ES - 7th Gen (2019-present) Discussion topics related to 2019+ ES models

Merged premium fuel threads - is higher than 87 Octane needed or useful?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-24, 07:46 PM
  #136  
Shaboom
Racer
 
Shaboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: PA
Posts: 1,407
Received 479 Likes on 338 Posts
Default

“The Lexus KCLV will get into a higher Value with 93 than 87. Thus it will perform better. Period.”

Is this why it could be more than a mere coincidence that my 2021 ES 350 with 13,000 miles on it often hesitated during acceleration, especially when going up hill, until I switched from 87 octane to Sunoco 93 octane, at which time it promptly and permanently (for 4 months and 2,000 miles now) began to run smooth as silk without the slightest hint of rough engine feel or hesitation under any circumstances whatsoever?
The following users liked this post:
jgscott (02-27-24)
Old 02-26-24, 09:37 AM
  #137  
Wilson2000
Pole Position
 
Wilson2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 2,592
Received 489 Likes on 390 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jgscott
Good least we designated you as owning that thinking, not me.
We seem to be debating two different topics, so I'll leave it at this: One can't conflate, compare and contrast, or talk about in the same sentence, octane grade and level-of-tier.
Old 02-26-24, 09:54 AM
  #138  
faisal1969
6th Gear
 
faisal1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: TX
Posts: 6
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I always follow Lexus from their site:

https://support.lexus.com/s/article/...rade-shou-8129

Base on their site, using a fuel with lower octane rating than the 'Recommended' may cause engine knocking...
Old 02-26-24, 10:45 AM
  #139  
Wilson2000
Pole Position
 
Wilson2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 2,592
Received 489 Likes on 390 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by faisal1969
Base on their site, using a fuel with lower octane rating than the 'Recommended' may cause engine knocking...
I don't think a lot people want to substitute regular when Lexus specifies high-octane, though, some do. But, others, use high-octane, when regular is specified by Lexus. As long as both are top-tier fuels, there is no benefit to running high-octane in a engine designed for regular gas. It's simply a waste of money.

There's too much convoluted thinking by misinformed people regarding this topic, and they spread their misinformation like a virus.
The following users liked this post:
bc6152 (02-27-24)
Old 02-26-24, 11:27 AM
  #140  
FastDawg
Pit Crew
 
FastDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: GA
Posts: 211
Received 67 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wilson2000
I don't think a lot people want to substitute regular when Lexus specifies high-octane, though, some do. But, others, use high-octane, when regular is specified by Lexus. As long as both are top-tier fuels, there is no benefit to running high-octane in a engine designed for regular gas. It's simply a waste of money.

There's too much convoluted thinking by misinformed people regarding this topic, and they spread their misinformation like a virus.
Curious - what’s your explanation ot expertise on this topic?
The following users liked this post:
jgscott (02-27-24)
Old 02-26-24, 02:22 PM
  #141  
newishgs
Driver School Candidate
 
newishgs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: WA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why does the manual specify 95 octane for es300h

I live in New
zealand and the manual for my 2020 es300h says to use 95 octane out higher. The Toyota models using same out similar engines don’t require high octane petrol. Why is that?
Old 02-26-24, 03:42 PM
  #142  
grp52
Instructor
 
grp52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 1,047
Received 520 Likes on 363 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by newishgs
I live in New
zealand and the manual for my 2020 es300h says to use 95 octane out higher. The Toyota models using same out similar engines don’t require high octane petrol. Why is that?
One thing to keep in mind, the octane rating cited for most of countries of Europe, Australia, and New Zealand is different than the one cited in the US, Canada, and Mexico. New Zealand, et al., uses Research Octane Number (RON) ; whereas, US, et al., use Anti-Knock Index (AKI) or (R+M)/2 which is the average of RON and Motor Octane Number (MON). From Wikipedia's Octane rating web page:
Because of the 8 to 12 octane number difference between RON and MON noted above, the AKI shown in Canada and the United States is 4 to 6 octane numbers lower than elsewhere in the world for the same fuel.
Old 02-26-24, 10:53 PM
  #143  
newishgs
Driver School Candidate
 
newishgs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: WA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by grp52
One thing to keep in mind, the octane rating cited for most of countries of Europe, Australia, and New Zealand is different than the one cited in the US, Canada, and Mexico. New Zealand, et al., uses Research Octane Number (RON) ; whereas, US, et al., use Anti-Knock Index (AKI) or (R+M)/2 which is the average of RON and Motor Octane Number (MON). From Wikipedia's Octane rating web page:
I don't know about any of that at the petrol stations here regular unleaded is 91 octane and premium is 95 octane (however they measure it). The manual is presumably printed for the country they are selling the car in and it says to use 95 or higher.

So the question remains. What is the difference between the lexus hybrid engine and the toyota engine (rav4, camry, etc) such that one requires 95 or higher and other can run perfectly fine on 91?
Old 02-27-24, 09:09 AM
  #144  
jgscott
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
jgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 11,621
Received 1,343 Likes on 1,067 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wilson2000
I don't think a lot people want to substitute regular when Lexus specifies high-octane, though, some do. But, others, use high-octane, when regular is specified by Lexus. As long as both are top-tier fuels, there is no benefit to running high-octane in a engine designed for regular gas. It's simply a waste of money.

There's too much convoluted thinking by misinformed people regarding this topic, and they spread their misinformation like a virus.
It's not just information, there are many post with supporting facts, but seems you still want to deny Science, just like your Sig Disclaimer. It's obvious that we just can't help you understand when you just keep denying? I have the D3 Pro Tuner that lets me Tune Map change things on my own Lexus. I can map and monitor air/fuel. TB opening percent, KCLV, and more, and read results.

I will leave you and others with this. If you go search the Lexus Forum for KCLV. You will find that for years now, the GS's, LS's, IS's, RC, RX, and F Cars, and many others have 100's of post about the effects of this on a bone stock car, to Modded cars. There is a Ton of actual Data reading, test, experience, and much more of fuels used from 87 octane up to Race Gas. It matters not which, because all those Lexus ECU's are mapped for KCLV by Lexus from the factory. Any denier who insults others as you have above, can determine for themselves that there are benefit gains if you run higher octane.

Nothing new here to other Lexus Owners.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Lexu...t=gws-wiz-serp

Originally Posted by FastDawg
Curious - what’s your explanation or expertise on this topic?
See his Sig Disclaimer at the bottom of his post. Appears some are so stubborn they ignore the ECU design, results, internal combustion ignition and burn, to continue the cheap gas saving at the pump cost narrative. He would have to refute all the info posted here like the Lexus Support site, experienced Tuners, those who feel the difference using 93, and so on. Talk about misinformation? Include lack of accepting facts too. lol!

Here are some who have, at least.

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/rx-...-rx350-30.html

Originally Posted by Shaboom
“The Lexus KCLV will get into a higher Value with 93 than 87. Thus it will perform better. Period.”

Is this why it could be more than a mere coincidence that my 2021 ES 350 with 13,000 miles on it often hesitated during acceleration, especially when going up hill, until I switched from 87 octane to Sunoco 93 octane, at which time it promptly and permanently (for 4 months and 2,000 miles now) began to run smooth as silk without the slightest hint of rough engine feel or hesitation under any circumstances whatsoever?
Yes it's true and only one who has used it, with enough tanks for it to become 100% not mixed would see the difference. As you mentioned when the car is pulling a load, uphill, and in very hot weather, are some of the conditions that the ECU will sense Knock and start to pull timing back. Everyone of the Lexus ECU Tuner, RR Racing, D3 Performance, Tune by Lori who have 1000's of hours on the Dyno, map readings, and KCLV monitoring experience have talked about what they see happens with the Lexus ECU's and fuel. The difference can be seen, measured, compared, and felt. PEIORD.
The following users liked this post:
FastDawg (02-27-24)
Old 02-27-24, 10:25 AM
  #145  
Wilson2000
Pole Position
 
Wilson2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 2,592
Received 489 Likes on 390 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FastDawg
Curious - what’s your explanation ot expertise on this topic?
Regarding my expertise, I'm 68 and have been working on gas engines since I was seven. I come from a long line of automotive engineers, and my grandfather was the first person to photograph combustion inside a engine. I have formal automotive training, and a bachelors degree. I had a career as a fleet manager with over 400 autos, light trucks, and pieces of heavy equipment. I was in charge of 4 service yards, 3 of which had full-service fueling stations.

Regarding my "explanation," see my posts above.
The following users liked this post:
bc6152 (02-27-24)
Old 02-27-24, 10:37 AM
  #146  
Wilson2000
Pole Position
 
Wilson2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 2,592
Received 489 Likes on 390 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jgscott
Any denier who insults others as you have above...
Look in the mirror. I went out of my way to not insult or offend you. You on the other hand got personal multiple times in the course of this debate.

Let's just agree to disagree, and move on.
Old 02-28-24, 01:59 PM
  #147  
jgscott
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
jgscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 11,621
Received 1,343 Likes on 1,067 Posts
Default

MODERATOR EDIT jgscott, please exit this thread. No need for that sort of commentary here.

Last edited by DaveGS4; 02-28-24 at 06:34 PM.
Old 02-28-24, 07:37 PM
  #148  
Shaboom
Racer
 
Shaboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: PA
Posts: 1,407
Received 479 Likes on 338 Posts
Default

Problem all too common to Twitter and many on-line chat rooms is that anonymity so often leads to incivility. People tend to say things they wouldn’t say in person. Some things I’ve read on political boards are downright nasty, crude and boorish.
When posters disagree, they should make every effort to do so without being disagreeable.
The following 7 users liked this post by Shaboom:
DaveGS4 (02-29-24), ESh (03-01-24), F3Woody (02-29-24), FastDawg (02-29-24), LexFinally (02-29-24), TechNut (02-29-24), Wilson2000 (02-29-24) and 2 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 02-29-24, 03:34 PM
  #149  
Wilson2000
Pole Position
 
Wilson2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: CA
Posts: 2,592
Received 489 Likes on 390 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaboom
Is this why it could be more than a mere coincidence that my 2021 ES 350 with 13,000 miles on it often hesitated during acceleration, especially when going up hill, until I switched from 87 octane to Sunoco 93 octane, at which time it promptly and permanently (for 4 months and 2,000 miles now) began to run smooth as silk without the slightest hint of rough engine feel or hesitation under any circumstances whatsoever?
Experiment! Try switching to Sunoco, top-tier 87 and see if the hesitation comes back. If so, you know it is not a coincidence. However, I've never heard of this phenomenon before, so it would be interesting to hear back from you with your results.
The following users liked this post:
LexFinally (02-29-24)
Old 02-29-24, 04:16 PM
  #150  
Shaboom
Racer
 
Shaboom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: PA
Posts: 1,407
Received 479 Likes on 338 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wilson2000
Experiment! Try switching to Sunoco, top-tier 87 and see if the hesitation comes back. If so, you know it is not a coincidence. However, I've never heard of this phenomenon before, so it would be interesting to hear back from you with your results.
Absolutely not!! I experimented through my first year of ownership with new air filters, calls to dealership service managers, use of sport mode, etc.etc. I finally got it right using this higher octane fuel and I’m not about to screw it up in any way. My car now drives so smoothly and she and I are both very happy with this fuel. No experimentation for me.
One other time in response to this suggestion, I analogized it to when, after trying three different statins, Doc finally picked one and my LDL went down promptly and perfectly. He was not interested to taking me off it to confirm the cause and effect and I wasn’t about to agree if he’d asked.
Don’t mess up a good thing!
The following users liked this post:
FastDawg (03-01-24)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RX3302004
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
12
09-11-13 09:59 PM
Dadikins
Hybrid Technology
7
07-18-13 06:22 PM
sunnyside
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015)
2
06-08-12 08:17 PM
lexus114
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
16
03-11-10 09:57 PM
dahozy
Maintenance
11
04-24-09 01:22 PM



Quick Reply: Merged premium fuel threads - is higher than 87 Octane needed or useful?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:00 PM.