ES - 7th Gen (2019-present) Discussion topics related to 2019+ ES models

Dealership is jerking me around / unobtainable vehicle?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-22 | 12:29 PM
  #16  
LexFinally's Avatar
LexFinally
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 964
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by glamglam
I like that Lexus made the infotainment center a touchscreen and that they also kept the touchpad on the console. Having both is really nice. One can pick to use either one or they can use both. It’s a brilliant idea that Lexus did this on the 2022 ES.
I respectfully disagree. I know some here have older ES models and I respect that some of them like the touchpad perfectly fine, but I have always found it a complete abomination. I would never buy a car that forced me to use it, which is why I ordered a '22 in 2021. I've had my car nearly six months and I still can't use it, don't expect to ever learn it, and find it a worse-than-useless waste of console space.

Lexus added a touchscreen for '21 and '22 as an emergency project by popular demand because virtually every tester (Car and Driver's HEADLINE: "A single frustrating flaw") and increasing numbers of buyers were rebelling. Keeping the touchpad while adding touch capability to the screen was a half-baked kludge fix done as a mid-model upgrade to multiple Lexus models (ES, LS, I think RX) only because there wasn't enough time and money to bring the new software to those existing models yet. To show Lexus's own thinking about it, the new NX has no touchpad, just a touchscreen with completely overhauled software. This system, with no touchpad, will be the standard for future Lexus models.
The following users liked this post:
dklanecky1 (06-15-22)
Old 06-13-22 | 05:11 PM
  #17  
mikemu30's Avatar
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 8,203
Likes: 2,573
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by LexFinally
I respectfully disagree. I know some here have older ES models and I respect that some of them like the touchpad perfectly fine, but I have always found it a complete abomination. I would never buy a car that forced me to use it, which is why I ordered a '22 in 2021. I've had my car nearly six months and I still can't use it, don't expect to ever learn it, and find it a worse-than-useless waste of console space.

Lexus added a touchscreen for '21 and '22 as an emergency project by popular demand because virtually every tester (Car and Driver's HEADLINE: "A single frustrating flaw") and increasing numbers of buyers were rebelling. Keeping the touchpad while adding touch capability to the screen was a half-baked kludge fix done as a mid-model upgrade to multiple Lexus models (ES, LS, I think RX) only because there wasn't enough time and money to bring the new software to those existing models yet. To show Lexus's own thinking about it, the new NX has no touchpad, just a touchscreen with completely overhauled software. This system, with no touchpad, will be the standard for future Lexus models.
And that new software and design is already being criticized by some reviewers. For example, you can no longer share the screen with map and something else at the same time. There will always be proponents and opponents. I mastered the touchpad in a matter of days more than three years ago and find touchscreen so much more distracting.
The following users liked this post:
mickbrown (06-14-22)
Old 06-13-22 | 05:28 PM
  #18  
dezymond's Avatar
dezymond
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 883
Likes: 486
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by LexFinally
I respectfully disagree. I know some here have older ES models and I respect that some of them like the touchpad perfectly fine, but I have always found it a complete abomination. I would never buy a car that forced me to use it, which is why I ordered a '22 in 2021. I've had my car nearly six months and I still can't use it, don't expect to ever learn it, and find it a worse-than-useless waste of console space.

Lexus added a touchscreen for '21 and '22 as an emergency project by popular demand because virtually every tester (Car and Driver's HEADLINE: "A single frustrating flaw") and increasing numbers of buyers were rebelling. Keeping the touchpad while adding touch capability to the screen was a half-baked kludge fix done as a mid-model upgrade to multiple Lexus models (ES, LS, I think RX) only because there wasn't enough time and money to bring the new software to those existing models yet. To show Lexus's own thinking about it, the new NX has no touchpad, just a touchscreen with completely overhauled software. This system, with no touchpad, will be the standard for future Lexus models.
While I agree their touchpad is far from perfect, it's at least 100x times better than that dumb joystick they used to have. Now that was infuriating. The new touchpad is at least more similar to the use of a touchpad of a laptop, but still it's mostly guessing where your initial input is and when driving does take your eyes off the road. The touch capability is a good bonus, but they kept the UI exactly the same, that needed to change. I have a long wingspan and even reaching to the far right icons, which are way too small by the way, is a bit of a stretch for me. Sure they threw in touchscreen, but it was clearly a rushed job and just so people can't complain that there isn't touch capability.

In general, this whole touchscreen UI for everything is a trend that I hate. I appreciate the actual buttons of the HVAC system and even some of the media buttons.
The following users liked this post:
LexFinally (06-13-22)
Old 06-13-22 | 08:20 PM
  #19  
LexFinally's Avatar
LexFinally
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 964
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by dezymond
While I agree their touchpad is far from perfect, it's at least 100x times better than that dumb joystick they used to have. Now that was infuriating. The new touchpad is at least more similar to the use of a touchpad of a laptop, but still it's mostly guessing where your initial input is and when driving does take your eyes off the road. The touch capability is a good bonus, but they kept the UI exactly the same, that needed to change. I have a long wingspan and even reaching to the far right icons, which are way too small by the way, is a bit of a stretch for me. Sure they threw in touchscreen, but it was clearly a rushed job and just so people can't complain that there isn't touch capability.

In general, this whole touchscreen UI for everything is a trend that I hate. I appreciate the actual buttons of the HVAC system and even some of the media buttons.
I agree with pretty much every one of those comments. Tesla started a toxic trend with their stupid iPad For Everything. The carmakers love it because the consumers think it's a "high-tech" benefit, when for the automakers it's actually a cheapout because mechanical switches are far costlier than one touch membrane and writing some software once that they then use 100,000 times. For control without distraction, they don't hold a candle to well-designed and differentiated physical buttons and *****. I don't care how how old-fashoined I sound, they generally suck.
The following 3 users liked this post by LexFinally:
dezymond (06-13-22), dklanecky1 (06-15-22), justim (06-13-22)
Old 06-14-22 | 05:39 AM
  #20  
mikemu30's Avatar
mikemu30
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 8,203
Likes: 2,573
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by dezymond
While I agree their touchpad is far from perfect, it's at least 100x times better than that dumb joystick they used to have. Now that was infuriating. The new touchpad is at least more similar to the use of a touchpad of a laptop, but still it's mostly guessing where your initial input is and when driving does take your eyes off the road. The touch capability is a good bonus, but they kept the UI exactly the same, that needed to change. I have a long wingspan and even reaching to the far right icons, which are way too small by the way, is a bit of a stretch for me. Sure they threw in touchscreen, but it was clearly a rushed job and just so people can't complain that there isn't touch capability.

In general, this whole touchscreen UI for everything is a trend that I hate. I appreciate the actual buttons of the HVAC system and even some of the media buttons.
The joystick is pretty awful I agree. My wife's RX has it 😥
Old 06-14-22 | 08:10 AM
  #21  
TechNut's Avatar
TechNut
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 729
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by LexFinally
I respectfully disagree. I know some here have older ES models and I respect that some of them like the touchpad perfectly fine, but I have always found it a complete abomination. I would never buy a car that forced me to use it, which is why I ordered a '22 in 2021. I've had my car nearly six months and I still can't use it, don't expect to ever learn it, and find it a worse-than-useless waste of console space.

Lexus added a touchscreen for '21 and '22 as an emergency project by popular demand because virtually every tester (Car and Driver's HEADLINE: "A single frustrating flaw") and increasing numbers of buyers were rebelling. Keeping the touchpad while adding touch capability to the screen was a half-baked kludge fix done as a mid-model upgrade to multiple Lexus models (ES, LS, I think RX) only because there wasn't enough time and money to bring the new software to those existing models yet. To show Lexus's own thinking about it, the new NX has no touchpad, just a touchscreen with completely overhauled software. This system, with no touchpad, will be the standard for future Lexus models.
I kind of like that they kept the touchpad. I have no problems with that touchpad and don’t have to stretch to reach it like I do with the touchscreen in our 21 RX. I don’t have to look at fingerprints on the screen all the time like I have with previous touchscreen equipped vehicles. Yes, I know I’m a bit OCD. This solution seems like a reasonable compromise to satisfy both preferences. To your point about the new NX, yes it is better integrated and looks like it brings the screen closer to the driver, so at least my “stretching” complaint would be mitigated. I agree this will be the new design for future models. Clearly Lexus wants to satisfy the reviewers. They are a powerful lobby.
Old 06-14-22 | 08:17 AM
  #22  
TechNut's Avatar
TechNut
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 729
From: Idaho
Default

Originally Posted by mikemu30
The joystick is pretty awful I agree. My wife's RX has it 😥
I had it in our last RX and our last ES. We got used to it and it worked OK, but I won’t sing it any praises. The touchpad is definitely an improvement. And I have no doubt the touchscreen has some improvements, but the early implementation suggests it isn’t fully baked just yet.
Old 06-14-22 | 09:56 AM
  #23  
LexFinally's Avatar
LexFinally
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 964
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by TechNut
I had it in our last RX and our last ES. We got used to it and it worked OK, but I won’t sing it any praises. The touchpad is definitely an improvement. And I have no doubt the touchscreen has some improvements, but the early implementation suggests it isn’t fully baked just yet.
Supposedly they wrote the underlying code in Linux to make it adjustable on the fly, so there's reason to hope for further improvement.
Old 06-14-22 | 10:11 AM
  #24  
lesz's Avatar
lesz
Lead Lap
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,279
Likes: 1,019
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by TechNut
I kind of like that they kept the touchpad. I have no problems with that touchpad and don’t have to stretch to reach it like I do with the touchscreen in our 21 RX. I don’t have to look at fingerprints on the screen all the time like I have with previous touchscreen equipped vehicles.
It really is a matter of trade-offs.

While moving a touch screen, for example, closer to the driver, makes it easier to use the touch screen without having to reach, there is a safety downside to moving the screen closer to the driver. When the screen is further away from the driver, the driver can glance at the screen by simply moving his/her eyes. When the screen is closer to the driver, glancing at the screen requires the driver to move his/her head, which means slightly more time without the driver's eyes being on the road.

That is why I really liked the screen placement on the 2 Generation 6 ES vehicles that I owned. The screen was far back from the driver, and that placement made it especially easy to glance at the screen with only minimal movement of the eyes. Also, the placement of the screen in a shaded alcove eliminated any issues with glare or reflections. But the trade-off was that such a screen placement requires use of a touch pad or joy stick. (I may be in the minority, but I really liked the joy stick in the Generation 6 ES and found it very easy to use once I got used to it.)

Like you, I find that the fingerprints and smudges that quickly accumulate on the touch screen are quite annoying.

Also, regardless of how any design technology seems, today, to be state-of-the art, it is almost guaranteed to appear to be dated 3 years from now.

(But these are all examples of 1st World Problems.)

Last edited by lesz; 06-14-22 at 01:15 PM.
The following users liked this post:
DavidZ (06-14-22)
Old 06-14-22 | 12:10 PM
  #25  
DavidZ's Avatar
DavidZ
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 313
From: oh
Default

Originally Posted by lesz
It really is a matter of trade-offs.

While moving a touch screen, for example, closer to the driver, makes it easier to use the touch screen without having to reach, there is a safety downside to moving the screen closer to the driver. When the screen is further away from the driver, the driver can glance at the screen by simply moving his/her eyes. When the screen is closer to the driver, glancing at the screen requires the driver to move his/her head, which means slightly more time without the driver's eyes being on the road.
I was thinking of making this point, but you beat me to it.
Old 06-14-22 | 04:34 PM
  #26  
LexFinally's Avatar
LexFinally
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 964
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by lesz
It really is a matter of trade-offs.

While moving a touch screen, for example, closer to the driver, makes it easier to use the touch screen without having to reach, there is a safety downside to moving the screen closer to the driver. When the screen is further away from the driver, the driver can glance at the screen by simply moving his/her eyes. When the screen is closer to the driver, glancing at the screen requires the driver to move his/her head, which means slightly more time without the driver's eyes being on the road.

That is why I really liked the screen placement on the 2 Generation 6 ES vehicles that I owned. The screen was far back from the driver, and that placement made it especially easy to glance at the screen with only minimal movement of the eyes. Also, the placement of the screen in a shaded alcove eliminated any issues with glare or reflections. But the trade-off was that such a screen placement requires use of a touch pad or joy stick. (I may be in the minority, but I really liked the joy stick in the Generation 6 ES and found it very easy to use once I got used to it.)

Like you, I find that the fingerprints and smudges that quickly accumulate on the touch screen are quite annoying.

Also, regardless of how any design technology seems, today, to be state-of-the art, it is almost guaranteed to appear to be dated 3 years from now.

(But these are all examples of 1st World Problems.)
Agree that all engineering decisions are compromises, but some tradeoffs work better than others. The Acura RL I used to drive had a system similar to BMW iDrive, with a non-touch screen operated by a scroll-and-push wheel. This was much better IMO than the Lexus joystick or the Lexus/Acura touchpad, because it didn't test the driver's manual dexterity and made it easy to put the cursor where you wanted it. I've seen that some reviewers have said that Mercedes made a mistake by moving away from a similar system to touchscreens only. I can live with the Lexus touchscreen, but if anything, I felt the Acura system (released 18 years ago!) was better resolved. Progress seemingly isn't always forwards.
Old 06-15-22 | 01:40 PM
  #27  
dlr86's Avatar
dlr86
1st Gear
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: DE
Default

I had a few dealers jerk me around with this kind of bs, so I recently purchased my 2022 350 f sport from out of state (Sewell dealership in Texas). They sold it to me at MSRP, dealing with the paperwork was a little annoying but they were very straightforward, no weird sales tricks or upsells. I did have to pay to ship it, but that was only like $1k, which was much less than the markup other dealers were trying to charge, and frankly their shadiness was a complete turnoff for me.
Old 06-15-22 | 10:04 PM
  #28  
asadani's Avatar
asadani
Pit Crew
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 222
Likes: 59
From: Dubai
Default

At this moment, we are so close with 2023. "i hope" so getting a 22 would not be my pick
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blanshot
ES - 7th Gen (2019-present)
375
05-20-22 06:40 PM
NJRonbo
NX - 2nd Gen (2022-current)
51
01-24-22 08:51 AM
2022LC500
LC Model (2018-present)
31
01-18-22 07:33 PM



Quick Reply: Dealership is jerking me around / unobtainable vehicle?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:29 AM.