Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2023 Toyota Sequoia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-22, 05:56 PM
  #346  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,279
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Yeah.....that one left me scratching my head, too. Simply doesn't make sense from a vehicle-design point of view, where the dedicated off-roader should get the part-time system, and the on-roader the more sophisticated system with the center-diff and electronic-actuator. The only possible thing I can think of is that, somehow, the Toyota marketers figured that, on the non-TRD Sequoias (which are admittedly cheaper), the vehicle would not often need or use AWD or 4WD at all. Of course, the full-time or on-demand system also makes driving on paved surfaces easier, too....like you, IMO, it makes more sense on a non-TRD. So, perhaps once again, it gets back to money...the same reason Toyota did those relatively cheap interiors for a number of years.
I am confused as to why you think the a off road vehicle should only have part-time? Makes no sense
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-04-22, 06:15 PM
  #347  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,383
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I am confused as to why you think the a off road vehicle should only have part-time? Makes no sense

One again, I think you misunderstood me. I said that the part-time system, with no center differential at all, is simply better off-road....but it is not the only option. If a vehicle intended for off-road use has a multi-use system, then part of that system should be either a traditional part-time system or a full-time system with a center-differential-lock, which, with greater complexity, mimics a part-time system to help you get out of tough situations. What you don't want, off-road, is a full-time AWD system without a center-differential lock, because it will simply be easier to get a system like that stuck.


Last edited by mmarshall; 02-04-22 at 06:31 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-04-22, 06:20 PM
  #348  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,279
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default D

Originally Posted by mmarshall
One again, I think you misunderstood me. I said that the part-time system, with no center differential at all, is simply better off-road....but it is not the only option. If a vehicle intended for off-road use has a multi-use system, then part of that system should be either a traditional part-time system or a full-time system with a center-differential-lock, which, with greater complexity, mimics a part-time system to help you get out of tough situations. What you don't want, off-road, is a full-time AWD system without a center-differential lock, because it will simply be easier to get a system like that stuck.
A full time 4WD system with a locking centre would be even better. That is the absolute ultimate for off road driving.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-04-22, 06:30 PM
  #349  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,383
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
A full time 4WD system with a locking centre would be even better. That is the absolute ultimate for off road driving.

In some ways, yes....it is more flexible both on and off-road, but costs more to produce, and is ultimately less-reliable.

I apologize if it is difficult for you to understand. It took me some time to completely understand the concept, too. Off road, the part-time system is usually best, because it sends equal-RPM to all four wheels and does not allow any wheel to spin freely while the others sit still, minimizing the chances you will get the vehicle stuck, unless all four wheels get equally stuck in the same mud/sand or ice. This system, however, while best off-road, is simply not suitable for dry pavement use, because on a dry curve, with all four wheels locked up at the same speed, the tires will scrub going around curves and possibly bind or damage the drive train. On a dry curve, the two outside tires MUST spin faster than the two inside ones, which part-time systems don't allow.

With a full-time or on-demand system, the benefits of a part-time system can be had, off-road or in a tough on-road slippery-situation, but only with with a center-diff lock, which mimics a part-time system, albeit with more complexity and more parts to wear. That is why warning signs in the vehicle or Owners' Manual tell you not to use the differential-lock on dry pavement....the lock is strictly for very slippery surfaces or off-roading, where the tires and drivetrain won't bind up.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-04-22, 06:40 PM
  #350  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,279
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
In some ways, yes....it is more flexible both on and off-road, but costs more to produce, and is ultimately less-reliable..
No no no The full time 4WD is always more reliable.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I. Off road, the part-time system is usually best, because it sends equal-RPM to all four wheels and does not allow any wheel to spin freely while the others sit still, minimizing the chances you will get the vehicle stuck, unless all four wheels get equally stuck in the same mud/sand or ice.
.
A full time 4WD system does this.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
With a full-time or on-demand system, the benefits of a part-time system ARE be had, off-road or in a tough on-road slippery-situation, but only with with a center-diff lock, which mimics a part-time system, albeit with more complexity and more parts to wear. That is why warning signs in the vehicle or Owners' Manual tell you not to use the differential-lock on dry pavement....the lock is strictly for very slippery surfaces or off-roading, where the tires and drivetrain won't bind up.
They already are had if it’s full time 4WD. All those on demand stuff are weak.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
.

I apologize if it is difficult for you to understand. It took me some time to completely understand the concept, too. .
No. You are wrong. You know that…


Last edited by Toys4RJill; 02-04-22 at 07:00 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-04-22, 07:51 PM
  #351  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,383
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
The full time 4WD is always more reliable.
Incorrect. Part time systems have fewer parts....although some of it, of course, depends on how well the vehicle was built and the quality of the parts themselves. But, in general, part-time systems have fewer chances of breaking down.....unless one abuses them on dry pavement.



A full time 4WD system does this.
Only if they have a center-differential-lock.


No. You are wrong. You know that…
Your argument is not with me, but with the auto engineers who design these systems. So, I'm going to consider this discussion closed...talk to them, not me. I have tried to be courteous, but you just want to argue.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-04-22, 07:54 PM
  #352  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,279
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Incorrect. Part time systems have fewer parts....although some of it, of course, depends on how well the vehicle was built and the quality of the parts themselves. But, in general, part-time systems have fewer chances of breaking down.....unless one abuses them on dry pavement.





Only if they have a center-differential-lock.




Your argument is not with me, but with the auto engineers who design these systems. So, I'm going to consider this discussion closed...talk to them, not me. I have tried to be courteous, but you just want to argue.
All good MM Do you like the looks of the new Sequoia? I think it looks great.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-04-22, 08:03 PM
  #353  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,383
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
All good MM Do you like the looks of the new Sequoia? I think it looks great.

Outside, not a big fan of the oversized grille and lower-front-end, but it looks nice from there on back to the rear. The interior looks OK from images, but I'll have to see and feel it close up to see if they used any better-quality parts or hardware...I agree with Hoovey that the last interior was awful.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-07-22, 12:00 PM
  #354  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,994
Received 96 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
A full time 4WD system with a locking centre would be even better. That is the absolute ultimate for off road driving.
I like being able to run in 2WD when I'm on dry pavement. I don't need to power the front wheels driving down the highway.
FrankReynoldsCPA is online now  
Old 06-08-22, 07:57 AM
  #355  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,308
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default 2023 Toyota Sequoia First Drive Review

At last year's Toyota HQ Confidential summit, I had a chance to drive basically anything in the Toyota line-up. I took a Sequoia TRD Pro out on a short off-road course, and while capable, it was appalling how cheap, flimsy and old it felt. Not that it should've been a surprise. The Sequoia had been virtually unchanged since its 2008 debut – it had even missed out on the updates made to the Tundra pickup upon which it was based. The full redesign for the 2023 Toyota Sequoia is therefore extremely welcome. It's vastly improved as far as the driving experience, build quality, materials and technology. That’s the good news. The bad news is that it remains well behind the full-size SUV leaders in several key factors.

As before, the new Sequoia is mechanically related to the Tundra, which includes its hybrid twin-turbo 3.5-liter V6. It makes the same 437 horsepower and 583 pound-feet of torque, and is mated to the same 10-speed automatic transmission. Rear-wheel-drive and four-wheel drive are available, and every Sequoia comes standard with a limited-slip rear differential. An electronic locking rear differential is available.

Unlike the Tundra, though, the hybrid is the only powertrain. Official fuel economy numbers haven't been announced, but Toyota said it should be similar to the hybrid Tundra. That should put it around 20 to 22 mpg combined depending on drivetrain and trim level (the TRD Pro with its lack of air dam and slightly taller ride height doesn't exactly have great aerodynamics). Towing capacity maxes out at 9,500 pounds.



Also, while the platform, including its fully-boxed frame, is derived from the Tundra, the Sequoia gets a multilink independent rear suspension with multiple options to enhance it for specific purposes. A rear load-leveling air suspension is available on fancier trims; the TRD Sport package tunes the suspension for better on-road handling; the TRD Off-Road package gets Bilstein shocks and springs for better off-road capability; and the TRD Pro (pictured above) goes even further with Fox shocks and its own unique springs.

Among those specs are a few highlights. Compared to its key rivals, the Chevy Tahoe/GMC Yukon, Ford Expedition and Jeep Wagoneer, the Sequoia boasts the most torque, the best fuel economy and the most towing capacity of any of those gas-powered SUVs. The exception being the diesel Tahoe, which can manage 22 to 24 mpg combined, but does take more expensive fuel and makes significantly less power.

There are some highlights on the road, too. The hybrid V6 is superb. It's incredibly smooth and quiet, or at least extremely well insulated from the cabin. The cabin in general is very quiet, particularly higher trims with the additional acoustic glass. Press the throttle, and the electric motor and turbo engine coordinate to provide smooth, effortless torque, which keeps coming all through the rev range. Push it harder, and you get a deep, throaty growl. It's even louder in the TRD Pro, which gets a cat-back exhaust. It thankfully doesn't change the tone, and the volume remains low enough to not annoy yourself or your neighbors. And considering the droney, nasal noises other V6s (looking at you F-150 Raptor and 4Runner TRD Pro, among others), this is quite impressive. Furthermore, the smart, gentle-shifting automatic doesn't bring attention to itself. The only exception is the occasional double-downshift due to its many ratios, but it's still a step above Ford's often out-of-step transmissions.


Ride quality is another excellent aspect of the Sequoia. The chassis in particular feels ultra-solid, and there are hardly any of the wiggles and shimmies found in other body-on-frame full-size SUVs. The suspension tuning is quite soft, but isn't overly floaty, and it remains stable over bumps. Off-road, the regular Sequoia with the TRD Off-Road package is capable, though the softness has trouble dealing with abrupt bumps and higher speeds. That's where the TRD Pro comes in with its stiffer suspension tuning that makes it very fun on faster dirt paths. The TRD Pro's off-road tires, added skid plate and deleted aero spoiler are also helpful off road.

But now we arrive at the list of many Sequoia shortcomings. First of all is handling. Even at the low bar set by full-size SUVs, the Sequoia feels rather barge-like. The steering is light, vague and slow. Frequent corrections are required to go straight as well as maintain a line through corners. The soft suspension results in lots of body roll, and it feels like there's a delay between steering inputs and the SUV's reactions. A Tahoe or Yukon can feel borderline fun to steer; the Sequoia definitely does not.

Then there's the interior. It's a great transformation compared to its predecessor, and has a nice, chunky design. The modern Toyota infotainment system is also bright, responsive and simple, particularly on the 14-inch touchscreen that comes on most Sequoia trim levels. The materials are certainly much better than before, but they’re only just on par with Ford and GM on the low to mid trims. The range-topping Capstone (pictured below) features niceties such as semi-aniline leather and walnut wood trim, but there are enough of the basic plastic components poking through that it doesn't feel as nice as an Expedition Platinum, Yukon Denali or Wagoneer Series III.


Interior comfort and usability is another problem. The front seats are spacious in every which way, and the seats are reasonably comfortable if a bit flat. But each following row has flatter and firmer seats that feel less comfortable than those in the competition. The third row in particular is disappointing. The rock-hard bench sits low on the floor, and despite the fact that it uniquely slides, legroom is always tight. So is headroom. So while adults can fit, they won't want to be back there long. Compare that to the third rows of the Expedition, Tahoe and Jeep Wagoneer, which can comfortably accommodate even 6-footers for as long as you need. At least access is fairly easy due to the tumble-forward second-row seats.

The biggest interior issue, however, is cargo space. The third-row seats can slide forward slightly, but they cannot be removed, nor can they fold flat into the floor. This is because, according to someone from Toyota, the hybrid battery pack sits under the third row, and leaving it in place provides an extra layer of protection. However, just because there’s a reason for a problem doesn’t mean it’s not a problem. The odd, terraced space is poorly suited to carrying long, bulky objects, and although there is an adjustable cargo shelf available that creates a flat-load floor, the vertical space provided is dramatically less than what you’d find elsewhere. The lift-in height is comically high, too.

Space behind the third row is also compromised. It can be as much as 22.3 cubic feet, which is comparable to the Tahoe/Yukon, Expedition and Wagoneer, but to get that, you have to slide the third row all the way forward, making it basically useless. Move it all the way back and the space shrinks to 11.5 cubic feet, which would be less than a Mitsubishi Outlander. And while the American SUVs have long variants, the Sequoia is available in one body style only.


Then we come to pricing. The Sequoia starts at $59,795, including the destination charge. That's between $5,000 and $6,000 more than the Ford and Chevy. The TRD Pro's $78,395 price tag also comes well above the Expedition Timberline and Tahoe Z71, even when the latter is outfitted with the optional 6.2-liter V8 and adaptive air and magnetic suspension. To be fair, the TRD Pro comes with a number of standard features that likely make it more capable than the Americans off road, such as the electronic locking rear differential, Fox shocks and Crawl Control (off-road cruise control). The Capstone comes in at $76,795 with the standard two-wheel drive. That puts it a couple thousand north of the Tahoe High Country, and and few thousand below the top Ford Expedition Platinum. It’s basically even with the range-topping Wagoneer, but well short of the much fancier Grand Wagoneer.

If you're a Sequoia owner or fan that's been waiting for a truly new example of the model to trade up to, your SUV is finally here. It's a galactic leap ahead of the outgoing model and will surely make existing owners happy. But if you have no loyalties to Toyota, the fact is that the American benchmarks remain the best all-around packages for the person that needs a do-it-all SUV for hauling people and stuff in comfort and more.
Source
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 06-08-22, 08:30 AM
  #356  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I see the reviewer didn't even touch on the lack of full-time 4WD. Even outside of that this seems like a vehicle full of compromises.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 06-08-22, 08:34 AM
  #357  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,498
Received 1,619 Likes on 1,033 Posts
Default

I think they just nailed the looks of this thing, and the engine is getting great reviews. I'm just disappointed in the cargo space and third row volume. I'll reserve final judgment until I see one in person, but those would be my potential show-stoppers.
JDR76 is offline  
Old 06-08-22, 09:59 AM
  #358  
UZ214
Pole Position
 
UZ214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DE
Posts: 2,661
Received 221 Likes on 163 Posts
Default

this point is not mentioned in most of the reviews, I dont know if they folks who are reviewing them dont know or dont care enough. The TRD pro if I remember correctly will be full time 4wd
Originally Posted by TangoRed
I see the reviewer didn't even touch on the lack of full-time 4WD. Even outside of that this seems like a vehicle full of compromises.
UZ214 is offline  
Old 06-08-22, 10:09 AM
  #359  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UZ214
The TRD pro if I remember correctly will be full time 4wd
Nope, you check back earlier in this thread. We discovered that's not the case and a Toyota engineer in a video confirmed it.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 06-08-22, 11:32 AM
  #360  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,514
Received 223 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

There are tons of first drives out today, not just here. Do a google news search.

I'm glad the new engine seems to be a hit, I had my doubts about it. No auto 4WD is still ridiculous and frankly crazy for something in this expensive.
AJT123 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2023 Toyota Sequoia



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 PM.