Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2023 Toyota Sequoia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-22, 08:36 AM
  #436  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,462
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
Sequoyahs are everywhere. I think Toyota sold a lot of them. Maybe not like Tahoes, but I see tons of them.
They sold like 8k units in 2021. Havent been keeping track but its low.
situman is offline  
Old 06-14-22, 08:38 AM
  #437  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,462
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Sorry, I don't clasp my hands and thank God Toyota for blessing me with half done efforts to vehicles that "shouldn't exist" anymore according to nobody but them.

If Toyota can't find a way to build a large SUV that is profitable when that is one of the largest segments in the entire industry, thats Toyota's fault and nobody else's. What we have here is a vehicle that has a LOT of great things going on, but a bunch of really questionable compromises that are potential fatal flaws for buyers. Brought to you by the company that scratches its head as to why making their flagship luxury sedan the longest in the segment yet also the smallest inside didn't make it successful. They are just lost in the weeds here lately...

There is NO reason why Toyota can't build a great full sized SUV free from these compromises that would be a huge competitor to the domestics.
No need to clasp your hands and thank God. It's here and we have a choice to either buy or not. If it offered full time 4WD or Auto and the 2nd row can slide, I would have considered it. As it is now, no thanks. And yes, the LS was a monumental blunder.
situman is offline  
Old 06-14-22, 09:55 AM
  #438  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,514
Received 223 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Yep, miss after miss. I will say the engine at least sounds decent enough (if it's fake sound, nevermind) and has received lots of praise, so that's good. If you skip to the launch part you can watch him do a pull or two.
AJT123 is online now  
Old 06-14-22, 10:23 AM
  #439  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,470
Received 2,749 Likes on 1,966 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
Yep, miss after miss. I will say the engine at least sounds decent enough (if it's fake sound, nevermind) and has received lots of praise, so that's good. If you skip to the launch part you can watch him do a pull or two.
I did think it sounded good, likely artificial.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 06-14-22, 10:37 AM
  #440  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,514
Received 223 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I did think it sounded good, likely artificial.
I need to run it though my new soundbar hah. Usually I do, I only heard this through computer speakers.
AJT123 is online now  
Old 07-25-22, 07:36 AM
  #441  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,308
Received 125 Likes on 83 Posts
Default 2023 Toyota Sequoia gets fuel economy ratings

When we drove the 2023 Toyota Sequoia last month, Toyota wasn't ready to give us estimated fuel economy ratings. Reps said the numbers should be similar to the hybrid Tundra pickup, the SUV sitting on that pickup platform and powered by the same twin-turbo 3.5-liter V6 hybrid making the same 437 horsepower and 583 pound-feet of torque, mated to the same 10-speed automatic transmission. We figured the Sequoia would get about 20 to 22 mpg combined depending on drivetrain and trim level, and we were right. Toyota put the numbers on its web site, the two-wheel-drive Sequoia returning 21 miles per gallon in the city, 24 on the highway and 22 combined. Buyers who choose four-wheel-drive are predicted to get 19 mpg in the city, 22 on the highway, 20 combined. Those numbers are the same regardless of trim.

Compared to the previous Sequoia and its 5.7-liter V8, the new family bus gets eight more miles to the gallon in the city, seven more on the highway, and seven more combined mpg. The gap narrows slightly on four-wheel-drive trims because the previous Sequoia only gave up one mile per gallon on the combined cycle to the rear-wheel-drive version. The 2023 Sequoia 4WD gets six more mpg in the city than the 2022 model, five more on the highway and six more combined mpg.

We dinged the new Toyota for not matching the polish and features of competitors, but the Toyota does now beat them all for fuel economy. A 2WD Chevrolet Tahoe with the 5.3-liter V8 and stop/start gets 15 city, 20 highway, 17 combined, and somehow makes the same rating when both axles are powered. A 2WD Ford Expedition with the 3.5-liter V6 and stop/start returns 17 city, 23 highway and 19 combined, dropping to 16 city, 22 highway, 18 combined. The relatively sippy nature of the Sequoia also moves its range on a full tank beyond that of the Tahoe and Expedition, at least on paper. We don't think this is enough to put the put the 2023 Sequoia above rivals, but for the Toyota faithful looking to save money in this segment, that will happen on every trip to the pump.
Source
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 07-25-22, 04:58 PM
  #442  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,731
Received 168 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Quite impressive mpg's. Although considering price these will sell for, the savings is erased pretty quickly.

Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 07-25-22, 05:01 PM
  #443  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian

 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,291
Received 64 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Haha, you're saying impressive and I'm over here like "that's it?!" Lol.

IMO, that's a whole lot of complication for a 2 mpg improvement over a regular gas powered Expedition.

This story also implies that the Sequoia is missi g out on many features too compared to the competition. Curious what that is. But, I do think it's one of the better looking in the segment and prefer it over most.
GFerg is offline  
Old 07-25-22, 05:12 PM
  #444  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,731
Received 168 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GFerg
Haha, you're saying impressive and I'm over here like "that's it?!" Lol.

IMO, that's a whole lot of complication for a 2 mpg improvement over a regular gas powered Expedition.

This story also implies that the Sequoia is missi g out on many features too compared to the competition. Curious what that is. But, I do think it's one of the better looking in the segment and prefer it over most.
5-6 mpg in the city, ontop of the competitors.... I'd say is a decent upgrade. The highway rating though... not a big improvement.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 07-25-22, 05:29 PM
  #445  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,514
Received 223 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

I'd still rather have the old V8, lol.
AJT123 is online now  
Old 07-25-22, 05:47 PM
  #446  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,498
Received 1,619 Likes on 1,033 Posts
Default

That's great mileage! If the rear cargo area were different (better), I'd be all over this thing.
JDR76 is offline  
Old 07-25-22, 05:55 PM
  #447  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,564
Received 702 Likes on 440 Posts
Default

Better efficiency is never a bad thing, but the real benefits with this new engine compared to the prior V8 are the significant increase in power and the massive increase torque (45%), particularly at lower RPM.
swajames is offline  
Old 07-25-22, 06:07 PM
  #448  
mbarron37
Advanced
 
mbarron37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: MA
Posts: 727
Received 76 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Most people looking to get into a full size SUV will like the better gas mileage. The rear cargo area is a concern, but like the rest. 15 mpg just doesn’t cut it anymore for a majority of buyers.
mbarron37 is online now  
Old 07-25-22, 06:10 PM
  #449  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,514
Received 223 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
Better efficiency is never a bad thing, but the real benefits with this new engine compared to the prior V8 are the significant increase in power and the massive increase torque (45%), particularly at lower RPM.
The 5.7 has plenty of low end torque, trust me.

What about reliability though? I do like this engine but let's see if they tick to 300k+ on nothing but plugs and oil changes like the 5.7 does.

AJT123 is online now  
Old 07-25-22, 06:52 PM
  #450  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 75,049
Received 2,472 Likes on 1,623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GFerg
This story also implies that the Sequoia is missi g out on many features too compared to the competition. Curious what that is.
yeah, cargo room in the back.


bitkahuna is offline  


Quick Reply: 2023 Toyota Sequoia



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:23 PM.