ES - 5th Gen (2007-2012) Discussion topics related to 2007+ ES350

Edmunds Tests 2007 ES350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-06 | 10:36 PM
  #16  
Gojirra99's Avatar
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,120
Likes: 231
From: Canada
Default

Black is nice (usually nice with almost any car), but I'm still most interested in seeing an Aquamarine ES350 in person
Old 03-20-06 | 10:41 PM
  #17  
SteVTEC's Avatar
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

I should tell my wife about the "cashmere" colored leather. She'll be sold on the spot.
Old 03-21-06 | 03:01 AM
  #18  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,964
Likes: 179
Default

Originally Posted by AJL0365
At 3,580 pounds the ES bears no small burden on its powertrain.

thought the car may be able to hit the upper 6 second range, but i guess 7.1 isnt bad even though Lexus clocked the ES 330 at 7.2, im sure C&D will push better numbers out. But anyways wish 18' were an option, but 17' are good for a standard wheel size, and the fender flares look really good, and this car looks really HOT in black, very smooth and sophicated looking. a Black ES 350 may be in my future.


At first i didnt like the back of the car all that well, no what i see it in black, i think it looks pretty darn good, at thats just seeing it in pictures, imagine what i would think when i see it in person Lexus did a terrific job on the ES over the years, im glad they didnt give up on it Looks really aggressive from a dead on front shot to
Quoted weight is LESS than Avalon Limited that C/D drove 6.0 (or was it 6.1), so lets not get ahead of ourselves.

It is only 50 lbs more than IS350, which has "only" 10% more powerful engine. RWD is easier to launch, but at the same time FWD is more efficient...

I expect very close to 6.0 from C/D and their powerlaunch techniques...
Old 03-21-06 | 05:45 AM
  #19  
Nas's Avatar
Nas
Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

One thing I miss, is that the new ES will not have the Lexus 'L' emblem on the hood, but on the grille.
Old 03-21-06 | 06:19 AM
  #20  
rai's Avatar
rai
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by AJL0365
just thinking, i was reading edmunds pro's and con's. honestly i dont think they have any con's about the car because they usually type them

their's were:

"Awkward market positioning. Numerous large sedans cost the same or less."
I was thinking about this same thing. Con: numerous sedans cost the same or less. That's true but doesn't tell the whole story. Because it's the features you are paying for. Things like 2 person seat memory, panoramic sunroof, active headlights, ML stereo etc.. are not cheap. They are not available on a TL for exapmple.

And feature heavy cars do cost a pretty penny. For example the new Passat can top $40K. I'm not kidding.

In fact (I think) the price should be looked at in the context of the features and options you get. If the Nav + ML stereo + Active headlights + Panoramic Sunroof (etc..) are worth $8K or whatever they cost then than don't hold that against the car when it tops $40K and say, a TL is 9K cheaper for similar size car and similar engine etc.

Last edited by rai; 03-21-06 at 06:24 AM.
Old 03-21-06 | 06:42 AM
  #21  
SteVTEC's Avatar
SteVTEC
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
Quoted weight is LESS than Avalon Limited that C/D drove 6.0 (or was it 6.1), so lets not get ahead of ourselves.

It is only 50 lbs more than IS350, which has "only" 10% more powerful engine. RWD is easier to launch, but at the same time FWD is more efficient...

I expect very close to 6.0 from C/D and their powerlaunch techniques...
You're right, in theory the ES350 "should be" just as quick if not quicker than the Avalon. But for all we know Lexus might have done something funky with the ECU like limiting throttle angle in 1st gear to soften up the acceleration and/or reduce torque steer. It could also be set for a more luxo soft shift pattern instead of quicker firmer upshifts. So you never know.
Old 03-21-06 | 07:38 AM
  #22  
LexusChris's Avatar
LexusChris
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 10
From: New York
Default

Wow, the new ES i'm sure is really going to be a hit....I like it alot more now that I see it in black.
Old 03-21-06 | 07:40 AM
  #23  
AJL0365's Avatar
AJL0365
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
You're right, in theory the ES350 "should be" just as quick if not quicker than the Avalon. But for all we know Lexus might have done something funky with the ECU like limiting throttle angle in 1st gear to soften up the acceleration and/or reduce torque steer. It could also be set for a more luxo soft shift pattern instead of quicker firmer upshifts. So you never know.
never really thought of it that way, see learn something new everyday
Old 03-21-06 | 09:29 AM
  #24  
Falcon LS's Avatar
Falcon LS
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: GB/KW
Default

Fantastic! That was well worth reading, wish it was longer.
Old 03-21-06 | 10:58 AM
  #25  
XeroK00L's Avatar
XeroK00L
Lexus Fanatic
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,813
Likes: 1
From: The Bay Area, CA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
You're right, in theory the ES350 "should be" just as quick if not quicker than the Avalon. But for all we know Lexus might have done something funky with the ECU like limiting throttle angle in 1st gear to soften up the acceleration and/or reduce torque steer. It could also be set for a more luxo soft shift pattern instead of quicker firmer upshifts. So you never know.
True, but it's not like the Avalon is supposed to be tuned any sportier than the ES either. I still firmly believe the ES350 will be just as quick if not quicker than the Avalon in C&D's acceleration tests.
Old 03-21-06 | 12:56 PM
  #26  
CallmeDoc's Avatar
CallmeDoc
Driver
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

Acura SAE Horses> Lexus SAE Horses

But seriously, to me the ES retains its same character (and similar shape to the outgoing ES330) with a bit more power. Its for people who want more soft and smooth than sport (ie.people >40-50 yrs old) in the entry level luxury market. Nothing revolutionary, but still a good car in its niche.
Old 03-21-06 | 01:07 PM
  #27  
Gojirra99's Avatar
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,120
Likes: 231
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by 260hpTypeS
Acura SAE Horses> Lexus SAE Horses
They BOTH have downgraded hp for their cars under new SAE rules but I applaud them for willing to go with the new SAE rules for almost all of their models, unlike some other manufacturers .
Old 03-21-06 | 01:55 PM
  #28  
spwolf's Avatar
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,964
Likes: 179
Default

Originally Posted by XeroK00L
True, but it's not like the Avalon is supposed to be tuned any sportier than the ES either. I still firmly believe the ES350 will be just as quick if not quicker than the Avalon in C&D's acceleration tests.
yep, plus Lexus has brand new 6 speed. Quickness of the shifts is determined by how you press the pedal, if you gun it, it will do it fast...
Old 04-13-06 | 07:56 PM
  #29  
mhc0725's Avatar
mhc0725
Driver
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Unhappy 6.1 or 5.9

Someone else on the posts had said that maybe Toyota bumped up the 0-60 number so that it didn't get too close on official marketing material to the IS and GS. I kind of suspect that. If they're going to release that the 0-60 is 6.1 (or maybe even 5.9) then potential buyers are going to be like "what the F---, what am I getting a GS for?" Although, there are other reasons to get the GS besides just 0-60 time.

As for Avalon or ES350, no comparison, ES350 all the way. The reason for Toyota having to release a Lexus division in the first place was the fact that Toyota will always just be seen as "Toyota." The small, economical, 'cheap' Japanese car company that came here to the US in the 70's (or late 60's?) and made a good car. Is that a fair image in people's minds? NO. They're no small any more, they're not cheap in price or quality, and yes, they are damn good cars...

Just take my parents for example, it doesn't matter how I try to sell them how good the Camry and Avalon are, they always go back to "who makes this car?" When I say Toyota, they just go "oh, so it's not expensive?" Shesh... but when I tell them that the ES350 has this and that and that it's a "Lexus" they say "Wow, it must be expensive and nice..." It's all one part image (marketing) and one part real addition value over a comparable Toyota.

ES350 to Camry, no comparison.
RX350 to Highlander, no comparison.
Old 05-25-06 | 06:43 AM
  #30  
4TehNguyen's Avatar
4TehNguyen
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26,060
Likes: 51
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by mhc0725
Someone else on the posts had said that maybe Toyota bumped up the 0-60 number so that it didn't get too close on official marketing material to the IS and GS. I kind of suspect that. If they're going to release that the 0-60 is 6.1 (or maybe even 5.9) then potential buyers are going to be like "what the F---, what am I getting a GS for?" Although, there are other reasons to get the GS besides just 0-60 time.

As for Avalon or ES350, no comparison, ES350 all the way. The reason for Toyota having to release a Lexus division in the first place was the fact that Toyota will always just be seen as "Toyota." The small, economical, 'cheap' Japanese car company that came here to the US in the 70's (or late 60's?) and made a good car. Is that a fair image in people's minds? NO. They're no small any more, they're not cheap in price or quality, and yes, they are damn good cars...

Just take my parents for example, it doesn't matter how I try to sell them how good the Camry and Avalon are, they always go back to "who makes this car?" When I say Toyota, they just go "oh, so it's not expensive?" Shesh... but when I tell them that the ES350 has this and that and that it's a "Lexus" they say "Wow, it must be expensive and nice..." It's all one part image (marketing) and one part real addition value over a comparable Toyota.

ES350 to Camry, no comparison.
RX350 to Highlander, no comparison.
wait for the GS350 and GS460 Probably mid 5s for the GS350 and probably 5.0 for the GS460
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
overclock
ES - 5th Gen (2007-2012)
2
03-12-10 05:11 AM
Lexwang07
Car Chat
1
05-13-06 06:14 AM
macaximx
ES - 5th Gen (2007-2012)
2
05-03-06 02:22 PM
encore888
ES - 5th Gen (2007-2012)
2
04-13-06 10:36 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:20 PM.