ES - 5th Gen (2007-2012) Discussion topics related to 2007+ ES350

Gen. V Nav Vs. Prior Versions....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-06, 11:00 AM
  #16  
twister
Lexus Test Driver
 
twister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: nj
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CaBlonde
Twister, I just had a bizzaro sis moment with you. lol I just now read your post in the other thread where you said, "My previous car was black, and I will never go back!!!" Before I read that I wrote in this thread "Once you have NAV, you wouldn't go back." Sppoookyy!
Indeed!!!

Everybody told me the same thing regarding NAV. If you never had it, you don't know what you are missing. But, once you get it, you can not imagine your life without it. I did not get NAV with my PP+. Currently, the car is only for my short home-to-work-and-back commute. Our other "traveling" car is my wife's '05 Highlander which doesn't have it. So, in my case it makes more sense to get $500 portable TomTom which can be shared between two cars.

I also don't feel too crazy about getting a piece of a hi-tech equipment into my car which I'm planning to own for 9-10 years. It will be obsolete in 2-3 years, probably replaced with some cool trans-lucent navigation technology you can project from your dashboard on to a windshield, or something like that I'm also hoping someone will combine radar detector with a portable NAV. This will eliminate two pieces into one...
Old 08-21-06, 01:24 PM
  #17  
PsychDoc
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
PsychDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Just a bit of an update. On my recent trip to Montreal and the Lake George area the NAV system proved to be a real disappointment. We tried to use it to call two movie theaters and both numbers were incorrect. On the way back to NYC it kept prompting us to get off a major turnpike (Rt. 87) and go on local roads when clearly the most direct and quickest route was to stay on 87. As we approached the city I foolishly heeded this advice (stupid me, I should have known better having disregarded it for the previous 75 miles) and ended up being guided through over 17 miles of crappy local streets replete with stoplights every two blocks.

I had it programmed to accept freeways and toll roads so there was nothing that I'm aware of in my settings that would have caused this screw up.

All in all, VERY (!!!) disappointing for a presumably "up to the second" fifth generation unit.
Old 08-21-06, 01:51 PM
  #18  
twister
Lexus Test Driver
 
twister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: nj
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

PsychDoc, thanks for the update!!! Now you need to head over to Kaius88 thread and give him a professional advice (unless you just play a doctor here at ClubLexus and not in real life?)

Since we are on a topic of NAV, would anybody care to share their experience with portable NAV units? Most of the on-line and magazine reviews rave about TomTom. Anybody using it?

edit: you already replied to Kaius88 thread. sorry, I should of read it first

Last edited by twister; 08-21-06 at 01:54 PM.
Old 08-21-06, 02:21 PM
  #19  
ckon
Rookie
 
ckon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PsychDoc
Just a bit of an update. On my recent trip to Montreal and the Lake George area the NAV system proved to be a real disappointment. We tried to use it to call two movie theaters and both numbers were incorrect. On the way back to NYC it kept prompting us to get off a major turnpike (Rt. 87) and go on local roads when clearly the most direct and quickest route was to stay on 87. As we approached the city I foolishly heeded this advice (stupid me, I should have known better having disregarded it for the previous 75 miles) and ended up being guided through over 17 miles of crappy local streets replete with stoplights every two blocks.



I had it programmed to accept freeways and toll roads so there was nothing that I'm aware of in my settings that would have caused this screw up.

All in all, VERY (!!!) disappointing for a presumably "up to the second" fifth generation unit.
Did you by any chance have it set to "shortest" instead of "quick"?
Old 08-21-06, 02:35 PM
  #20  
PsychDoc
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
PsychDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't think so, but I'm not 100% sure.

It would be reassuring if that was the explanation.

Perhaps it is.
Old 08-21-06, 03:50 PM
  #21  
CaBlonde
Rookie
 
CaBlonde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Psychdoc, I was just listening to the instructional CDs on the NAV system yesterday morning. I got halfway through it but I did learn that there are three settings - Quick 1, Quick 2 and Shortest distance. It defaults to Quick 1, which is the quickest route, unless you have changed your settings. I haven't used the NAV too much yet but that is very disappointing if that is how it guides us to our destination.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dlbama1
LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006)
14
01-15-18 10:12 PM
JFNash
LS - 4th Gen (2007-2017)
10
06-06-12 11:29 AM
masboy
GX - 1st Gen (2003-2009)
10
10-18-10 04:04 PM
espressoRX
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
4
09-06-10 03:29 PM
wailealexu
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
1
05-28-10 09:37 PM



Quick Reply: Gen. V Nav Vs. Prior Versions....



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:57 AM.