GS - 2nd Gen (1998-2005) Discussion about the second generation GS300, GS400 and GS430 (1998 - 2005)

How accurate is the G-Tech

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-02 | 04:35 PM
  #1  
hubbard316's Avatar
hubbard316
Thread Starter
Pole Position
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: MS
Default How accurate is the G-Tech

i was wondering if anyone used a G-Tech and what kind of numbers were they getting? I was runnning mines and got some very good number last night. I was wondering if it was very accurate. Any help would do.
Thanks
Old 03-04-02 | 07:17 PM
  #2  
Mean Gene's Avatar
Mean Gene
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 1
From: Alabama
Thumbs up Pretty Close

Hubbard - I've run my G-Tech simultaneously while making some runs down the quartermile track in Baton Rouge & I've found the times to be slightly more optimistic in terms of times & mph. However, if ya use it not as an "absolute" timing tool but instead just to chart performance figures whenever U make modifications it's an excellent piece of electronics. Also keeps ya from having to wait for the local "test 'n tune" night at the strip.
BTW - my best quartermile run was an actual 13.79 @ 106.2 ( that's with the track's timers ). The G-tech showed 13.68 @ 16.7 on the same run. Close enough for me!!
Old 03-04-02 | 07:41 PM
  #3  
JAC JZS's Avatar
JAC JZS
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 1
From: California
Thumbs up

Mean Gene, it's impressive to see that you are running stock Supra TT auto times in the quarter without any forced induction. Nice job on the mods. What do have about 330 hp at the crank?
Old 03-04-02 | 08:43 PM
  #4  
Mean Gene's Avatar
Mean Gene
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 1
From: Alabama
Question Bit More, I Think

JAC - After all the engine mods ( which R only the SRT intake/ECU & the Borlas ), the best dyno test showed 274.1 HP at the rear wheels & we used 80% for the drivetrain efficiency figure & ended up with roughly 342.6 flywheel HP. I've seen 75% used before but the baseline runs yielded 248 rearwheel HP & if the factory numbers of 300 HP R to be believed, then 80% is closer to the correct percentage. I know that 248/.8 results in 310 HP but I think maybe I got a slightly stronger engine in mine - hope so!! It was a cool ( for Louisiana, anyway ) day of 60 degrees & relatively low humidity & the best results came on the first runs ( as to be expected although I let the car cool off between runs ). FWIW - I changed to the Borlas after 2 baseline runs & they showed an increase of almost 7 rearwheel HP so Borlas claims of 5-10 engine HP should be considered valid ( this 7 HP should show almost 9 flywheel using the aforementioned 80%. The addition of the SRT induction was worth the balance of the power gains &, again, should validify SRT's claims of 20-30 engine HP ( at least in MY case ). The rest of the performance gains came from maximizing what power I had via the 2800 rpm stall Dragon T/C & the Supra 3.76 geared LSD. Other tricks I used was lowering my rear tire pressures ( ran 18" wheel/tire combo ) &, as I've run for many years at State Capital Dragway, I had a kind of a "home field" advantage!! Next step on the dyno will be TorqueMaster spark plugs ( on Percy's recommendation ) maybe in early summer. THIS time I'll try to remember to print out & KEEP the dyno sheets for posting.
Old 03-04-02 | 10:10 PM
  #5  
JAC JZS's Avatar
JAC JZS
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 1
From: California
Question ?

Originally posted by Mean Gene
JAC - After all the engine mods ( which R only the SRT intake/ECU & the Borlas ), the best dyno test showed 274.1 HP at the rear wheels & we used 80% for the drivetrain efficiency figure & ended up with roughly 342.6 flywheel HP. I've seen 75% used before but the baseline runs yielded 248 rearwheel HP & if the factory numbers of 300 HP R to be believed, then 80% is closer to the correct percentage.
Gene, I'm gettin 330hp with a 15% drivetrain loss equaling 281 RWHP. Now with a 20% drivetrain loss I'm getting 351 hp at the flywheel
JAC

Last edited by JAC JZS; 03-05-02 at 12:10 PM.
Old 03-04-02 | 10:19 PM
  #6  
1niceride's Avatar
1niceride
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: Petal,MS
Default

Hubbard - What times you get ? The best i got was 15.4 if i recall . What mods have you done ? Been awhile since i've been on so excuse me for asking .

After i make the switch to srt's race ecu maybe we can meet up to dyno both of our cars to compare . Wynne speed is only 30 min from vicksburg and 1hr from Hattiesburg .
Old 03-04-02 | 11:20 PM
  #7  
Mean Gene's Avatar
Mean Gene
Lexus Test Driver
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 1
From: Alabama
Question Math?

JAC - R U refering to my GS or your Supra? Unless I'm suffering from ANOTHER senior moment ( OK, Percy - NO comments!!:eek: ), 274.1/.8 equals 342.6. Of course, this wouldn't be the first ( or last ) time that my math stunk - & I'm an engineer!!
Old 03-04-02 | 11:50 PM
  #8  
JAC JZS's Avatar
JAC JZS
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Gene, I'm referring to my supra

Last edited by JAC JZS; 03-05-02 at 12:09 AM.
Old 03-05-02 | 12:30 AM
  #9  
JAC JZS's Avatar
JAC JZS
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Gene, I should have been a little more specific with my post now this is getting pretty confusing . My car has 330 hp at the crank with a 15% loss I am getting 281rwhp. With a 20% loss my car has 351 hp at the crank (not 342) .

Last edited by JAC JZS; 03-05-02 at 12:12 PM.
Old 03-05-02 | 01:32 AM
  #10  
JAC JZS's Avatar
JAC JZS
Lexus Champion
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mean Gene
[B]JAC - I know that 248/.8 results in 310 HP but I think maybe I got a slightly stronger engine in mine - hope so!!

Gene, I wouldn't be surprised if your car started out with 310hp at the crank stock I know my car dynoed at around 328hp at crank stock versus the 320 advertised . It appears as Toyota was conservative in thier hp ratings for these two engines vs. other carmakers that overrate thier engines(i.e. Ford's mustang cobra pre 02' or 01' .
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ssmoked
RC F (2015-present)
25
02-29-16 12:48 PM
shaodome
Florida Lexus Club
36
09-25-11 04:11 PM
ISF-88
IS F (2008-2014)
9
09-01-10 09:18 AM



Quick Reply: How accurate is the G-Tech



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:40 PM.