General Car Conversation
#2761
Lexus Champion
The last one that had tons of power got 30+ mpg, that's plenty good enough. I don't need 50mpg, 30 is great for me.
#2762
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
And if someone wants 50 MPG, which most consumers do today, they would believe the new one is much better than the old one.
#2763
Lexus Champion
I'll be down there this summer.....you want me to bring the two turbo or the 12?
#2766
Then you have its competitors such as the ES, where the 5th certainly lost a step over the prior gen. The 07 was better at whipping around corners fast but that wasn't what the ES was designed for in the first place. You got a GS for spirited driving. You could even make a case for the 3rd gen better than the 4th regarding this car, although (to me) it's pretty close and I couldn't personally pick a winner.
Point is, some gens are better than previous but some are worse.
#2767
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Many examples of this not being true. Just in the TL lineup, the 4th gen was complete garbage in every sense compared to the 3rd. The only area it was better was a whopping mpg better and an AWD option. Everything else, from material quality, looks (subjective but everyone hated the beak and overall styling), visibility, etc was a noticeable decline.
Then you have its competitors such as the ES, where the 5th certainly lost a step over the prior gen. The 07 was better at whipping around corners fast but that wasn't what the ES was designed for in the first place. You got a GS for spirited driving. You could even make a case for the 3rd gen better than the 4th regarding this car, although (to me) it's pretty close and I couldn't personally pick a winner.
#2768
Lexus Champion
No they don't. SO.MANY.PEOPLE don't care about gas mileage (I mean, within reason). Not saying you but people are brainwashed.
The Honda 2.0t was a monster and they ripped it away for Uncle Sam. Know how many test drivers are gonna find this new one slow?
The Honda 2.0t was a monster and they ripped it away for Uncle Sam. Know how many test drivers are gonna find this new one slow?
#2769
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Look at those ranked things, and you will understand why Honda designed the Accord the way they did. Its not "for Uncle Sam", its what consumers want!
We are not typical consumers...this Accord will sell very well. Its a driving appliance, people don't care about it being fast. Where on that list is "performance"? Its not on there at all.
We blame carmakers or the government for the decrease in engine size and type in the name of fuel economy, but consumers drive that.
Last edited by SW17LS; 02-26-23 at 08:23 AM.
#2770
Lexus Champion
That is just not true at all. Its the #1 thing they are looking for:
Look at those ranked things, and you will understand why Honda designed the Accord the way they did. Its not "for Uncle Sam", its what consumers want!
We are not typical consumers...this Accord will sell very well. Its a driving appliance, people don't care about it being fast. Where on that list is "performance"? Its not on there at all.
Look at those ranked things, and you will understand why Honda designed the Accord the way they did. Its not "for Uncle Sam", its what consumers want!
We are not typical consumers...this Accord will sell very well. Its a driving appliance, people don't care about it being fast. Where on that list is "performance"? Its not on there at all.
People do care about performance, more than you think, but not performance numbers etc like us. My mother is 71 years old and would never buy one of these, because she likes powerful cars. Not all consumers are just blind sheep.
I have not one friend who bought a car for fuel economy now that I think about it.
#2771
Lexus Champion
The "best"? I don't see why. Good to live with on a daily basis? Honestly, in this day and age, with infotainment screens, I would never give an opinion on that from a still picture. Gotta test it out to be sure.
#2773
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
It's for CAFE averages, which is for Uncle Sam.
People do care about performance, more than you think, but not numbers etc like us. My mother is 71 years old and would never buy one of these, because she likes powerful cars. Not all consumers are just blind sheep.
I have not one friend who bought a car for fuel economy now that I think about it.
People do care about performance, more than you think, but not numbers etc like us. My mother is 71 years old and would never buy one of these, because she likes powerful cars. Not all consumers are just blind sheep.
I have not one friend who bought a car for fuel economy now that I think about it.
Not every car has to be designed for us. There are plenty of great cars designed for us...this one is designed for the average non enthusiast appliance carbuyer who primarily cares about fuel economy.
#2774
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
https://consumerfed.org/press_releas...omy-standards/
Washington, D.C. – Increasing federal fuel economy standards for cars and light duty trucks, to 42 MPG by 2025, is supported by 79 percent of Americans (68 percent of Republicans), and opposed by only 18 percent, according to a recent national survey commissioned by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA). The Administration and Congress are considering weakening these standards.
One reason for the widespread support of higher standards is that a large majority (79%) of those intending to purchase a motor vehicle in the future, think that the vehicle’s fuel economy is important in the purchase of their next vehicle. In part, this concern may reflect the belief that gas prices will rise in the future. When asked to guess the price of gasoline in five years, the average price given by all respondents was $3.90. Today’s average price is only $2.27.
One reason for the widespread support of higher standards is that a large majority (79%) of those intending to purchase a motor vehicle in the future, think that the vehicle’s fuel economy is important in the purchase of their next vehicle. In part, this concern may reflect the belief that gas prices will rise in the future. When asked to guess the price of gasoline in five years, the average price given by all respondents was $3.90. Today’s average price is only $2.27.
#2775
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
Part of this too is you drive very little, when people drive a lot fuel makes up a huge part of their expenses. One of the managers at my company got a Tesla Model S and traded her X5. She manages several offices spread out geographically, so she drives a lot. Her monthly fuel cost was nearly $1,000. Thats why she got the Tesla....she bought a $115,000 Tesla and her monthly outlay for transportation decreased. Thats crazy lol.
I pay about $500 a month to fuel my cars and one of them is driven 14,000 miles a year (the national average) and the other is only driven about 8,000 miles a year which is way low. If my wife was also driving for work our monthly expense would be about $700 a month.
That is a HUGE part of a family's monthly budget. It makes total sense for consumers to want to dramatically reduce that. Going from 30MPG to 50 MPG basically cuts their fuel budget in half, which puts an extra $100 a month back in their pocket.
You said in your BMW thread you don't care about having a new phone because "$1,100 isnt worth it to you", well for typical consumers having a more powerful car isn't worth $1,000+ a year in additional fuel cost. Everybody has different things they feel are worth spending on, and the majority of people clearly value fuel economy over power.
I pay about $500 a month to fuel my cars and one of them is driven 14,000 miles a year (the national average) and the other is only driven about 8,000 miles a year which is way low. If my wife was also driving for work our monthly expense would be about $700 a month.
That is a HUGE part of a family's monthly budget. It makes total sense for consumers to want to dramatically reduce that. Going from 30MPG to 50 MPG basically cuts their fuel budget in half, which puts an extra $100 a month back in their pocket.
You said in your BMW thread you don't care about having a new phone because "$1,100 isnt worth it to you", well for typical consumers having a more powerful car isn't worth $1,000+ a year in additional fuel cost. Everybody has different things they feel are worth spending on, and the majority of people clearly value fuel economy over power.
Last edited by SW17LS; 02-26-23 at 08:48 AM.