Thoughts: LMW Remote Start and sense-o-shock alarm
#18
Re: alarm
Originally posted by Gs Dreams
is it really that hard to install a after market alarm since the factory one is installed through the ecu
is it really that hard to install a after market alarm since the factory one is installed through the ecu
#19
Originally posted by LXOGOOD
Henry, let me get this straight... Sometimes when you do a remote start, your CD player does not come on? Does everything else power up like the AC and stuff? Maybe Steve over at LMW will have an answer for you. Hopfully your CD player isn't going bad.. All my audio equipment powers on just fine when i do a remote start. And you know I have a tun of stuff that has to power on...Let me know bro...
Henry, let me get this straight... Sometimes when you do a remote start, your CD player does not come on? Does everything else power up like the AC and stuff? Maybe Steve over at LMW will have an answer for you. Hopfully your CD player isn't going bad.. All my audio equipment powers on just fine when i do a remote start. And you know I have a tun of stuff that has to power on...Let me know bro...
if i use my key to start the car though, 100% of the time the audio will come up fine? @_@
#23
I agree with you guys, the setup is really cool and works great. Hasn't failed yet. (Knock on wood. )But I did notice one thing about the remote start.
It seems to crank the engine a hair longer than I would usually do to start the car. When starting the car manually, I usually just give it just enough juice to start it. The remote start cranks it for quite a bit longer. I'm not sure if this is bad or not, but it's just something I noticed. Does anyone know if this is bad for anything? maybe the starter? Any thoughts?
It seems to crank the engine a hair longer than I would usually do to start the car. When starting the car manually, I usually just give it just enough juice to start it. The remote start cranks it for quite a bit longer. I'm not sure if this is bad or not, but it's just something I noticed. Does anyone know if this is bad for anything? maybe the starter? Any thoughts?
#24
Originally posted by 93lscoupe
I agree with you guys, the setup is really cool and works great. Hasn't failed yet. (Knock on wood. )But I did notice one thing about the remote start.
It seems to crank the engine a hair longer than I would usually do to start the car. When starting the car manually, I usually just give it just enough juice to start it. The remote start cranks it for quite a bit longer. I'm not sure if this is bad or not, but it's just something I noticed. Does anyone know if this is bad for anything? maybe the starter? Any thoughts?
I agree with you guys, the setup is really cool and works great. Hasn't failed yet. (Knock on wood. )But I did notice one thing about the remote start.
It seems to crank the engine a hair longer than I would usually do to start the car. When starting the car manually, I usually just give it just enough juice to start it. The remote start cranks it for quite a bit longer. I'm not sure if this is bad or not, but it's just something I noticed. Does anyone know if this is bad for anything? maybe the starter? Any thoughts?
#26
Longer cranking time.
Originally posted by 93lscoupe
I agree with you guys, the setup is really cool and works great. Hasn't failed yet. (Knock on wood. )But I did notice one thing about the remote start.
It seems to crank the engine a hair longer than I would usually do to start the car. When starting the car manually, I usually just give it just enough juice to start it. The remote start cranks it for quite a bit longer. I'm not sure if this is bad or not, but it's just something I noticed. Does anyone know if this is bad for anything? maybe the starter? Any thoughts?
I agree with you guys, the setup is really cool and works great. Hasn't failed yet. (Knock on wood. )But I did notice one thing about the remote start.
It seems to crank the engine a hair longer than I would usually do to start the car. When starting the car manually, I usually just give it just enough juice to start it. The remote start cranks it for quite a bit longer. I'm not sure if this is bad or not, but it's just something I noticed. Does anyone know if this is bad for anything? maybe the starter? Any thoughts?
By the way guys, I've also been waiting for the GB for the Sense-O-Shock alarm with remote start. I've talked to Steve at LMW and he guaranteed me the GB price. Mine should be here by Mon. the 18th. I ordered the alarm and remote start for $380 including next day air and the $35 for the extra key, which is needed to get by the imobilizer. Hope this helps.
Will
P.S.
I forgot to mention that the longer crank time is not harmfull. It just takes a little longer for the ECU to recognize the code from the chip in the extra key I mentioned above.
#27
If the remote is manufactured by Lexus Master Techs, why is this "luxury" option not even an option from Lexus? If I go to the dealer they discourage me from using one and threaten warranty voiding (potential starter issues). I've heard various reasons that these cars, including at least BMW who put it in their actual manual, that long-term this isn't good for the engine. I had one on my Accord for a year and saw no issues but I'm not about to screw with a $40k vehicle just to stay warm.
#28
Originally posted by LexusPride
If the remote is manufactured by Lexus Master Techs, why is this "luxury" option not even an option from Lexus? If I go to the dealer they discourage me from using one and threaten warranty voiding (potential starter issues). I've heard various reasons that these cars, including at least BMW who put it in their actual manual, that long-term this isn't good for the engine. I had one on my Accord for a year and saw no issues but I'm not about to screw with a $40k vehicle just to stay warm.
If the remote is manufactured by Lexus Master Techs, why is this "luxury" option not even an option from Lexus? If I go to the dealer they discourage me from using one and threaten warranty voiding (potential starter issues). I've heard various reasons that these cars, including at least BMW who put it in their actual manual, that long-term this isn't good for the engine. I had one on my Accord for a year and saw no issues but I'm not about to screw with a $40k vehicle just to stay warm.
whether something is an option for the car is totally up to manufacturer, so there is no reason why. from my memeory i dn't really recall cars with auto start from manufacturer?
and a lexus master tech developped the auto start on the side, that has nothing to do with lexus
#29
The remote starter simply simulates the ignition key being turned in the ignition cylinder. In many ways it is actually better than doing it with the key. We all know how weak the Lexus key base is and every time you go to start the car it weakens the key base. Eventually the base breaks and the keys are extremely expensive to replace. In no way shape or form is remotely starting your vehicle any different on the starter than actually starting it with the key.
#30
Originally posted by Luxury Motorworks
The remote starter simply simulates the ignition key being turned in the ignition cylinder. In many ways it is actually better than doing it with the key. We all know how weak the Lexus key base is and every time you go to start the car it weakens the key base. Eventually the base breaks and the keys are extremely expensive to replace. In no way shape or form is remotely starting your vehicle any different on the starter than actually starting it with the key.
The remote starter simply simulates the ignition key being turned in the ignition cylinder. In many ways it is actually better than doing it with the key. We all know how weak the Lexus key base is and every time you go to start the car it weakens the key base. Eventually the base breaks and the keys are extremely expensive to replace. In no way shape or form is remotely starting your vehicle any different on the starter than actually starting it with the key.