EV Chat General discussion about electrified Lexus, other EV vehicle manufacturers and BEV, PHEV related industry news.

General EV Conversation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-24, 06:00 PM
  #3196  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,589
Received 722 Likes on 452 Posts
Default

The project to extract lithium has already started and the state hasn't objected. The state has, in fact, helped and supported the effort, and true to form, has already passed a lithium extraction tax.
The following 2 users liked this post by swajames:
AMIRZA786 (05-26-24), bitkahuna (05-26-24)
Old 05-26-24, 06:25 PM
  #3197  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 14,378
Received 2,250 Likes on 1,753 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
The project to extract lithium has already started and the state hasn't objected. The state has, in fact, helped and supported the effort, and true to form, has already passed a lithium extraction tax.
Haha told you. Californian's have their price 🤣. Not allowing the extraction of one of the largest lithium finds would be sheer stupidity for a state with the largest amount of battery powered vehicles
Old 05-26-24, 06:35 PM
  #3198  
Bob04
Lead Lap
 
Bob04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 3,666
Received 271 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

lithium extraction tax. lol

If that doesn't tell you exactly what this is all about, then nothing ever will.
Old 05-26-24, 06:42 PM
  #3199  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 14,378
Received 2,250 Likes on 1,753 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bob04
lithium extraction tax. lol

If that doesn't tell you exactly what this is all about, then nothing ever will.
What else would it be about LoL? You think it's going to be free? I guess you didn't see "Let there be blood"
Old 05-26-24, 06:49 PM
  #3200  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,589
Received 722 Likes on 452 Posts
Default

It is to be distributed to local communities impacted by the extraction and to generally pay for the clean up of an already polluted area.
The following users liked this post:
Margate330 (05-26-24)
Old 05-26-24, 06:52 PM
  #3201  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 14,378
Received 2,250 Likes on 1,753 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
It is to be distributed to local communities impacted by the extraction and to generally pay for the clean up of an already polluted area.
You probably should have just left out the "tax" part, as you know, there are people always looking for the "gotcha" moment
Old 05-26-24, 06:55 PM
  #3202  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,589
Received 722 Likes on 452 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
You probably should have just left out the "tax" part, as you know, there are people always looking for the "gotcha" moment
Yes, and, curiously, once again it's people who don't live here and aren't impacted by either the tax or the pollution.
The following 2 users liked this post by swajames:
AMIRZA786 (05-26-24), Hameed (05-27-24)
Old 05-26-24, 07:01 PM
  #3203  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 14,378
Received 2,250 Likes on 1,753 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
Yes, and, curiously, once again it's people who don't live here and aren't impacted by either the tax or the pollution.
Which also includes you and I who don't live anywhere near Pelican Bay 🤣🤣
Old 05-26-24, 07:14 PM
  #3204  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,589
Received 722 Likes on 452 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
Which also includes you and I who don't live anywhere near Pelican Bay 🤣🤣
In other circumstances, the additional tax revenue would have gone into the general fund. So indirectly everyone here is impacted to one extent or another. The bigger thing as it relates to the forum is it should help ensure future supply for EV batteries. Some reports suggest that there’s enough lithium in the Salton Sea to make batteries for 300 million EV’s. Studies are underway to validate that.
The following 2 users liked this post by swajames:
AMIRZA786 (05-26-24), bitkahuna (05-26-24)
Old 05-26-24, 07:39 PM
  #3205  
DaveGS4
Forum Administrator
Administrator
iTrader: (2)
 
DaveGS4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 31,609
Received 2,321 Likes on 1,414 Posts
Default

Getting into debate content, drop it or drop out of the thread please (some posts pruned)
Old 05-26-24, 08:59 PM
  #3206  
Margate330
Lexus Test Driver
 
Margate330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: FL
Posts: 7,341
Received 1,029 Likes on 814 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
Yes, and, curiously, once again it's people who don't live here and aren't impacted by either the tax or the pollution.
Of course, we all want to speculate and weigh in too. Lol

Originally Posted by swajames
It is to be distributed to local communities impacted by the extraction and to generally pay for the clean up of an already polluted area.
I cringe every time I hear the expression, "Game Changer" because I hate that expression.

However this mining deal sounds like a win -> win, aka Game Changer!
Spoiler
 
The following users liked this post:
AMIRZA786 (05-26-24)
Old 05-26-24, 11:00 PM
  #3207  
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
peteharvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 4,358
Received 487 Likes on 322 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
You mentioned twice about your Indian friend, are you trying to say Indians are smarter? If so, I'm half Indian, so thank you

You are again mentioning arguments that have been debunked or are outdated. Modern battery chemistry has been evolving at breakneck speeds, they can now fast charge, and provide long range. Where I will agree with you is non Tesla infrastructure is still lacking, and infrastructure in other parts of the country needs more attention for sure. But I've travelled numerous times in my Model Y with almost the same ease as my gas cars. I'm not advocating that you get an EV, but living where you do, owning an EV would be effortless.

So a couple of questions:

Should we abandoned EV's and stop advancing battery tech? And did Tesla waste time and resources building out there charging infrastructure?

Do you think oil is an unlimited resource, or is it finite? And do you think acquiring it has been bloodless? As I last remember, we spend billions of taxpayer dollars fighting wars and protecting oil in the Middle East
My Indian friends are Sikhs - they don't cut their hair and wear turbans to cover it.

No, Tesla have not wasted their time; indeed, Musk was the only one to see the potential of lithium ion powered EV's.
No, EV must not be abandoned, but EV's must continue to develop EV's, and find an alternative battery chemistry breakthrough.
Something that is more abundant.
With considerably less mining and pollution.
Higher energy densities not only for longer range, but also for lower weight to reduce particulate matter pollution.
Much less battery degradation for longer life hence less mining pollution.
Faster charging.
This is the only way to convert niche early adopter to the mainstream market.


Remember the world's first digital camera in the US$15k Nikon D1 with only 2.8 megapixels and laughable these days?





Or the 2003 world's first mass produced dSLR in the Canon EOS 300D/Digital Rebel/Kiss Digital with only 6.3 megapixels.
Look at those tiny LCD displays above and below?
A Nikon D1 with only 2.7 megapixels? Even your phone can do better than that.





In the same way, in ten years time, you will laugh at the early adopter electric vehicles today...
Old 05-26-24, 11:34 PM
  #3208  
BayeauxLex
Instructor
 
BayeauxLex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,227
Received 197 Likes on 168 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
i'm sure a turo rental of a model s is a bit more than renting a malibu from hertz.

M3P is $44/day. I will gladly pay that to not drive a Malibu
The following users liked this post:
AMIRZA786 (05-27-24)
Old 05-27-24, 12:56 AM
  #3209  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 14,378
Received 2,250 Likes on 1,753 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BayeauxLex
M3P is $44/day. I will gladly pay that to not drive a Malibu
I'd pay more than that not to have the pleasure of driving a Malibu 😁
Old 05-27-24, 01:18 AM
  #3210  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 14,378
Received 2,250 Likes on 1,753 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by peteharvey
My Indian friends are Sikhs - they don't cut their hair and wear turbans to cover it.

No, Tesla have not wasted their time; indeed, Musk was the only one to see the potential of lithium ion powered EV's.
No, EV must not be abandoned, but EV's must continue to develop EV's, and find an alternative battery chemistry breakthrough.
Something that is more abundant.
With considerably less mining and pollution.
Higher energy densities not only for longer range, but also for lower weight to reduce particulate matter pollution.
Much less battery degradation for longer life hence less mining pollution.
Faster charging.
This is the only way to convert niche early adopter to the mainstream market.


Remember the world's first digital camera in the US$15k Nikon D1 with only 2.8 megapixels and laughable these days?





Or the 2003 world's first mass produced dSLR in the Canon EOS 300D/Digital Rebel/Kiss Digital with only 6.3 megapixels.
Look at those tiny LCD displays above and below?
A Nikon D1 with only 2.7 megapixels? Even your phone can do better than that.





In the same way, in ten years time, you will laugh at the early adopter electric vehicles today...
I think you and I pretty much agree here. Which is why two of my three EV'S are leased, because you are correct, the changes in 10 years will be significant 👍


Quick Reply: General EV Conversation



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 AM.