EV Chat General discussion about electrified Lexus, other EV vehicle manufacturers and BEV, PHEV related industry news.

BMW says electrification is overhyped

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-19, 09:36 PM
  #61  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 228 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I know I've said this before, but this just is one more sign that, even with a large volume of vehicles in production, the fact that a profit is still doubtful shows that the company simply keeps biting off more than it can chew with its policy of company-owned/company-operated everything, and no private franchises. Bob Lutz stated, in an article for Road & Track magazine, that the idea of company-ownership of everything has never worked on a significant scale in the history of automobiles. Even Henry Ford, whose company owned not just the auto plants but the steel-making plants, rubber-plantations for tires, cargo ships for the Great Lakes, and other facilities involved in auto production, allowed private dealer franchises.
EVs are a paradigm shift that cannot survive in the traditional auto world. Only thing dealerships make money on is service and Teslas barely need servicing. Not enough to make money on it anyway. In two years, I need tire rotations and washer fluid fill up. No oil changes, no changes of any kind. The dealer model will die in my lifetime as EVs, ride-share, and other pressures will make them obsolete.
Old 06-30-19, 10:21 PM
  #62  
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
peteharvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 4,252
Received 458 Likes on 303 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZZ
EVs are a paradigm shift that cannot survive in the traditional auto world. Only thing dealerships make money on is service and Teslas barely need servicing. Not enough to make money on it anyway. In two years, I need tire rotations and washer fluid fill up. No oil changes, no changes of any kind. The dealer model will die in my lifetime as EVs, ride-share, and other pressures will make them obsolete.
You are absolutely correct EZZ.

The only question is when will EV sales be greater than ICEV sales?

Roughly 2025?
Roughly 2030?
Roughly 2035?
Roughly 2040?
Old 06-30-19, 11:54 PM
  #63  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,929
Received 2,846 Likes on 2,405 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
Tesla is also in trouble and no longer has backlog of sales orders.
Tesla is always in trouble, starting an auto company from scratch is incredibly difficult which gets even more amplified when it happens to be BEVs.
ICE engines are still the future especially with oil prices continuing to decrease. If it wasn’t for the negative politics of Environmentalists, nobody would care about EVs.
Oil if a finite resource we WILL run out of the stuff. Have to at some point move away from it why not start now.
Originally Posted by mmarshall
I know I've said this before, but this just is one more sign that, even with a large volume of vehicles in production, the fact that a profit is still doubtful shows that the company simply keeps biting off more than it can chew with its policy of company-owned/company-operated everything, and no private franchises.
I find these posts incredibly frustrating Tesla's start up costs are unbelievable. Expecting Tesla to be routinely profitable is incredibly unrealistic at this point in their history. It took Amazon 10 years before they turned a profit and that's a company that had not a whole lot of competition.

Bob Lutz stated, in an article for Road & Track magazine, that the idea of company-ownership of everything has never worked on a significant scale in the history of automobiles. Even Henry Ford, whose company owned not just the auto plants but the steel-making plants, rubber-plantations for tires, cargo ships for the Great Lakes, and other facilities involved in auto production, allowed private dealer franchises.
Lutz has recently praised Tesla

https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-car...lity-bob-lutz/

Tesla Model 3s are a rare sight in Michigan, since our laws don't permit factory-owned dealers. But the strongly motivated Tesla fan can procure the car in neighboring states. When I spied a metallic-red Model 3 in an Ann Arbor parking lot, I felt compelled to check it out. I was eager to see the oft-reported sloppy assembly work, the poor-fitting doors, blotchy paint, and other manifestations of Tesla CEO Elon Musk's "production hell" with my own eyes.

But, when next to the car, I was stunned. Not only was the paint without any discernible flaw, but the various panels formed a body of precision that was beyond reproach. Gaps from hood to fenders, doors to frame, and all the others appeared to be perfectly even, equal side-to-side, and completely parallel. Gaps of 3.5 to 4.5mm are considered word-class. This Model 3 measured up
.
Old 07-01-19, 04:04 AM
  #64  
Freds430
Pole Position
 
Freds430's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 2,531
Received 1,119 Likes on 726 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Lexus2000;10554694]It took Amazon 10 years before they turned a profit and that's a company that had not a whole lot of competition.


Comparing Tesla and Amazon is the truly proverbially apples and oranges. Amazon made a profit in their 9th year. Every year however they were cutting their losses. Tesla is in it's 16th year and had it's worst loss in 2017 (1.9 billion) and second worst loss in 2018 (1.1 billion). It's sales were down 31% in the first quarter of this year compared to the fourth quarter of 2018. Their sales in the first quarter averaged 14,000 units contributing to their 700 million dollar loss which was their worst quarter ever. Sales in units for April and May are also averaging 14,000 units. Their loss for the second quarter could exceed the first quarter's. The tax credit July 1 goes from $3,750 to $1,875. Their stock is down -33% year to date while the S&P is 17%. That is a difference of 50%. Audi's E Tron is out and the Mercedes EV will be out soon. Both are less expensive then the Model X with a $7,500 tax credit. The Model X is averaging 1,330 units sold per month in 2019. That is a production line setup for less then 16,000 units per year.
Old 07-01-19, 06:38 AM
  #65  
situman
Pole Position
 
situman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 3,446
Received 166 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Not to bring politics into this, but since China owns a majority of the world's supply or mines of exotic metals and minerals needed for batteries, does this mean they will be our overlords if the world goes full electric vehicles?
Old 07-01-19, 07:06 AM
  #66  
Allen K
-0----0-

iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,439
Received 748 Likes on 518 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Freds430
Comparing Tesla and Amazon is the truly proverbially apples and oranges. Amazon made a profit in their 9th year. Every year however they were cutting their losses. Tesla is in it's 16th year and had it's worst loss in 2017 (1.9 billion) and second worst loss in 2018 (1.1 billion). It's sales were down 31% in the first quarter of this year compared to the fourth quarter of 2018. Their sales in the first quarter averaged 14,000 units contributing to their 700 million dollar loss which was their worst quarter ever. Sales in units for April and May are also averaging 14,000 units. Their loss for the second quarter could exceed the first quarter's. The tax credit July 1 goes from $3,750 to $1,875. Their stock is down -33% year to date while the S&P is 17%. That is a difference of 50%. Audi's E Tron is out and the Mercedes EV will be out soon. Both are less expensive then the Model X with a $7,500 tax credit. The Model X is averaging 1,330 units sold per month in 2019. That is a production line setup for less then 16,000 units per year.
Tesla didn't release their first mass market car until 2012 (Model S) and are spending massively on gigafactories & production lines right now. The E Tron (204 miles), I Pace (240 miles), and EQC (230ish miles) still can't match a standard Model X (255) and they don't have the charging infrastructure to make up for that lackluster range.
Old 07-01-19, 07:07 AM
  #67  
Allen K
-0----0-

iTrader: (4)
 
Allen K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,439
Received 748 Likes on 518 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by situman
Not to bring politics into this, but since China owns a majority of the world's supply or mines of exotic metals and minerals needed for batteries, does this mean they will be our overlords if the world goes full electric vehicles?
Battery tech is evolving and as prices of rare earth metals increase, other regions that have deposits become more viable
Old 07-01-19, 08:44 AM
  #68  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,452
Received 1,614 Likes on 1,030 Posts
Default

I found this applicable to the discussion.

The upcoming BMW i4 is a fully electric sports sedan, a low-slung four-door fitted with one or two motors. It promises to be the closest competitor yet to the Tesla Model 3, with the added benefit of having the build quality of a seasoned carmaker.

The i4 won't get its own EV platform: but will instead be based on the 3-/4-series' underpinnings known as the Cluster Architecture, or CLAR. While a one-motor version is conceivable, we expect the i4 to have two motors providing standard all-wheel drive. Expect BMW to offer several power and price levels. The largest battery should last about 350 miles between charges and put up zero-to-60 times in the four-second range. Top speed will likely be governed at a low 125 mph to save juice.
Source
Old 07-01-19, 10:35 AM
  #69  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,751
Received 2,411 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I know I've said this before, but this just is one more sign that, even with a large volume of vehicles in production, the fact that a profit is still doubtful shows that the company simply keeps biting off more than it can chew with its policy of company-owned/company-operated everything, and no private franchises. Bob Lutz stated, in an article for Road & Track magazine, that the idea of company-ownership of everything has never worked on a significant scale in the history of automobiles. Even Henry Ford, whose company owned not just the auto plants but the steel-making plants, rubber-plantations for tires, cargo ships for the Great Lakes, and other facilities involved in auto production, allowed private dealer franchises.
but they're not doing company-owned/company-operated 'everything'. the vast battery factory in nevada is a joint venture with panasonic.

not using dealers SAVES them vast amounts of money (marketing programs, dealer margins, training programs, and on and on) primarily because the uniqueness, buzz, and demand of the vehicles means people will seek them out.

henry ford has been dead over 70 years for one, plus tesla is not making their own tires, doesn't make steel, cargo ships, etc. so not even remotely comparable.

and ford probably allowed dealers because he knew he'd be in trouble with antri-trust monopoly laws in short order. with such a broader market today, tesla didn't have that issue. of course dealer organizations nationwide continue to fight tesla, including, i believe, your state of virginia. this is pathetic, and eventually tesla will prevail everywhere.
Old 07-01-19, 12:22 PM
  #70  
riredale
Instructor
 
riredale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Oregon
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lexus2000
Oil if a finite resource we WILL run out of the stuff. Have to at some point move away from it why not start now.
Well, yeah, from a purely theoretical viewpoint then EVERYTHING is finite. From a practical viewpoint engineers are confident that cheap oil will be available for 100+ years, with new mind-boggling reserves discovered every few years.

Hey, to each his own, but every time I see a Model S or 3 parked somewhere in a parking lot I can't help but think that the owner has done a quick calculation that morning as to range and recharging plans. No thanks. I have enough things to worry about without adding more.
Old 07-01-19, 12:42 PM
  #71  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,990
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna

not using dealers SAVES them vast amounts of money (marketing programs, dealer margins, training programs, and on and on) primarily because the uniqueness, buzz, and demand of the vehicles means people will seek them out.
Not really. No dealers means inflated prices. Harder to get their hands on a Tesla for the consumer. Lack of competition which is bad for the consumers. Lack of fundraiser from the absence of franchise fees etc etc.
Old 07-01-19, 01:32 PM
  #72  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,751
Received 2,411 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Not really. No dealers means inflated prices. Harder to get their hands on a Tesla for the consumer. Lack of competition which is bad for the consumers. Lack of fundraiser from the absence of franchise fees etc etc.
i disgree 100% with what you're saying, and don't understand your last sentence, but that's all from me on this.
Old 07-01-19, 01:33 PM
  #73  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 91,138
Received 87 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
of course dealer organizations nationwide continue to fight tesla, including, i believe, your state of virginia.


We do have Tesla shops in Virginia....one is at Tyson's Corner in the D.C. Suburbs, just a few miles from me. In the past, though, I haven't done a full-review there, though, because for a long time, they just didn't keep vehicles in stock, outside of one or two displays, in the stark, warehouse-like showroom. That no-stock policy might (?) be changing now, though, as they have gotten their production lines going.

not using dealers SAVES them vast amounts of money (marketing programs, dealer margins, training programs, and on and on) primarily because the uniqueness, buzz, and demand of the vehicles means people will seek them out.


I'm not quite sure you understand. What they have ARE dealerships....just company-owned ones, where, unlike private-franchise, Tesla has to pay all of the costs of running and maintaining them. That's why Bob Lutz (whom I greatly respect) forecast that they are essentially a company on borrowed time.

Last edited by mmarshall; 07-01-19 at 01:41 PM.
Old 07-01-19, 01:45 PM
  #74  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,990
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
i disgree 100% with what you're saying, and don't understand your last sentence, but that's all from me on this.
Toyota or GM or Hyundai etc make money off the dealers paying them for the rights to sell their models. In turn, this money is thus used for whatever reasons. In the case of Tesla, they do not have private dealers, so they fit the bill for retail. They fit the bill for upgrades and build outs. Not allowing private franchises to compete for consumer spending is a drawback to the Tesla way. The Tesla way is not wrong, but they are not as competitive for the consumer as a Toyota dealer or Mercedes dealer that might offer better locations, services, and thus prices.
Old 07-01-19, 02:55 PM
  #75  
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
peteharvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 4,252
Received 458 Likes on 303 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Freds430
Comparing Tesla and Amazon is the truly proverbially apples and oranges. Amazon made a profit in their 9th year. Every year however they were cutting their losses. Tesla is in it's 16th year and had it's worst loss in 2017 (1.9 billion) and second worst loss in 2018 (1.1 billion). It's sales were down 31% in the first quarter of this year compared to the fourth quarter of 2018. Their sales in the first quarter averaged 14,000 units contributing to their 700 million dollar loss which was their worst quarter ever. Sales in units for April and May are also averaging 14,000 units. Their loss for the second quarter could exceed the first quarter's. The tax credit July 1 goes from $3,750 to $1,875. Their stock is down -33% year to date while the S&P is 17%. That is a difference of 50%. Audi's E Tron is out and the Mercedes EV will be out soon. Both are less expensive then the Model X with a $7,500 tax credit. The Model X is averaging 1,330 units sold per month in 2019. That is a production line setup for less then 16,000 units per year.
Good informative post.

Originally Posted by situman
Not to bring politics into this, but since China owns a majority of the world's supply or mines of exotic metals and minerals needed for batteries, does this mean they will be our overlords if the world goes full electric vehicles?
Apparently the US was mining rare earth metals long ago.
However, we have stopped mining rare earths there, because the labour of mining rare earths in China is so much cheaper.
Mining rare earth is also very hazardous.

The Japanese have also found a site to potentially mine rare earths.


Quick Reply: BMW says electrification is overhyped



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:19 AM.