EV Chat General discussion about electrified Lexus, other EV vehicle manufacturers and BEV, PHEV related industry news.

Tesla business discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-23, 01:23 PM
  #1336  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,837
Received 2,826 Likes on 2,389 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
OK, give me that! BTW, the phantom imagery can most likely be fixed with software, it just may take longer. If you rely on images and radar, you would be able to cancel out that phantom imagery, as the object wouldn't be seen on the camera.
This is where the trouble began, how do you decide which is the true image, camera or RADAR? If the camera doesn't see something in theory the whole point of RADAR is it does. What if RADAR is wrong? Which it often is. Then you have a coding conundrum, filter out when RADAR is correct and when vision is correct. And decide when vision can't see something and RADAR can, if RADAR is in fact seeing a legit object. Apparently Tesla has found a way to get much more reliable RADAR images, we'll see.

As vision only FSD has evolved it's become basically flawless at interpreting camera inputs into a 3D space. The system knows what is moving and what isn't to a high degree of accuracy. That part is solved, now augmenting that with other types of sensors is the cherry on top.

Unfortunately the intricacies of the above is continuously ignored by some and we simply get Elon is bad Elon is an idiot. Burn the engineers that don't agree with Elon. Not exactly productive discussion.
LeX2K is offline  
Old 03-22-23, 01:28 PM
  #1337  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,579
Received 2,098 Likes on 1,630 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
This is where the trouble began, how do you decide which is the true image, camera or RADAR? If the camera doesn't see something in theory the whole point of RADAR is it does. What if RADAR is wrong? Which it often is. Then you have a coding conundrum, filter out when RADAR is correct and when vision is correct. And decide when vision can't see something and RADAR can, if RADAR is in fact seeing a legit object. Apparently Tesla has found a way to get much more reliable RADAR images, we'll see.

As vision only FSD has evolved it's become basically flawless at interpreting camera inputs into a 3D space. The system knows what is moving and what isn't to a high degree of accuracy. That part is solved, now augmenting that with other types of sensors is the cherry on top.

Unfortunately the intricacies of the above is continuously ignored by some and we simply get Elon is bad Elon is an idiot. Burn the engineers that don't agree with Elon. Not exactly productive discussion.
I agree that the media is out to get Elon, and put him in the most negative light possible. But why have so many Tesla engineers come out saying they opposed removing Radar? I don't know enough to explain that, unless it's actually fake news, which I doubt
AMIRZA786 is online now  
Old 03-22-23, 01:40 PM
  #1338  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,837
Received 2,826 Likes on 2,389 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AMIRZA786
I agree that the media is out to get Elon, and put him in the most negative light possible. But why have so many Tesla engineers come out saying they opposed removing Radar? I don't know enough to explain that, unless it's actually fake news, which I doubt
Because they are stuck in the old paradigm. What may work now or perceived to work is the only way to ever do anything. Period. We see that exact sentiment in this thread.

How many "industry experts" over the years have said Tesla can't do what they end up doing. Can't make an electric car with good range, can't make an affordable electric car. Tesla will never be able to scale. Tesla will never sell 500k cars a year. Large castings will never work. There is no charging network electric cars will never be viable. I could go on and on.

The above and more has been said by current and former CEOs, engineers etc. you name it. Bob Lutz was adamant Tesla can't do what they plan to and ended up doing. Bill Gates said Tesla Semi is impossible it violates the laws of physics. Convention is a very powerful barrier.
LeX2K is offline  
Old 03-22-23, 01:54 PM
  #1339  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,629
Received 2,372 Likes on 1,557 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
I'm curious why people think RADAR solves the problem of how the car knows to drive itself on any street in any given scenario.
you're curious about something no one stated.

I've watched many FSD beta vids 99% of the mistakes have zero to do with seeing the road.
and i bet 99% (or 100%) of those beta vids are in good weather.

There are cases where vision can't see the road correctly, but that is not a neural network software problem,
that doesn't mean it's not a problem!

And that is not even getting into RADAR having serious issues differentiating between stationary and moving objects. Hello phantom braking.
i've NEVER experienced 'phantom braking' with adaptive cruise or lane assist on my hyundai. not the same as completely hands free driving, but still.

But I get it, RADAR is seen as some sort of fix all. I simply don't know why.
you get wrong, no one said it's a fix all. it's just another sensory input, just like humans tend to do better with 5 senses rather than less. are each of them perfect? no. do humans make endless mistakes even with all 5 senses? yes.

Originally Posted by LeX2K
This misses the point. FSD is a 99.99999% a software problem,
blind is blind. no amount of software can fix cameras that can't see.

RADAR was giving phantom imagery so they got rid of it.
that's ALSO a software problem.

There are some conditions you can't drive in including humans. Even aircraft gets grounded and guess what kind of tech they use.
they rely on both eyeballs from plane and tower (VFR) and radar (IFR).

Tesla designed their own RADAR unit and is adding that back. Not the same thing they removed.
but you've stated it's worthless, so why do you believe they added back a new one?

Originally Posted by LeX2K
This is where the trouble began, how do you decide which is the true image, camera or RADAR? If the camera doesn't see something in theory the whole point of RADAR is it does. What if RADAR is wrong? Which it often is. Then you have a coding conundrum, filter out when RADAR is correct and when vision is correct. And decide when vision can't see something and RADAR can, if RADAR is in fact seeing a legit object. Apparently Tesla has found a way to get much more reliable RADAR images, we'll see.
complicated for sure, and endless scenarios must be defined, tested, and then real world 'random' testing and analysis for the 'best' outcome.

As vision only FSD has evolved it's become basically flawless at interpreting camera inputs into a 3D space.
then why are they putting radar back in?

Unfortunately the intricacies of the above is continuously ignored by some and we simply get Elon is bad Elon is an idiot.
i don't think anyone said he's bad or an idiot. you keep throwing up false straw men. he's human, he's fallible, he's wrong sometimes. but i guess he eventually conceded his remaining engineers must have had a valid reason to put radar back.

Burn the engineers that don't agree with Elon. Not exactly productive discussion.
yes, you're the one laughing that they are now working at starbucks, which is really callous.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 03-22-23, 01:58 PM
  #1340  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,629
Received 2,372 Likes on 1,557 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LeX2K
Because they are stuck in the old paradigm. What may work now or perceived to work is the only way to ever do anything. Period. We see that exact sentiment in this thread.

How many "industry experts" over the years have said Tesla can't do what they end up doing. Can't make an electric car with good range, can't make an affordable electric car. Tesla will never be able to scale. Tesla will never sell 500k cars a year. Large castings will never work. There is no charging network electric cars will never be viable. I could go on and on.

The above and more has been said by current and former CEOs, engineers etc. you name it. Bob Lutz was adamant Tesla can't do what they plan to and ended up doing. Bill Gates said Tesla Semi is impossible it violates the laws of physics. Convention is a very powerful barrier.
i agree with this, but that doesn't mean tesla or elon musk are infallible. i'm really glad tesla is disrupting the car industry! it forces all to innovate or die.

to say tesla will 'never' accomplish something is pretty foolish. i've been critical of some things but i still applaud what they've accomplished and what they're planning to do (even if their announced time frames are always a joke).

bitkahuna is offline  
Old 03-23-23, 07:35 AM
  #1341  
jrmckinley
Pole Position
 
jrmckinley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: fl
Posts: 3,043
Received 367 Likes on 252 Posts
Default

Ford lost $2.1 billion in their EV business (source https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/23/ford...inancials.html). There was a separate thread on here about Porsche raising prices to their ICE lineup to compensate for losses in their EV lineup. These companies are figuring out that making EV's is not nearly as simple as they thought.

It's interesting how these traditional manufacturers are having to figure out ways to increase margin on non-EV's (raising prices) while the customers continue to demonstrate a desire to move to EV's. Talk about choppy waters for them to navigate. Advantage: Tesla.
jrmckinley is offline  
Old 03-23-23, 08:01 AM
  #1342  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,629
Received 2,372 Likes on 1,557 Posts
Default

^^^ good post. from what i've read i suspected pretty much everyone other than tesla is losing a fortune on ev's. not a good business model long term!
no doubt they're all trying to figure out how to lower costs, but as you say, choppy waters indeed, and a GIANT advantage to tesla, likely for years to come.
i don't know if hyundai/kia/genesis is losing their behind on ev's as well, but they seem like the company most likely to be able to make a profitable go of it. that is, besides chinese companies like byd, although i don't know.

bitkahuna is offline  
Old 03-23-23, 08:12 AM
  #1343  
jrmckinley
Pole Position
 
jrmckinley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: fl
Posts: 3,043
Received 367 Likes on 252 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
^^^ good post. from what i've read i suspected pretty much everyone other than tesla is losing a fortune on ev's. not a good business model long term!
no doubt they're all trying to figure out how to lower costs, but as you say, choppy waters indeed, and a GIANT advantage to tesla, likely for years to come.
i don't know if hyundai/kia/genesis is losing their behind on ev's as well, but they seem like the company most likely to be able to make a profitable go of it. that is, besides chinese companies like byd, although i don't know.
It would be hard to be the CEO of one of these companies right now. The market is shifting towards EV more each year, but you lose money in that product category. So you have to figure out how to scale/increase production in that category (almost like a "loss leader") and find the balance of lowering production in your ICE line (fewer models) but also walking the line of how you increase margin in ICE to offset your EV losses.

I'm a TSLA shareholder but I'm not rooting against any of these "traditional" manufacturers.
jrmckinley is offline  
Old 03-23-23, 08:22 AM
  #1344  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,579
Received 2,098 Likes on 1,630 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jrmckinley
It would be hard to be the CEO of one of these companies right now. The market is shifting towards EV more each year, but you lose money in that product category. So you have to figure out how to scale/increase production in that category (almost like a "loss leader") and find the balance of lowering production in your ICE line (fewer models) but also walking the line of how you increase margin in ICE to offset your EV losses.

I'm a TSLA shareholder but I'm not rooting against any of these "traditional" manufacturers.
I'm with you there. I'm also a TSLA shareholder, but I want other manufactures to succeed, as we need competition. Not everyone is into the minimalist approach Tesla takes. Hyundai and Kia (as well as Genesis) are companies that could give Tesla stiff competition if they could manufacture to meet demand. The upcoming Ioniq 9/EV9 could really pull buyers from the Model Y. Polestar is another one, they have already cut down on their operational losses and increased sales by 60 percent. BYD could be another company Tesla needs to worry about, but I'm not sure their cars would appeal to North American car buyers
AMIRZA786 is online now  
Old 03-23-23, 09:46 AM
  #1345  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,579
Received 2,098 Likes on 1,630 Posts
Default

Tesla Shares How Musk's "Plaid Mode" Means Acceleration Of Progress

It seems CEO Elon Musk had much more in mind than EV acceleration when engaging "Plaid Mode."



If you follow Tesla, you likely already knew that "Plaid" has something to do with acceleration. However, while many people think of Elon Musk's Plaid simply as a performance car or a specific mode for the quickest acceleration, it's actually something Musk talks about when it comes to accelerating the company as a whole, primarily via software successes.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk is a huge fan of Spaceballs, and that's where the Plaid and Ludicrous references come from. The quirky and outspoken CEO also likes to share memes and talk in code at times, this way only some people will truly understand what he's sharing.

With that said, it recently came to light that Musk had much more in mind than Model S acceleration when engaging "Plaid Mode." As reported by Teslarati, Tesla recently spoke with the media at an event in China. Vice President of Global Software Engineering David Lau shared at the event that Tesla's Plaid Mode applies to software development as much as it does EV performance, though the two are obviously related.

A few of the topics at the event included, “Enabling Plaid Mode in Software Development” and “How Tesla’s Software Development Maintains Plaid Speed.” An attendee of the event shared some of Lau's words with Teslarati. The VP explained:
“Tesla has always been challenging tradition, challenging industry conventional thinking, and challenging its own comfort zone… This is indeed difficult, but as long as we keep pushing ourselves to continuously break through boundaries, there is nothing that cannot be achieved."
In moving from the already impressive "Ludicrous Mode" to the ridiculous "Plaid Mode," Tesla and Elon Musk are working to prove that they can continue to push the envelope. The goal is to be hyper-disruptive and bring new innovations to market that will transform the industry. Moreover, to do so at the speed of Plaid.



Tesla China reiterated Lau's words in a related press release, sharing that the company's teams "have a persistent pursuit of disruptive innovation and breakthroughs." They work in an environment that caters to engineers and attracts some of the top experts in their fields.

For Tesla to "accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy” at Plaid speed, it needs to develop successful new software and implement it as quickly as possible. Moreover, this also encourages rivals to step up their game.

Lau made it very clear in his presentation that Tesla really is a software company and a clear leader in the space. While the average person may simply see the company as an automaker, it goes far beyond producing EVs. Without the software, Tesla arguably wouldn't be anywhere near where it is today.

https://insideevs.com/news/658496/te...-acceleration/
AMIRZA786 is online now  
Old 03-23-23, 10:14 AM
  #1346  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,918
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
i agree with this, but that doesn't mean tesla or elon musk are infallible. i'm really glad tesla is disrupting the car industry! it forces all to innovate or die..
Tesla just did massive price cuts to spur demand. Very uncommon if demand is so high

Originally Posted by jrmckinley
Ford lost $2.1 billion in their EV business (source https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/23/ford...inancials.html). There was a separate thread on here about Porsche raising prices to their ICE lineup to compensate for losses in their EV lineup. These companies are figuring out that making EV's is not nearly as simple as they thought.

It's interesting how these traditional manufacturers are having to figure out ways to increase margin on non-EV's (raising prices) while the customers continue to demonstrate a desire to move to EV's. Talk about choppy waters for them to navigate. Advantage: Tesla.
In hindsight. Akio was very forward thinking to be cautious
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-23-23, 10:31 AM
  #1347  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 74,629
Received 2,372 Likes on 1,557 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Tesla just did massive price cuts to spur demand. Very uncommon if demand is so high
i assume as giga texas really cranks up, plus giga berlin, and the other factories, tesla believes it can catch up to demand. i think the loweing of prices was two-fold... the increase volume sales, and to crush competitors.

if, for example, someone is ev shopping and sees a tesla model is $10K less than a comparable other brand model, it's going to be hard for the customer to choose the non-tesla, even if they don't like everything about the tesla.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 03-23-23, 10:33 AM
  #1348  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,918
Received 64 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
and to crush competitors.
You don't crush competitors by lowering prices. Product excellence is what matters. Can you imagine if Toyota cut prices on their hybrids by 20% like Tesla did?
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 03-23-23, 10:46 AM
  #1349  
LeX2K
Lexus Champion
 
LeX2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Alberta
Posts: 19,837
Received 2,826 Likes on 2,389 Posts
Default

If Toyota cut prices by 20% they would lose boat loads of money. Tesla has massive pricing power via margins Toyota does not.
LeX2K is offline  
Old 03-23-23, 10:46 AM
  #1350  
AMIRZA786
Lexus Champion
 
AMIRZA786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: California
Posts: 13,579
Received 2,098 Likes on 1,630 Posts
Default

Tesla's Q1 sales are up 32 percent from Q1 2022. Model Y is completely sold out for Q1 2023. Doesn't sound like a demand problem to me. If there is a demand problem, please explain it, and explain why Tesla is expanding it's existing factories and building new ones. If I had a demand problem, I wouldn't build or expand factories. It's all about moving inventory faster and undercutting the competition, Tesla has huge profit margins it can work with which other auto companies don't have that luxury

Last edited by AMIRZA786; 03-23-23 at 11:21 AM.
AMIRZA786 is online now  


Quick Reply: Tesla business discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:19 AM.