Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

2023 m2 seen - could it be any uglier?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-22, 03:18 PM
  #76  
gor134
Intermediate
 
gor134's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: California
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default





As expected.. it looks really good in my opinion, unlike the ****ty leak photos washing out all the body lines.

Classic BMW proportions, strong character line, muscled big fenders, normal size grilled. And way better front bumper than the triangular M240i.
gor134 is offline  
Old 10-11-22, 03:26 PM
  #77  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,591
Received 723 Likes on 452 Posts
Default

Much better pictures. I think it looks great, it looks much better in these pictures than in some of the earlier ones.
swajames is offline  
Old 10-12-22, 05:09 AM
  #78  
GFerg
Speaks French in Russian
Senior Moderator
 
GFerg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: What is G?
Posts: 13,303
Received 65 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

This is a modern day E30 M3, with the boxed fenders. I'm liking it more and more. Great way to pay homage to the car that started it all for them while at the same time serve as their last true ICE M car.

I never thought it was horrible in the spy shots a few weeks back, just some improvements can be made to make it better (and as stated then, there are MULTIPLE other current BMW's that are worse and in the running for worse looking of all time ).

Now seeing the official pics, Im thinking an aftermarket rear bumper or new rear diffuser is all that is needed here. I'm cool with the rest of it.

Last edited by GFerg; 10-12-22 at 05:13 AM.
GFerg is offline  
Old 10-12-22, 05:21 AM
  #79  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 75,265
Received 2,510 Likes on 1,650 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gor134
...


As expected.. it looks really good in my opinion, unlike the ****ty leak photos washing out all the body lines.

Classic BMW proportions, strong character line, muscled big fenders, normal size grilled. And way better front bumper than the triangular M240i.
classic boy racer looks, and cheap looking. reminds me some of a subaru wrx. absolutely nothing classy about this at all.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 10-12-22, 05:56 AM
  #80  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,262
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

I really like the looks and thinks it’s much more aggressive design than previous M2.
It also looks a million times better than the pig nose M4.

I also really like the interior especially the carbon buckets. The ipad screen is really the only negative.
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 10-12-22, 06:02 AM
  #81  
tex2670
Lexus Champion
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 10,123
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gor134




As expected.. it looks really good in my opinion, unlike the ****ty leak photos washing out all the body lines.

Classic BMW proportions, strong character line, muscled big fenders, normal size grilled. And way better front bumper than the triangular M240i.
The shape of that grille makes me think early 80s Pontiac....
tex2670 is offline  
Old 10-12-22, 06:22 AM
  #82  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,312
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default 2023 bmw m2








BMW designers were intent on making a statement with the debut of the brand's last non-electrified M car, starting with a low, wide front fascia exaggerating all the horizontals. Leaving the M2 CS design language behind, straight lines and hard edges dominate. A stretched, frameless kidney grille separates stretched, single-element LED headlights. A pair of deep creases distinguish the upper area from the triple lower intake that is all rectangles, each element pulled laterally across the car.

The design softens slightly from there, the sides dominated by wheel arches bulgy enough for the M2's track to match the BMW M4, at 63.7 inches in front (+1.5 inches over the previous M2) and 63.2 inches in back (+0.16 inch), as well as matching the M4's 74.3-inch width. The other dimensions are a 180.3-inch width, 4.1 inches longer than before; a 55.2-inch height, 0.3 inch lower than before; on a 108.1-inch wheelbase, 2.1 inches longer than the last M2. The extra distance between the wheels makes for more legroom in front and back, but we still wouldn't expect to put anyone we liked in the second row for long.

The rear fascia exaggerates elements from the earlier car. A more pronounced crease sets off the decklid spoiler. The lower edge of the trunk doesn't cascade into the bumper anymore, rather, the two meet with straight lines, the bumper drawn like a jutting crossbar. Slim outer air vents are gone, pried open to form vertical rectangles housing reflectors. The diffuser insert looks to be merely that, a decorative insert to frame quad pipes emerging from a wide muffler. It is all very serious.

M's signature engine sits under the long hood, the S58 TwinPower Turbo inline six-cylinder. Puissance comes to 453 horsepower and 406 pound-feet of torque, 48 horses more than the M2 Competition, nine more than the M2 CS, with the same torque figure shared between the three. The turbo six hits those numbers at slightly higher rpms than before, peak horse at 6,250 rpm instead of 5,230 rpm in the former M2 Competition, peak torque at 2,650 rpm instead of 2,350 rpm. The redline comes at 7,200 rpm.

Every bit of that goes to the rear wheels through either a six-speed manual transmission or an eight-speed automatic. Those wheels are now staggered; instead of wearing 19-inchers all around, a pair of Jet Black 19-inch light alloy wheels in 275/35 rubber hang off the front axle, a pair of 20-inch light alloy wheels shod in 285/30 rubber hang off the back. The larger contact patch is really about improving handling more than acceleration. BMW says 0 to 60 miles per hour takes 3.9 seconds in the automatic, 4.1 seconds in the manual. The M2 CS with the seven-speed dual-clutch automatic ran the same sprint in 3.8 seconds, the M2 Competition with the same gearbox did it in 4.2 seconds. These close times are definitely related to the fact that BMW lists curb weight for the new second-gen M2 at 3,814 pounds with the manual gearbox, 3,867 with the automatic. The previous M2 weighed 3,600 pounds with the six-speed manual.

Standard performance aids to make the most of the go will include rev-matching Gear Shift Assistant on manual-equipped cars, the Active M Differential, Adaptive M Suspension, dual-mode steering, and M Drive Professional with ten traction control settings. Reigning everything in, the dual-mode braking system gets a set of six-piston brakes clamping 15-inch discs in front, single-piston calipers clamping 14.6-inch rotors in back.

The interior gets redesigned M Sport Seats with more aggressive side bolsters, stitched up in perforated in black or cognac Vernasca leather and set off with illuminated M logos. An optional Carbon Package swaps out for a set of new M Carbon bucket seats that save 24 pounds over the M Sport Seats, while keeping amenities like Merino leather, electric adjustment, seat heating, and illuminated M2 badges. The Carbon Package also gets the weight saving carbon roof instead of the glass moonroof that's 20% larger than before, carbon shift paddles for the automatic-equipped models, and carbon trim throughout the cabin.

Standard convenience and safety systems include Park Distance Control, Dynamic Cruise Control, Front Collision Warning with brake intervention, and Lane Departure Warning. Active Cruise Control with Stop & Go can be optioned only on cars with the eight-speed auto. The standard color palette gets Alpine White, Black Sapphire metallic, Brooklyn Grey metallic, Toronto Red metallic, and the M2-exclusive Zandvoort Blue.

The new M2's global launch will come in April 2023. Starting price will be $62,200 plus a $995 destination charge, totaling $63,195, about $3,300 more than the last-gen.
Source
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 10-12-22, 07:54 AM
  #83  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,522
Received 1,629 Likes on 1,037 Posts
Default

I'm still struggling to like this. I bet it's a blast to drive, and the pricing is great, but something about that front end just looks cheap to me. Very plasticky.
JDR76 is online now  
Old 10-12-22, 08:29 AM
  #84  
patgilm
Lead Lap
 
patgilm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,147
Received 295 Likes on 211 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
I'm still struggling to like this. I bet it's a blast to drive, and the pricing is great, but something about that front end just looks cheap to me. Very plasticky.
I agree, I like almost everything about it but something about the exterior looks cheap to me. Maybe it’s the headlights and tailights, I can’t put a finger on it.
patgilm is online now  
Old 10-12-22, 11:52 AM
  #85  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 75,265
Received 2,510 Likes on 1,650 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey689




only a true fan could like the front, back, and interior.
especially the back


Last edited by bitkahuna; 10-12-22 at 02:54 PM.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 10-12-22, 01:57 PM
  #86  
arentz07
drives cars
Forum Moderator
 
arentz07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 8,605
Received 3,912 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Default

I think it looks better than the normal 2er.

I know, spicy take, but I just think the proportions work a lot better, especially with the flared fenders and the more normal-shaped headlights.
arentz07 is offline  
Old 10-12-22, 02:30 PM
  #87  
geko29
Super Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
geko29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 8,046
Received 309 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Fronts not bad in colors other than the awful launch color. The rear is still horrid.

But more than that, I don't understand who this car is for. The M2 is supposed to be the "Baby M", but it's the same width on the outside, and the same weight as the M4. It's actually just slightly heavier than the M3. Yes it's $10k cheaper, but it's less powerful with a smaller and less-appointed interior.
geko29 is offline  
Old 10-12-22, 02:38 PM
  #88  
arentz07
drives cars
Forum Moderator
 
arentz07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: GA
Posts: 8,605
Received 3,912 Likes on 1,976 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
Fronts not bad in colors other than the awful launch color. The rear is still horrid.

But more than that, I don't understand who this car is for. The M2 is supposed to be the "Baby M", but it's the same width on the outside, and the same weight as the M4. It's actually just slightly heavier than the M3. Yes it's $10k cheaper, but it's less powerful with a smaller and less-appointed interior.
It seems to weigh about the same as the M3. I am seeing 3814 for the manual, and 3867 for the auto on the M2. The M3 is about 13-14 pounds heavier spec-for-spec according to Edmunds.

I think this car is for someone who maybe values, well, value and a tidier set of proportions than the larger M4. The M3 makes more sense, practically, but does cost more.

Similar arguments could be made for the M240i versus the M340i.
arentz07 is offline  
Old 10-12-22, 02:55 PM
  #89  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 75,265
Received 2,510 Likes on 1,650 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
Fronts not bad in colors other than the awful launch color. The rear is still horrid.

But more than that, I don't understand who this car is for. The M2 is supposed to be the "Baby M", but it's the same width on the outside, and the same weight as the M4. It's actually just slightly heavier than the M3. Yes it's $10k cheaper, but it's less powerful with a smaller and less-appointed interior.
it's a step up from a civic type r, although probably smaller.
bitkahuna is online now  
Old 10-12-22, 04:18 PM
  #90  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,262
Received 70 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by geko29
Fronts not bad in colors other than the awful launch color. The rear is still horrid.

But more than that, I don't understand who this car is for. The M2 is supposed to be the "Baby M", but it's the same width on the outside, and the same weight as the M4. It's actually just slightly heavier than the M3. Yes it's $10k cheaper, but it's less powerful with a smaller and less-appointed interior.
I think its for those that find the M4 hideous.

Last gen M2 also weighed just as much as M3/4 of that generation.

I think the smaller size will make it more fun to drive.
The M3/4 have significantly more power.

BTW Competition model is coming in about 18months, followed by CS variant.
RNM GS3 is offline  


Quick Reply: 2023 m2 seen - could it be any uglier?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:56 PM.