Edmunds Tests 2007 ES350
#18
Originally Posted by AJL0365
At 3,580 pounds the ES bears no small burden on its powertrain.
thought the car may be able to hit the upper 6 second range, but i guess 7.1 isnt bad even though Lexus clocked the ES 330 at 7.2, im sure C&D will push better numbers out. But anyways wish 18' were an option, but 17' are good for a standard wheel size, and the fender flares look really good, and this car looks really HOT in black, very smooth and sophicated looking. a Black ES 350 may be in my future.
At first i didnt like the back of the car all that well, no what i see it in black, i think it looks pretty darn good, at thats just seeing it in pictures, imagine what i would think when i see it in person Lexus did a terrific job on the ES over the years, im glad they didnt give up on it Looks really aggressive from a dead on front shot to
thought the car may be able to hit the upper 6 second range, but i guess 7.1 isnt bad even though Lexus clocked the ES 330 at 7.2, im sure C&D will push better numbers out. But anyways wish 18' were an option, but 17' are good for a standard wheel size, and the fender flares look really good, and this car looks really HOT in black, very smooth and sophicated looking. a Black ES 350 may be in my future.
At first i didnt like the back of the car all that well, no what i see it in black, i think it looks pretty darn good, at thats just seeing it in pictures, imagine what i would think when i see it in person Lexus did a terrific job on the ES over the years, im glad they didnt give up on it Looks really aggressive from a dead on front shot to
It is only 50 lbs more than IS350, which has "only" 10% more powerful engine. RWD is easier to launch, but at the same time FWD is more efficient...
I expect very close to 6.0 from C/D and their powerlaunch techniques...
#20
Originally Posted by AJL0365
just thinking, i was reading edmunds pro's and con's. honestly i dont think they have any con's about the car because they usually type them
their's were:
"Awkward market positioning. Numerous large sedans cost the same or less."
their's were:
"Awkward market positioning. Numerous large sedans cost the same or less."
And feature heavy cars do cost a pretty penny. For example the new Passat can top $40K. I'm not kidding.
In fact (I think) the price should be looked at in the context of the features and options you get. If the Nav + ML stereo + Active headlights + Panoramic Sunroof (etc..) are worth $8K or whatever they cost then than don't hold that against the car when it tops $40K and say, a TL is 9K cheaper for similar size car and similar engine etc.
Last edited by rai; 03-21-06 at 06:24 AM.
#21
Originally Posted by spwolf
Quoted weight is LESS than Avalon Limited that C/D drove 6.0 (or was it 6.1), so lets not get ahead of ourselves.
It is only 50 lbs more than IS350, which has "only" 10% more powerful engine. RWD is easier to launch, but at the same time FWD is more efficient...
I expect very close to 6.0 from C/D and their powerlaunch techniques...
It is only 50 lbs more than IS350, which has "only" 10% more powerful engine. RWD is easier to launch, but at the same time FWD is more efficient...
I expect very close to 6.0 from C/D and their powerlaunch techniques...
#23
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
You're right, in theory the ES350 "should be" just as quick if not quicker than the Avalon. But for all we know Lexus might have done something funky with the ECU like limiting throttle angle in 1st gear to soften up the acceleration and/or reduce torque steer. It could also be set for a more luxo soft shift pattern instead of quicker firmer upshifts. So you never know.
#25
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
You're right, in theory the ES350 "should be" just as quick if not quicker than the Avalon. But for all we know Lexus might have done something funky with the ECU like limiting throttle angle in 1st gear to soften up the acceleration and/or reduce torque steer. It could also be set for a more luxo soft shift pattern instead of quicker firmer upshifts. So you never know.
#26
Acura SAE Horses> Lexus SAE Horses
But seriously, to me the ES retains its same character (and similar shape to the outgoing ES330) with a bit more power. Its for people who want more soft and smooth than sport (ie.people >40-50 yrs old) in the entry level luxury market. Nothing revolutionary, but still a good car in its niche.
But seriously, to me the ES retains its same character (and similar shape to the outgoing ES330) with a bit more power. Its for people who want more soft and smooth than sport (ie.people >40-50 yrs old) in the entry level luxury market. Nothing revolutionary, but still a good car in its niche.
#27
Originally Posted by 260hpTypeS
Acura SAE Horses> Lexus SAE Horses
#28
Originally Posted by XeroK00L
True, but it's not like the Avalon is supposed to be tuned any sportier than the ES either. I still firmly believe the ES350 will be just as quick if not quicker than the Avalon in C&D's acceleration tests.
#29
6.1 or 5.9
Someone else on the posts had said that maybe Toyota bumped up the 0-60 number so that it didn't get too close on official marketing material to the IS and GS. I kind of suspect that. If they're going to release that the 0-60 is 6.1 (or maybe even 5.9) then potential buyers are going to be like "what the F---, what am I getting a GS for?" Although, there are other reasons to get the GS besides just 0-60 time.
As for Avalon or ES350, no comparison, ES350 all the way. The reason for Toyota having to release a Lexus division in the first place was the fact that Toyota will always just be seen as "Toyota." The small, economical, 'cheap' Japanese car company that came here to the US in the 70's (or late 60's?) and made a good car. Is that a fair image in people's minds? NO. They're no small any more, they're not cheap in price or quality, and yes, they are damn good cars...
Just take my parents for example, it doesn't matter how I try to sell them how good the Camry and Avalon are, they always go back to "who makes this car?" When I say Toyota, they just go "oh, so it's not expensive?" Shesh... but when I tell them that the ES350 has this and that and that it's a "Lexus" they say "Wow, it must be expensive and nice..." It's all one part image (marketing) and one part real addition value over a comparable Toyota.
ES350 to Camry, no comparison.
RX350 to Highlander, no comparison.
As for Avalon or ES350, no comparison, ES350 all the way. The reason for Toyota having to release a Lexus division in the first place was the fact that Toyota will always just be seen as "Toyota." The small, economical, 'cheap' Japanese car company that came here to the US in the 70's (or late 60's?) and made a good car. Is that a fair image in people's minds? NO. They're no small any more, they're not cheap in price or quality, and yes, they are damn good cars...
Just take my parents for example, it doesn't matter how I try to sell them how good the Camry and Avalon are, they always go back to "who makes this car?" When I say Toyota, they just go "oh, so it's not expensive?" Shesh... but when I tell them that the ES350 has this and that and that it's a "Lexus" they say "Wow, it must be expensive and nice..." It's all one part image (marketing) and one part real addition value over a comparable Toyota.
ES350 to Camry, no comparison.
RX350 to Highlander, no comparison.
#30
Originally Posted by mhc0725
Someone else on the posts had said that maybe Toyota bumped up the 0-60 number so that it didn't get too close on official marketing material to the IS and GS. I kind of suspect that. If they're going to release that the 0-60 is 6.1 (or maybe even 5.9) then potential buyers are going to be like "what the F---, what am I getting a GS for?" Although, there are other reasons to get the GS besides just 0-60 time.
As for Avalon or ES350, no comparison, ES350 all the way. The reason for Toyota having to release a Lexus division in the first place was the fact that Toyota will always just be seen as "Toyota." The small, economical, 'cheap' Japanese car company that came here to the US in the 70's (or late 60's?) and made a good car. Is that a fair image in people's minds? NO. They're no small any more, they're not cheap in price or quality, and yes, they are damn good cars...
Just take my parents for example, it doesn't matter how I try to sell them how good the Camry and Avalon are, they always go back to "who makes this car?" When I say Toyota, they just go "oh, so it's not expensive?" Shesh... but when I tell them that the ES350 has this and that and that it's a "Lexus" they say "Wow, it must be expensive and nice..." It's all one part image (marketing) and one part real addition value over a comparable Toyota.
ES350 to Camry, no comparison.
RX350 to Highlander, no comparison.
As for Avalon or ES350, no comparison, ES350 all the way. The reason for Toyota having to release a Lexus division in the first place was the fact that Toyota will always just be seen as "Toyota." The small, economical, 'cheap' Japanese car company that came here to the US in the 70's (or late 60's?) and made a good car. Is that a fair image in people's minds? NO. They're no small any more, they're not cheap in price or quality, and yes, they are damn good cars...
Just take my parents for example, it doesn't matter how I try to sell them how good the Camry and Avalon are, they always go back to "who makes this car?" When I say Toyota, they just go "oh, so it's not expensive?" Shesh... but when I tell them that the ES350 has this and that and that it's a "Lexus" they say "Wow, it must be expensive and nice..." It's all one part image (marketing) and one part real addition value over a comparable Toyota.
ES350 to Camry, no comparison.
RX350 to Highlander, no comparison.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post