EV Chat General discussion about electrified Lexus, other EV vehicle manufacturers and BEV, PHEV related industry news.

VinFast VF32 and VF33

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-21, 02:51 PM
  #31  
F1Driver
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
F1Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ON
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gengar
Misread that as meaning December 2022. We'll still see about worldwide launch in 2022, no idea what "launching ahead of schedule" can possibly mean when even your OP mentioned an American launch in 2021.
Launch as in begin taking orders for later deliveries? Who knew (except you)?

P.S. Quit while you're ahead.
Old 04-13-21, 07:56 PM
  #32  
gengar
Lexus Test Driver

 
gengar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NV
Posts: 5,285
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F1Driver
Launch as in begin taking orders for later deliveries? Who knew (except you)?

P.S. Quit while you're ahead.
My question all along was regarding battery supply, it doesn't take any battery supply to take orders.

Still no clue as to why you're being so absurdly adversarial regarding this topic. I could give a #*&! less whether VinFast takes over Tesla or fails.
Old 04-13-21, 10:41 PM
  #33  
F1Driver
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
F1Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ON
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by gengar
My question all along was regarding battery supply, it doesn't take any battery supply to take orders.

Still no clue as to why you're being so absurdly adversarial regarding this topic. I could give a #*&! less whether VinFast takes over Tesla or fails.
Er ... Don't you need batteries to operate EVs?
Old 04-13-21, 11:55 PM
  #34  
gengar
Lexus Test Driver

 
gengar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NV
Posts: 5,285
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

I'm just not going to get into a meaningless semantic debate about what "launch" means. If your argument is that VinFast can start taking orders internationally for these cars sometime in 2022 then there's nothing to discuss, they could go ahead and take orders in the USA right now if they want. My original question was regarding battery supply and this remains unanswered despite your continuing attempts to be obnoxious about it.
Old 05-19-21, 11:15 AM
  #35  
Motorola
Lead Lap
 
Motorola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,995
Received 53 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

LOL

Good luck succeeding in the free market with this kind of mentality.

Vietnam's VinFast reports customer to police after 'untrue' YouTube complaints

Old 05-19-21, 11:22 AM
  #36  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,891
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
LOL

Good luck succeeding in the free market with this kind of mentality.
Not all that different from Elon quickly claiming that cars aren't in autopilot when accidents happen.
Old 05-19-21, 11:23 AM
  #37  
Motorola
Lead Lap
 
Motorola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,995
Received 53 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
Not all that different from Elon quickly claiming that cars aren't in autopilot when accidents happen.
I don't recall Elon sicing the police on YouTubers when they give bad reviews of his cars.
Old 05-19-21, 11:37 AM
  #38  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,891
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
I don't recall Elon sicing the police on YouTubers when they give bad reviews of his cars.
No, not directly, which is why i said it's not all that different. Elon quickly and publicly goes against any crash victim that claims that it was under Autopilot and refuses to concede that the Autopilot technology is truly less than what it is being made out to be.

Companies in the U.S. go after customers for libel/slander all the time, settle with non disclosure agreements, etc.
Old 05-19-21, 11:43 AM
  #39  
Motorola
Lead Lap
 
Motorola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,995
Received 53 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
No, not directly, which is why i said it's not all that different. Elon quickly and publicly goes against any crash victim that claims that it was under Autopilot and refuses to concede that the Autopilot technology is truly less than what it is being made out to be.

Companies in the U.S. go after customers for libel/slander all the time, settle with non disclosure agreements, etc.
The point isn't about big companies denying accidents as being their fault. The point is that this company is using what is effectively a communist police state to silence people they don't like, simply because they have control over it. This is very different from a lawsuit.

Tesla has been sold in China for a couple years now, which is also a communist country like Vietnam. Do you recall Elon ever siccing the Chinese Police on his customers for giving his cars a bad review?


Old 05-19-21, 12:23 PM
  #40  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,891
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
The point isn't about big companies denying accidents as being their fault. The point is that this company is using what is effectively a communist police state to silence people they don't like, simply because they have control over it. This is very different from a lawsuit.

Tesla has been sold in China for a couple years now, which is also a communist country like Vietnam. Do you recall Elon ever siccing the Chinese Police on his customers for giving his cars a bad review?
No, but companies are constantly involved in libel/slander lawsuits, it's just not often in the news. Companies in the U.S. will go after people immediately.
Old 05-19-21, 12:30 PM
  #41  
Motorola
Lead Lap
 
Motorola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,995
Received 53 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
No, but companies are constantly involved in libel/slander lawsuits, it's just not often in the news. Companies in the U.S. will go after people immediately.
No sane car company will go after someone for giving a poor review.

Here's a snippet from the article:

In the now-deleted video, a copy of which remained on the Internet Archive website, Hoang had said he was proud to own a VinFast car and was only reluctantly highlighting problems.

“Although Mr. Tran Van Hoang proactively removed those clips, we saved all the evidence and have sent our complaints to the police,” the statement said.

“The police have received our submission and have scheduled a time to work with Mr. Hoang”.
So let me get this straight. This guy wasn't even badmouthing the car, just highlighting some of his criticisms. He removed his video, but VinFast saved it and called the police on him, who "scheduled a time to work" with him.

Does this sound like any other car company to you?
Old 05-19-21, 01:08 PM
  #42  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,891
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
No sane car company will go after someone for giving a poor review.

Here's a snippet from the article:


So let me get this straight. This guy wasn't even badmouthing the car, just highlighting some of his criticisms. He removed his video, but VinFast saved it and called the police on him, who "scheduled a time to work" with him.

Does this sound like any other car company to you?
It's a relatively popular YouTuber in Vietnam, not just any customer. So if his claims weren't justifiable or were lies, then the company should try to protect itself. Seems like less of a legit video with complaints than some sort of clickbait'y video. It's a double edged sword for VinFast. They're trying to keep a positive reputation of its vehicles and quality as it's trying to make international expansions, but this reaction probably brought more attention than it should have.

Ferrari once supposedly went after an Instagrammer because it didn't like his fashion and pictures.

Ford sued John Cena for selling his GT.

Old 05-19-21, 01:22 PM
  #43  
Motorola
Lead Lap
 
Motorola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,995
Received 53 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
It's a relatively popular YouTuber in Vietnam, not just any customer. So if his claims weren't justifiable or were lies, then the company should try to protect itself. Seems like less of a legit video with complaints than some sort of clickbait'y video. It's a double edged sword for VinFast. They're trying to keep a positive reputation of its vehicles and quality as it's trying to make international expansions, but this reaction probably brought more attention than it should have.
So if a popular reviewer like Doug Demuro or Scotty Kilmer gave a car a negative review with clickbait titles (especially in the case of Scotty), that means that the car company whose product they're reviewing is entitled to sue them "to protect itself"?

No matter how you try to sugarcoat, what VinFast is doing here is something that is only permissible in authoritarian governments, where the large company is essentially a part of the government, and to criticize the company means to criticize the government, meaning you're going to be prosecuted like a criminal before you even get a trial- just like the Vietnamese YouTuber.

Other companies may sue whomever, but I guarantee you most of those suits will be thrown out of court here unless they have merit. Hence, most companies aren't stupid enough to try it. If VinFast wants to compete with other companies in America, it better realize that it has to play by the same laws.
Old 05-19-21, 01:25 PM
  #44  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,891
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Motorola
So if a popular reviewer like Doug Demuro or Scotty Kilmer gave a car a negative review with clickbait titles (especially in the case of Scotty), that means that the car company whose product they're reviewing should sue them "to protect itself"?
If the negative reviews were not based of facts, or purposefully misleading, which is potentially the case that VinFast is trying to make here. We're obviously missing a lot of details. A bad customer experience or subjective opinion items are different from potentially malicious content.

Old 05-19-21, 01:28 PM
  #45  
Motorola
Lead Lap
 
Motorola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,995
Received 53 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pbm317
If the negative reviews were not based of facts, or purposefully misleading.
So your average Scotty Kilmer video.

Again, there is no justification whatsoever for this type of authoritarian behavior. This will be the Achilles heel of Chinese companies and others such VinFast if they want to establish themselves in the free market.


Quick Reply: VinFast VF32 and VF33



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:15 PM.