ES - 7th Gen (2019-present) Discussion topics related to 2019+ ES models

2021 ES300h fuel economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-22 | 01:58 PM
  #1  
landonm86's Avatar
landonm86
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 63
Likes: 31
From: IL
Default 2021 ES300h fuel economy


I know a lot of people like to turn up their nose at the hybrid ES with the eCVT, but when you have gone 230 miles on a 13 gallon tank and still have 390 miles of range, you can’t complain too much. Also I’m in Illinois where gas is $5.29. Buying the hybrid ES was the best decision.

Last edited by landonm86; 06-05-22 at 01:59 PM. Reason: Added MY
Old 06-05-22 | 03:04 PM
  #2  
jeverett72's Avatar
jeverett72
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 261
Likes: 71
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by landonm86

I know a lot of people like to turn up their nose at the hybrid ES with the eCVT, but when you have gone 230 miles on a 13 gallon tank and still have 390 miles of range, you can’t complain too much. Also I’m in Illinois where gas is $5.29. Buying the hybrid ES was the best decision.
Damn I'm jealous. My GS gets 15-18 city and 21-24 hwy and only takes premium lol

The following users liked this post:
landonm86 (06-05-22)
Old 06-05-22 | 03:39 PM
  #3  
UltraLux22's Avatar
UltraLux22
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 550
From: Kentucky
Default

Originally Posted by landonm86

I know a lot of people like to turn up their nose at the hybrid ES with the eCVT, but when you have gone 230 miles on a 13 gallon tank and still have 390 miles of range, you can’t complain too much. Also I’m in Illinois where gas is $5.29. Buying the hybrid ES was the best decision.
This is off-topic and being overly critical but I liked the fact that on my 2019 the screen with fuel range only displayed the range and not any other details like “After Refuel” but on my 2022 the view was like the one on your pictured view here. I was glad I was able to finally edit that screen on the 22 to display the “Fuel Range” only. Just my personal preference.

I agree as fuel prices increase those with hybrids and EV’s will likely be very proud of their decision to go that route.
The following users liked this post:
landonm86 (06-05-22)
Old 06-05-22 | 03:49 PM
  #4  
dezymond's Avatar
dezymond
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 883
Likes: 486
From: CA
Default

I just took my 2022 ES 300h F Sport on some backroads to go hiking and I am thoroughly impressed at how the car handles even on its skinnier 235 tires. It's such a well planted car than handles the curves with ease. And I'm getting 41mpg overall, yeah that's a nice bonus.

I filled up 4 days with 405 miles on the ODO AND with a bit over 1/4 of a tank to spare, plus regular fuel only. That felt real nice.
The following users liked this post:
landonm86 (06-05-22)
Old 06-05-22 | 05:47 PM
  #5  
mikemu30's Avatar
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 8,203
Likes: 2,573
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by landonm86

I know a lot of people like to turn up their nose at the hybrid ES with the eCVT, but when you have gone 230 miles on a 13 gallon tank and still have 390 miles of range, you can’t complain too much. Also I’m in Illinois where gas is $5.29. Buying the hybrid ES was the best decision.
Presumably you're not getting that kind of mileage at high speed driving. It's great dont get me wrong.
Old 06-05-22 | 05:49 PM
  #6  
landonm86's Avatar
landonm86
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 63
Likes: 31
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by mikemu30
Presumably you're not getting that kind of mileage at high speed driving. It's great dont get me wrong.
I try to keep it around 65mph on the freeway. Driving 80-85mph will always kill your efficiency. 😜
The following users liked this post:
jeverett72 (06-05-22)
Old 06-05-22 | 06:38 PM
  #7  
mikemu30's Avatar
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 8,203
Likes: 2,573
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by landonm86
I try to keep it around 65mph on the freeway. Driving 80-85mph will always kill your efficiency. 😜
so you're getting 55mpg going 65mph on the highway? I find that hard to believe.
Old 06-05-22 | 06:47 PM
  #8  
landonm86's Avatar
landonm86
Thread Starter
Driver
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 63
Likes: 31
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by mikemu30
so you're getting 55mpg going 65mph on the highway? I find that hard to believe.
lol, well, my commute is 10 miles each way and part is interstate freeway and part city driving. I drive 65ish on the freeway and 45ish in the city. You can believe whatever you wish, though I have found gentle acceleration makes most of the difference, and I always focus on that.
Old 06-06-22 | 05:07 AM
  #9  
ionian's Avatar
ionian
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 901
Likes: 261
From: Delaware
Default

You guys are getting insanely great MPG. Just to temper expectation that not everyone is in this exclusive club. My "After Refuel" is usually hover around 37MPG. If I drive like a turtle for a mile or two after refueI can get a couple more miles. I fall into more of a typical range:

https://www.fuelly.com/car/lexus/es300h

Last edited by ionian; 06-06-22 at 05:15 AM. Reason: ....
The following 2 users liked this post by ionian:
landonm86 (06-06-22), Oldfart (06-06-22)
Old 06-06-22 | 06:48 AM
  #10  
toyotaman7's Avatar
toyotaman7
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 615
From: Ontario
Default

My commute is 160 km (100 miles) daily. About 60% Highway 40% city.

I'm averaging 4.7 L/100km (50 MPG).

At $2.18 per Liter ($8.24 per US Gallon) gas, I love this cars ride and fuel economy. And I carry 4-5 people and stuff in the car regularly....
Old 06-06-22 | 06:57 AM
  #11  
ionian's Avatar
ionian
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 901
Likes: 261
From: Delaware
Default

What were you getting in your retired vehicles?
Old 06-06-22 | 07:19 AM
  #12  
toyotaman7's Avatar
toyotaman7
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 615
From: Ontario
Default

about 10 L/100km (23 MPG) on the Venza. The RX is a pig on gas. I average 11 L/100 km (21 MPG) on RX.
Old 06-07-22 | 08:11 AM
  #13  
TechNut's Avatar
TechNut
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 729
From: Idaho
Default

I'm averaging about 30 MPG on the 2021 RXh, but the 2019 ESh averages about 42, depending on prevailing temps and pretty normal driving styles. Our best tank in late summer was 46 mpg. I have never seen anywhere close to 50. My driving is mixed but mostly shorter trips of 35 to 55 mph. I probably don't have more than 20 miles of Interstate driving (75 mph) on average per tank, unless I'm on a road trip.
Old 06-07-22 | 08:16 AM
  #14  
mikemu30's Avatar
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 8,203
Likes: 2,573
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by TechNut
I'm averaging about 30 MPG on the 2021 RXh, but the 2019 ESh averages about 42, depending on prevailing temps and pretty normal driving styles. Our best tank in late summer was 46 mpg. I have never seen anywhere close to 50. My driving is mixed but mostly shorter trips of 35 to 55 mph. I probably don't have more than 20 miles of Interstate driving (75 mph) on average per tank, unless I'm on a road trip.
Just curious why the RX hybrid is so much lower? Is it size or something else?
Old 06-07-22 | 08:58 AM
  #15  
TechNut's Avatar
TechNut
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 729
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by mikemu30
Just curious why the RX hybrid is so much lower? Is it size or something else?
I would say its a combination of things. Weight is certainly a factor, but then so is the V6 Internal Combustion Engine in the RX 450h. In my opinion, the RX hybrid design doesn't give up nearly as much "energy" as the ES hybrid. To this point, the combined horsepower of the RXh is actually higher than the standard RX 350, but that is not the case with the ESh which has lower combined horsepower numbers.

The RX is physically larger as well, so it probably has more wind resistance, costing it some in fuel economy.

The 2019 ESh is also the newer generation design and Toyota/Lexus made significant increases to the hybrid's fuel economy. For example, our 2015 ESh rarely achieved better than about 35 mpg with the older generation 2.5L ICE engine, but I generally exceed 40 mpg with this newer model.


Quick Reply: 2021 ES300h fuel economy



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:37 AM.