2022 Lexus LX600 (4th gen)
#17
I know this car is in complete camo, but I can't help but feeling that it looks small compared to an Escalade.
#20
#21
That's why they need the LQ crossover to compete with high end crossovers like X7, etc IMO.
#22
LQ is not a three-row vehicle, and from all accounts including even resident Lexus Youtube clickbaiter Kirk Kreifels, it's been cancelled. Instead we'll be getting a new three-row based on the upcoming RX known as the TX, the Toyota equivalent of which will be the Grand Highlander.
The LX is such a low-cost investment for Lexus because it's just a reskinned Land Cruiser yet commands a huge sticker, so it won't hurt them to sell it here in North America despite its niche appeal as the profit margins would be enormous.
The LX is such a low-cost investment for Lexus because it's just a reskinned Land Cruiser yet commands a huge sticker, so it won't hurt them to sell it here in North America despite its niche appeal as the profit margins would be enormous.
#23
LCs sell like hotcakes all over the world where they're actually needed, the robustness and crazy over-engineering.
Hate to use this as example but I've seen so many LC200s just on TV in Afghanistan with all this going on.
#24
I think Lexus is wholly satisfied with the LX sales numbers and so is Toyota with LC sales. This is been debated. Toyota has ZERO problem selling LC200, in the US is just for pure profit. They load them up into luxury vehicles and cash in. LC200s are everywhere around the world. In Australia alone they sell 40k a year. If you watch the news and see what's going on in Afghanistan, I have noticed at least dozen LC200s in all that turmoil. They are much more basic, but the platform is the same. They sell in big, big numbers in other markets.
Same here! I hope they bring that super high end LQ crossover to market, too. Now, that vehicle I think Lexus will want a lion's share of the market with and if it's good enough they just might get it.
Agree on LS, as an LS430 owner it's a f'n disaster.
Same here! I hope they bring that super high end LQ crossover to market, too. Now, that vehicle I think Lexus will want a lion's share of the market with and if it's good enough they just might get it.
Agree on LS, as an LS430 owner it's a f'n disaster.
#25
Sometimes it all comes down to what you get for the price. Terrible infotainment systems and cramped 3rd row will turn off potential buyers of Escalades and Navigators. At the end of the day, for $100k, they should have up to date infotainment systems and long range useable 3rd rows. And yes BOF vehicles are a different breed and its hard to go back to a unibody.
LX third row is rated terrible, people in reviews say it's bad but my average-size male buddy sat back there to check it for a 30 minute trip (I can't yet, back surgery) and said he'd sit back there for hours on a trip gladly. Even the third row seats have the nice semi-aniline contrast leather, plenty of vents and cupholders. I thought the third row was supposed to be awful in the LX, and I get why to begin with.
#26
I disagree with you. I think the new LS500 is beautiful car...by far the most prestigious LS so far. The nicest and most interesting interior as well and it has its own identity. I have never really cared for past LS models to be honest (I do know you love your LS though)
Last edited by Toys4RJill; 08-25-21 at 01:49 PM.
#27
I would say design and build what consumers want. Why design something that will not sell?
If I am Lexus, I would rather sell 15k units per year than 5k. Common sense really.
The major issue is the inability to redesign vehicles sooner. In this day and age, it is difficult to have steady sales on something that has been out a decade +.
Either way, interested to see the new LX, Sequoia and Tundra. Way overdue IMO.
If I am Lexus, I would rather sell 15k units per year than 5k. Common sense really.
The major issue is the inability to redesign vehicles sooner. In this day and age, it is difficult to have steady sales on something that has been out a decade +.
Either way, interested to see the new LX, Sequoia and Tundra. Way overdue IMO.
#28
I disagree with you. I think the new LS500 is beautiful car...by far the most prestigious LS so far. The nicest and most interesting interior as well and it has its own identity. I have never really cared for past LS models to be honest (I do know you love your LS though)
Though, I do agree LS is best in class or one of best in class looks-wise now, especially with the refresh. I saw a black one EVERYTHING blacked out and about wrecked gawking at it. Absolutely stunning.
#29
No kidding sir! I love my SUVs, I don't have one like yours but I finally took my new 4R out on a long trip...amazing! No 10 speeds to keep shifting, no auto stop start to annoy me...a BIG 4.0 liter V6 is what I got, it always has enough juice...always in a good gear....there is SO MUCH room inside....everything works as advertised. Anyways, back the new LX...I'd be more happy if they carried over the 5.7 V8 to tell you the truth
LS430 was better than the 460 from everything I have read and heard.
Nice..glad you like the looks I love the looks haven't seen the new refresh as of yet....but every time I see a LS500, I wish I had one....I guess the low sales numbers makes it even more special when you see them
LS430 was better than the 460 from everything I have read and heard.
Nice..glad you like the looks I love the looks haven't seen the new refresh as of yet....but every time I see a LS500, I wish I had one....I guess the low sales numbers makes it even more special when you see them
#30
Those both have nice, spacious third rows now. Escalade especially and Navi are state of the art, and quite lovely though I'm not a Ford guy. LX is a dinosaur. But still, there is a group of people who go straight the the LX when buying without thinking of any other competitor at all, and there always will be that group. Same thing if Toyota brings back LC.
LX third row is rated terrible, people in reviews say it's bad but my average-size male buddy sat back there to check it for a 30 minute trip (I can't yet, back surgery) and said he'd sit back there for hours on a trip gladly. Even the third row seats have the nice semi-aniline contrast leather, plenty of vents and cupholders. I thought the third row was supposed to be awful in the LX, and I get why to begin with.
LX third row is rated terrible, people in reviews say it's bad but my average-size male buddy sat back there to check it for a 30 minute trip (I can't yet, back surgery) and said he'd sit back there for hours on a trip gladly. Even the third row seats have the nice semi-aniline contrast leather, plenty of vents and cupholders. I thought the third row was supposed to be awful in the LX, and I get why to begin with.
I'm in the camp of going straight for the LX....if I have the funds.