2004 Gs Vs Tl 2004
#17
Well now that you have made up your mind, I'll put in my two cents...
For the money, you just can't beat the TL. It is almost as fast as a GS (the people here talking about smoking one have not raced one), has FAR more technology than the GS and has better reliability (per consumer reports) than the GS (ok, I'm comparing the 2002 TL vs. the 2002 GS). I should also add that it doesn't rattle like a GS does either (although I must admit, mine has quieted down since it returned from its month long stay at the dealer, maybe I scared it into being quiet? .
It is however FWD and it is a V6 - so it won't have the torque or the kick your butt out handling that you achieve with a RWD V8 car.
BTW, I am curious if you posted your question on acuraworld.com and if the suggestions were the same as here.
Doug
For the money, you just can't beat the TL. It is almost as fast as a GS (the people here talking about smoking one have not raced one), has FAR more technology than the GS and has better reliability (per consumer reports) than the GS (ok, I'm comparing the 2002 TL vs. the 2002 GS). I should also add that it doesn't rattle like a GS does either (although I must admit, mine has quieted down since it returned from its month long stay at the dealer, maybe I scared it into being quiet? .
It is however FWD and it is a V6 - so it won't have the torque or the kick your butt out handling that you achieve with a RWD V8 car.
BTW, I am curious if you posted your question on acuraworld.com and if the suggestions were the same as here.
Doug
#18
exclusive matchup
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by ToyoTundra
thanks for the info i decieded to purchase a used gs430 now anyidea of wat a used one cost thanks everyone
thanks for the info i decieded to purchase a used gs430 now anyidea of wat a used one cost thanks everyone
it's worth so much more than the tl imho. the power of the gs430 is pretty insane compared to the tl
#19
Originally posted by doug_999
Well now that you have made up your mind, I'll put in my two cents...
For the money, you just can't beat the TL. It is almost as fast as a GS (the people here talking about smoking one have not raced one), has FAR more technology than the GS and has better reliability (per consumer reports) than the GS (ok, I'm comparing the 2002 TL vs. the 2002 GS). I should also add that it doesn't rattle like a GS does either (although I must admit, mine has quieted down since it returned from its month long stay at the dealer, maybe I scared it into being quiet? .
It is however FWD and it is a V6 - so it won't have the torque or the kick your butt out handling that you achieve with a RWD V8 car.
BTW, I am curious if you posted your question on acuraworld.com and if the suggestions were the same as here.
Doug
Well now that you have made up your mind, I'll put in my two cents...
For the money, you just can't beat the TL. It is almost as fast as a GS (the people here talking about smoking one have not raced one), has FAR more technology than the GS and has better reliability (per consumer reports) than the GS (ok, I'm comparing the 2002 TL vs. the 2002 GS). I should also add that it doesn't rattle like a GS does either (although I must admit, mine has quieted down since it returned from its month long stay at the dealer, maybe I scared it into being quiet? .
It is however FWD and it is a V6 - so it won't have the torque or the kick your butt out handling that you achieve with a RWD V8 car.
BTW, I am curious if you posted your question on acuraworld.com and if the suggestions were the same as here.
Doug
#20
exclusive matchup
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by dbox
can't believe what i just read i guess consumer reports forgot about the (99-03 tl ) transmission failures(my cl-s had 3). my cl-s (same as tl just 2 door) rattled worse than any car i've ever been in. i'm not trying to argue here but i don't see how anyone would want an acura of any kind over a lexus. i have my 99 gs3 and an 00 rl now so i'm no acura hater.
can't believe what i just read i guess consumer reports forgot about the (99-03 tl ) transmission failures(my cl-s had 3). my cl-s (same as tl just 2 door) rattled worse than any car i've ever been in. i'm not trying to argue here but i don't see how anyone would want an acura of any kind over a lexus. i have my 99 gs3 and an 00 rl now so i'm no acura hater.
#22
exclusive matchup
iTrader: (4)
Originally posted by SexySC
For the same amount of money: Used GS4 > new TL > Used GS3
I' ve had a TL and a CL-S before and I' ve never had problems with the transmissions fortunately.
For the same amount of money: Used GS4 > new TL > Used GS3
I' ve had a TL and a CL-S before and I' ve never had problems with the transmissions fortunately.
#23
Lexus Champion
Maybe I can bring some perspective into this issue, as I currently own a 99 GS400 and went to test drive an 04 TL. I'm not particularly biased toward either brand as I love them both.
After test driving the TL I'm very convinced that it's apples to oranges. Not saying that a new 04 TL is a better or worse choice than a used GS4... I'm just saying that the two cars have very different characteristics.
The TL's chassis definitely feels more BMW-like... very stiff but very controlled at the same time. It definitely handles better than a GS4 as well.
Acceleration was disappointing compared to a GS4... I suspect that a 6-speed 04 TL w/ a good driver would be a pretty even race with a GS4... but with an automatic, no way.
What's more disappointing about the acceleration is that the torque is very weak off the line... the TL has 270 horsepower which will definitely throw you back in your seat at high RPM, but it only has 238 pounds of torque, and the torque doesn't seem to really take its hold until 2.5-3k RPM. The GS4 seems to produce a good amount of torque at just about any RPM.
In terms of noise, the GS4 is also definitely quieter. It also seems to ride smoother- but I guess this is also why it doesn't handle as well.
The place where the TL just absolutely shames the GS is in terms of technology. The entire interior of the TL feels like a cockpit... comfortable, but still, like a machine... everything just falls into hand and looks extremely modern. Then you go to look at the navigation system and the DVD-A surround sound stereo... both of which blow anything the GS4 offers out of the water. If you just put a CD in the TL then the Nakamichi or Levinson stereo in the GS4 is very noticably better. But man, with a DVD-A disc, the TL's stereo is absolutely mind-blowing in terms of imaging and clarity. The navigation system which has an 8" high-res screen and was co-developed between IBM and Honda, is also extremely nice and intuitive. It has a whole ton of cool little features like the ability to sync your phone's contact list with an in-car contact and address list which you can just push a button and say somebody's name and it dials and/or gives you directions to their house. Definitely better than the navi Lexus has out right now.
So overall, if comfort, quiet, torque, build quality, and a reputation for reliability is your deal, I think the GS4 is where it's at.
If you want a manual transmission, a BMW-like chassis feel, better handling, a high-tech 'cockpit', etc, then the TL is a very good choice.
After test driving the TL I'm very convinced that it's apples to oranges. Not saying that a new 04 TL is a better or worse choice than a used GS4... I'm just saying that the two cars have very different characteristics.
The TL's chassis definitely feels more BMW-like... very stiff but very controlled at the same time. It definitely handles better than a GS4 as well.
Acceleration was disappointing compared to a GS4... I suspect that a 6-speed 04 TL w/ a good driver would be a pretty even race with a GS4... but with an automatic, no way.
What's more disappointing about the acceleration is that the torque is very weak off the line... the TL has 270 horsepower which will definitely throw you back in your seat at high RPM, but it only has 238 pounds of torque, and the torque doesn't seem to really take its hold until 2.5-3k RPM. The GS4 seems to produce a good amount of torque at just about any RPM.
In terms of noise, the GS4 is also definitely quieter. It also seems to ride smoother- but I guess this is also why it doesn't handle as well.
The place where the TL just absolutely shames the GS is in terms of technology. The entire interior of the TL feels like a cockpit... comfortable, but still, like a machine... everything just falls into hand and looks extremely modern. Then you go to look at the navigation system and the DVD-A surround sound stereo... both of which blow anything the GS4 offers out of the water. If you just put a CD in the TL then the Nakamichi or Levinson stereo in the GS4 is very noticably better. But man, with a DVD-A disc, the TL's stereo is absolutely mind-blowing in terms of imaging and clarity. The navigation system which has an 8" high-res screen and was co-developed between IBM and Honda, is also extremely nice and intuitive. It has a whole ton of cool little features like the ability to sync your phone's contact list with an in-car contact and address list which you can just push a button and say somebody's name and it dials and/or gives you directions to their house. Definitely better than the navi Lexus has out right now.
So overall, if comfort, quiet, torque, build quality, and a reputation for reliability is your deal, I think the GS4 is where it's at.
If you want a manual transmission, a BMW-like chassis feel, better handling, a high-tech 'cockpit', etc, then the TL is a very good choice.
#24
Originally posted by doug_999
It is almost as fast as a GS (the people here talking about smoking one have not raced one)...
Doug
It is almost as fast as a GS (the people here talking about smoking one have not raced one)...
Doug
With 225 horsepower and 216 pound-feet of torque, the standard 3.2TL towed itself to 60 mph in 7.4 seconds, 100 in 20.9, and through the quarter-mile in 15.9 seconds at 90 mph.
My GS4 isn't stock anymore, but when it was it was still faster than that. AND look at the time it took the TL to go from 90-100...a whole 5 seconds? I'll bet my GS goes from 90-100 in way less than 5 secs...
I'll go toe to toe with a TL anyday.
#25
Lexus Champion
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
225 HP is the old base-model TL. The Type-S had 260 and the new one-size-fits-all version has 270. When you factor in that C&D also says the GS430 does 0-60 in 7.0 seconds ( ), it seems that the cars are pretty close indeed.
Last edited by Iceman; 02-27-04 at 07:49 AM.
#26
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
Originally posted by Iceman
225 HP is the old base-model TL. The Type-S had 260 and the new one-size-fits-all version has 270. When you factor in that C&D also says the GS430 does 0-60 in 7.0 seconds (), it seems that the cars are pretty close indeed.
225 HP is the old base-model TL. The Type-S had 260 and the new one-size-fits-all version has 270. When you factor in that C&D also says the GS430 does 0-60 in 7.0 seconds (), it seems that the cars are pretty close indeed.
Same thing with the 350Zs, ranging from 5.5 to 6.1sec. WRXs ranging from 5.4 to 6.0. When you compare the fastest tested numbers of the TL to the slowest tested numbers of the GS430, yes the gap isn't small at all. Heck my GS300, if tested at 9.9 sec, is even slower than the Tundra!
I went testdriving the new TL with my friends. It certainly feels good for a FF car. But IMO the TSX and RSX could both do better in terms of handling. Acceleration is good. The interior is not bad, and the gadgets are eye catching. But I can still feel the strong FF feel, being pulled compared to being pushed by rear wheels.
#27
Lexus Test Driver
Since I have a 02 Type-S and Acura offered free extended warranty for its A/T to 7 years/100,000 miles, I am in no hurry to get another TL soon. Search on 'transmission failure' or 'tranny failure' at acura-tl.com and one will find plenty of readings on its tranny. Not sure whether the new 04 TL with even more ponies has a better A/T, better wait and see whether Acura has resolve this tranny issue.
#28
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i just got my 2001 gs430 i paid 25000 used it came with 31,000 miles, hids, no dents, only minor scratches with 100,000 mile warrenty bumper to bumper
now my question is that a fair deal or what
now my question is that a fair deal or what
#29
Originally posted by GlobeCLK
car magazine tests are usually very unbalanced. Some tested GS430 5.7sec, some 7.0 (that's way whacked). I've seen GS300 tests as fast as 7.0 sec to almost 10 sec. Major BS.
car magazine tests are usually very unbalanced. Some tested GS430 5.7sec, some 7.0 (that's way whacked). I've seen GS300 tests as fast as 7.0 sec to almost 10 sec. Major BS.
1. They correct for altitude and for temp - so the times posted are the adjusted times- for sea level and 70 degrees I think.
2. They note when something is out of wack. So when a car with 230hp does 0-60 in 4.6 seconds, they tend to point out that something is not right - and vice versa.
Originally posted by dbox
can't believe what i just read i guess consumer reports forgot about the (99-03 tl ) transmission failures(my cl-s had 3). my cl-s (same as tl just 2 door) rattled worse than any car i've ever been in. i'm not trying to argue here but i don't see how anyone would want an acura of any kind over a lexus. i have my 99 gs3 and an 00 rl now so i'm no acura hater.
can't believe what i just read i guess consumer reports forgot about the (99-03 tl ) transmission failures(my cl-s had 3). my cl-s (same as tl just 2 door) rattled worse than any car i've ever been in. i'm not trying to argue here but i don't see how anyone would want an acura of any kind over a lexus. i have my 99 gs3 and an 00 rl now so i'm no acura hater.
#30
Lexus Test Driver
Originally posted by ToyoTundra
i just got my 2001 gs430 i paid 25000 used it came with 31,000 miles, hids, no dents, only minor scratches with 100,000 mile warrenty bumper to bumper
now my question is that a fair deal or what
i just got my 2001 gs430 i paid 25000 used it came with 31,000 miles, hids, no dents, only minor scratches with 100,000 mile warrenty bumper to bumper
now my question is that a fair deal or what