Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2023 m2 seen - could it be any uglier?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-22 | 03:18 PM
  #76  
gor134's Avatar
gor134
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: California
Default





As expected.. it looks really good in my opinion, unlike the ****ty leak photos washing out all the body lines.

Classic BMW proportions, strong character line, muscled big fenders, normal size grilled. And way better front bumper than the triangular M240i.
Old 10-11-22 | 03:26 PM
  #77  
swajames's Avatar
swajames
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 757
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Default

Much better pictures. I think it looks great, it looks much better in these pictures than in some of the earlier ones.
Old 10-12-22 | 05:09 AM
  #78  
GFerg's Avatar
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian
CL Folding 25,000
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,303
Likes: 65
From: What is G?
Default

This is a modern day E30 M3, with the boxed fenders. I'm liking it more and more. Great way to pay homage to the car that started it all for them while at the same time serve as their last true ICE M car.

I never thought it was horrible in the spy shots a few weeks back, just some improvements can be made to make it better (and as stated then, there are MULTIPLE other current BMW's that are worse and in the running for worse looking of all time ).

Now seeing the official pics, Im thinking an aftermarket rear bumper or new rear diffuser is all that is needed here. I'm cool with the rest of it.

Last edited by GFerg; 10-12-22 at 05:13 AM.
Old 10-12-22 | 05:21 AM
  #79  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,549
Likes: 2,575
From: Present
Default

Originally Posted by gor134
...


As expected.. it looks really good in my opinion, unlike the ****ty leak photos washing out all the body lines.

Classic BMW proportions, strong character line, muscled big fenders, normal size grilled. And way better front bumper than the triangular M240i.
classic boy racer looks, and cheap looking. reminds me some of a subaru wrx. absolutely nothing classy about this at all.
Old 10-12-22 | 05:56 AM
  #80  
RNM GS3's Avatar
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,312
Likes: 72
From: New York
Default

I really like the looks and thinks it’s much more aggressive design than previous M2.
It also looks a million times better than the pig nose M4.

I also really like the interior especially the carbon buckets. The ipad screen is really the only negative.
Old 10-12-22 | 06:02 AM
  #81  
tex2670's Avatar
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10,161
Likes: 10
From: Southeastern PA
Default

Originally Posted by gor134




As expected.. it looks really good in my opinion, unlike the ****ty leak photos washing out all the body lines.

Classic BMW proportions, strong character line, muscled big fenders, normal size grilled. And way better front bumper than the triangular M240i.
The shape of that grille makes me think early 80s Pontiac....
Old 10-12-22 | 06:22 AM
  #82  
Hoovey689's Avatar
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 42,324
Likes: 129
From: California
Default 2023 bmw m2








BMW designers were intent on making a statement with the debut of the brand's last non-electrified M car, starting with a low, wide front fascia exaggerating all the horizontals. Leaving the M2 CS design language behind, straight lines and hard edges dominate. A stretched, frameless kidney grille separates stretched, single-element LED headlights. A pair of deep creases distinguish the upper area from the triple lower intake that is all rectangles, each element pulled laterally across the car.

The design softens slightly from there, the sides dominated by wheel arches bulgy enough for the M2's track to match the BMW M4, at 63.7 inches in front (+1.5 inches over the previous M2) and 63.2 inches in back (+0.16 inch), as well as matching the M4's 74.3-inch width. The other dimensions are a 180.3-inch width, 4.1 inches longer than before; a 55.2-inch height, 0.3 inch lower than before; on a 108.1-inch wheelbase, 2.1 inches longer than the last M2. The extra distance between the wheels makes for more legroom in front and back, but we still wouldn't expect to put anyone we liked in the second row for long.

The rear fascia exaggerates elements from the earlier car. A more pronounced crease sets off the decklid spoiler. The lower edge of the trunk doesn't cascade into the bumper anymore, rather, the two meet with straight lines, the bumper drawn like a jutting crossbar. Slim outer air vents are gone, pried open to form vertical rectangles housing reflectors. The diffuser insert looks to be merely that, a decorative insert to frame quad pipes emerging from a wide muffler. It is all very serious.

M's signature engine sits under the long hood, the S58 TwinPower Turbo inline six-cylinder. Puissance comes to 453 horsepower and 406 pound-feet of torque, 48 horses more than the M2 Competition, nine more than the M2 CS, with the same torque figure shared between the three. The turbo six hits those numbers at slightly higher rpms than before, peak horse at 6,250 rpm instead of 5,230 rpm in the former M2 Competition, peak torque at 2,650 rpm instead of 2,350 rpm. The redline comes at 7,200 rpm.

Every bit of that goes to the rear wheels through either a six-speed manual transmission or an eight-speed automatic. Those wheels are now staggered; instead of wearing 19-inchers all around, a pair of Jet Black 19-inch light alloy wheels in 275/35 rubber hang off the front axle, a pair of 20-inch light alloy wheels shod in 285/30 rubber hang off the back. The larger contact patch is really about improving handling more than acceleration. BMW says 0 to 60 miles per hour takes 3.9 seconds in the automatic, 4.1 seconds in the manual. The M2 CS with the seven-speed dual-clutch automatic ran the same sprint in 3.8 seconds, the M2 Competition with the same gearbox did it in 4.2 seconds. These close times are definitely related to the fact that BMW lists curb weight for the new second-gen M2 at 3,814 pounds with the manual gearbox, 3,867 with the automatic. The previous M2 weighed 3,600 pounds with the six-speed manual.

Standard performance aids to make the most of the go will include rev-matching Gear Shift Assistant on manual-equipped cars, the Active M Differential, Adaptive M Suspension, dual-mode steering, and M Drive Professional with ten traction control settings. Reigning everything in, the dual-mode braking system gets a set of six-piston brakes clamping 15-inch discs in front, single-piston calipers clamping 14.6-inch rotors in back.

The interior gets redesigned M Sport Seats with more aggressive side bolsters, stitched up in perforated in black or cognac Vernasca leather and set off with illuminated M logos. An optional Carbon Package swaps out for a set of new M Carbon bucket seats that save 24 pounds over the M Sport Seats, while keeping amenities like Merino leather, electric adjustment, seat heating, and illuminated M2 badges. The Carbon Package also gets the weight saving carbon roof instead of the glass moonroof that's 20% larger than before, carbon shift paddles for the automatic-equipped models, and carbon trim throughout the cabin.

Standard convenience and safety systems include Park Distance Control, Dynamic Cruise Control, Front Collision Warning with brake intervention, and Lane Departure Warning. Active Cruise Control with Stop & Go can be optioned only on cars with the eight-speed auto. The standard color palette gets Alpine White, Black Sapphire metallic, Brooklyn Grey metallic, Toronto Red metallic, and the M2-exclusive Zandvoort Blue.

The new M2's global launch will come in April 2023. Starting price will be $62,200 plus a $995 destination charge, totaling $63,195, about $3,300 more than the last-gen.
Source
Old 10-12-22 | 07:54 AM
  #83  
JDR76's Avatar
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 12,592
Likes: 1,630
From: WA
Default

I'm still struggling to like this. I bet it's a blast to drive, and the pricing is great, but something about that front end just looks cheap to me. Very plasticky.
Old 10-12-22 | 08:29 AM
  #84  
patgilm's Avatar
patgilm
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 304
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
I'm still struggling to like this. I bet it's a blast to drive, and the pricing is great, but something about that front end just looks cheap to me. Very plasticky.
I agree, I like almost everything about it but something about the exterior looks cheap to me. Maybe it’s the headlights and tailights, I can’t put a finger on it.
Old 10-12-22 | 11:52 AM
  #85  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,549
Likes: 2,575
From: Present
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey689




only a true fan could like the front, back, and interior.
especially the back


Last edited by bitkahuna; 10-12-22 at 02:54 PM.
Old 10-12-22 | 01:57 PM
  #86  
arentz07's Avatar
arentz07
Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,688
Likes: 3,990
From: GA
Default

I think it looks better than the normal 2er.

I know, spicy take, but I just think the proportions work a lot better, especially with the flared fenders and the more normal-shaped headlights.
Old 10-12-22 | 02:30 PM
  #87  
geko29's Avatar
geko29
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,161
Likes: 338
From: IL
Default

Fronts not bad in colors other than the awful launch color. The rear is still horrid.

But more than that, I don't understand who this car is for. The M2 is supposed to be the "Baby M", but it's the same width on the outside, and the same weight as the M4. It's actually just slightly heavier than the M3. Yes it's $10k cheaper, but it's less powerful with a smaller and less-appointed interior.
Old 10-12-22 | 02:38 PM
  #88  
arentz07's Avatar
arentz07
Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,688
Likes: 3,990
From: GA
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
Fronts not bad in colors other than the awful launch color. The rear is still horrid.

But more than that, I don't understand who this car is for. The M2 is supposed to be the "Baby M", but it's the same width on the outside, and the same weight as the M4. It's actually just slightly heavier than the M3. Yes it's $10k cheaper, but it's less powerful with a smaller and less-appointed interior.
It seems to weigh about the same as the M3. I am seeing 3814 for the manual, and 3867 for the auto on the M2. The M3 is about 13-14 pounds heavier spec-for-spec according to Edmunds.

I think this car is for someone who maybe values, well, value and a tidier set of proportions than the larger M4. The M3 makes more sense, practically, but does cost more.

Similar arguments could be made for the M240i versus the M340i.
Old 10-12-22 | 02:55 PM
  #89  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,549
Likes: 2,575
From: Present
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
Fronts not bad in colors other than the awful launch color. The rear is still horrid.

But more than that, I don't understand who this car is for. The M2 is supposed to be the "Baby M", but it's the same width on the outside, and the same weight as the M4. It's actually just slightly heavier than the M3. Yes it's $10k cheaper, but it's less powerful with a smaller and less-appointed interior.
it's a step up from a civic type r, although probably smaller.
Old 10-12-22 | 04:18 PM
  #90  
RNM GS3's Avatar
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,312
Likes: 72
From: New York
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
Fronts not bad in colors other than the awful launch color. The rear is still horrid.

But more than that, I don't understand who this car is for. The M2 is supposed to be the "Baby M", but it's the same width on the outside, and the same weight as the M4. It's actually just slightly heavier than the M3. Yes it's $10k cheaper, but it's less powerful with a smaller and less-appointed interior.
I think its for those that find the M4 hideous.

Last gen M2 also weighed just as much as M3/4 of that generation.

I think the smaller size will make it more fun to drive.
The M3/4 have significantly more power.

BTW Competition model is coming in about 18months, followed by CS variant.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:59 AM.