EV Chat General discussion about electrified Lexus, other EV vehicle manufacturers and BEV, PHEV related industry news.

Tesla Business and News Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-23, 09:10 AM
  #751  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,671
Received 2,115 Likes on 1,643 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blaze876
imo and this is not based off of any facts or statistics but I think a lot of model 3 buyers bought it because its the cheapest Tesla. If Tesla differentiate them enough such as vegan leather not an option on the model 2, much smaller screen, a lot slower (6.5-7 seconds) to 60 then I would think the Model 3 stills sees strong demand. However, if the Model 2 is a shrunken version of the Model 3 with less range and slightly slower, then I can see the Model 2 being the best selling model and taking away a lot of sales for the model 3.

A lot of people on the reservation I know are scalpers lol. Some people have multiple reservations as well. A lot of these people are going to cancel with the leaked document that Tesla is restricting buyers from selling the Cybertruck until after 1 year of ownership....with some exceptions.
Correct, those who buy the base RWD are just looking for a cheap commuter, but Long Range and Performance buyers aren't looking to save money. Someone who is in the market for a Model 3 Performance would see a Model 2 as a downgrade...even if they have a performance version. It would be like someone who drives a Camry XSE V6 switching to a fully loaded Corolla XSE.

Someone like my daughter, who recently bought a Bolt EUV would be a candidate for a Model 2 (she was also cross shopping a Corolla/Civic)
Old 11-13-23, 09:45 AM
  #752  
Blaze876
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Blaze876's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: miami
Posts: 752
Received 107 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
Correct, those who buy the base RWD are just looking for a cheap commuter, but Long Range and Performance buyers aren't looking to save money. Someone who is in the market for a Model 3 Performance would see a Model 2 as a downgrade...even if they have a performance version. It would be like someone who drives a Camry XSE V6 switching to a fully loaded Corolla XSE.

Someone like my daughter, who recently bought a Bolt EUV would be a candidate for a Model 2 (she was also cross shopping a Corolla/Civic)
exactly. Is there a breakdown for the model 3 to see how many RWD, vs dual motor vs performance sold? I would think the model 3 performance sales is miniscule compared to the other models.
Old 11-13-23, 09:47 AM
  #753  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,671
Received 2,115 Likes on 1,643 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blaze876
exactly. Is there a breakdown for the model 3 to see how many RWD, vs dual motor vs performance sold? I would think the model 3 performance sales is miniscule compared to the other models.
I don't think Tesla breaks down those numbers by single motor vs dual motor. Also Long Range uses the same battery pack and motors as the Performance. Power is limited through software
Old 11-13-23, 10:02 AM
  #754  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,470
Received 661 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

No need to overthink this. If Tesla believed the Model 2 would cannibalize Model 3 sales they wouldn't have developed it. They have already shown they can scale Model 3 pricing close enough to the rumored 25K Model 2 entry point and with some decontenting and software limitations on range/performance that could be unlocked later for a premium they could attack that market without the billions in R&D and manufacturing spend for a new product line. They will expect some buyer overlap, but would not risk cannibalizing their volume vehicles.

Tesla believes the 2 and 3 can co-exist, and has the biggest vested interest in and 2 and 3 being able to co-exist.
Old 11-13-23, 10:16 AM
  #755  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,671
Received 2,115 Likes on 1,643 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
No need to overthink this. If Tesla believed the Model 2 would cannibalize Model 3 sales they wouldn't have developed it. They have already shown they can scale Model 3 pricing close enough to the rumored 25K Model 2 entry point and with some decontenting and software limitations on range/performance that could be unlocked later for a premium they could attack that market without the billions in R&D and manufacturing spend for a new product line. They will expect some buyer overlap, but would not risk cannibalizing their volume vehicles.

Tesla believes the 2 and 3 can co-exist, and has the biggest vested interest in and 2 and 3 being able to co-exist.
There is no doubt in my mind they can co-exist. There is little reason a Model 3 buyer will want to downgrade. Higher end Sedan buyers will continue to buy the Model 3/S and SUV buyers will continue to buy Model Y/X. Entry level, first time buyers will flock to the Model 2. There's plenty of room for an entry level sedan
Old 11-13-23, 10:53 AM
  #756  
Blaze876
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
Blaze876's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: miami
Posts: 752
Received 107 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
No need to overthink this. If Tesla believed the Model 2 would cannibalize Model 3 sales they wouldn't have developed it. They have already shown they can scale Model 3 pricing close enough to the rumored 25K Model 2 entry point and with some decontenting and software limitations on range/performance that could be unlocked later for a premium they could attack that market without the billions in R&D and manufacturing spend for a new product line. They will expect some buyer overlap, but would not risk cannibalizing their volume vehicles.

Tesla believes the 2 and 3 can co-exist, and has the biggest vested interest in and 2 and 3 being able to co-exist.
I'm probably out of the loop, you said they have shown they can scale model 3 pricing close enough to the promoted 25k model 2, can you explain?
Old 11-13-23, 11:57 AM
  #757  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,470
Received 661 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blaze876
I'm probably out of the loop, you said they have shown they can scale model 3 pricing close enough to the promoted 25k model 2, can you explain?
Sure. Even before Tesla started their most aggressive pricing adjustments, the Model 3 has sold for as low as $35,000 and it's absolutely conceivable that a decontented and range-limited entry level model could sell for less than that today if Tesla wishes. Tesla has scaled production sufficiently to realize significant build cost advantages, and has sufficient margin to sell these for at or below $30,000 if it wished. And that's before you factor in any federal and state incentives. The $25,000 Model 3 is already here if you factor in available incentives in some locations. Tesla has made it very clear it prioritizes market share over margin, a wise strategy as the data shows that Tesla customers are far more likely than not to stick with the brand in future. The notion that Tesla could price the low end of the Model 3 within range of the rumored price targets for the Model 2 is entirely reasonable.

But my broad point remains that Tesla wouldn't build the Model 2 if they believed it would cannibalize Model 3 sales. Tesla is in the business of aggressively targeting the market share of others, not diluting its own.
The following users liked this post:
AMIRZA786 (11-13-23)
Old 11-13-23, 12:57 PM
  #758  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,768
Received 2,417 Likes on 1,584 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
Even before Tesla started their most aggressive pricing adjustments, the Model 3 has sold for as low as $35,000 and it's absolutely conceivable that a decontented and range-limited entry level model could sell for less than that today if Tesla wishes.
what 'content' do you think they could remove from a 3 at this point? rear seats?

The $25,000 Model 3 is already here if you factor in available incentives in some locations.
like where? looks like the cheapest place in the nation you could get a model 3 (with 18" wheels) is colorado at 28130 (including 7500 federal and 5000 state).

source: https://insideevs.com/news/692133/ch...-tesla-modely/

But my broad point remains that Tesla wouldn't build the Model 2 if they believed it would cannibalize Model 3 sales. Tesla is in the business of aggressively targeting the market share of others, not diluting its own.
do we even know what a 2 will be like? is it a small 3 or a small y? i figure there would be far more market for a cuv than a sedan. corolla may sell a ton but in europe for example, tall hatchbacks or dozens or brands and models sell by the zillion.
Old 11-13-23, 02:05 PM
  #759  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,470
Received 661 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

There were posts on the forum over the summer that talked about the potential to get a Model 3 RWD in California for around 23K after myriad incentives were factored in. There were counterpoints from members like me who pointed out that it took a very specific set of circumstances for that 23K Model 3 to be possible, but it was indeed possible if you could check all the right boxes. But above all, it shows that there are indeed ways to get the Model 3 down to the rumored price of the Model 2.

*** Let's not lose sight of the fact, however, that the reason I brought up the possibility of Model 2/Model 3 price overlap in the first place was as evidence that Tesla themselves see separate and distinct markets for the 2 and 3 and that Tesla, like me, thinks that they can and will co-exist rather than compete. The point being if you want to offer a 25K to 30K car, it's one hell of a lot cheaper for Tesla to price flex the Model 3 than it is for them to design, develop and build a whole new Model 2. So the fact that Tesla is doing just that shows they expect it to be accretive to their revenue/margin and not dilute their revenue/margin. ***
The following 2 users liked this post by swajames:
AMIRZA786 (11-13-23), Hameed (11-13-23)
Old 11-13-23, 08:44 PM
  #760  
JeffKeryk
Racer
 
JeffKeryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 1,918
Received 516 Likes on 352 Posts
Default

The Model 2 will certainly take some 3 market share, but will open up a far bigger, untapped market. Corolla/Civic buyers. In Monterrey, an educated upper scale area, the car could flourish. India. Ever heard of the China car market?
And remember, market share is leverage. Margin strength is leverage and the Model 2 will employ everything Tesla has learned about efficiency.

Of course my crystal ball is as cloudy as anyone else's...
The following 2 users liked this post by JeffKeryk:
AMIRZA786 (11-13-23), swajames (11-13-23)
Old 11-15-23, 08:51 AM
  #761  
Mike728
Lead Lap
 
Mike728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 4,785
Received 652 Likes on 487 Posts
Default

While researching the latest SW release online, I ran across this little bit of info. I really hope it doesn't come to this.

Tesla Prepares to Turn the Heated Front Seats and Wipers into Paid Features

Old 11-15-23, 08:59 AM
  #762  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,671
Received 2,115 Likes on 1,643 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike728
While researching the latest SW release online, I ran across this little bit of info. I really hope it doesn't come to this.

Tesla Prepares to Turn the Heated Front Seats and Wipers into Paid Features

I don't use heated seats, so middle finger to that. If Elon thinks I'm paying to use my wipers, I guess I'll be using my mostly unused X account to SPAM him with my discontent at that stupidity. If this is even true
Old 11-15-23, 09:49 AM
  #763  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,470
Received 661 Likes on 413 Posts
Default

You can bet your bottom dollar that was included in the code release precisely so someone "discovers" it and posts about it so Tesla can gauge reaction.

Of course with this particular thing being related to Tesla, there will no doubt be a surprisingly large contingent of people on forums who will find ways to spin heated seat and heated wiper subscriptions as a positive, and declare it to be ground breaking genius
Old 11-15-23, 09:57 AM
  #764  
Allen K
-0----0-

iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,440
Received 748 Likes on 518 Posts
Default

Even BMW gave up on the idea of a monthly seat heater subscription
Old 11-15-23, 10:02 AM
  #765  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,671
Received 2,115 Likes on 1,643 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
You can bet your bottom dollar that was included in the code release precisely so someone "discovers" it and posts about it so Tesla can gauge reaction.

Of course with this particular thing being related to Tesla, there will no doubt be a surprisingly large contingent of people on forums who will find ways to spin heated seat and heated wiper subscriptions as a positive, and declare it to be ground breaking genius
I'm not among one of those. It's one thing paying for premium data services or even a performance upgrade, but to heat your seats and use your windshield wipers? What kind of sick joke is that??


Quick Reply: Tesla Business and News Thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 PM.