performance but will be more expensive due to a bigger battery but should have equivalent range. Tesla is 3 or more years ahead of the competition still.
the plaid may be 'on sale' but they haven't delivered any have they?

i know you're all about the speeds but MOST consumers don't care that much. but it's obviously what has attracted a lot of decent income younger techie buyers. also of note, tesla owners are OVERWHELMINGLY male.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 05-07-21, 10:09 AM
  #149  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Och
Again, deceptive marketing, otherwise known as BS.
Not deceptive at all. Giving you exactly what was advertised. It also said quarter mile in about 9.3s and less than 9s for the Plaid Plus. Tesla puts the Model 3 at 3.1s and people have already beaten that at the track. Tesla performance figures are very exact and have been verified hundreds of times at the strip. There is a dedicated thread on people's draggy times for each model on the forums and people have always bested Tesla's claims. Go look for yourself.
EZZ is offline  
Old 05-07-21, 10:11 AM
  #150  
Och
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (3)
 
Och's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 16,436
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
Not deceptive at all. Giving you exactly what was advertised. It also said quarter mile in about 9.3s and less than 9s for the Plaid Plus. Tesla puts the Model 3 at 3.1s and people have already beaten that at the track. Tesla performance figures are very exact and have been verified hundreds of times at the strip. There is a dedicated thread on people's draggy times for each model on the forums and people have always bested Tesla's claims. Go look for yourself.
Nope, not how it works. Watch the video.
Och is offline  


Quick Reply: Scotty talks about Tesla’s being green



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:20 AM.