Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Toyota Avalon Is Dead In The US After 2022 Model Year

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-21, 11:51 AM
  #76  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,911
Received 157 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GFerg
​​​​​I Interesting.... A Camry L would be an alternative. I am curious as to what they will do with the next ES as well since it was on the Avalon's stretched Camry platform I believe. Also, the 6 cylinder engine could potentially be the discontinued for the next gen Camry/ES.
Considering how much better ES sells worldwide, it was Avalon that was using ES platform, not vice versa.

Nothing is going to happen to ES because.... it sells well..
spwolf is online now  
Old 08-04-21, 11:58 AM
  #77  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,104
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Yeah..Avalon was never the car for you.
Yes and no. I would have been more likely to get one had Toyota put more attention into the hardware-quality and not used Halloween-mask styling.


But, I was also shocked at your dismay for that terrible stop start feature your Lacrosse had an how you used to always try to outsmart it
There were a couple of ways to outsmart it. But, yes, that was one of GM's weak points....they should have used the de-activate switch from the beginning, instead of waiting a couple of years to install it. And then, when they DID install the switch, like some other automakers, they programmed it so that you have to punch the button every time you start the engine....unless the engine is cold or the A/C or heater is on full-blast, which overrides the idle-cut-off.

Having said that, the system on the Lacrosse never failed me, left me stranded or refused to automatically fire up the engine, even after many thousands of restarts. After a while, I got tired of playing Cat-and-Mouse with the system, and just let it do its thing. GM said that they beefed up the starter, battery, and electronics to handle the extra load of all those extra starts,, and that did seem to be the case.


And that electronic shifter was always something so confusing…. Oh well, you have a cross over now
Chevy and Cadillac also used that E-Joystick on some of their models. It was not an exclusively Lacrosse or Enclave feature. I never liked it, but got used to it.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 12:40 PM
  #78  
Motorola
Lead Lap
 
Motorola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,855
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UDel
That would not happen unless Lexus wants to just be a very 2nd Tier at most premium company. The ES sells because it is pretty inexpensive, offers a lot of car for the money, not because it is all that desirable/aspirational like a flagship luxury sedan should be or even a mid level sedan. A 3 row RX based CUV is not going to take over where the LS is either, if Lexus would make a move like that they would not be seen much as a luxury company anymore, just a seller of nicer Toyota's. LS's problem is its odd/awkward styling, odd interior styling, less roomy then previous version and especially lack of V8, the LS name can still be fixed and give traditional LS buyers the car they want to upgrade to, they clearly don't want what is being currently offered.
Tell that to the GS which is dead and the IS which is gone in most countries and soon the RC which will be replaced by some Lexified BR-Z. Lexus doesn't care what online pundits want, because they aren't the ones spending money on their vehicles en masse. The LS is selling poorly, and poor sales in a shrinking segment aren't going to lead anyone to think that the best course of action is to waste more money redesigning a vehicle from the ground up in a format that nobody wants.

Like it or not, a Highlander-based SUV will soon take the place of the RWD Toyota Crown in Japan, a nameplate that has a much longer history and far more global recognition than the LS. The LS has no chance of survival in its current sedan form if even the Crown can't survive.
Motorola is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 01:56 PM
  #79  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,104
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
The LS is selling poorly, and poor sales in a shrinking segment aren't going to lead anyone to think that the best course of action is to waste more money redesigning a vehicle from the ground up in a format that nobody wants.
The LS is selling poorly because they messed up the redesign several years ago, not necessarily because people don't want big LS models any more. The Lexus designers created the LS's problems......now it will be up to them to un-create those problems by returning the car to what it is supposed to be.

The LS has no chance of survival in its current sedan form if even the Crown can't survive.
Well, there's the key.....return the LS to what it is supposed to be. That means a naturally-aspirated V8, soft suspension, traditional Lexus quality, and plenty of insulation inside snd out.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 02:49 PM
  #80  
mmatheny
Instructor
 
mmatheny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dickinson, Texas
Posts: 884
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

FUGLY! Good riddance!
mmatheny is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 03:31 PM
  #81  
Motorola
Lead Lap
 
Motorola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,855
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
The LS is selling poorly because they messed up the redesign several years ago, not necessarily because people don't want big LS models any more. The Lexus designers created the LS's problems......now it will be up to them to un-create those problems by returning the car to what it is supposed to be.

Well, there's the key.....return the LS to what it is supposed to be. That means a naturally-aspirated V8, soft suspension, traditional Lexus quality, and plenty of insulation inside snd out.
The reasons don't matter so much as Lexus's response. People have cried out for years that the GS ought to get an update to remain competitive- and what did Lexus do? They cancelled it because sales declined. IS? Cancelled it in parts of the world where sales declined. Same story with Avalon, and soon the Crown. They could make all of these vehicles better, but why take that risk when they're part of a shrinking segment? The LS, as a flagship sedan, is a niche within a niche compared to these other vehicles. Its chances of survival given Toyota's recent track record is very slim.

And even if the LS miraculously makes it onto the next generation, it won't have a V8 as it won't be possible to sell it anywhere in the world except for the U.S. because of emissions just like the IS500, which will make it a very unprofitable venture.

Will it dilute Lexus's brand image if they replace the LS with some FWD CUV, or kill it altogether? Perhaps- but it's a moot point when most of Lexus's ICE RWD offerings are on their way out the door. If they truly want an aspirational image, they'll have to follow Tesla/Mercedes/Audi/BMW/Porsche/Volvo/Genesis's steps and shift towards full EV's and electrification, an area that we all know Toyota isn't that fond of.

Last edited by Motorola; 08-04-21 at 03:41 PM.
Motorola is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 03:43 PM
  #82  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,984
Received 2,723 Likes on 1,950 Posts
Default

The LS is not just selling poorly because f the changes they made, the whole segment's sales have decreased dramatically.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 08-04-21, 04:01 PM
  #83  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,104
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
The LS is not just selling poorly because f the changes they made, the whole segment's sales have decreased dramatically.

True to an extent, but there is no question that the redesign was also a factor. You yourself (at least, according to the threads you did on it) were one of those who moved to a German competitor because of the way the new LS500 was executed.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 04:36 PM
  #84  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,984
Received 2,723 Likes on 1,950 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
True to an extent, but there is no question that the redesign was also a factor. You yourself (at least, according to the threads you did on it) were one of those who moved to a German competitor because of the way the new LS500 was executed.
I did, but looking at the sales performance of the 500 relative to its peers, I don’t think it would be much better off if it had been less of a departure from what it traditionally had been.

The bottom line is the only full size luxury sedan today that sells over 10k units a year is the S Class.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 08-04-21, 05:56 PM
  #85  
Trackruner
Driver
 
Trackruner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 61
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
And then, when they DID install the switch, like some other automakers, they programmed it so that you have to punch the button every time you start the engine....unless the engine is cold or the A/C or heater is on full-blast, which overrides the idle-cut-off.

Apparently that's an EPA thing. If they allow it to remember it each time the engine cycles they loose credits for their CAFE standards. That's why they all do it that way, they figure the average person won't push the button each time they start the car.
Trackruner is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 06:42 PM
  #86  
xjokerz
Racer
 
xjokerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: WA
Posts: 1,535
Received 69 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

In my opinion, they ruined it when they went and tried making it sporty. Older clientele drive these large cars and they want a really soft, comfortable, quiet ride. What I still can't get past is the fact they made a TRD Avalon.

The last few days I've been wondering myself why I've stuck with sedans for all these years. I guess just nostalgia and wanting to be different. A throwback in a way. I do get why crossovers are so popular. The 3 or 4 inch difference in riding height as well as the added versatility for towing/cargo room cannot be denied.

Still sad all these sedans are going away.
xjokerz is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 06:44 PM
  #87  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 56,984
Received 2,723 Likes on 1,950 Posts
Default

But here’s the thing. The Avalon is not sporty. Drive one, they ride and drive great, very soft and quiet.

The TRD version was just an attempt to try and get the car noticed.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 08-04-21, 06:51 PM
  #88  
xjokerz
Racer
 
xjokerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: WA
Posts: 1,535
Received 69 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

I just saw a video of the TRD Avalon on YouTube and I got a good laugh with the body kit and the spoiler and all that. TRD badges all over the place. I guess it's mostly cosmetic but still. I would figure an older person would have wanted just a regular, plain looking large sedan. Not many to pick from.

Maybe they are figuring that sitting down in a low-riding sedan is more uncomfortable than stepping into a crossover.
xjokerz is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 07:37 PM
  #89  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,689
Received 2,394 Likes on 1,568 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
It'll be a long time before American infrastructure can make way for car-less traveling.
chuckNX said the future is driverless and ride share, not car-less.

Originally Posted by LexWannabe
That said, all things being equal, sedan platforms still have better handling, better ride, better braking, better acceleration, better fuel economy, and in the current environment, lower pricing. To me, this last part explains automakers' eagerness to switch to SUVs —they can charge thousands more for the same content (Legacy vs. Outback, Impreza vs. Crosstour, Fit vs. HR-V, CR-V vs. Civic, RAV4 vs. Corolla, etc, etc, etc..). Are people willing to pay that difference? Yes. Does that make the SUV version the better value objectively? Not necessarily. Just because little Johnny runs off the cliff doesn't mean I have to.
we've had this discussion several times. It isn't just that automakers can charge more for suv's because there's demand, it's that they couldn't get enough people to buy sedans to make them profitable any longer. the shift in demand to cuv/suvs was so overwhelming that it made no sense for many makers keep making mainstream sedans.

And we're not talking the last dodo here. The Camry, Corolla, Civic, and Accord still sell very well, and even the Fusion and Malibu moved a lot of units despite their makers' neglect right up to their discontinuation decisions. There are still millions of people who think a sedan makes sense for them.
Honda/toyota still sell a ton of accords/civics/camrys/corollas because they have outstanding reputations and some younger people just don't need/want the cargo space of a cuv/suv. And yes, there's still millions who want a sedan, but tens of millions want suv/cuv.

I do get your continued desire for a sedan. In 2018 i traded my jeep grand cherokee in and leased a genesis g90 (large sedan). The ride was certainly nice, and the trunk pretty big, and the back seat was GIGANTIC. But this february when the 3 year lease was nearly up, i decided to go back to a crossover for work because it really is more practical. Got a hyundai santa fe. Obviously the santa fe doesn't have the wood or some other high quality materials, and doesn't have as big rear seat leg room (although not bad because it's more upright), but it's still an incredibly nice design to me, and amazingly, it has MORE features than the g90 had.

A loaded santa fe calligraphy is about HALF the price is a loaded g90. That's incredible.

About the santa fe's features, just today i parked it at a client and then someone else parked about 1" behind me. Not thrilled, i got out the key fob and moved the car forward without getting in the car.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 08-04-21, 07:40 PM
  #90  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,689
Received 2,394 Likes on 1,568 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xjokerz
I just saw a video of the TRD Avalon on YouTube and I got a good laugh with the body kit and the spoiler and all that. TRD badges all over the place. I guess it's mostly cosmetic but still. I would figure an older person would have wanted just a regular, plain looking large sedan. Not many to pick from.
yeah avalon trd is a sad joke.

Maybe they are figuring that sitting down in a low-riding sedan is more uncomfortable than stepping into a crossover.
That's exactly right. My lexus LC is certainly low and challenging for this aging 6'3" guy to get in and out of, but it's not my work vehicle.
bitkahuna is offline  


Quick Reply: Toyota Avalon Is Dead In The US After 2022 Model Year



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:25 AM.