Honda shafts its Ohio workers, demands they repay their bonus
#46
#48
Yes, keeping a large amount would indeed be theft....I never said otherwise. But for a relatively small amount......well, good luck trying to get a jury to convict somebody for that LOL, especially a factory worker. Sorry to bust your bubble, but that's not gonna happen.
and withholding the money would be easy even if they fire the employees, because that last paycheck can be net of the bonus overpayment.
If Honda pursues this matter in court and forces the money returned, the negative public image is going to be very bad for the company. The company will seriously regret it when sales are impacted. Will it be worth it? I seriously doubt it.....and that was the point that bitkahuna was making.
a bunch of talking heads with probably no legal expertise among them. their opinion, while interesting (especially the lady on the left ), is irrelevant.
#49
company tells you they overpaid your account, you refuse to give it back, sounds like knowingly steal to me.
#50
According to the article employees who were overpaid have until tomorrow to decide which repayment option they choose with the deduction from their future bonuses the default method. No doubt there will be some who can't or won't repay so the default method will be resolve most of those issues.
#51
Couple hundred dollars times several thousand employees can be too much of a mistake to swallow at a publicly traded corporation.
Although It seems they simply needed to send out a heads up that employees next paycheck is going to have deduction and then an explanation for what’s going on would have been the gentlest method of correcting this mistake. Most people can deal with Reduced paycheck in the future easier than repaying money they have already been paid and likely spent already.
Unfortunately corporations have taken over the world, and the days of an owner/operator, being able to put a little compassion into a business, are long gone. Share holders and stock value is the only thing that matters in any business, these days.
Toyota’s and Hondas could easily be getting produced in China before the ICE is retired.
Although It seems they simply needed to send out a heads up that employees next paycheck is going to have deduction and then an explanation for what’s going on would have been the gentlest method of correcting this mistake. Most people can deal with Reduced paycheck in the future easier than repaying money they have already been paid and likely spent already.
Unfortunately corporations have taken over the world, and the days of an owner/operator, being able to put a little compassion into a business, are long gone. Share holders and stock value is the only thing that matters in any business, these days.
Toyota’s and Hondas could easily be getting produced in China before the ICE is retired.
#52
And just look at this thread - most people back the company for getting back money paid in error. Why would any widespread public reaction be any different.
I realize that no one here will convince you otherwise, but that's just how it would go.
#53
Yes, keeping a large amount would indeed be theft....I never said otherwise. But for a relatively small amount......well, good luck trying to get a jury to convict somebody for that LOL, especially a factory worker. Sorry to bust your bubble, but that's not gonna happen.
There are cases where one should hand it back
I am astonished you feel this way. I don't know if you actually do or if this is just an example of you refusing to reverse course on something you've said even when its obvious its wrong...but I have never seen you on the wrong side of a moral and ethical issue before.
Cashing one of my old paychecks (before I went direct-deposit on my account), a careless bank-teller once did exactly that...accidentally handed me a brand-new stack of big bills right out of the safe (probably enough to buy a new car with at that time). As soon as I saw what happened, I immediately handed it back.....her face turned red as a beet.
No. That was apples and oranges. The IRS decided I had a little more refund coming to me than I actually put down on my return. That has happened a couple of times.
OK, for argument's sake, let's suppose that several of you here are correct, and that the workers, legally, HAVE to return the money one way or another. If Honda pursues this matter in court and forces the money returned, the negative public image is going to be very bad for the company. The company will seriously regret it when sales are impacted. Will it be worth it? I seriously doubt it.....and that was the point that bitkahuna was making.
Last edited by SW17LS; 09-22-22 at 08:17 AM.
#54
Aka, you're good but sorry, not that good. lol
PS- I'm not saying I would keep the money if someone said hey I Bonus you too much, just saying it's a let down and sad a little.
Last edited by Margate330; 09-22-22 at 01:47 PM.
#55
I never thought the biggest practical problem for Honda here would be bad publicity. By far the bigger potential problem is employee morale. For the people directly affected, it's THEIR bank account and THEIR kiddies' new shoes. They'll remember, and not favorably. At best, that won't help the quality of Marysville Honda products. At worst, it could hurt it. And THAT'S what makes me think management's handling of the aftermath was ham-fisted and misguided.
#56
You're correct that I misread your comment, and I apologize. I took your comment to mean that the absence of long-term public controversy was proof that Honda's actions were not wrong, but you didn't say that. In its context, I see now you were simply saying it won't be remembered long as a public controversy. With that, I agree.
I never thought the biggest practical problem for Honda here would be bad publicity. By far the bigger potential problem is employee morale. For the people directly affected, it's THEIR bank account and THEIR kiddies' new shoes. They'll remember, and not favorably. At best, that won't help the quality of Marysville Honda products. At worst, it could hurt it. And THAT'S what makes me think management's handling of the aftermath was ham-fisted and misguided.
I never thought the biggest practical problem for Honda here would be bad publicity. By far the bigger potential problem is employee morale. For the people directly affected, it's THEIR bank account and THEIR kiddies' new shoes. They'll remember, and not favorably. At best, that won't help the quality of Marysville Honda products. At worst, it could hurt it. And THAT'S what makes me think management's handling of the aftermath was ham-fisted and misguided.
#57
Since you brought up the subject (Christian ethics)..it is also wrong to falsely-accuse people of stealing when they are not stealing.
Sales won't be impacted,
Last edited by mmarshall; 09-22-22 at 07:12 PM.
#58
That's not stealing. The company deposited it in their accounts. The workers did not just take it. Besides, if the workers DID feel that they aren't entitled to it, they can always (voluntarily) give part of it back...nothing is stopping them. But most of them probably deserve it.....they worked for it.
Since you brought up the subject (Christian ethics)..it is also wrong to falsely-accuse people of stealing when they are not stealing.
Since you brought up the subject (Christian ethics)..it is also wrong to falsely-accuse people of stealing when they are not stealing.
If you give a cashier $40 for a $30 item, and they hand you back $20...taking that extra $10 when you know it was given to you in error is stealing and its wrong.
Just because people work hard doesn't mean they are entitled to keep a bonus that was paid to them erroneously. We all work hard, and we work hard in exchange for compensation that is pre-negotiated and agreed to. You can't expect to profit from someone else's error just because you "work hard".
#59
That's not stealing. The company deposited it in their accounts. The workers did not just take it. Besides, if the workers DID feel that they aren't entitled to it, they can always (voluntarily) give part of it back...nothing is stopping them. But most of them probably deserve it.....they worked for it.
Since you brought up the subject (Christian ethics)..it is also wrong to falsely-accuse people of stealing when they are not stealing.
I disagree. This bad PR for Honda is very likely to affect a fair number of sales, but not to the same extent as the VW Dieselgate-scandal did. Honda will survive it, albeit with some bruises.
Since you brought up the subject (Christian ethics)..it is also wrong to falsely-accuse people of stealing when they are not stealing.
I disagree. This bad PR for Honda is very likely to affect a fair number of sales, but not to the same extent as the VW Dieselgate-scandal did. Honda will survive it, albeit with some bruises.