Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Honda shafts its Ohio workers, demands they repay their bonus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-22 | 07:11 PM
  #46  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,752
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
You will see for yourself what happens if the workers are forced to return it. The negative image for Honda is going to be significant. And that also is a fact.
I disagree. I think most people would side with Honda…

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 09-21-22 at 07:15 PM.
Old 09-21-22 | 07:22 PM
  #47  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,715
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I disagree. I think most people would side with Honda…

This group got it right............

Old 09-21-22 | 07:52 PM
  #48  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,631
Likes: 2,588
From: Present
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Yes, keeping a large amount would indeed be theft....I never said otherwise. But for a relatively small amount......well, good luck trying to get a jury to convict somebody for that LOL, especially a factory worker. Sorry to bust your bubble, but that's not gonna happen.
this won't go to a jury if someone was stupid enough to keep the overpaid bonus money.

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Nobody would get charged with this. It was accidental error. But, they will get fired if they don’t comply
exactly.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
OK, for argument's sake, let's suppose that several of you here are correct, and that the workers, legally, HAVE to return the money one way or another.
what can't you understand about "workers overpaid must pay back what they weren't entitled to"?

and withholding the money would be easy even if they fire the employees, because that last paycheck can be net of the bonus overpayment.

If Honda pursues this matter in court and forces the money returned, the negative public image is going to be very bad for the company. The company will seriously regret it when sales are impacted. Will it be worth it? I seriously doubt it.....and that was the point that bitkahuna was making.
does anyone know how much total money we're talking about?

Originally Posted by mmarshall
This group got it right............
a bunch of talking heads with probably no legal expertise among them. their opinion, while interesting (especially the lady on the left ), is irrelevant.

Old 09-21-22 | 08:22 PM
  #49  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,060
Likes: 51
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
What you are describing, however, is not petty theft. You are speaking of embezzlement, which is a different offense. Embezzlement is when you KNOWINGLY steal from your company or organization....not when they actually put something in your account.
company tells you they overpaid your account, you refuse to give it back, sounds like knowingly steal to me.
Old 09-21-22 | 08:42 PM
  #50  
LexBob2's Avatar
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,343
Likes: 142
From: Illinois
Default

According to the article employees who were overpaid have until tomorrow to decide which repayment option they choose with the deduction from their future bonuses the default method. No doubt there will be some who can't or won't repay so the default method will be resolve most of those issues.
Old 09-22-22 | 03:44 AM
  #51  
dwoods801's Avatar
dwoods801
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 266
From: Utah
Default

Couple hundred dollars times several thousand employees can be too much of a mistake to swallow at a publicly traded corporation.
Although It seems they simply needed to send out a heads up that employees next paycheck is going to have deduction and then an explanation for what’s going on would have been the gentlest method of correcting this mistake. Most people can deal with Reduced paycheck in the future easier than repaying money they have already been paid and likely spent already.
Unfortunately corporations have taken over the world, and the days of an owner/operator, being able to put a little compassion into a business, are long gone. Share holders and stock value is the only thing that matters in any business, these days.
Toyota’s and Hondas could easily be getting produced in China before the ICE is retired.
Old 09-22-22 | 05:51 AM
  #52  
tex2670's Avatar
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,166
Likes: 11
From: Southeastern PA
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
You will see for yourself what happens if the workers are forced to return it. The negative image for Honda is going to be significant. And that also is a fact.
Nope. It will hardly get any significant coverage. Hardly anyone will hear about it. There will be virtually 0 impact on Honda's image.

And just look at this thread - most people back the company for getting back money paid in error. Why would any widespread public reaction be any different.

I realize that no one here will convince you otherwise, but that's just how it would go.
Old 09-22-22 | 07:41 AM
  #53  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 58,376
Likes: 2,793
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Yes, keeping a large amount would indeed be theft....I never said otherwise. But for a relatively small amount......well, good luck trying to get a jury to convict somebody for that LOL, especially a factory worker. Sorry to bust your bubble, but that's not gonna happen.
I thought you were a moral and Christian person? Stealing is wrong, whatever it is. If you take a dollar from someone that isn't yours, thats stealing just the same as if it were $100,000.

There are cases where one should hand it back
Yeah every case..

I am astonished you feel this way. I don't know if you actually do or if this is just an example of you refusing to reverse course on something you've said even when its obvious its wrong...but I have never seen you on the wrong side of a moral and ethical issue before.

Cashing one of my old paychecks (before I went direct-deposit on my account), a careless bank-teller once did exactly that...accidentally handed me a brand-new stack of big bills right out of the safe (probably enough to buy a new car with at that time). As soon as I saw what happened, I immediately handed it back.....her face turned red as a beet.
But if she gave you $20 extra you would have just stolen that?

No. That was apples and oranges. The IRS decided I had a little more refund coming to me than I actually put down on my return. That has happened a couple of times.
Thats totally different.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
OK, for argument's sake, let's suppose that several of you here are correct, and that the workers, legally, HAVE to return the money one way or another. If Honda pursues this matter in court and forces the money returned, the negative public image is going to be very bad for the company. The company will seriously regret it when sales are impacted. Will it be worth it? I seriously doubt it.....and that was the point that bitkahuna was making.
Sales won't be impacted, and Honda will just take the overpayment out of their future pay.

Last edited by SW17LS; 09-22-22 at 08:17 AM.
Old 09-22-22 | 12:38 PM
  #54  
Margate330's Avatar
Margate330
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 7,534
Likes: 1,037
From: FL
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I thought you were a moral and Christian person? Stealing is wrong, whatever it is. If you take a dollar from someone that isn't yours, thats stealing just the same as if it were $100,000.
If I was given a "Bonus" and then they came back and said sorry too much bonus, um that's kinda lame.

Aka, you're good but sorry, not that good. lol

PS- I'm not saying I would keep the money if someone said hey I Bonus you too much, just saying it's a let down and sad a little.

Last edited by Margate330; 09-22-22 at 01:47 PM.
Old 09-22-22 | 05:07 PM
  #55  
LexFinally's Avatar
LexFinally
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 971
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
I have no idea what your point is here. Did you read what I was commenting on? Are you suggesting that there is/should be nationwide moral outrage that will cost Honda so much in sales that they should just let everyone keep the $$?
You're correct that I misread your comment, and I apologize. I took your comment to mean that the absence of long-term public controversy was proof that Honda's actions were not wrong, but you didn't say that. In its context, I see now you were simply saying it won't be remembered long as a public controversy. With that, I agree.

I never thought the biggest practical problem for Honda here would be bad publicity. By far the bigger potential problem is employee morale. For the people directly affected, it's THEIR bank account and THEIR kiddies' new shoes. They'll remember, and not favorably. At best, that won't help the quality of Marysville Honda products. At worst, it could hurt it. And THAT'S what makes me think management's handling of the aftermath was ham-fisted and misguided.
Old 09-22-22 | 06:39 PM
  #56  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,752
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by LexFinally
You're correct that I misread your comment, and I apologize. I took your comment to mean that the absence of long-term public controversy was proof that Honda's actions were not wrong, but you didn't say that. In its context, I see now you were simply saying it won't be remembered long as a public controversy. With that, I agree.

I never thought the biggest practical problem for Honda here would be bad publicity. By far the bigger potential problem is employee morale. For the people directly affected, it's THEIR bank account and THEIR kiddies' new shoes. They'll remember, and not favorably. At best, that won't help the quality of Marysville Honda products. At worst, it could hurt it. And THAT'S what makes me think management's handling of the aftermath was ham-fisted and misguided.
So you think these workers are going to be disgruntled?
Old 09-22-22 | 07:06 PM
  #57  
mmarshall's Avatar
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 91,715
Likes: 89
From: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
I thought you were a moral and Christian person? Stealing is wrong, whatever it is. If you take a dollar from someone that isn't yours, thats stealing just the same as if it were $100,000.
That's not stealing. The company deposited it in their accounts. The workers did not just take it. Besides, if the workers DID feel that they aren't entitled to it, they can always (voluntarily) give part of it back...nothing is stopping them. But most of them probably deserve it.....they worked for it.

Since you brought up the subject (Christian ethics)..it is also wrong to falsely-accuse people of stealing when they are not stealing.


Sales won't be impacted,
I disagree. This bad PR for Honda is very likely to affect a fair number of sales, but not to the same extent as the VW Dieselgate-scandal did. Honda will survive it, albeit with some bruises.

Last edited by mmarshall; 09-22-22 at 07:12 PM.
Old 09-22-22 | 07:12 PM
  #58  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 58,376
Likes: 2,793
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
That's not stealing. The company deposited it in their accounts. The workers did not just take it. Besides, if the workers DID feel that they aren't entitled to it, they can always (voluntarily) give part of it back...nothing is stopping them. But most of them probably deserve it.....they worked for it.

Since you brought up the subject (Christian ethics)..it is also wrong to falsely-accuse people of stealing when they are not stealing.
If they are overpaid and they refuse to give it back, it is stealing.

If you give a cashier $40 for a $30 item, and they hand you back $20...taking that extra $10 when you know it was given to you in error is stealing and its wrong.

Just because people work hard doesn't mean they are entitled to keep a bonus that was paid to them erroneously. We all work hard, and we work hard in exchange for compensation that is pre-negotiated and agreed to. You can't expect to profit from someone else's error just because you "work hard".
Old 09-22-22 | 07:16 PM
  #59  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,752
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
That's not stealing. The company deposited it in their accounts. The workers did not just take it. Besides, if the workers DID feel that they aren't entitled to it, they can always (voluntarily) give part of it back...nothing is stopping them. But most of them probably deserve it.....they worked for it.

Since you brought up the subject (Christian ethics)..it is also wrong to falsely-accuse people of stealing when they are not stealing.




I disagree. This bad PR for Honda is very likely to affect a fair number of sales, but not to the same extent as the VW Dieselgate-scandal did. Honda will survive it, albeit with some bruises.
because of this m Maybe they need to call the UAW and organize for better pay and working conditions etc. What you think ?
Old 09-22-22 | 07:20 PM
  #60  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,060
Likes: 51
From: Houston, Texas
Default

some of yall arent seeing the bigger precedent if honda allows them to keep the extra. What about the other people that didnt get overpaid, then what? Is that fair to them?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:44 AM.