Ford backing away from EV commitment.
#46
"Wait till the big boys get in..." Wasn't it supposed to be easy?
I give CEO Farley and his team big credit for doing what they believe is right for the company and its shareholders. Progress is never a straight line. Change is difficult. Ford (and GM) bread-and-butter is pickups. At this point in time, I do not see the viability of an electric pickup, especially at $100K or whatever it is. For any company.
I wish Ford success in their endeavors. They have a way to go, as do all the legacy car companies. Developing and making ICE, Hybrid and EV vehicles allows for overlap but does not allow for a singleness of product. That's putting your eggs in a lotta baskets.
At least Ford has the huevos to break out their ICE vs EV financials. Seems others have something to hide?
I give CEO Farley and his team big credit for doing what they believe is right for the company and its shareholders. Progress is never a straight line. Change is difficult. Ford (and GM) bread-and-butter is pickups. At this point in time, I do not see the viability of an electric pickup, especially at $100K or whatever it is. For any company.
I wish Ford success in their endeavors. They have a way to go, as do all the legacy car companies. Developing and making ICE, Hybrid and EV vehicles allows for overlap but does not allow for a singleness of product. That's putting your eggs in a lotta baskets.
At least Ford has the huevos to break out their ICE vs EV financials. Seems others have something to hide?
#47
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
#48
Super Moderator
I do. Do you think it costs nothing to give every employee a 27% raise, a $5,000 bonus, 10% 401k contribution (with no EE contribution requirement), and all the other things in the contract? And then increase starting wages by 70%, such that day 1 employees now make just $2/hr less than the top rate from the prior contract? There's a reason these contract battles are fought. That stuff costs REAL money.
#49
Lexus Fanatic
I wouldn't be pointing fingers at GM when this type of thing keeps happening.
https://thehill.com/business/4763776...nt-fain-probe/
Yes it was.
I thought Farley was doing the right thing now I don't, he's back peddling and delaying Ford's EV plans. It's not going to get any easier take the hit now or take a harder hit later.
Ford went for the quick fix, F-150 because it's their bread and butter and use the Mustang name. Neither helped bring down costs.
True and I'm still surprised by this.
https://thehill.com/business/4763776...nt-fain-probe/
Yes it was.
I give CEO Farley and his team big credit for doing what they believe is right for the company and its shareholders. Progress is never a straight line. Change is difficult. Ford (and GM) bread-and-butter is pickups. At this point in time, I do not see the viability of an electric pickup, especially at $100K or whatever it is. For any company.
I wish Ford success in their endeavors. They have a way to go, as do all the legacy car companies. Developing and making ICE, Hybrid and EV vehicles allows for overlap but does not allow for a singleness of product. That's putting your eggs in a lotta baskets.
At least Ford has the huevos to break out their ICE vs EV financials.
#50
Lexus Test Driver
Do you all think Ford could save money by making a Mustang that can be either ice or ev?
One platform and two drive line options?
One platform and two drive line options?
#51
Lexus Fanatic
#52
Pole Position
And yet my Lightning has an absolutely massive frunk, much bigger than the frunk on the Cybertruck, that’s genuinely usable and as an added bonus it won’t chop your finger off when you close it.
Last edited by swajames; 08-22-24 at 02:16 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Hameed (09-08-24)
#54
Lexus Fanatic
F-150 Lightning and Cybertruck are not enemies.
#55
#56
Pole Position
Oh I don't disagree, but in comparing one approach against the other with two "what's behind the frunk" pics you were implying that the outcome of the non-clean sheet design was inferior, when in fact the Ford approach has resulted in a much better outcome for the customer because the frunk capacity and usability is significantly better on the Lightning than it is on the Cybertruck.
#57
Lexus Champion
Oh I don't disagree, but in comparing one approach against the other with two "what's behind the frunk" pics you were implying that the outcome of the non-clean sheet design was inferior, when in fact the Ford approach has resulted in a much better outcome for the customer because the frunk capacity and usability is significantly better on the Lightning than it is on the Cybertruck.
The following users liked this post:
swajames (08-23-24)
#58
Pole Position
On this point, the cybertruck may be better engineered than the Lightning, better constructed etc., but if you gave me a choice of which one I wanted, it would be the Lightning by a mile based on looks. And now that the Tesla Superchargers are open to Ford, well, I would take the Lightning. That's not to say the Cybertruck is not a great truck, it's been proven to me already that it's an awesome truck, I just can't get past the stainless steel panels, the shape and looks
I'm not sure about the Cybertruck being better constructed though. Lightnings aren't falling apart on videos.
#59
Lexus Champion
I guess I said that wrong. The Cybertruck has 48v architecture, rear steering, steer by wire, and can probably withstand more abuse like people kicking it, throwing stuff at it, or shopping carts hitting it. The impact has to be really hard to even scratch those panels
The following users liked this post:
swajames (08-23-24)
#60
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
The following users liked this post:
AMIRZA786 (08-24-24)