Tesla is 'irresponsible' for touting 'Full Self-Driving' features, NTSB says
09-21-21, 01:35 PM
#61
Lexus Fanatic
09-21-21, 01:56 PM
#62
Lexus Fanatic
O'rly? In your mind there is zero chance someone bought FSD and as a result used it and it made their drive safer? That's impossible?
What stat? You posted nothing but opinion.
You've gone way off into the weeds here.
Well, to everybody who looks at it objectively. If Tesla stops calling it that and is more honest about what the feature actually can do, then we will see if there is a reduction in issues and we'll have our stat.
Like you, I am a fan of technology. What Tesla does with this ridiculous naming scheme is hold this technology back from further adoption. What will happen now is the NHTSA will further regulate these features, private and class action lawsuits will pop up as people see an opportunity to get rich and that will result in them being reduced in functionality in the name of safety and the further development of them delayed. And...thats Tesla's fault because this ridiculous Elon-ego naming scheme has caught their attention. He cares more about fulfilling his own fantasies than he does being a responsible member of the automotive industry. THAT is Tesla's biggest flaw.
Why must it be called "Full Self Driving"? Because it gives Elon a boner that he created a "self driving car", even when thats a lie. Thats the ONLY reason. He's a child, a brilliant child...but a child.
Why must it be called "Full Self Driving"? Because it gives Elon a boner that he created a "self driving car", even when thats a lie. Thats the ONLY reason. He's a child, a brilliant child...but a child.
09-21-21, 02:02 PM
#63
Wow, it literally is called Full Self Driving, LMAO. As I understand it, putting labels on a bottle of your average off the shelf consumer goods requires a thorough process where the label is scrutinized extensively. Knowing this, it bewilders me how Tesla were able to label it Full Self Driving. Might as well call cigarettes "Lung health regenerators". No this is not a conspiracy theory against Telsa lol.
09-21-21, 02:31 PM
#65
Wow, it literally is called Full Self Driving, LMAO. As I understand it, putting labels on a bottle of your average off the shelf consumer goods requires a thorough process where the label is scrutinized extensively. Knowing this, it bewilders me how Tesla were able to label it Full Self Driving. Might as well call cigarettes "Lung health regenerators". No this is not a conspiracy theory against Telsa lol.
09-21-21, 02:44 PM
#66
Lexus Fanatic
Just look around...you are the only person here who thinks "full self driving" shouldn't make anybody think the car can fully drive itself. Literally all we are using are the words that are in the name of the feature itself.
I know, its just ridiculous and what it does is make skeptics even more skeptical.
09-21-21, 03:57 PM
#68
Lexus Fanatic
09-21-21, 04:38 PM
#71
Lexus Fanatic
You've made that abundantly clear I respect the opinion. But you can't demonstrate, prove or even give evidence to say the marketing does in fact make a Tesla on average more dangerous. All you can offer "common sense" that's not a data point.
To be clear if the name is found to be bad, then I 100% want it changed.
To be clear if the name is found to be bad, then I 100% want it changed.
09-21-21, 05:30 PM
#72
Lexus Fanatic
When I saw him dancing on that stage, I had immediate flashbacks!
Your position is just too ridiculous to continue to discuss lol
You've made that abundantly clear I respect the opinion. But you can't demonstrate, prove or even give evidence to say the marketing does in fact make a Tesla on average more dangerous. All you can offer "common sense" that's not a data point.
To be clear if the name is found to be bad, then I 100% want it changed.
To be clear if the name is found to be bad, then I 100% want it changed.
09-21-21, 05:34 PM
#73
Lexus Fanatic
09-21-21, 05:53 PM
#74
Lexus Fanatic
No, that’s just absurd lol
