When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
All the more reason why, to get a best-American sedan-ranking of the LS from CR when it first debuted, was a rather remarkable achievement.
Considering the dearth of American luxury sedans, that really doesn't say much. It's debatable whether the LS can even be considered "American" when its platform and powertrain were co-developed by Jaguar.
Yes, I'll note that, but that alone did not impact CR's view of the LS.
Why would it when it was no longer even in production?
The larger RWD/AWD 300 was probably more of a luxury sedan than the smaller FWD 300M which preceded it. It definitely had better ride-comfort and was more suitable as a luxo-cruiser.
They were literally the exact same size, 197.8 inches long.
Probably wasn't worthy of the name. You and I both know it was a redone Taurus. Most of the reviews I've read of it (plus my own test-drive) weren't very favorable. Although it didn't sell because of Lincoln's own SUVs, the next, more recent, Continental, was a far better attempt, head and shoulders better inside and out, but, still, in several ways, was related to the Taurus.
Probably wasn't worthy of the name. You and I both know it was a redone Taurus. Most of the reviews I've read of it (plus my own test-drive) weren't very favorable. Although it didn't sell because of Lincoln's own SUVs, the next, more recent, Continental, was a far better attempt, head and shoulders better inside and out, but, still, in several ways, was related to the Taurus.
It had been a redone Taurus since 1989…and the more recent Continental was the same thing.
It had been a redone Taurus since 1989…and the more recent Continental was the same thing.
Still, IMHO, no real comparison between the two. Despite the Taurus-based platforms, Lincoln spent the time and money on the more recent Continental that it should have spent on the earlier one, and didn't. The one unfortunate difference is that, with the earlier one, the public was in a mood to buy large upmarket sedans, and, with the newer one, it wasn't. One of the sad fates of the auto-market......along wth the VW Phaeton, the most-recent Lacrosse, and the Cadillac CT6.
Still, IMHO, no real comparison between the two. Despite the Taurus-based platforms, Lincoln spent the time and money on the more recent Continental that it should have spent on the earlier one, and didn't. The one unfortunate difference is that, with the earlier one, the public was in a mood to buy large upmarket sedans, and, with the newer one, it wasn't. One of the sad fates of the auto-market......along wth the VW Phaeton, the most-recent Lacrosse, and the Cadillac CT6.
I never compared the two, I just replied to him that they were also still selling the Continental when they began selling the Lincoln LS.
VW Phaeton was gone long before sedan sales fell off a cliff.
I owned a 2006 Lincoln LS V8, I put 260k miles and it was still going strong 2 years later after I sold it. The Jag pic you put is nowhere near the interior Quality or year of the LS or the Sister car Jag there was. No wonder you are confused
I owned a 2006 Lincoln LS V8, I put 260k miles and it was still going strong 2 years later after I sold it. The Jag pic you put is nowhere near the interior Quality or year of the LS or the Sister car Jag there was
Which LS interior did you have, though...dark or light color; with or without the wood-tone? As in the images I posted, there were noticeable differences between them. The camel-color with the wood-tone, IMO, was head and shoulders above the dark monochrome with the silver-paint trim. And, even then, there are several different ways to measure interior quality....some by looks; some by comfort, some by wear-reisitance.
Which LS interior did you have, though...dark or light color; with or without the wood-tone? As in the images I posted, there were noticeable differences between them. The camel-color with the wood-tone, IMO, was head and shoulders above the dark monochrome with the silver-paint trim. And, even then, there are several different ways to measure interior quality....some by looks; some by comfort, some by wear-reisitance.
The materials are the same, the color doesn't change them lol