EV Chat General discussion about electrified Lexus, other EV vehicle manufacturers and BEV, PHEV related industry news.

Tesla Business and News Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-24, 12:03 PM
  #1351  
Mike728
Lead Lap
 
Mike728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 4,771
Received 642 Likes on 482 Posts
Default

What ever happened to Tesla pulling the Disney+ app off of their vehicles? It's still up and running on ours. I thought Musk was all pissed after Disney pulled their advertising from twitter/x.

I think the drugs are taking their toll on him. He needs to go back to leading and spend less time throwing temper tantrums.
Old 02-01-24, 12:04 PM
  #1352  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,562
Received 2,096 Likes on 1,628 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
so i'm trying to understand this here... some shareholders sued tesla over musk's compensation, and tesla is currently incorporated in delaware, is that right?

so what happens to musk's compensation? goes to zero?
I doubt that. They will purpose a new compensation package as I understand. And yes, they are incorporated in DE. He could be sued in Texas as well. I think, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, the idea is that a Texas court would be friendlier to him

Last edited by AMIRZA786; 02-01-24 at 12:07 PM.
Old 02-01-24, 12:14 PM
  #1353  
Allen K
-0----0-

iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,374
Received 727 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
so i'm trying to understand this here... some shareholders sued tesla over musk's compensation, and tesla is currently incorporated in delaware, is that right?

so what happens to musk's compensation? goes to zero?
The argument being made (and that the judge accepted) was that the board, which is supposed to be independent, was acting in the best interest of Elon instead of the best interest of Tesla. Essentially, they're accusing him of building a BOD that would do whatever he wanted including giving him the $55B comp package that he supposedly came up with himself.
The following users liked this post:
swajames (02-01-24)
Old 02-01-24, 12:39 PM
  #1354  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,831
Received 2,825 Likes on 2,388 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
Tesla can appeal the decision. There's always going to be an activist judge, even if they sit on a bench in Texas.
What do you base this on? Until now there has never been a judge that nullified a BODs.
And why is it bad that I don't always agree with Musk? I can still think he's a brilliant guy but not agree with everything he does.
That's fair, but the upside is spectacular.
As soon as the stock hits $305, I'm out.
If you believe the stock will never go over $305 until the end of time then yes, sell it all. If you do believe there is upside beyond $305 then you're making an emotional decision not a financial one.
Made my 3x, I'm done with all the drama and rollercoasters
I don't believe you, you're just venting. I was losing it 1 year ago until I came to my senses and realized the opportunity. This is not peak fear the sky is falling not even close. When I first starting investing every single thing I read said Tesla was doomed. Same for this forum, there were 2-3 people bullish the rest said legacy auto was going to crush Tesla, Tesla would never make money, their only hope was to be bought out etc. etc. it was endless. Hatred and generally buying into FUD cost many people an incredible opportunity. I feel like I'm in a version of Groundhog Day it's happening again.
Originally Posted by bitkahuna
so i'm trying to understand this here... some shareholders sued tesla over musk's compensation, and tesla is currently incorporated in delaware, is that right?
Not some shareholders, one. Single. One person with 9 shares. The judge in this case (same one that forced Elon to buy Twitter) started her judgement by saying, "Is Elon too rich?"
so what happens to musk's compensation? goes to zero?
It did go to zero, as of now he worked since 2018 for free.

Originally Posted by Mike728
I think the drugs are taking their toll on him. He needs to go back to leading and spend less time throwing temper tantrums.
Elon is tested all the time because of government contracts.

Originally Posted by Allen K
The argument being made (and that the judge accepted) was that the board, which is supposed to be independent, was acting in the best interest of Elon instead of the best interest of Tesla. Essentially, they're accusing him of building a BOD that would do whatever he wanted including giving him the $55B comp package that he supposedly came up with himself.
Board of directors are elected by shareholders.

Old 02-01-24, 12:54 PM
  #1355  
Allen K
-0----0-

iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,374
Received 727 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

When it's time for a proxy vote, have you ever looked into the board members and put thought into whether you should vote for them? I certainly haven't
Old 02-01-24, 01:10 PM
  #1356  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,831
Received 2,825 Likes on 2,388 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
When it's time for a proxy vote, have you ever looked into the board members and put thought into whether you should vote for them? I certainly haven't
Of course I do, it takes less than 10 minutes to do basic research on the board members. You claimed Elon built a BOD he wanted as to execute his evil scheme now you're saying people just blindly vote. So he got his very friendly to him BOD by accident.

Since the compensation package was approved by the board investors saw a 10x return. Imagine suing for that, and people believing this person taking legal action is on the level. Even more insane is claiming the board acted against the interest of Tesla, really? How much better could the company have executed?
Old 02-01-24, 01:21 PM
  #1357  
Allen K
-0----0-

iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,374
Received 727 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

Lol I'm sure that 10 minutes is very enlightening. I claimed nothing, it's the judge saying the board members were beholden to Musk either personally as friends or financially

https://www.msn.com/en-ae/money/comp...ff/ar-BB1hyOC4

Judge's decision here: https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/use...paOEefQse00/v0

The board also settled a lawsuit and had to return $735M in stock and options because of accusations that they overpaid themselves starting in 2017
Old 02-01-24, 01:26 PM
  #1358  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,412
Received 643 Likes on 400 Posts
Default

It doesn't matter much whether the plaintiff had 9 shares or 9 million, the point was one of principle and it was litigated accordingly.

It's somewhat analogous to class action suits where the actual plaintiff may have only a limited individual claim but the matter being litigated extends to others.
Old 02-01-24, 01:26 PM
  #1359  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,831
Received 2,825 Likes on 2,388 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
Lol I'm sure that 10 minutes is very enlightening.
Much better than your zero minutes.
I claimed nothing, it's the judge saying the board members were beholden to Musk either personally as friends or financially
Because that never happens. What is the board supposed to be, hostile to their CEO? BODs results speak for themselves, period. Only reason you would not like them is if you want Tesla to fail.

As yes I know what the judge said that's the problem it's not the defense you think it is.
Old 02-01-24, 01:30 PM
  #1360  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,412
Received 643 Likes on 400 Posts
Default

The board has a fiduciary responsibility to Tesla shareholders. So the question is whether a single person's compensation represents the best use of the funds.

That's not a difficult question to answer. It's clearly no, because it could have funded so many other things like the development of new vehicles, the build out of the charging network and myriad other things that are in better interest of the company and the shareholders than paying it to one person.

Old 02-01-24, 01:35 PM
  #1361  
Allen K
-0----0-

iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,374
Received 727 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

I actually vote against all board members when it's proxy vote time. I realize that my few thousand shares aren't going to do much vs. the investors that own percentages of the company

The board is supposed to have the best interest of the company and shareholders in mind. Considering they settled a case claiming they overcompensated themselves and Tesla has now lost the $56B comp plan for Musk, it looks like it's time for a new board.
Old 02-01-24, 01:44 PM
  #1362  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,831
Received 2,825 Likes on 2,388 Posts
Default

I don't want a new BOD, no thanks. Ross Gerber ran to be a board member thankfully that was voted down the guy is a clown shoe IMO. I certainly don't understand where this notion comes from that board members have to completely unbiased and independent. Look at Meta's BOD tell me what you see.
Old 02-01-24, 02:12 PM
  #1363  
Allen K
-0----0-

iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,374
Received 727 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

No one has said they need to be unbiased and independent. They have a duty to serve the needs of the shareholder and based on the board settling a previous case and with Musk's comp plan being struck down, the broader argument is that they acted in their own best interest instead of the interest of the shareholders.
Old 02-01-24, 02:30 PM
  #1364  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,831
Received 2,825 Likes on 2,388 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Allen K
No one has said they need to be unbiased and independent. They have a duty to serve the needs of the shareholder and based on the board settling a previous case and with Musk's comp plan being struck down, the broader argument is that they acted in their own best interest instead of the interest of the shareholders.
So 10x is not good enough. What is the acceptable number?
Old 02-01-24, 02:38 PM
  #1365  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,562
Received 2,096 Likes on 1,628 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
What do you base this on? Until now there has never been a judge that nullified a BODs.

That's fair, but the upside is spectacular.

If you believe the stock will never go over $305 until the end of time then yes, sell it all. If you do believe there is upside beyond $305 then you're making an emotional decision not a financial one.

I don't believe you, you're just venting. I was losing it 1 year ago until I came to my senses and realized the opportunity. This is not peak fear the sky is falling not even close. When I first starting investing every single thing I read said Tesla was doomed. Same for this forum, there were 2-3 people bullish the rest said legacy auto was going to crush Tesla, Tesla would never make money, their only hope was to be bought out etc. etc. it was endless. Hatred and generally buying into FUD cost many people an incredible opportunity. I feel like I'm in a version of Groundhog Day it's happening again.
Activist judges have been around forever, on both sides of the political spectrum. But forget about that. I think the reason you haven't seen a judge over ruling a BOD before is because this was the largest compensation package in history. I'm not saying one way or another if he deserved it or not, I'm not qualified to say.

I think Tesla has a huge upside, and can easily reach beyond $305 per share...but Elon has of recent made that elusive. Just look at the rollercoaster ride over the last two years. It goes up, and then he tanks it because he has to speak during the investor calls, or he has to buy X. OK, but enough is enough for me.

I will continue to buy their vehicles though, the best in the industry, with the best infrastructure that exists


Quick Reply: Tesla Business and News Thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47 AM.