Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

in what ways are new cars better than old cars (if that's what you think)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-23 | 09:39 PM
  #31  
AJT123's Avatar
AJT123
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 13,085
Likes: 246
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
A W140 or XF20/30 are nowhere near as safe as a modern midmarket car, let alone a new S Class or LS.

If you asked me if I would rather be in a crash in a W140 or a 2023 Accord, I would choose the Accord.
Oh gosh this is debatable I think. You have a very larrrrrge weight advantage on your side in a W140, and those old Mercedes were, well, tanks and are still extremely safe, I think safer than you realize. Just because new tests and stuff have come out which while valid, it doesn't mean a $100,000 car from 25 years ago isn't still a rolling tank.

What kind of crash are we talking about? Head on? W140 on the move would split Accord in half in a head on. Remember Mercedes basically invented safety, and S-Class was always the pinnacle.

Check the inside metal door hinges on that Honda then go check a W140.
Old 02-20-23 | 09:53 PM
  #32  
xjokerz's Avatar
xjokerz
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 70
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
Safety is NOT blown out of proportion. When I put my family into a vehicle, I want the safest vehicle that I can get for them. Just because a 15-20 year old car may not be a "death trap", it simply is not the safest vehicle I can get for them. They are constantly evolving how vehicles are designed and tested. A great example is the small offset crash test, which is a very realistic crash scenario. Cars we thought were really safe performed great in a full frontal crash into a barrier, well unless you crash into a brick wall how likely is that? They performed great in a medium offset crash, but performed TERRIBLY in a small offset crash. Hardly ANY cars passed that new test. Now, all cars pass it. Why? Because manufacturers design cars to perform in the test, the new stricter tests make cars safer for us.

So no, no way I would put my family into a car designed before around 2012, because I know cars designed after that are MUCH SAFER because of that test. If my family were in a crash and died or were injured in a way that providing them with a newer, safer car would have prevented and I knew that, I could never live with myself.

On top of that, all the additional safety features in cars, automatic braking which you ridecule but again helps avoid crashes, skid control and yaw control are much better than they once were, make for a much safer car. Great example? My RWD LS400 and LS430 were undrivable in the snow, my RWD LS460L was extremely drivable. Why? Much better traction control and skid control technology.

Safety is #1
If Car A (had every feature desirable to you tech wise and everything else you wanted in a car) was built in 2010 and was rated 8.9/10 on a comprehensive safety database and Car B that was built in 2013 (some low-rent thing worse than a Mirage) was rated a 9.2/10 on the same formula, you would automatically think Car A was so unsafe for your family and you would immediately disregard it?
Old 02-20-23 | 09:55 PM
  #33  
xjokerz's Avatar
xjokerz
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 70
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
tire pressure data on the dash…what could be so bad
Spoiler
 
Care to explain your "spoiler" nonsense?

My Avalon doesn't have any tire pressure info. Just an annoying light that was set off from a variety of reasons. My 07 TL gave the PSI on each tire on the info screen in the instrument cluster but not this car. Both 07, go figure...
Old 02-20-23 | 09:58 PM
  #34  
Toys4RJill's Avatar
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,752
Likes: 73
From: ON/NY
Default

Deleted…..

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 02-20-23 at 10:37 PM.
Old 02-20-23 | 11:09 PM
  #35  
AMIRZA786's Avatar
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 14,742
Likes: 2,349
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by xjokerz
Care to explain your "spoiler" nonsense?

My Avalon doesn't have any tire pressure info. Just an annoying light that was set off from a variety of reasons. My 07 TL gave the PSI on each tire on the info screen in the instrument cluster but not this car. Both 07, go figure...
I just don't know why you have all this negativity towards modern tech and modern cars. It seems you get set off by these types of threads.

If you don't like modern cars, well buy old ones then. But I don't understand why you care so much that others want the benefits of new technology. Just stick with what you like and want, and let others do the same, and we can all coexist in peaceful harmony
Old 02-20-23 | 11:49 PM
  #36  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,640
Likes: 2,589
From: Present
Default

Originally Posted by xjokerz
My Avalon doesn't have any tire pressure info. Just an annoying light that was set off from a variety of reasons. My 07 TL gave the PSI on each tire on the info screen in the instrument cluster but not this car. Both 07, go figure...
so now you're saying you wish your avalon was more technologically advanced and had individual wheel readouts on your gauge cluster like your TL had.

and there's no way i can manually check the tire pressures on all 4 tires on a vehicle in 30 seconds.
first i have to find my pressure gauge.
then take off all the caps.
then read the pressure on the tires.
then put the caps back on (obviously putting in air in between if needed)
2-3 minutes easy for the reading alone. if i have to add air to a couple of tires, now we're up to 5 minutes.

not a giant hardship for sure, but i LOVE having individual tire pressure readings on the gauge cluster like you said.

Old 02-21-23 | 01:08 AM
  #37  
xjokerz's Avatar
xjokerz
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 70
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
so now you're saying you wish your avalon was more technologically advanced and had individual wheel readouts on your gauge cluster like your TL had.

and there's no way i can manually check the tire pressures on all 4 tires on a vehicle in 30 seconds.
first i have to find my pressure gauge.
then take off all the caps.
then read the pressure on the tires.
then put the caps back on (obviously putting in air in between if needed)
2-3 minutes easy for the reading alone. if i have to add air to a couple of tires, now we're up to 5 minutes.

not a giant hardship for sure, but i LOVE having individual tire pressure readings on the gauge cluster like you said.
I never said I wish it had that feature. It really doesn't matter. Was just pointing out that the TL had it while the Avalon (Toyota's flagship, although it wasn't technically a luxury car like the TL was) did not.
Old 02-21-23 | 08:35 AM
  #38  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 58,376
Likes: 2,794
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by xjokerz
If Car A (had every feature desirable to you tech wise and everything else you wanted in a car) was built in 2010 and was rated 8.9/10 on a comprehensive safety database and Car B that was built in 2013 (some low-rent thing worse than a Mirage) was rated a 9.2/10 on the same formula, you would automatically think Car A was so unsafe for your family and you would immediately disregard it?
I didn’t say that at all. I said that cars designed after 2012 (when the small overlap test was implemented) are safer because they were designed to perform in that test.

I said I would not put my family in a car not designed to perform well in that test, because I want them to be in as safe a car as is possible. What’s hard to understand about that?
Old 02-21-23 | 08:41 AM
  #39  
Striker223's Avatar
Striker223
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 12,193
Likes: 1,277
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by SW17LS
A W140 or XF20/30 are nowhere near as safe as a modern midmarket car, let alone a new S Class or LS.

If you asked me if I would rather be in a crash in a W140 or a 2023 Accord, I would choose the Accord.
I wouldn't, a W140 vs the new accord would destroy the accord severely due to the insane weight difference.

500lb difference is immense for the sake of car vs car performance, this is 1000lb in favor of the 140. Can't fight physics.....plus I was comparing those older flagships vs "normal" cars not cutting edge modern ones that we know are the best.
Old 02-21-23 | 09:10 AM
  #40  
Allen K's Avatar
Allen K
-0----0-
CL Folding 25,000
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,647
Likes: 845
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Striker223
I wouldn't, a W140 vs the new accord would destroy the accord severely due to the insane weight difference.

500lb difference is immense for the sake of car vs car performance, this is 1000lb in favor of the 140. Can't fight physics.....plus I was comparing those older flagships vs "normal" cars not cutting edge modern ones that we know are the best.
The Accord would certainly be headed to the scrap yard if it hit/got hit by the W140, but the passengers would likely be fine. A lot of engineering improvements have happened in 20+ years. Passengers in the w140 would probably be feeling it more in the following days as the Accord would dissipate the force better with more crumple zones
Old 02-21-23 | 09:13 AM
  #41  
bitkahuna's Avatar
bitkahuna
Thread Starter
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 75,640
Likes: 2,589
From: Present
Default

even if old cars were 'tanks' we should all be able to agree, for endless obvious reasons, that vehicles today are vastly more safe to drive. not only do they do better in collisions (a tank isn't 'safer' because it has no crumple zones so people fly around inside and hit things) AND can now AVOID collisions (ABS, CTA, LKA, ACC, etc) which is huge.

edit: saw allen's post after submitting mine. and, yeah.
Old 02-21-23 | 09:22 AM
  #42  
1111GS's Avatar
1111GS
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,007
Likes: 104
From: US
Default

- Power steering wheel
- Safety features such as Rear traffic alert/Blind Spot/Rear view cameras
- Automatic
- Run flat
The rest are all good and nice but just icing on a cake. Lol.
Old 02-21-23 | 09:36 AM
  #43  
sm1ke's Avatar
sm1ke
Racer
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 21
From: MB, Canada
Default

Electric power steering is way better than hydraulic power steering. My wife's 06 Civic blew a power steering line again, I guess the aftermarket replacement was low quality. We replaced it with an OEM line from a junkyard Civic. When I had my 99 Accord, I had to replace the power steering line when it cracked during a cold snap. Zero issues in -50c weather with the CX-9.
Old 02-21-23 | 10:01 AM
  #44  
geko29's Avatar
geko29
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,176
Likes: 340
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
and there's no way i can manually check the tire pressures on all 4 tires on a vehicle in 30 seconds.
first i have to find my pressure gauge.
then take off all the caps.
then read the pressure on the tires.
then put the caps back on (obviously putting in air in between if needed)
2-3 minutes easy for the reading alone. if i have to add air to a couple of tires, now we're up to 5 minutes.

not a giant hardship for sure, but i LOVE having individual tire pressure readings on the gauge cluster like you said.
You forgot "go back and look at the doorframe to find out what they SHOULD be". Hell I just topped both cars off less than 2 weeks ago (thanks to TPMS letting me know that my pressure had dropped more than I expected due to a cold snap. Thanks TPMS!) and I couldn't tell you what the spec is for the F/R pressure on each car.
Old 02-21-23 | 10:43 AM
  #45  
SW17LS's Avatar
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 58,376
Likes: 2,794
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
The Accord would certainly be headed to the scrap yard if it hit/got hit by the W140, but the passengers would likely be fine. A lot of engineering improvements have happened in 20+ years. Passengers in the w140 would probably be feeling it more in the following days as the Accord would dissipate the force better with more crumple zones
This is exactly right. The W140 being a "tank' does not mean that the passengers inside would be subject to less crash forces, in fact its the opposite.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:58 AM.