Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

General Car Conversation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-23, 08:37 PM
  #8296  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,987
Received 2,462 Likes on 1,615 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Margate330
... I thought I was hot stuff because I'd already replaced two blown engines in my Mustang by myself.

Ticked off because I felt changing oil was beneath me, I then got schooled on my first Jaguar oil change.

I couldn't find the oil filter!

Engine design looked completely foreign, it was. Duh. Lol

Moral to the story, just because a man can DIY his own car doesn't mean he's automatically qualified to work on someone else's. Haha

I found the oil filter, eventually... lol
haha, a humbling experience i'm sure.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 08:40 PM
  #8297  
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,019
Received 241 Likes on 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
ha, you know proper english then.
lol oh yea bri'ish innit...

Stroock639 is offline  
Old 11-28-23, 08:51 PM
  #8298  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,453
Received 219 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I remember reading that at the time, and I remember test driving all those cars when we were looking for the LS400. Pretty cool for a 17 year old to get to drive all those incredible cars. The only one we didn’t look at was the Audi.
Yep, I was a Junior in HS when this article came out.

I also got to drive every S-Class back when I had family in South Florida, from 320 to 600 V12, E38 740iL and 750iL V12, but I was 15 on a learner's permit driving these $100k cars (in mid-late 90s money), it was kind of insane. The licensed drivers let me put the cars through their paces, plenty.

Originally Posted by SW17LS
The S Class and the 7 were significantly bigger than the LS, but the LS at the time was just a package that was right sized in and out and just an undeniable value for a car that in many ways was also the best car. Best riding, quietest, smoothest engine. In the end for my dad it was between the 740 and the LS, there was a CPO 97 740 if I remember correctly that he really seriously considered. We were so excited with the LS we used to trade off driving to and from places lol
I can see why the LS is the winner for sure and agree, but I would take the Mercedes second. Even though it is slow, they aren't wrong when they say it moved faster than the numbers say. And that MB is built as solidly as that Lexus (reliability, no). I remember loading up in one, full car, and my dad just took off full throttle and I was shocked it was an S320. They should have brought in the S420 at least, for 8 grand more in this test so it would have had a V8. S420s were semi-quick once up to speed, S500s were fast at any speed. S600 I didn't get a chance to drive hard at all. Notice that the article says the overwhelming majority of W140s sold were S500s, the second most expensive one at $90,000+ which is $155k today. Remember back when people wanted big big engines? They bought them and had no problem paying for it. I think they still would if we still had those options. A big draw of a Denali/High Country is the 6.2.

Last edited by AJT123; 11-28-23 at 08:54 PM.
AJT123 is offline  
Old 11-29-23, 08:16 AM
  #8299  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,348
Received 2,741 Likes on 1,962 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
All else equal, RWD doers not help with interior space-efficiency,
Yet all the other cars in the segment which are RWD have plenty of room...

Has nothing to do with the XJ8 being RWD.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 11-29-23, 08:18 AM
  #8300  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,227
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Yet all the other cars in the segment which are RWD have plenty of room...

Has nothing to do with the XJ8 being RWD.
XJ8 is just a really only design style. . The replacement Jaguar was much better. (I just can’t remember the name)
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 11-29-23, 08:22 AM
  #8301  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,348
Received 2,741 Likes on 1,962 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
I can see why the LS is the winner for sure and agree, but I would take the Mercedes second. Even though it is slow, they aren't wrong when they say it moved faster than the numbers say. And that MB is built as solidly as that Lexus (reliability, no). I remember loading up in one, full car, and my dad just took off full throttle and I was shocked it was an S320. They should have brought in the S420 at least, for 8 grand more in this test so it would have had a V8. S420s were semi-quick once up to speed, S500s were fast at any speed. S600 I didn't get a chance to drive hard at all. Notice that the article says the overwhelming majority of W140s sold were S500s, the second most expensive one at $90,000+ which is $155k today. Remember back when people wanted big big engines? They bought them and had no problem paying for it. I think they still would if we still had those options. A big draw of a Denali/High Country is the 6.2.
The problem was the S Class at that time being really old, it came out in 91 as a 92 model, and it was dramatically more expensive. When you drove the W140 against those cars the only reason that presented itself to choose it was because it was an S Class. It felt absolutely ancient inside. The LS and 7 rode better, were quieter, has more modern tech and feel especially the LS400. The reason why they used the S320 was it was the only way to make it remotely comparable in cost.

A similar S Class to my dad's 98 LS400 would have cost $30,000 more, 50% more, that was just a non starter. Now, had the W220 been out at that time, it would have been much more competitive. Way more modern and pricing was a little easier to swallow, no 6 cyl etc. Thats exactly why they made the W220 cheaper, the W140 was just way too expensive.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 11-29-23, 08:34 AM
  #8302  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,227
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
The reason why they used the S320 was it was the only way to make it remotely comparable in cost.

.
‘They should not have used that car as a comparison. A S320 does not make sense. Mercedes and BMW were vastly ahead of Lexus LS in 1998.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 11-29-23 at 08:52 AM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 11-29-23, 08:39 AM
  #8303  
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,019
Received 241 Likes on 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Thats exactly why they made the W220 cheaper, the W140 was just way too expensive.
and a big reason it was so expensive in the first place was the LS 400! when that first came out in 1989 mercedes was basically caught with its pants down and had to rush to add extra features, ultimately resulting in delays and budget overruns

unfortunately i think the W220 suffered as a result of them trying to "undo" their financial setbacks and excess of the W140... eventually the W220 got better and was the first platform to get the V8 Kompressor and V12 Biturbo engines as well as ABC suspension (so for that i appreciate it lol) but it was never quite the tank its predecessor was
Stroock639 is offline  
Old 11-29-23, 09:15 AM
  #8304  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,348
Received 2,741 Likes on 1,962 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
‘They should not have used that car as a comparison. A S320 does not make sense. Mercedes and BMW were vastly ahead of Lexus LS in 1998.
Yet the LS400 won the test.

That really wasn’t true at the time, the LS really was superior in many ways AND cheaper. Best riding, quietest car with the most refined powertrain. When you compared it to the S and the 7, there was really no reason to buy either of them other than the badge.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 11-29-23, 09:20 AM
  #8305  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,453
Received 219 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

A few of the other cars were also 70k, for 8k more they should have picked an S420 with the V8.

W140 and E38 drove great, W140 was old but I personally don’t care. They drove amazingly well. Yes Mercedes being way more expensive, that’s just how they were then. People paid the piper for them, they sold.

I never have had extended personal experience with any LS400, which is a shame. I have no doubt it was fully competitive.
AJT123 is offline  
Old 11-29-23, 09:29 AM
  #8306  
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,019
Received 241 Likes on 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AJT123
Yes Mercedes being way more expensive, that’s just how they were then
and now, and basically throughout all of history lol
Stroock639 is offline  
Old 11-29-23, 09:40 AM
  #8307  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,227
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
.
That really wasn’t true at the time, the LS really was superior in many ways AND cheaper. Best riding, quietest car with the most refined powertrain. When you compared it to the S and the 7, there was really no reason to buy either of them other than the badge.
Car and Driver should have used a V8 short wheelbase Mercedes. Makes no sense to compare a. 6 cylinder long wheelbase car to a short wheel base V8. The Lexus was 500lbs lighter…the Mercedes was in a higher class of automobiles. Would you compare a short wheel base Tundra with a V8 to a long wheel base V6 Ford…makes no sense.

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...mparison-test/

Look where Lexus ranks here…. The BMW is on another level with a V12. But…makes no sense to campare a V8 to a V12


‘’Just
Originally Posted by AJT123
A few of the other cars were also 70k, for 8k more they should have picked an S420 with the V8.
Yes. They should have

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 11-29-23 at 09:45 AM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 11-29-23, 09:47 AM
  #8308  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 57,348
Received 2,741 Likes on 1,962 Posts
Default

They were comparing flagship sedans, and that’s what the LS was…and again the LS won so it’s hard to say it can’t be compared to cars that it beat in the comparison test.

In that Car & Driver test, remember after that test came out the LS destroyed the Germans in sales to the point where they had to make massive shifts in their product design and offerings.
SW17LS is online now  
Old 11-29-23, 09:55 AM
  #8309  
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
AJT123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 12,453
Received 219 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Car and Driver should have used a V8 short wheelbase Mercedes. Makes no sense to compare a. 6 cylinder long wheelbase car to a short wheel base V8. The Lexus was 500lbs lighter…the Mercedes was in a higher class of automobiles
Indeed, W140 was engineered to run with the absolute nicest cars like Bentleys, etc.

However there was no SWB V8, just the 320 was offered in SWB and they were easy to spot bc they were the only W140s without wiper headlights.
AJT123 is offline  
Old 11-29-23, 10:07 AM
  #8310  
Stroock639
Lexus Test Driver
 
Stroock639's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,019
Received 241 Likes on 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Look where Lexus ranks here…. The BMW is on another level with a V12. But…makes no sense to campare a V8 to a V12
from the review:

But keep in mind that the Lexus marketers never intended to position the car as a top-of-the-line luxury machine. Remembering that, and remembering that the Lexus folks definitely consider it a workable alternative to expensive luxury cars, the LS400 emerges as a fox in the henhouse.

"I can't believe that this car compares so well to the expensive cars," was a comment heard more than a few times during our testing days.
they also said the transmission was the best of all 4 cars, and even ranked it higher than the bentley overall... it was also their favorite highway cruiser and the only real "issue" is the lack of badge prestige
Stroock639 is offline  


Quick Reply: General Car Conversation



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:16 AM.